ED Response to 30-Day Comment Period

NAEP 2019 and 2020 LTT Update 2 Response to 30-day Public Comment.docx

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2019 and 2020 Long-Term Trend (LTT) Update 2

ED Response to 30-Day Comment Period

OMB: 1850-0928

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Public Comment Received During the 30-day Comment Period

August 2019

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2019 and 2020 Long-Term Trend (LTT) Update 2

ED-2019-ICCD-0079 Comments on FR Doc # 2019-15557



Document: ED-2019-ICCD-0079-0004

Name: Carol Bazenet


In regard to data collection, and how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected, I would like to submit a suggestion.


I believe asking the schools to classify their mode of instructional delivery for each class cohort would result in valuable insight into which type of instruction results in the greatest coursework retention for the disaggregated classifications. An example of this could be:


Types of Teaching Strategies

  • Direct Instruction.

  • Indirect Instruction.

  • Experiential Learning.

  • Independent Study.

  • Interactive Instruction.


I believe this could provide added value to the data retrieved and could create a platform for drilled-down best practices for teachers to reference when working with students with particular attributes. The categories could be cross checked, based on student circumstances, to provide a teacher insight into what teaching method a particular child may most struggle with, or be most receptive to. Below is an abbreviated example of what those results may look like.


Mode of

Teaching

White

Black/African

American

Asian

Indian

Chinese

Hispanic/Latino

Not Hispanic/

Latino

Direct

Highest

Score

Lowest Score

Highest

Score

Lowest

Score



Indirect



Lowest

Score


Lowest Score


Experiential

Lowest

Score



Highest

Score

Highest Score

Highest Score

Interactive


Highest Score




Lowest Score


Mode of Teaching

150%

below Poverty

50% below poverty

At Poverty

Middle Income


Upper Income


High Income

Direct







Indirect

Lowest

Score

Lowest

Score





Experiential


Highest

Score





Interactive

Highest

Score







Complete data on all classifications can be cross referenced to determine overall best delivery of instruction for a child’s unique circumstances.

___________________________________________________________________________________

NCES Response:

First, thank you for taking the time to review the materials and for providing feedback. NAEP is committed to continuing to report contextual and performance data of the highest quality. As part of our next development cycle, we will be sure to consider your suggestions for collecting teaching strategies in either the teacher or school administrator questionnaire.



Sincerely,

NAEP Project Team

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorStainthorpe, Anne E
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy