Supporting Statement for OMB Approval

Supporting Statement for OMB Approval.pdf

Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts

OMB: 2590-0016

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
“CONTRACTOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION
GOOD FAITH EFFORTS”
OMB NUMBER 2590-00##
SUPPORTING STATEMENT

A.

JUSTIFICATION

1. Circumstances necessitating the collection of information
Section 342(a)(1)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA or the Agency)
and certain other Federal agencies each to establish an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion
(OMWI) responsible for all matters of the agency relating to diversity in management,
employment, and business activities. 1 Section 342(c)(1) requires the OMWI Director at each
agency to develop and implement standards and procedures to ensure, to the maximum extent
possible, the fair inclusion and utilization of minorities, women, and minority- and womenowned businesses in all business and activities of the agency at all levels, including procurement,
insurance, and all types of contracts. Section 342(c)(2) requires that the OMWI Director include
in the agency’s procedures for evaluating contract proposals and hiring service providers a
component that gives consideration to the diversity of an applicant, to the extent consistent with
applicable laws. That statutory provision also requires that each agency’s procedures include a
written statement that a contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair
inclusion of women and minorities in the workforce of the contractor and, as applicable,
subcontractors.
Further, section 342(c)(3)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that each agency’s standards and
procedures include a procedure for determining whether an agency contractor or subcontractor
has failed to make a good faith effort to include minorities and women in its workforce. If the
OMWI Director determines that a contractor or subcontractor has failed to make such a good
faith effort, section 342(c)(3)(B)(i) provides that the OMWI Director shall recommend to the
agency administrator that the contract be terminated. Section 342(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that,
upon receipt of such a recommendation, the agency administrator may either terminate the
contract, make a referral to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) of the
Department of Labor, or take other appropriate action.
As a means of implementing the requirements of section 342(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, FHFA
developed a Minority and Women Inclusion Clause (MWI Clause) 2 that it now includes in all
Agency contracts with a dollar value greater than the “simplified acquisition threshold”—
1
2

12 U.S.C. 5452.
A copy of the full MWI Clause is included as an attachment to this Supporting Statement.

currently, $150,000—established in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). 3 The MWI
Clause requires a contractor to confirm its commitment to equal opportunity in employment and
contracting, and to implement that commitment by ensuring, to the maximum extent possible
consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. The
MWI Clause also requires that a contractor include the substance of the MWI Clause in all
subcontracts with a dollar value greater than $150,000 awarded under the contract. (Hereinafter,
contractors that are subject to the MWI Clause and subcontractors that are subject to a similar
clause required to be included in a subcontract are referred to as “covered” contractors and
subcontractors.)
Finally, the MWI Clause requires a contractor to provide, when requested by FHFA,
documentation demonstrating that the contractor, as well as any covered subcontractor, has made
a good faith effort to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. The
MWI Clause provides that such documentation may include, but is not limited to: (1) the
contractor’s total number of employees, and the number of minority and women employees, by
race, ethnicity, and gender (e.g., an EEO-1 Employer Information Report (Form EEO-1)); (2) a
list of the subcontracts the contractor awarded including the dollar amount, date of the award,
and the ownership status of the subcontractor by race, ethnicity, and/or gender; (3) information
similar to that required under the first item above for each subcontractor; and (4) the contractor’s
plan to ensure that minorities and women have appropriate opportunities to enter and advance
within its workforce, including outreach efforts (hereinafter, a “workforce inclusion plan”). A
request for documentation by FHFA pursuant to this provision of the MWI Clause would
constitute a “collection of information” within the meaning of the PRA.
While FHFA has included the MWI Clause in all contracts with a dollar value greater than
$150,000 consummated since November 7, 2013, the Agency has not, to this point, asked any
contractor or covered subcontractor to provide documentation pursuant to the clause. FHFA is
now developing procedures that the OMWI Director will follow in determining whether covered
contractors and subcontractors have made good faith efforts to comply with the MWI Clause.
The Agency expects that, once it adopts those procedures, it will begin to request the types of
documentation described in the MWI Clause from covered contractors and subcontractors.
2. Use of data
The purpose of this information collection is to fulfill the requirements of section 342(c)(3)(B) of
the Dodd-Frank Act. The collected information will allow FHFA’s OMWI Director to determine
whether covered contractors and subcontractors have complied with their contractual obligations
to make good faith efforts to ensure, to the maximum extent possible consistent with applicable
law, the fair inclusion of minorities and women in their respective workforces.
3. Use of information technology
Respondents will have the option of complying with this information collection requirement by
using electronic or paper submissions.

3

See FAR 2.101. The FAR appears at 48 CFR chapter 1.

2

4. Efforts to identify duplication
This information collection avoids duplication by allowing respondents to fulfill the reporting
requirement, where possible, by submitting information that already is available to, or compiled
by, respondents for other purposes.
5. Impact on small entities
This information collection will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The collection will affect small as well as larger entities. As described in Item
#12 of this Supporting Statement, FHFA believes the reporting and recordkeeping burdens will
be low for all entities, regardless of size.
6. Consequences of less frequent collection and obstacles to burden reduction
FHFA anticipates that it will require most covered contractors and subcontractors to submit
information on their good faith inclusion efforts annually. To require less frequent submissions
would compromise the ability of the Agency to fulfill its duty under section 342(c)(3) of the
Dodd-Frank Act to determine whether any covered contractor or subcontractor has failed to
make a good faith effort to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce.
7. Circumstances requiring special information collection
The MWI Clause requires each covered contractor and subcontractor to provide documentation
to demonstrate its good faith efforts to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its
workforce within 10 business days of a written request from FHFA’s Contracting Officer, or
such longer time as the Contracting Officer determines. Although the minimum response time
provided in the MWI Clause is shorter than the 30-day guideline provided in 5 CFR
1320.5(d)(2)(ii), FHFA believes that the 10 days provided under the MWI Clause is a reasonable
amount of time to respond to a request to submit the specified documentation and is justifiable
given the requirements of section 342(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Section 342(c) and the MWI Clause require contractors to engage in good faith efforts at all
times during the term of a contract and not merely in the 30 days preceding the Contracting
Officer’s review. Because each covered contractor and subcontractor should have a workforce
inclusion plan in place at all times during the term of the contract, 10 days should normally be
sufficient time to submit a copy of the plan to the Contracting Officer. The other data that may
be required to be submitted under the MWI Clause are factual in nature, and it is reasonable for
contractors to be prepared to provide them. Moreover, the MWI Clause requires that information
be provided within 10 business days of a written request “or such longer time as the Contracting
Officer determines.” Federal Contracting Officers have a duty to act in good faith in
administering contracts. Thus, if unusual circumstances exist that would prevent a contractor
from providing the requested data within 10 days, the Contracting Officer would be required to
provide the contractor a reasonable period of time in which to respond to the request.

3

In addition, because most respondents may fulfill the reporting requirement by submitting
information that has already been prepared for other purposes, the specified documentation
should in most cases be readily available when the request is received. As explained in Item #12
of this Supporting Statement, FHFA estimates that it will take contractors on average
approximately one hour to retrieve and submit the documentation specified in the MWI Clause.
8. Solicitation of comments on information collection
In accordance with the requirements of 5 CFR 1320.8(d), FHFA published a request for public
comments regarding this information collection in the Federal Register on November 18, 2016. 4
The 60-day comment period closed on January 17, 2017. FHFA received no comments.
9. Provision of payments or gifts to respondents
No payment or gift will be provided to any respondent.
10. Assurance of confidentiality
FHFA makes no express assurance of confidentiality in relation to this information collection.
However, contractors and subcontractors submitting information that is considered sensitive and
confidential will be advised to follow the procedures under FHFA’s regulations implementing
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for designating information as confidential business
information or seeking confidential treatment. 5
11. Questions of a sensitive nature
There are no questions of a sensitive nature in this information collection.
12. Estimates of the hour burden of the information collection on respondents
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden imposed on all respondents by this information
collection over the next three years will be 368 hours. The estimated annualized cost associated
with this burden estimate is $20,256. 6 Because, as explained below, the amount of burden
imposed upon a contractor by this information collection will differ depending upon whether the
contractor has 50 or more employees, FHFA has based its total burden estimate on two separate
sets of calculations—(I) one for contractors and subcontractors with 50 or more employees; and
(II) another for contractors and subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees.

4

See 81 FR 81766 (Nov. 18, 2016).
See 12 CFR part 1202.
6
FHFA has based its estimates as to the hourly costs associated with the burdens imposed by this information
collected on data contained in the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics publication “Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation” for March 2017. That publication shows average hourly compensation for civilian
management, professional, and related occupations as $58.00 per hour and for civilian administrative support
occupations as $25.75 per hour. For purposes of the burden calculations, FHFA has rounded up the latter figure to
$26 per hour.
5

4

FHFA includes the MWI Clause in Agency contracts with a dollar value greater than $150,000.
Under the MWI Clause, FHFA may also request information about covered subcontractors’
ownership status, workforce demographics, and workforce inclusion plans. Contractors would
request this information from their covered subcontractors, who, because the substance of the
MWI Clause would be included in their subcontracts, would have a contractual obligation to
keep records and report data as required under the MWI Clause.
FHFA data on the dollar value of contracts awarded by the Agency from the beginning of fiscal
year 2013 through the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 shows that 63 contractors were subject to
the MWI Clause. FHFA believes that 44 of those contractors have 50 or more employees, while
19 contractors have fewer than 50 employees. FHFA estimates that no more than two
subcontracts with a dollar value of $150,000 or more were awarded by Agency contractors
during that same time period. Both of those subcontractors have 50 or more employees each.
Thus, over the preceding three years, a total of 65 contractors and subcontractors were subject to
the MWI Clause—46 of which have 50 or more employees and 19 of which have fewer than 50
employees.
Based on these figures, FHFA estimates that, on average over the next three years, 48 contractors
and subcontractors with 50 or more employees and 20 contractors or subcontractors with fewer
than 50 employees will be subject to the MWI Clause at any given time. For purposes of these
burden estimates, FHFA has assumed that each contractor or subcontractor will provide
documentation under the MWI Clause once per year, although it is unlikely that the Agency will
actually request documentation from every contractor and subcontractor in every year.
I. Documentation Submitted by Contractors with 50 or More Employees
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with 50 or more employees will
be 48 hours and that the annualized cost associated with this burden will be $2,016.
Because Federal contractors with 50 or more employees are already required to maintain the
same types of records that may be requested pursuant to the MWI Clause under regulations
implementing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 7 and Executive Order 11246 (E.O.
11246), 8 this information collection will not impose new recordkeeping burdens on such
contractors or subcontractors. FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, requires that such
contractors’ contracts and subcontracts include a clause implementing E.O. 11246. OFCCP
regulations require each contractor with 50 or more employees and a Federal contract or
subcontract of $50,000 or more to maintain records on the race, ethnicity, gender, and EEO-1 job
category of each employee. 9 OFCCP regulations also require each such contractor to: (1)
demonstrate that it has made a good faith effort to remove identified barriers, expand
employment opportunities, and produce measureable results; 10 and (2) develop and maintain a
written program summary describing the policies, practices, and procedures that the contractor
uses to ensure that applicants and employees received equal opportunities for employment and
7

42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq.
Exec. Order No. 11246, 30 FR 12319 (Sept. 28, 1965).
9
See 41 CFR 60-1.7.
10
See 41 CFR 60-2.17.
8

5

advancement. 11 In lieu of creating and maintaining a separate workforce inclusion plan to
submit in satisfaction of the MWI Clause, a contractor or subcontractor with 50 or more
employees could submit the written program summary that it is already required to maintain
under the OFCCP regulations to demonstrate its good faith efforts to ensure the fair inclusion of
minorities and women in its workforce.
With respect to reporting burden, FHFA estimates that it will take each contractor or
subcontractor with 50 or more employees approximately one hour to retrieve, review, and submit
the documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Based upon that assumption, FHFA estimates
that the annual reporting burden imposed upon such contractors and subcontractors will be 48
hours, with associated costs of $2,016, calculated as follows:
Administrative support staff of contractor or subcontractor retrieves and, after managerial
review and approval, submits documentation.
•
•
•
•
•

Time per contractor:
Total contractors:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

0.5 hours
48
24
$26 (includes salary, benefits, and overhead)
$624

Managerial and professional employees of contractor or subcontractor review and approve
submission of documentation.
•
•
•
•
•

Time per contractor:
Total contractors:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

0.5 hours
48
24
$58 (includes salary, benefits, and overhead)
$1,392

II. Documentation Submitted by Contractors with Fewer Than 50 Employees
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors and subcontractors with fewer
than 50 employees will be 320 hours and that the annualized cost associated with this burden will
be $18,240.
OFCCP regulations require contractors with fewer than 50 employees to maintain records on the
race, ethnicity, and gender of each employee. 12 FHFA believes that such contractors also keep
EEO-1 job category information in the normal course of business, despite the fact that they are
not required by law to do so. However, contractors or subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees may not have the type of written program summary that is required of larger
contractors under the OFCCP regulations or any similar document that could be submitted as a

11
12

See 41 CFR 60-2.31.
See 41 CFR 60-3.4.

6

workforce inclusion plan under the MWI Clause. Accordingly, such contractors or
subcontractors may need to create a workforce inclusion plan to comply with the MWI Clause.
In order to estimate the burden associated with creating a workforce inclusion plan, FHFA
considered the OFCCP’s burden estimates for the time needed to develop the written program
summaries required under its regulations. 13 In its OMB Supporting Statement, the OFCCP
estimated that a contractor with 1 to 100 employees would take approximately 73 burden hours
to create an initial written program summary. While the OFCCP regulations require contractors
to perform time-consuming quantitative analyses when developing their written program
summaries, such analyses would not be required in connection with the creation of a workforce
inclusion plan. For this reason, FHFA believes that a contractor could develop a workforce
inclusion plan in about one-third of the time that it would take to develop the written program
summary required under the OFCCP regulations.
FHFA estimates that a contractor or subcontractor with fewer than 50 employees would spend
approximately 25 hours creating a workforce inclusion plan for the first time. The Agency
estimates that each contractor or subcontractor would then spend approximately 10 hours
annually in updating and maintaining its plan. Thus, FHFA estimates that each contractor or
subcontractor with fewer than 50 employees would spend an average of 15 hours per year over
the next three years [(25 + 10 +10)/3 years] on recordkeeping requirements associated with the
MWI Clause.
Based upon those assumptions, FHFA estimates that the recordkeeping burden imposed upon
contractors and subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees will be 300 hours and that the
associated costs will be $17,400, calculated as follows:
Managerial and professional employees of contractor or subcontractor draft, edit, and
approve workforce inclusion plan.
•
•
•
•
•

Time per contractor:
Total contractors:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

15 hours
20
300
$58 (includes salary, benefits, and overhead)
$17,400

As with larger entities, FHFA estimates that it will take each contractor or subcontractor with
fewer than 50 employees approximately one hour to retrieve, review, and submit the
documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Based upon that assumption, FHFA estimates that
the reporting burden imposed upon contractors and subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees
will be 20 hours, with associated costs of $840, calculated as follows:
Administrative support staff of contractor or subcontractor retrieves and, after managerial
review and approval, submits documentation.
13

See PRA Supporting Statement for the OFCCP Recordkeeping and Requirements-Supply and Service Program,
OMB Control No. 1250-0003, at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201602-1250-001.

7

•
•
•
•
•

Time per contractor:
Total contractors:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

0.5 hours
20
10
$26 (includes salary, benefits, and overhead)
$260

Managerial and professional employees of contractor or subcontractor reviews and approves
submission of documentation.
•
•
•
•
•

Time per contractor:
Total contractors:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

0.5 hours
20
10
$58 (includes salary, benefits, and overhead)
$580

13. Estimated total annualized cost burden to respondents
FHFA has not identified any costs to respondents other than the hourly personnel costs detailed
under item #12.
14. Estimated cost to the federal government
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on the federal government in connection with
this information collection will be 308 hours and that the annualized cost associated with this
burden will be $35,150. These estimates are based on the following calculations:
I. Documentation Submitted by Contractors with 50 or More Employees
FHFA senior policy analyst reviews and analyzes documentation submitted pursuant to the
MWI Clause by contractors with 50 or more employees:
•
•
•
•
•

Time per submission:
Total submissions:
Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

6 hours
48
288
$95 (includes salary, benefits and overhead)
$33,250

II. Documentation Submitted by Contractors with Fewer Than 50 Employees
FHFA senior policy analyst reviews and analyzes documentation submitted pursuant to the
MWI Clause by contractors with fewer than 50 employees:
•
•

Time per submission: 1 hour
Total submissions: 20
8

•
•
•

Total hours:
Hourly rate:
Total cost:

20
$95 (includes salary, benefits and overhead)
$1,900

15. Reasons for change in burden
This is a new collection of information, so there are no changes.
16. Plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication
FHFA will not publish the results of this information collection.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection, explain the reasons why display would be inappropriate
FHFA plans to display the expiration date for OMB approval.
18. Explain each exception to the topics of the certification statement identified in
“certification for paperwork reduction act submission”
There are no exceptions to the certification statement identified in “Certification for Paperwork
Reduction Act Submissions.”

B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods
The information collection does not employ statistical methods.

9


File Typeapplication/pdf
Authorraudenbushe
File Modified2017-05-26
File Created2017-05-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy