Data Quality Institue 2011 Participant Evaluation

Master Generic Plan for Customer Surveys and Focus Groups

Att_2011 DQI Evaluation (3)

DQI Conference 2011 Participant Evaluation

OMB: 1800-0011

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


Institute EVALUATION FORM

Please mark your rating:

LOGISTICS


Poor


Satisfactory


Excellent

Institute Technology Services

  • Explanation of Technology Needs

  • Pre-Conference Technical Assistance






1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Institute Information

  • Institute Announcements/Background

  • Institute Registration

  • eBinder Organization/Materials






1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Institute

  • Virtual Format/Structure

  • Content






1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

WEBCAST SESSIONS | JUNE 7, 2011


Not

Informative/Useful

Somewhat

Informative/Useful

Very

Informative/Useful

Session 1: National Perspectives on Implementation of State Longitudinal Data Systems | Gould & Pinkus

1

2

3

4

5

Session 2: Link SLDS Across the P-20 Education Pipeline and Across State Agencies | Gould, Pfeiffer, & Pinkus

1

2

3

4

5

Session 3: Ensure CTE data Can Be Accessed, Analyzed, and Used | Enright, Wilkins, & Shah

1

2

3

4

5

Session 4: Build the Capacity of CTE Stakeholders to Use Data for Effective Decision Making | Brant, Parke, & Sonn

1

2

3

4

5

WEBINAR SESSIONS | JUNE 8, 2011


Not

Informative/Useful

Somewhat

Informative/Useful

Very

Informative/Useful

Session 5a: Proposed FERPA Regulation Update | Styles

1

2

3

4

5

Session 5b: NCES Newly-Established “Career-related” Data Category | Boivin

1

2

3

4

5



Not

Informative/Useful

Somewhat

Informative/Useful

Very

Informative/Useful

OVERALL, the conference was

1

2

3

4

5



Please mark the category best describing the area you represent as a member of your state team:

YOUR ROLE

_____ Secondary CTE

_____ Postsecondary CTE

_____ CTE Data Staff

_____ Other; Please identify ___________________________________



GENERAL COMMENTS


What did you like the most about this Institute? What should we do the same next time?








What did you like least about this Institute? What should we do differently next time?





Additional comments:









Public Burden Statement:


According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number

1800-0011. Note: Please do not return the completed Institute Evaluation form to this address.


June 2011 Virtual Data Quality Institute | Page 4 | February 4, 2021

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorJim Schoelkopf
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy