IMPEP Viewpoint Surveys for Team Members and Program Directors

IMPEP VIEWPOINT SURVEY
Agreement State and NRC Materials Programs
FY 2016

The NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards is performing a satisfaction survey of its
administration of the Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP). The satisfaction
survey will cover IMPEP reviews of Agreement State radiation control programs and NRC materials
programs performed during fiscal year 2016. Also the satisfaction survey will provide useful information for
management decision making regarding areas where NRC should dedicate more resources or
management attention.
Please answer the following questions based on your involvement and experience during the IMPEP review
you supported in FY2016.
1. How would you rate the review team with regard to their preparation and knowledge in their
respective technical areas?
Poor

Needs
Improvement

Average

Good

Outstanding

N/A

Rating

2. Did you find the questionnaire helpful for preparing for the IMPEP on site review?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Almost
Always

N/A

Rating

3. Were the review team's questions based on the requirements in Management Directive 5.6,
Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Almost
Always

N/A

Almost
Always

N/A

Rating

4. Did the review look at the most important aspects of the program?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Rating

1

5. Did the review result in a report that was consistent with IMPEP criteria?
Almost
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Always

N/A

Rating

6. Did the report accurately reflect the strengths and areas for improvement of the program?
Almost
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Always

N/A

Rating

7. Did the Management Review Board (MRB) add value to the IMPEP review process and was it
consistent with Management Directive 5.6?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Almost
Always

N/A

Rating

8. Was the Team Leader effective in conducting a thorough and fair review of your program?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Almost
Always

N/A

Frequently

Almost
Always

N/A

Almost
Always

N/A

Rating

9. Is the format of the report useful?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Rating

10. Is the report an accurate record of the results of the review?
Not at all

Sometimes

Usually

Frequently

Rating

11. Please comment on any aspect of the IMPEP review process that you think worked well, and/or
did not work well. Do you have any suggestions to improve the IMPEP process?

2

12. Please comment on any aspect of the MRB evaluation that you think worked well, and/or did not
work well. Do you have any suggestions to improve the MRB process?

13. Additional comments you would like to add?

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION (OPTIONAL):
14. Last Name (Family Name/Surname):

15. First Name:

16. Please select the Agreement State or NRC program reviewed:

17. Work email address:
Please provide an email address for the purpose of feedback or follow-up.

The estimated burden to respond to this voluntary information collection is 15 minutes. The
information provided will be used to determine areas of improvement for future IMPEP reviews. If a
means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control
number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person not required to respond to, the
information collection.
EXPIRES: January 31, 2017
OMB NO.
3150-0217

3