Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N) (Renewal) | |||||||||||
108.28 | 144.33 | 53.34 | |||||||||
Burden item | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) | (H) | |||
Technical Person-hours per occurrence | No. of occurrences per respondent per year | Technical Person-hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
Respondents per year a | Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD) |
Management person-hours per year (F=Ex0.05) |
Clerical person-hours per year (G=Ex0.1) |
Total Cost per year ($) b | ||||
1. Applications | N/A | ||||||||||
2. Survey and Studies | N/A | ||||||||||
3. Reporting requirements | |||||||||||
A. Familiarize with regulatory requirements c | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0.8 | 1.6 | $1,933.29 | |||
B. Required Activities | N/A | ||||||||||
Initial performance emission tests d | 80 | 1 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Repeat of performance emission tests d | 80 | 0.2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
C. Create information | See 3B | ||||||||||
D. Gather existing information | See 3B | ||||||||||
E. Write report | |||||||||||
Application of construction or modification | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Notification of anticipated startup | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Notification of actual startup | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Source status report | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Notification of initial performance emission test | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
Report of initial performance emission test | See 3B | ||||||||||
Report results of continuous monitoring system (CMS) evaluation | See 3B | ||||||||||
Report of arsenic emission estimates e | 16 | 2 | 32 | 15 | 480 | 24 | 48 | $57,998.64 | |||
Report of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates f | 8 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 240 | 12 | 24 | $28,999.32 | |||
Request approval of control device bypass g | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | $724.98 | |||
Semiannual excess emissions (opacity) h | 16 | 2 | 32 | 1 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $3,866.58 | |||
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements | 890 | $93,523 | |||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||
A. Familiarize with regulatory requirements | See 3A | ||||||||||
B. Plan activities | See 3B | ||||||||||
C. Implement activities | See 3B | ||||||||||
D. Develop record system | N/A | ||||||||||
E. Time to enter information i | 40 | 1 | 40 | 16 | 640 | 32 | 64 | $77,331.52 | |||
Record continuous opacity and temperature of gas entering control device | See 4E | ||||||||||
Records of emission test results | See 4E | ||||||||||
Records of CMS performance evaluations | See 4E | ||||||||||
Occurrence and duration of startup, shutdown, and malfunction of furnace | See 4E | ||||||||||
Records of malfunction of control device | See 4E | ||||||||||
Periods when monitors are inoperative | See 4E | ||||||||||
Maintain and repair of control device, CMS, or monitors | See 4E | ||||||||||
Records of approved control device bypass | See 4E | ||||||||||
Semiannual records of uncontrolled arsenic emission rate j | 40 | 2 | 80 | 16 | 1,280 | 64 | 128 | $154,663.04 | |||
F. Time to train personnel | N/A | ||||||||||
G. Time for audits | N/A | ||||||||||
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements | 2,208 | $231,995 | responses | hr/response | |||||||
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) k | 3,100 | $326,000 | 63 | 49.2063492063492 | |||||||
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded) k | $56,000 | ||||||||||
GRAND TOTAL (rounded) k | $382,000 | ||||||||||
Assumptions: | |||||||||||
a We have assumed that there are 16 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. | |||||||||||
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $144.33 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $108.28 per hour for Technical labor, and $53.34 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2016, “Table 2: Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. | |||||||||||
c We have assumed that all respondents will have to familiarize with the regulatory requirements each year. | |||||||||||
d We have assumed that it will take eighty hours to complete performance tests and 20% of sources will have to repeat performance tests. | |||||||||||
e We have assumed that fifteen respondents will write report of arsenic emission estimates on a semiannual basis. | |||||||||||
f We have assumed that fifteen respondents will write report of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates on a semiannual basis. | |||||||||||
g We have assumed that one respondent will write report requesting approval of control device bypass once a year. | |||||||||||
h We have assumed that one respondent will write an excess emissions report semiannually. | |||||||||||
i It will take each respondent forty hours to enter information. | |||||||||||
j It will take each respondent forty hours twice a year to record uncontrolled arsenic emission rate. | |||||||||||
k Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N) (Renewal) | ||||||||
48.08 | 64.8 | 26.02 | ||||||
Burden Item | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) | (H) |
Technical Person-hours per occurrence | No. of occurrences per year | Technical Person-hours per Plant per year (C=AxB) |
Respondents per year a | Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD) |
Management person-hours per year (F=Ex0.05) |
Clerical person-hours per year (G=Ex0.1) |
Total Cost per year b | |
Activities | ||||||||
New facility | ||||||||
Initial performance test c | 24 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Repeat performance test d | 24 | 0.2 | 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Review reports | ||||||||
New facility | ||||||||
Construction or modification application | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Notification of anticipated startup | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Notification of actual startup | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Source status report | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Notification of initial performance emissions test | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Report of initial performance emissions test results | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Notification of physical or operational change | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Notification of emissions test | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Report results of CMS evaluation | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
Existing facility | ||||||||
Report of arsenic emission estimates rates e | 4 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 60 | 3 | 6 | $3,235.32 |
Reports of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates f | 8 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 120 | 6 | 12 | $6,470.64 |
Semiannual excess emissions g | 6 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 0.6 | 1.2 | $647.06 |
Request approval of control device bypass h | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | $323.53 |
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) i | 228 | $10,700 | ||||||
Assumptions: | ||||||||
a We have assumed that there are 16 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. | ||||||||
b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $64.80 (GS-13, Step 5, $40.50 + 60%) for managerial, $48.08 (GS-12, Step 1, $30.05 + 60%) for Technical, and $26.02 (GS-6, Step 3, $16.26 + 60%) for Clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2017 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. | ||||||||
c We have assumed that it will take twenty four hours to perform initial performance test. | ||||||||
d We have assumed that 20% of sources will take twenty four hours to repeat performance test. | ||||||||
e We have assumed that reports submitted by the fifteen respondents will be reviewed once a year. These reports are submitted semiannually. | ||||||||
f We have assumed that it will take eight hours to review reports of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates once a year. These reports are submitted semiannually. | ||||||||
g It is required that excess emissions reports are reviewed on a semiannual basis. | ||||||||
h We have assumed that the report requesting approval of control device bypass will be reviewed once a year. | ||||||||
i Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |