Regulatory Information Conference Feedback Forms

TECHNICAL SESSION EVALUATION AND FEEDBACK

Our goal is to make each RIC better than the last. Please help us achieve our goal by taking a moment to evaluate this session.

Session Number and Title:

SECTION 1 – PANEL SUMMARY - Please indicate the quality of each speaker and presentation based on the descriptors listed below. Scoring: 5-Excellent, 4-Very Good, 3-Good, 2-Fair, 1-Poor

SPEAKER #1 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion	SPEAKER #2 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion
SPEAKER #3 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion	SPEAKER #4 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion
SPEAKER #5 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion	SPEAKER #6 NAME:__________________________ ____ Knowledge of Subject Matter ____ Objectivity and Perspective ____ Quality of Content ____ Effectiveness of Materials (Slides) ____ Delivery of Presentation ____ Value Added to Q/A Portion

SECTION 2 – SESSION SUMMARY - Please check the response that most accurately reflects your opinion below:

1. The topic and content are relevant to the needs and interests of RIC attendees.

_ Strongly Agree _ Agree _ Neutral _ Disagree _ Strongly Disagree

2. The session description accurately reflects the proposed content.

_ Strongly Agree _ Agree _ Neutral _ Disagree _ Strongly Disagree

3. The program format is appropriate for subject matter.

_ Strongly Agree _ Agree _ Neutral _ Disagree _ Strongly Disagree

4. I personally benefited from the information presented during this session and will be able to apply the knowledge gained to the work I perform on a daily basis.

_ Strongly Agree _ Agree _ Neutral _ Disagree _ Strongly Disagree

SECTION 3 – EXECUTION OF THE SESSION - Please check the response that most accurately reflects your opinion below:

The Session Chair and Session Coordinator were effective in coordinating the speakers and presentations, arranging the panel discussion, and facilitating questions and answers from the audience.

_ Strongly Agree _ Agree _ Neutral _ Disagree _ Strongly Disagree

SECTION 4 – COMMENTS - In the space below, please note any additional comments or suggestions you may have related to this session.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Our goal is to make each RIC better than the last, and your feedback is important to us. Thank you for taking

the time to complete this evaluation. Please place it in one of the evaluation drop-off boxes located throughout the conference center, take it to the registration service desk, or hand it to one of the RIC volunteers.

The estimated burden to respond to this voluntary information collection is 10 minutes. The information provided will be used to determine areas of improvement for future conferences. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person not required to respond to, the information collection.

OMB NO. 3150-0217 EXPIRES: JANUARY 31, 2017