60 FR Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Overview of This Information

[OMB Number 1121–0240]

1. Type of information collection: Reinstatement of previously approved data
collection, Survey of General Purpose
Law Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA),
2012.
2. The title of the form/collection:
Survey of General Purpose Law
Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA), 2012.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form labels are SGPLEA, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
4. Affected Public Who Will be Asked
or Required to Respond, as well as a
Brief Abstract: Respondents will be
general purpose state and local law
enforcement agencies, including police
departments, sheriffs, and constables at
the state, county and municipal level,
including tribal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: The Bureau of
Justice Statistics (BJS) proposes to
implement a Survey of General Purpose
Law Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA).
This content of the survey builds upon
the previous eight waves of the BJSsponsored surveys in the Law
Enforcement Management and
Administrative Statistics (LEMAS)
Program. Like LEMAS, the SGPLEA will
continue to generate nationallyrepresentative estimates of the nature of
law enforcement agencies and personnel
by focusing on a smaller set of core
issues in contemporary policing.
However, beginning with SGPLEA, BJS
will produce law enforcement statistics
on a regular two-year cycle. SGPLEA
will include a consistent set of core
items and topical supplements that will
vary from wave to wave. In addition to
core issues concerning the number and
type of agencies, the nature and
diversity of law enforcement personnel,
employee wages and benefits, agency
budgets and organizational responses to
contemporary law enforcement issues,
the 2012 SGPLEA supplemental
components will collect information on
the following topics:
a. Recruitment and Retention of Staff;
b. Community Policing;
c. Information Systems;
d. Officer Safety;
e. Uses of Force.
5. An Estimate of the Total Number of
Respondents and the Amount of Time
Estimated for an Average Respondent to
Respond: Based on the testing
experience with the 2007 LEMAS
survey, the reduction in the total
number of variables included in
SGPLEA form compared to the 2007
LEMAS forms, and the increased burden
on smaller law enforcement agencies,

Agency Information Collection
Agencies: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested Reinstatement,
With Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection for Which
Approval Has Expired: Survey of
General Purpose Law Enforcement
Agencies, 2012
60-Day notice of information
collection under review.

pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

ACTION:

The Department of Justice, Office of
Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice
Statistics, will be submitting the
following information collection request
for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The proposed information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until
June 12, 2012. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have additional comments,
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact:
Joel Garner, Statistician, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice,
810 Seventh Street NW., Washington,
DC 20531 (phone: 202–307–0765).
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:16 Apr 12, 2012

Jkt 226001

PO 00000

Frm 00067

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

22347

BJS estimates that 3,000 respondents
will complete the SGPLEA survey form
with an average burden per respondent
of 2.5 hours.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 7,500
total annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite
2E–508, Washington, DC 20530.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–8935 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Sematech, Inc. d/b/a
International Sematech
Notice is hereby given that, on March
16, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Sematech, Inc.
d/b/a International Sematech
(‘‘SEMATECH’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Centrotherm Photovoltaics
AG, Blaubeuren, GERMANY; Fujifilm
Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN;
Inpria Corporation, Corvallis, OR; and
Invensas Corporation, San Jose, CA,
have been added as parties to this
venture.
Also, United Microelectronics
Corporation, Inc., Hsinchu City,
TAIWAN; and Asahi Glass Corporation,
Chiyodaku, Tokyo, JAPAN, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
In addition, the following have been
added as members to International
SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative,
Inc. (‘‘ISMI’’): Winbond Electronics
Corporation, Taichung City, TAIWAN;
Macronix International Co. Ltd.,
Hsinchu, TAIWAN; and Renesas
Electronics Corporation, Santa Clara,
CA.

E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM

13APN1