FERC-725HH, (RD17-8-000 Order) RF Reliability Standards

ICR 201802-1902-005

OMB: 1902-0301

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2018-02-09
Supplementary Document
2018-02-09
Supplementary Document
2018-02-09
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
Supplementary Document
2018-02-08
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
229980
New
ICR Details
1902-0301 201802-1902-005
Active
FERC FERC-725HH
FERC-725HH, (RD17-8-000 Order) RF Reliability Standards
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 03/19/2018
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 02/09/2018
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three years.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
03/31/2021 36 Months From Approved
2 0 0
32 0 0
0 0 0

On August 8, 2005, The Electricity Modernization Act of 2005, which is Title XII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), was enacted into law. EPAct 2005 added a new Section 215 to the Federal Power Act (FPA), which requires a Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission review and approval. Once approved, the Reliability Standards may be enforced by the ERO, subject to Commission oversight. In 2006, the Commission certified the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) as the ERO pursuant to FPA section 215. Reliability Standards that the ERO proposes to the Commission may include Reliability Standards that are proposed to the ERO by a Regional Entity . A Regional Entity is an entity that has been approved by the Commission to enforce Reliability Standards under delegated authority from the ERO. On 3/17/2011, the Commission approved a regional Reliability Standard submitted by the ERO that was developed by ReliabilityFirst Corporation (RF). There was only one Reliability Standard in the RF region, namely BAL-502-RFC-02 (Planning Resource Adequacy Analysis, Assessment, and Documentation). BAL-502-RFC-02 established common criteria (based on “one day in ten year”) load loss expectation principles, for the analysis, assessment, and documentation of resource adequacy for load in the RF region. Burden associated with BAL-502-RF-02 Reliability Standard was once contained in FERC-725H information collection (OMB Control No. 1902-0256) as approved by Order No. 747 . FERC-725H was discontinued on 3/6/2014 . However, the reporting requirements of BAL-502-RF-02 remained imposed on NERC entities after discontinuance as they had been imposed before Order No. 747 was approved. Based on the findings of Order No. 747, burden associated with BAL-502-RF-02 was not substantive, but Commission staff sought approval anyway using a minimal amount of burden. In 2014, Commission staff no longer considered renewing this collection as an effective use of time for Commission staff, OMB, or the public since it did not qualify as an “information collection” under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Commission staff have verified that the ReliabilityFirst Corporation Terms of Membership did require members to comply with the standard regardless of whether FERC has approved it and, as stated earlier, this was the Standard’s status prior to FERC approving the standard in 2011. Those requirements in BAL-502-RF-02 are now being retired with no removal of burden (any associated burden was removed concurrent with the discontinuance of FERC-725H in 2014). On 9/7/2017, NERC and RF filed a joint petition in Docket No. RD17-8-000 requesting Commission approval of: • Regional Reliability Standard BAL-502-RF-03; • The retirement of regional Reliability Standard BAL-502-RF-02 .

US Code: 16 USC 824(o) Name of Law: EPAct 2005
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  82 FR 53489 11/16/2017
83 FR 5420 02/07/2018
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
BAL-502-RF-03 Reliability Standard

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 2 0 0 2 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 32 0 0 32 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
In addition to approving regional Reliability Standard BAL-502-RFC-02 in Order No. 747, the Commission also directed ReliabilityFirst to: (1) add time horizons to the two main requirements, and (2) consider including a requirement that the Planning Coordinators identify any gap between the needed amount of planning reserves determined in Requirement R1, Part 1.1 and the planning reserves documented in Requirement R2 as determined from the Resource Adequacy analysis. The Commission directed ReliabilityFirst to address these directives during its scheduled five-year review of BAL-502-RFC-02. The revisions add in time horizons to Requirements R1 and R2; add Requirement R3 to identify any gaps between the needed amount of planning reserves defined in Requirement R1, Part 1.1 and the projected planning reserves document in Requirement R2; and add other corresponding changes to the measures.

$5,723
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Susan Morris 202 502-6803

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
02/09/2018


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy