G421: Public Engagement Partnership (PEP) Survey

Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

G421 PEP Survey

G421: Public Engagement Partnership (PEP) Survey

OMB: 0651-0080

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Welcome

OMB	Control	No.	0651-0080	
Expiration	Date:	XX/XX/XXXX

Thank	you	for	attending	the	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting.
In	an	effort	to	improve	our	programs,	please	complete	this	short	10
minute	survey.	Your	voluntary	response	is	confidential	and	data	will	be
analyzed	in	aggregated	form	only.	
For	questions	regarding	the	purpose	of	the	survey,	contact	Karin
Ferriter	(karin.ferriter@uspto.gov)	or
PublicEngagementPartnership@uspto.gov.	If	you	encounter	any
problems	with	the	survey	instrument,	contact	Michael	Easdale
(michael.easdale@uspto.gov).
Thank	you	in	advance	for	your	honest	feedback	in	this	important
survey.
Click	'Next'	below	to	begin.
A	Federal	agency	may	not	conduct	or	sponsor,	and	a	person	is	not	required	to	respond	to,	nor	shall	a	person	be
subject	to	a	penalty	for	failure	to	comply	with	an	information	collection	subject	to	the	requirements	of	the
Paperwork	Reduction	Act	of	1995,	unless	the	information	collection	has	a	valid	OMB	Control	Number.	The	OMB
Control	Number	for	this	information	collection	is	0651-0080.	Public	burden	for	this	survey	is	estimated	to	average
10	minutes	per	response,	including	the	time	for	reviewing	instructions,	searching	existing	data	sources,	gathering
and	maintaining	the	data	needed,	and	completing	and	reviewing	the	information	collection.	Send	comments
regarding	this	burden	estimate	or	any	other	aspect	of	this	information	collection,	including	suggestions	for
reducing	this	burden	to	the	Office	of	the	Chief	Administrative	Officer,	United	States	Patent	and	Trademark	Office,
P.O.	Box	1450,	Alexandria,	VA	22313-1450	or	email	InformationCollection@uspto.gov.

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Demographics

1.	How	did	you	hear	about	the	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting?	(Check	all	that
apply)	
USPTO.gov	website
USPTO	social	media	(e.g.,	Facebook,	Twitter)
USPTO	email	announcement
Other	social	media	or	email	announcements
USPTO	colleague/friend
Other	colleagues/friends
Attendance	at	a	previous	USPTO	event
Other	(please	specify)

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Rating	Topics

2.	Which	of	the	following	best	describes	your	role?	
Inventor	who	files	on	their	own
Inventor	who	files	with	assistance	from	licensed	IP	professional
IP	Professional:	Attorney	/	Agent
IP	Professional:	Paralegal
Public	Interest	Professional
Entrepreneur
Student
Researcher
Journalist	/	Media
Other	(please	specify)

*	3.	How	useful	were	each	of	the	topics	presented	at	the	meeting?	
Not	useful	at
all

	
Intro	to	Patent	Center
Search	Like	an	Examiner
Optional	Interactive	Search	Workshop
Third-Party	Submissions	–	Rules,
Requirements	and	Resources
Networking	Break	&	Virtual	Resource	Fair
Third-Party	Submissions	–	Practitioner
Perspectives	and	Strategies

Somewhat
useful

Moderately
useful

Very	useful

N/A

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Less	Useful	Topics

4.	Please	provide	any	details	as	to	why	these	topics	weren't	more	useful:	
Intro	to	Patent	Center
Search	Like	an	Examiner
Optional	Interactive	Search	Workshop
Third-Party	Submissions	–	Rules,
Requirements	and	Resources
Networking	Break	&	Virtual	Resource	Fair
Third-Party	Submissions	–	Practitioner
Perspectives	and	Strategies

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Overall	Ratings

5.	Please	rate	your	level	of	agreement	with	the	following	statements	regarding	the	Public
Engagement	Partnership	Meeting:	
	

Disagree
strongly

Neither
Disagree disagree
Agree
somewhat nor	agree somewhat

Information	presented	was	relevant	and	applicable	to
me.
Materials	provided	were	clear	and	easily	understood
The	knowledge	and	experience	of	the	presenter(s)
enhanced	my	learning	experience
I	had	ample	opportunity	to	ask	questions	and	discuss
course	topics
Question	and	answer	sessions	were	helpful

6.	Considering	the	content	of	the	meeting,	was	there	sufficient	time	allotted?	
Too	short

	

Just	right

	

Too	long

7.	Overall,	how	would	you	rate	your	satisfaction	with	the	meeting?	
Very	dissatisfied

	

Dissatisfied

	

Neither	satisfied	nor	dissatisfied

	

Satisfied

Very	satisfied

8.	How	likely	would	you	be	to	recommend	the	meeting	to	a	colleague?	
Definitely	would	not
Definitely	would

	

Probably	would	not

	

May	or	may	not

	

Probably	would

Agree
strongly

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Comments

9.	What	other	kinds	of	events	surrounding	intellectual	property	and	U.S.	Patent	and
Trademark	Office	resources	would	be	of	interest	to	you?	

10.	What	was	the	best	part	of	the	meeting?	

11.	What	could	have	improved	the	meeting?	

If	you	would	like	to	be	considered	as	a	speaker	at	a	future	Public
Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	please	send	an	email	to
PublicEngagementPartnership@uspto.gov

USPTO	Public	Engagement	Partnership	Meeting,	June	2024
Conclusion

12.	Is	there	anything	else	you’d	like	to	share	about	the	meeting?	

Thank	you	for	your	participation!		
Clicking	'Done'	below	will	submit	your	answers,	close	the	survey	window,	and
redirect	you	to	the	external	USPTO	webpage.
When	you	are	satisfied	that	your	responses	are	complete,	click	'Done'.


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2024-09-17
File Created2024-05-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy