Electronic Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) (formerly entitled "Vessel Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species")

ICR 201610-0648-001

OMB: 0648-0372

Federal Form Document

ICR Details
0648-0372 201610-0648-001
Historical Active 201409-0648-011
DOC/NOAA
Electronic Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) (formerly entitled "Vessel Monitoring Systems for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species")
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 01/17/2017
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/06/2016
Respondents suggested changes regarding this collection of information and NMFS has stated it will consider the comments as part of a three year review of the Individual Bluefin Quota program. The respondents' comments must be considered and responded to prior to or as part of the renewal of this collection of information.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2020 36 Months From Approved 01/31/2017
44,729 0 67,388
6,420 0 20,513
422,329 0 3,912,437

This request is for revision and extension of an existing information collection for electronic monitoring and vessel monitoring systems (VMS) in Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) commercial fisheries. Pelagic longline (PLL) vessels, bottom longline (BLL) vessels fishing in the region of the Mid-Atlantic Closed Area, shark gillnet vessels in vicinity of U.S. Southeast Restricted Area, and purse seine vessels are required to use Enhanced Mobile Transmitting Unit (E-MTU) VMS to submit hourly automatic position reports, and hail in and out on fishing trips. PLL and purse seine vessels are also required to report bluefin tuna catches via E-MTU message. PLL vessels are also required to install a video and gear electronic monitoring system and record all catch and relevant data regarding PLL gear retrieval. These data must be submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for catch monitoring and accounting of individual bluefin tuna quota balances.

US Code: 16 USC 971 Name of Law: Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  81 FR 36893 06/08/2016
81 FR 69514 10/06/2016
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 44,729 67,388 0 0 -22,659 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 6,420 20,513 0 0 -14,093 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 422,329 3,912,437 0 -883,296 -2,606,812 0
No
No
Program changes: The costs are changed to reflect the government taking on funding EM electronic data retrieval and review costs (-$939,600 per year), and PLL fishermen being required to pay for the postage costs of mailing EM hard drives to the government following each trip (plus $56,304 per year). These resulted in an overall reduction of $883,296 in costs to respondents per year. Adjustments: The hours and costs are adjusted to reflect changes in the number of PLL vessels required to report with VMS and EM that qualified for IBQ shares (253 to 136 vessels), the number that have already installed EM equipment (112 of 136 vessels), the estimated time it takes to mail in an EM hard drive (2 hrs reduced to 1 hr), and an increase in the number of months purse seine vessels are likely to be fishing and required to use VMS (1 month to 2 months). There were reductions of 117 respondents, 22,658 responses, 14,093 hours and $2,606,812.

$1,101,600
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Margo Schulz-Haugen 301 713-0234

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/06/2016


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy