Rule 18a-9 – Quarterly
Security Counts to be Made by Certain Security-Based Swap
Dealers
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
No
Regular
05/05/2021
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
6
0
650
0
0
0
Rule 18a-9, as adopted, would require
stand-alone SBSDs to note any discrepancies between the count and
the firm’s records, and to record in the firm’s record any
discrepancies that remain unresolved seven business days after the
date of the examination, count, and verification. Rule 18a-9 would
allow the Commission to exempt any stand-alone SBSD from the rule
if the Commission determines that it is not necessary in the public
interest and for the protection of investors to subject the firm to
certain or all of the provisions of the rule.
US Code:
15
USC 78o-10 Name of Law: Securities Exchange Act of 1934
PL:
Pub.L. 111 - 203 764 Name of Law: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
PL: Pub.L. 111 - 203 764 Name of Law:
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010
The Commission's estimated
burden has decreased because of a reduction in the estimated number
of respondents due to related amendments in Rule 18a-10. These
changes are described in more detail in Item 15 of the Supporting
Statement.
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Abraham Jacob 202
551-5583
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.