Minimum Internal Control
Standards for Class II Gaming
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
12/01/2025
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
12/31/2025
840
842
251
1,199
3,866,060
3,296,800
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA
or the Act), 25 U.S.C. 2701, et seq., laid out a comprehensive
framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. Amongst
other actions necessary to carry out the Commission’s statutory
duties, the Act directs the Commission to monitor class II gaming
conducted on Indian lands on a continuing basis in order to
adequately shield Indian gaming from organized crime and other
corrupting influences, to ensure that the Indian tribe is the
primary beneficiary of the gaming operation, and to ensure that
gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and
players. 25 U.S.C. 2702(2), 2706(b)(1). The Commission is also
authorized to “promulgate such regulations and guidelines as it
deems appropriate to implement” IGRA. 25 U.S.C. 2706(b)(10). The
Commission has promulgated part 543 of title 25, Code of Federal
Regulations, to aid it in monitoring class II gaming on a
continuing basis.
US Code:
25
USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Burden estimate updates are
based upon stakeholder consultations and it should be cautioned at
the outset that tribal gaming operations and their business
practices are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many
local, state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary
in size and complexity and range from small truck stops and
lotteries to world-class casino mega-resorts. The amount of time
and resources that gaming tribes expend fulfilling regulatory
requirements can vary dramatically and is further complicated by
different Tribal governance practices and varying levels of
investment in, and adoption of, new technologies and technical
expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically
insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants has limited
value and it would be improper to extrapolate from these burden
estimates any definitive trends. In this collection cycle, the
number of responses remained statistically the same, however, both
Annual Burden Hours and Burden Hour Wage Costs dropped
significantly and it appears that these decreases are due to the
fact that tribes are increasingly electing to contract the required
audit services in lieu of performing these functions themselves
in-house. This trend towards contracted services is thus reflected
in the increase in Non-Burden Hour Costs.
$87,273
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tim Osumi 202 632-7054
tim_osumi@nigc.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.