Acquisition 360 Survey

4

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Satisfaction Survey - Acquisition 360

Pre-Award & Debriefing Satisfaction Survey

Your firm submitted an offer for Solicitation No. NRC-HQ-10-14-E-0001, Task Order: NRC-HQ-10-14-T-0001 from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Acquisition Management Division.

Please provide us with your feedback on the acquisition process. Your answers will help us assess our performance and identify our strengths and weaknesses. The survey should take no more than 10 minutes to complete. The results from this anonymous survey will not be published or made publicly available.

Please submit your response within the next thirty days via Survey Monkey. If you have any questions, please contact Chane Petty, NRC Acquisition Management Division, at chane.petty@nrc.gov.

Please rate your level of satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being “Very Satisfied” and 1 being “Very Dissatisfied”

	Very Satisfied					Very Dissatisfied
Requirements Development Process - How satisfied were you:
With the agency’s vendor engagement methods (e.g., RFIs, draft RFP, pre-award conferences) in fostering early communication and exchange before receipt of proposals?	5	4	3	2	1		N/A
That the exchange offered by any industry day(s) offered valuable information that improved your understanding of the agency’s requirements?	5	4	3	2	1		N/A
With the agency’s understanding of your firm’s marketplace?	5	4	3	2	1		N/A
With the clarity of the final requirements?	5	4	3	2	1		N/A
Solicitation Phase - How satisfied were you:
That the agency kept vendors informed about any delays in the solicitation process (considering both the initial release and any subsequent delays)?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
That the solicitation included clear proposal submission instructions that sufficiently guided offerors or respondents in preparing proposals or responses to requests for information?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
That the government chose an appropriate contract type?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
That the government chose an appropriate source selection methodology?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
That the agency answered questions regarding the solicitation in such a way that it helped you to prepare the proposal?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
With the opportunity to propose unique and innovative solutions (i.e., the solicitation promoted innovation)?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
With the clarity of the solicitation’s evaluation criteria?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
With the amount of time the agency gave to submit a proposal?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
That the solicitation’s evaluation criteria allowed for the best selection among competing proposals?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
Award Execution and Debriefings- How satisfied were you:
With the agency’s resolution of issues/concerns related to the contracting process?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
With the robustness of the agency’s debriefing (i.e., it allowed you to understand how to improve on similar efforts in the future)?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
How satisfied were you with your overall experience on this acquisition?	5	4	3	2		1		N/A
Please provide any additional comments:
Are you a small business?	Yes			No

Public Protection Notification

The NRC may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Burden is estimated to average 10 minutes per response. Please send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection for information, including suggestions for reducing the burden to:

Mailing address: FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch

Mail Stop T-5 F53

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

Email address: Infocollects.Resource@NRC.gov

OMB Control Number: 3150-0217

Expiration: 01/31/2017