OIE NAL@ED TA Survey

Office of Indian Education

Education Technical Assistance and

Support Services Task Order

NAL@ED Draft OMB Survey Questions, Subtask 3.3: Evaluation of Technical Assistance Provided

2018

Public Burden Statement:

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1880-0542 Note: Please do not return the completed Qualitative Feedback Survey to this address.

1. Given your experience working with the U.S. Department of Education’s technical assistance (TA) providers during the past 10 months, in what ways did you find the TA beneficial to begin grant activities? Select all that apply.

   • Aligning and refining goals and objectives

   • Recruiting and onboarding staff

   • Understanding budget requirements

   • Refining partnerships

   • Planning and developing curriculum and assessments

   • Planning for continuous improvement

   • Preparing for the Annual Performance Report (APR)

   • Additional comments (comment box)

2. What TA delivery method did you find most beneficial this year? Select all that apply.

   • On site

   • Virtual

   • Coaching

   • Additional comments (comment box)

3. What TA approach was most beneficial for your learning style? Select all that apply.

   • All grantees

   • Small group

   • One-on-one

   • Additional comments (comment box)

4. In what areas did you find the U.S. Department of Education’s TA providers to be most knowledgeable? Select all that apply.

   • Aligning and refining goals and objectives

   • Recruiting and onboarding staff

   • Understanding budget requirements

   • Refining partnerships

   • Planning and developing curriculum and assessments

   • Planning for continuous improvement

   • Additional comments (comment box)

5. What TA content was most helpful in preparing to submit your APR? Select all that apply.

   • Goals, objectives, and outcomes

   • Staffing

   • Budget

   • Partnerships

   • Curriculum and assessments

   • Continuous improvement

   • Additional comments (comment box)

6. Given your observations of staff members who work in your program, which TA topic(s) had the greatest impact on their ability to implement the program? Select all that apply.

   • Aligning and refining goals and objectives

   • Recruiting and onboarding staff

   • Understanding budget requirements

   • Refining partnerships

   • Planning and developing curriculum and assessments

   • Planning for continuous improvement

   • Additional comments (comment box)

7. What type of TA could be provided to help support your work next year? Select all that apply.

   • Curriculum development

   • Assessment development

   • Best practices from promising Native language programs

   • Teacher certification and alternative methods

   • Second language instructional strategies

   • Collecting, tracking and analyzing student performance data

   • Data-based decision-making

   • Additional comments (comment box)

8. What topics would you like to hear more about from your fellow grantees’ own work experience and/or expertise?

(open-ended response)

9. Are there specific grantees, programs, or other subject matter experts whose work you would like to know more about?

(open-ended response)