This collection
was first approved in March of 1995 with the understanding that EPA
would use the data from the July 1, 1996 reports to recalculate the
number of respondents and the estimates of respondent burden and to
make a determination whether the alternative threshold level should
be changed. EPA's submission on August 2, 1996 claimed that because
the reporting deadline was extended to August 1, 1996, the EPA did
not have sufficient time with the data to comply with the earlier
terms of clearance. Therefore, this collection of information is
approved through June 1, 1998, to allow EPA to continue to collect
this information and to evaluate its experience with the program.
On the basis of this evaluation, EPA should seek to make changes,
where appropriate, to the program such that they are effective for
the 1997 report filed in July of 1998. Prior to submission of this
collection for renewal, the EPA shall analyze the data it received
in 1996 and the data that it will receive in 1997 to make the
recalculations in burden referenced above and to make a
determination whether rule changes are warranted. Specifically, the
EPA should check its projections of reductions in paperwork burden
against the actual number of the Forms A submitted. EPA should
examine the effects of adopting a higher reportable amount such as
1000 or 5000 pounds and of raising the alternate threshold from one
million pounds to five or ten million pounds. The EPA should also
evaluate the possibility of excluding recycling and energy recovery
from the reportable amount and the possibility of using quantities
of releases rather than quantities of wastes as the basis for
reporting. As part of this submission, the EPA shall assess the
practical utility and burden associated with each of these
requirements (under Form A and Form R) and respond to the following
questions: 1) How many reports were filed using Form A, and how
many would be filed if the rule were modified as discussed above?
2) What was the resultant reduction in paperwork burden, and how
much would the bruden be reduced if the Form A requirements were
modified? 3) What was the reduction in reported releases, and what
would the reduction be for the alternatives? 4) What, if any, are
the important losses in information associated with the various
alternatives? EPA should submit an interim report to OMB by June of
1997 answering these questions for the 1995 Reports. If EPA
determines that changes in the regulation are warranted, the Agency
shall initiate a rulemaking promptly to make the necessary changes
(see 5 CFR 1320.14(f)). OMB also reserves its right to initiate a
proposal for change.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
05/31/1998
05/31/1998
09/30/1996
20,514
0
23,288
709,784
0
803,436
0
0
0
The Emergency Preparedness and
Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requires certain chemical
facilities to report their annual environmental releases of
specified chemicals if such releases exceed a determined threshold.
EPA has established an alternate threshold for facilities with low
release amounts of such chemicals. Each facility using the
alternate threshold must file an annual certification stating that
the total releases given chemical did not exceed 500 pounds for the
reporting year and that the chemical was manufactured in an amount
not exceeding 1 million pounds during the reporting year.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.