The revisions to
this ICR associated with the proposed rule to remove the automatic
CBI status of substantiation material are not approved. It is not
clear that the new reporting requirements minimize to the extent
practicable and appropriate the burden on persons providing
information, as required by 5 CFR 1320.9(c). In the ICR for the
final rule, the agency` should review the reporting and record
keeping requirements to ensure that this provision is
satisfied.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
10/31/2003
09/30/2003
10/31/2003
1,101
0
1,101
6,432
0
0
0
0
0
Under EPA's current regulations, when
EPA received comments from a business explaining why
previously-submitted information should be entitled to confidential
treatment (i.e., substatiation), EPA automatically protects those
comments as confidential. The proposed rule would eliminate the
automatic protection of CBI substantiations, so that they would be
treated in the same manner as other information that is claimed as
CBI. Under the proposed rule, if EPA needed to determine the
confidentially of a substan- tiation (e.g., in response to a FOIA
request), it would make an initial determination, notify the
affected business and ...
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.