Download:
docx |
pdf
National Park Service
U.S.
Department of the Interior
S
ocial
Science Program
|
OMB
Control Number 1024-0224
Current
Expiration Date:8-31-2014
|
Programmatic
Approval for NPS-Sponsored Public Surveys
|
|
|
Submission Date
|
03-04-2013
|
|
|
1.
|
Project Title:
|
Visitor Use and Experience Study in Grand Canyon National Park’s
(GRCA) Corridor Zone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Abstract:
|
Public comments solicited to help inform Grand Canyon’s
backcountry management plan illustrate that there are a number or
issues related to crowding and conflict in the park’s
corridor zone. Management concerns include the amount and type
of use the corridor can accommodate before impacts to visitor
experience, managerial facilities, or resources become
unacceptable. This study aims to understand not only what the
appropriate types and amounts of visitation are, but also what
potential management actions are the most acceptable to visitors
of Grand Canyon’s corridor. On-site survey will occur
April – June and September – November 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
(not to exceed 150 words)
|
|
|
3.
|
Principal Investigator Contact Information
|
|
|
|
First Name:
|
Peter
|
Last Name:
|
Pettengill
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Outdoor Recreation Planner
|
|
|
|
Affiliation:
|
National Park Service
|
|
|
|
Street Address:
|
2A Powell
|
|
|
|
City:
|
Grand Canyon
|
State:
|
AZ
|
Zip code:
|
86023
|
|
|
|
Phone:
|
928.638.7734
|
Fax:
|
|
|
|
|
Email:
|
Peter_Pettengill@nps.gov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Park or Program Liaison Contact Information
|
|
|
|
First Name:
|
Linda
|
Last Name:
|
Jalbert
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Wilderness Coordinator
|
|
|
|
Park:
|
Grand Canyon National Park
|
|
|
|
Office/Division:
|
Science
and Resource Management
|
|
|
|
Street Address:
|
Dutton Building
|
|
|
|
City:
|
Grand Canyon
|
State:
|
AZ
|
Zip code:
|
86023
|
|
|
|
Phone:
|
928.638.7909
|
Fax:
|
|
|
|
|
Email:
|
Linda_Jalbert@nps.gov
|
|
|
Project Information
|
|
|
5.
|
Park(s) For Which Research is to be Conducted:
|
Grand Canyon National Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Survey Dates:
|
04/2013
|
TO
|
11/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Type of Information Collection Instrument (Check ALL that
Apply)
|
|
|
|
Mail-Back Questionnaire
|
On-Site Questionnaire
|
Face-to-Face Interview
|
Telephone Survey
|
Focus Groups
|
|
|
|
Other (explain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Survey Justification:
(Use
as much space as needed; if necessary include additional
explanation on a
separate page.)
|
Social science research in support of park planning and
management is mandated in the NPS Management Policies 2006
(Section 8.11.1, “Social Science Studies”).
The NPS pursues a policy that facilitates social science studies
in support of the NPS mission to protect resources and enhance
the enjoyment of present and future generations (National Park
Service Act of 1916, 38 Stat 535, 16 USC 1, et seq.). NPS policy
mandates that social science research will be used to provide an
understanding of park visitors, the non-visiting public, gateway
communities and regions, and human interactions with park
resources. Such studies are needed to provide a scientific basis
for park planning, development.
Data are needed to
develop management options and planning alternatives that will be
used to address visitor capacity in Grand Canyon National Park.
Park managers need to understand how current visitor use levels
and types are impacting visitor experience, resources, and
facilities.
This study builds
upon research and planning efforts focused on visitors’
experiences traveling in Grand Canyon’s corridor (see:
Backlund et. al.2006 & 2008; Manning et al., 1999; Stewart,
1997). The goal of this collection is to understand the
psychological, social, and behavioral dimensions of park
visitors’ corridor travel experiences. This information
collected will be used to inform backcountry planning and
management and visitor use capacity decision making.
|
|
|
9.
|
Survey Methodology: (Use as much space as needed; if necessary
include additional explanation on a
separate page.)
|
Respondent
Universe:
The respondent
universe for this study will include adult park visitors (aged 18
and older) visiting GRCA during the study period (April –
November, 2013). A total of 450 visitors will be contacted and
asked to participate in the survey.
Sampling Plan/Procedures:
The study will
employ a purposive sampling strategy. Sampling will be
stratified by trail location (North and South Kaibab and Bright
Angel trails), and target peak use days (weekends) and hours
(0800-1600) as estimated by the park.
Instrument Administration:
Surveys will be administered by National Park Service employees
and possibly undergraduate and graduate research assistants
working under the supervision of GRCA staff. The
questionnaire will be completed on-site. The respondent will be
handed the questionnaire to complete and the survey administrator
will be available for assistance.
Intercept locations
will be trail junctions and attraction sites that provide
adequate space for accommodating visitors without adversely
impacting park resources. Each location will have one survey
administrator to serve as a data collector. At each location, at
the beginning of the sample period, each visitor group will be
intercepted as they approach the site. No more than 4 surveys
will be conducted at any one time. Groups will be greeted by the
surveyor as they approach the site and will be introduced to the
purpose of the study.
“Excuse me,
sir/ma’am. I’m conducting a study for Grand Canyon
National Park to understand visitor use in this area.
Participation is voluntary and all responses are anonymous. Would
you be willing to take 10 minutes to help?”
If YES: “Thank
you. Who in your group (who is at least 18 years old) has the
next birthday? Would you be willing to fill out this survey? Have
you completed a survey at a different location in the park?”
If YES:
“Thank you, but we can only accept one response per group.
Thank you for your time.”
If NO:
“Thank you. Please feel free to ask me any questions you
have about the survey.”
If NO: “I
understand. I hope you enjoyed your visit.”
Although the
questionnaire will be self-administered, the surveyor will be
available to provide assistance when necessary.
Expected
Response Rate/Confidence Levels:
A total of 150
visitor groups will be intercepted at each of the three sampling
locations (North and South Kaibab and Bright Angel) for a total
of 450 overall contacts. Based on previous on-site surveys
conducted along popular National Park trails (Newman et al.,
2005; Manning et al., 2003) a final response rate of 90% is
anticipated. A 90% response will yield approximately 405
completed questionnaires overall. Based on this, the overall
sampling error will be approximately +/- 5% at the 95% confidence
interval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Initial Contacts
|
Expected Response
Rate
|
Expected Number of
Responses
|
Margin of Error +/- %
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
90%
|
405
|
5%
|
|
|
Strategies for dealing with potential non-response bias:
To assess potential
non-response bias, surveyors will use an on-site contact log to
document sampling location, time of day, gender, number of
children present, personal group size, and comments regarding
reason for refusal. Analyses will be performed to determine if
respondents differed significantly from non-respondents, and the
implications, if any, for interpreting the results will be
discussed. If necessary, data weighting may be applied during the
analysis phase.
Description of any pre-testing and peer review of the methods
and/or instrument (recommended):
Survey research
methods and the questionnaire instrument were reviewed by NPS
officials. The methods and instrument have also been reviewed by
nationally-recognized scholars including: Dr. Robert Manning,
Professor and Director of the Park Studies Laboratory at the
University of Vermont and Dr. Rudy Schuster, Branch Chief of
Policy Analysis and Science Assistance for the United States
Geological Survey. Questionnaire items have been used in previous
studies in several other national park sites and all appear in
the NPS Pool of Known Questions (OMB Control Number 1024-0224).
|
|
|
10
|
Burden Estimates:
|
We plan to approach at least 450 individuals during the sampling
period. With an anticipated response rate of 90%, we expect to
receive 405 total responses for this collection.
We expect that the initial contact
time will be at least one minute per person (450 x 1 minute =
7.5hours). We expect that 45 (10%) visitors will refuse to
participate during the initial on-site contact, for those
individuals we will note their reason for refusal and record
information that will be used for the non-response check on the
on-site contact log: sampling location, time of day, gender,
number of children present, personal group size. This is
estimated to take no more than 2 minutes (45 x 2 = 1.5 hours) to
complete each session.
We
expect that 405 agree to participate and will complete the
questionnaire. With that, an additional 10 minutes will be
required to complete the process (405 response x 10 minutes =
67.5 hours). The burden for this collection is estimated to be 63
hours.
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Number of Contacts
|
|
Estimation
of Time
|
|
Estimation
of Respondent Burden
|
|
|
Total Number of Initial
Contacts
|
450
|
|
Estimated Time (mins.) to
Complete Initial Contact
|
1
|
|
Estimated Burden Hours
|
8
|
|
|
Estimated number of
on-site refusals
|
45
|
|
On-site Refusal/
nonresponse
|
2
|
|
Estimated Burden Hours
|
2
|
|
Total Number of Responses
(Spring and Fall – combined)
|
405
|
|
Time to complete and
return surveys
|
10
|
|
Estimated Burden Hours
|
68
|
|
|
Total Burden
|
78
|
|
11.
|
Reporting Plan:
|
Analysis and results will include frequency distributions and
descriptive statistics for all questionnaire variables as well as
selected cross-tabulations and other comparisons. Depending on
the variable, appropriate statistical analyses will be conducted.
Electronic version (in PDF and MS Word file
formats) of the completion report will be provided to the park
representatives. A final copy of the report will also be
submitted to the NPS Social Science Division for archiving in the
Social Science Studies Collection as required by the programmatic
approval process.
|
References
Backlund,
E., Stewart, W., Schwartz, Z. (2008). Overnight Backcountry Visitors
at Grand Canyon National Park. Report submitted to Grand Canyon
National Park.
Backlund,
E., Stewart, W., Schwartz, Z., McDonald, C. (2006). Backcountry Day
Hikers at Grand Canyon National Park. Report submitted to Grand
Canyon National Park.
Manning,
R., Cole, D., Stewart, W., Taylor, J., Lee, M. (1999). Day Use
Hiking in Grand Canyon National Park. Report submitted to Grand
Canyon National Park.
Manning,
R., W. Valliere, B. Wang, S. Lawson, and P. Newman. (2003).
Estimating Day Use Social Carrying Capacity in Yosemite National
Park. Leisure: The
Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies.
Newman,
P., R. Manning, and D. Dennis. (2005). Informing Carrying Capacity
Decision-Making in Yosemite National Park, USA Using Stated Choice
Modeling. Journal of
Park and Recreation Administration.
23: 75-89
Stewart,
W. (1997). Grand Canyon Overnight Backcountry Visitor Study: Use of
diary-like techniques. Report submitted to Grand Canyon National
Park.
12
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | CPSU |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-02-01 |