Fourth Access, Participation,
Eligibility, and Certification Study Series (APEC IV)
Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection
No
Regular
03/03/2022
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
118,361
0
21,013
0
0
0
The Access, Participation,
Eligibility, and Certification (APEC) Study series provides
reliable national estimates of improper payments made to school
districts participating in the NSLP and SBP.
US Code:
42 USC 1766, Sections 4 and 10) Name of Law: Richard B. Russell
National School Lunch Act of 1966
EO: EO 13520 Name/Subject of EO: Reducing Improper
Payments
PL:
Pub.L. 107 - 300 17 Name of Law: Improper Payments Information
Act (IPIA) of 2002
PL:
Pub.L. 111 - 204 1508 Name of Law: Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act (IPERA) of 2010
PL:
Pub.L. 112 - 248 4053 Name of Law: Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act (IPERIA) of 2012
PL:
Pub.L. 111 - 296 305 Name of Law: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act
of 2010
This collection is a
reinstatement of a previously approved information collection (APEC
III; OMB Number 0584-0530, Discontinued: 10/31/2020) as a result of
program changes, and will add 21,013 hours of annual burden and
118,361 responses to OMB’s inventory. This reinstatement reflects
greater burden hours and a greater number of estimated responses
compared to APEC III (13,042 hours and 59,016 responses).
Specifically, there is an increase in 7,971 total burden hours and
an increase in 59,345 responses in APEC IV compared to APEC III.
The increase in burden is primarily due to a larger household
sample in APEC IV than APEC III, which is necessary to account for
the low response rate to the household survey in APEC III (31
percent). Also, the two sub-studies and the meal observation pilot
study will add a small amount of burden (96 hours) to APEC IV.
Finally, SFAs and States will be asked to provide meal count data
for all of their schools and SFAs, respectively, in an effort to
validate a less burdensome method for future APEC series (see
Supporting Statement A2 and A4 for more detail). We have worked to
offset the additional burden by thoroughly reviewing and
streamlining the data collection instruments. In particular, the
SFA director survey and the household survey were heavily edited to
remove redundant questions.
Jamia Franklin 202 409-8729
jamia.franklin@usda.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.