Information Collections Burden for 10 CFR Parts 30, Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings Final Rule

ICR 202509-3150-005

OMB:

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.
ICR Details
202509-3150-005
Received in OIRA
NRC
Information Collections Burden for 10 CFR Parts 30, Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings Final Rule
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular 09/05/2025
  Requested Previously Approved
07/31/2027
12 0
646 0
20 0

FINAL RULE - Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations for approved financial assurance mechanisms for decommissioning, specifically for parent-company and self-guarantees that previously required bond ratings issued by credit rating agencies and now is replaced with a demonstration of a creditworthiness criterion. This final rule implements the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 that directed agencies to amend their regulations to remove any reference to or requirement of reliance on credit ratings. This final rule affects applicants and licensees who are required to provide decommissioning financial assurance. The information collections associated with the final rule have been submitted under the following clearance numbers: 3150-XXXX Burden for 10 CFR Part 30, Rules of General Applicability to Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material (this is a temporary clearance number, 3150-0017 is currently unavailable for submissions due to the Regulatory Framework for Fusion Machines proposed rule) 3150-0011 - 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities 3150-0009 - 10 CFR Part 70, Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material 3150-0029 - 10 CFR Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source Material

PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 1-311 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act
  
None

3150-AJ92 Final or interim final rulemaking

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Information Collections Burden for 10 CFR Parts 30, Alternatives to the Use of Credit Ratings Final Rule

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 12 0 0 12 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 646 0 0 646 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 20 0 0 20 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The final rule changes to 10 CFR Part 30 will affect applicants during the period of this clearance. The annual estimated burden increase due to the final rule is 646 hours, covering six respondents annually. The NRC issued this final rule to amend the approved financial assurance mechanisms for decommissioning, specifically for parent-company and self-guarantees that require bond ratings issued by credit rating agencies. The rule implements the required provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act directed agencies to amend their regulations to remove any reference to or requirements of reliance on credit ratings. Applicants and licensees who are required to provide decommissioning financial assurance may be impacted. The rule requires applicants and licensees that relied on bond ratings issued by credit rating agencies for their financial guarantee to instead rely on new financial tests currently provided in NRC regulations that do not contain a credit rating criterion.

$1,705,450
No
    No
    No
No
Yes
No
No
Gregory Trussell 301 415-6445

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
09/05/2025


© 2026 OMB.report | Privacy Policy