60-Day FRN

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices
20892, 301–827–5997, shinako.takada@
nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR–23–
064 Program Projects: Interactions Between
HIV–1 and Opioids.
Date: April 3, 2025.
Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Address: National Institutes of Health,
Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive,
Bethesda, MD 20892.
Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
Contact Person: Alok Mulky, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4203,
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–3566,
mulkya@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 1, 2025.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of
Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025–04098 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket Number DHS–2025–0005]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Case
Assistance Form, DHS Form 7001,
1601–0004
Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The Department of Homeland
Security will submit the following
Information Collection Request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until May 13, 2025.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.1
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number Docket
#DHS–2025–0005, at:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Please
follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number Docket #DHS–2025–
0005. All comments received will be

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
The Office
of the Citizenship and Immigration
Services Ombudsman (CIS
Ombudsman) was created under section
452 of the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (Pub. L. 107–296) to: (1) assist
individuals and employers in resolving
problems with U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS); (2) to
identify areas in which individuals and
employers have problems in dealing
with USCIS; and (3) to the extent
possible, propose changes in the
administrative practices of USCIS to
mitigate problems. This form is used by
individuals and employers who are
experiencing problems with USCIS
during the processing of immigration
benefits. Authorities that support this
information collection include:
• Section 452 of the Homeland
Security Act provides the legal authority
for the CIS Ombudsman.
The information is collected on the
DHS Form 7001, Case Assistance
Request, which is available
electronically or via pdf on the CIS
Ombudsman website. Individuals and
employers (or their legal
representatives) experiencing problems
with USCIS may submit a DHS Form
7001. The information contained on the
form allows the CIS Ombudsman to
identify the problem encountered by
individuals and employers seeking
immigration benefits and inquire with
USCIS to resolve the issue. In the past,
this information has been used to
understand the issue the customer is
trying to resolve, to obtain information
needed to research USCIS systems, and
to relay USCIS communications to the
customer. This information has been
collected on the electronic or paper DHS
Form 7001 for over a decade. The
electronic version is automatically
integrated into the CIS Ombudsman’s
Case Assistance Analytics and Data
Integration (CAADI) case management
system; paper versions received by
email, mail or fax are ingested manually
and saved electronically in the case
management system.
(a) Proposed form enhancements:
To enhance the form’s usability:
• Limit each request to one
immigration issue.
• Remove questions customers did
not historically answer correctly.
• Enhance the instructions in each
form section.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

12171

• Re-order form sections (see below)
to reflect the customer’s perspective.
The revised form will include these
re-ordered, merged, and re-named
sections. Delete former Section 4, Form
Type.
1. Move Section 10 to 1: Person
Completing the Form
a. Ask who is completing the form
upfront so that attorneys can enter
their information first and upload
the required Form G–28 in Section
9.
2. Move Sections 5 & 6 to 2: Name of
Applicant or Petitioner & Contact
Information
3. Rename Section 3: Application or
Petition Filed with USCIS
4. Move Section 7 to 4 and rename:
Biographical Information for
Applicant or Petitioner
5. Delete old Section 4
6. Move Section 11 to 5: Beneficiary
Information
a. Expanded to include more than just
employment-based petitions
7. Move Section 2 to 6: Reason for
Requesting Case Assistance
a. Now limited to one reason/issue
8. Merge Sections 1A & B, Actions
Taken with USCIS and move to
Section 7
9. Section 8: Supporting Documentation
a. Now cross-referenced with new
Section 1.
10. Move Section 12 to 9: How Did You
Learn About Our Case Assistance
Services?
11. Merge Sections 9 and 10 into new
Section 10: Consent
a. A new single consent section with
a pop-up signature based on role, to
include third parties.
The CIS Ombudsman collects and
processes requests for case assistance,
the majority of which are submitted
electronically through the DHS website.
This form provides the most efficient
means for collecting and processing the
required data. The electronic form feeds
the information collected directly into
CAADI. Per Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) requirements, a fillable PDF
version is also available on the website
and may be emailed or printed and
mailed or faxed to the CIS Ombudsman.
The information on the paper forms are
manually entered and then scanned into
the CAADI system and then destroyed.
Using the paper method may result in
delays due to mail delivery and intake
processing. Once approved, the online
and PDF versions of the new form will
be posted on the CIS Ombudsman’s
website at https://www.dhs.gov/caseassistance. The paper form remains
available because some individuals are
unable to access or lack the skill to use

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

12172

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

the electronic version of the DHS Form
7001. The CIS Ombudsman has
enhanced completion of the DHS Form
7001 on mobile devices to further
reduce paper use.
Burden Reduction Initiatives in 2024
(a) See Section 2 for proposed form
enhancements.
(b) New Format for Hard Copy
Version: Once the renewed form is
approved, the CIS Ombudsman will roll
out a redesigned and updated hard copy
version of the form in PDF format for
both ease of use and compliance with
the 21st Century Integrated Digital
Experience Act.
(c) New Foreign Language
Capabilities: The form must be
submitted in English, but it will be
translated into the following five most
frequently requested languages to make
it easier for immigrants from these
countries to complete the form and
instructions. The CIS Ombudsman also
initiated translation and interpretation
services for customers with limited
English proficiency in October 2024.
(d) New Online Portal: The CIS
Ombudsman launched a new web portal
to provide better customer service while
also saving staff time. Currently,
customers who have submitted the
Form 7001 call or email the CIS
Ombudsman to check their case status,
and where applicable, the CIS
Ombudsman emails customers to
request additional documents needed to
process the request. The new web portal
provides customers with an online selfservice tool, enabling staff to focus on
more complex customer inquiries.
Customers can access the new web
portal via a link on the online Form
7001 web page. The web portal then
shares data with CAADI to provide two
functions: (1) the Online Case Status
Check functionality allows individuals
and employers to check the current
status of their case online; and (2) the
Online Document Upload functionality
allows individuals and employers to
submit additional documentation for a
previously submitted case. Users now
have the ability to upload on-demand as
well as in response to email requests
initiated by the CIS Ombudsman. Case
assistance request number and email
address are required for submission, and
a confirmation email is sent after
document upload is successful.
Customers do not have to create an
account or login but are required to
provide their case assistance request
number, which was provided in their
submission confirmation email, and
their email address. The email address
is needed to verify the identity of the
requestor.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

a. What’s new in 2024 for the
customer:
b. Before you submit: You will see a
simpler, cleaner online DHS Form 7001,
Request for Case Assistance page with
an easy link to our Tips for Submitting
a Case Assistance Request.
i. The tips address specific situations
like signing on behalf of clients and
requests involving multiple form types
or family members.
c. While you complete the form:
Instead of a series of accordion sections,
you will see an interactive form with
these new features:
i. A progress bar to help you see how
much of the form you have completed.
ii. Sections that adapt the questions
based on your answers to help you
know what fields to complete.
iii. Alerts in each section that tell you
if you are missing information.
iv. A clearer view of the forms and/
or beneficiaries you have already added.
v. A screen for reviewing and editing
your answers before submitting.
vi. Your CIS Ombudsman Request
Number appearing on the confirmation
page after you submit the form.
d. After you submit: Use these two
new features:
i. Upload Requested Documents (after
submitting your request): If you
experience problems uploading
documents when you submit DHS Form
7001 or if you need to add more
documents afterwards, you can use this
tab to upload documents.
ii. Check the Status of Your Request:
You can use this tab to track the status
of your case assistance request. You will
also see an overview of the different
steps your request goes through as we
work on it.
(e) Usability Test: The CIS
Ombudsman also completed a usability
test on the form.
a. What was the purpose of the UX?
To identify any pain points in
completing the online form, both on a
computer and a mobile phone.
b. How many participants? Six: 3
were familiar with the form and 3 were
not.
c. Here is a list of customer findings
and recommended form fixes by section:
(a) General Observations:
1. Average completion time for all six
participants was 50 minutes. One
completed the form in 20 minutes,
while it took others over an hour to
complete.
2. Some instructions are placed after
the field requesting the related
information.
a. For example, in Section 1A
customers are asked to upload
supporting documents but the
instructions and functionality are in
Section 8.

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

3. Some people wondered if they
could go back and edit their data.
a. FIX: Add a note to the General
Instructions that you can make edits at
the end before submitting the form.
(b) General Instructions:
1. None of the participants opened
and read the instructions.
a. FIX: Enhance the instructions
within each section of the form.
(c) Section 1A—Actions Taken:
1. When we ask if they’ve already
contacted USCIS, some did not
understand that we are asking whether
they used USCIS’ customer service
options.
a. FIX: suggest we make this very
clear in our public-facing materials and
engagements.
2. Some wanted to enter their
complete history rather than focusing on
the past 60–90 days as we want them to.
a. FIX: Instructions should emphasize
we want their most RECENT contact
date with USCIS and why we are asking.
3. Some wanted to tell whole life
story in the small comment box about
actions taken because they didn’t read
question carefully—and then later
wanted to go back.
a. FIX: Recommend combining 1A
and 1B.
4. Instructions above box say to attach
documents without stating how to do
so.
a. FIX: Add text on where and how to
upload documents.
(d) Section 1B—Other Actions:
Recommendation is to merge Sections
1A & B.
1. Can we delete Option 1: Contacted
a U.S. government department or agency
for assistance. People may assume it
refers to USCIS.
2. Option 2: Congressional inquiry,
‘‘Response Received, Yes or No?’’—do
we want to know if they received a
response to the congressional inquiry or
if Congress received a response to their
inquiry to USCIS?
a. FIX: add text to state we want the
congressional response sent to the
individual.
(e) Section 2—Reasons for Request:
1. We start with what actions did you
take; the intent was to weed out people
whose issues weren’t ripe for a request
for case assistance. But from their
perspective, they want to tell us their
problem and ask for our help and that’s
what we should let them do first.
a. FIX: Recommend moving this
section before Section 1; see #3 below.
2. Checkbox comments: use plain
language, shorten text, and alphabetize
the list.
a. FIX: Edit the master redlined form
accordingly.

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices
3. Some said they already provided an
explanation of their issue in section 1a,
then retyped it here.
a. FIX: Reduce to one explanation box
and emphasis that we need to know
what happened when they contacted
USCIS.
(f) Section 3—Applications/Petitions
Filed:
1. For Form I–90, sub-options are
confusing.
a. FIX: Do we need to know these
things?
1. 10-year renewal.
2. initial issue or replacement.
2. Unable to cut and paste receipt
number, even w/o dashes.
a. FIX: Ask developers if possible.
3. Some were confused about what is
meant by ‘‘Primary’’; others were
confused about which form to submit.
a. FIX: Should we reformat this
section to make it simpler? Options
include:
1. Put the instructions at the top.
1. Check the ‘‘Primary’’ box next to
the USCIS receipt number for which
you seek assistance.
2. Receipt date/Filing date need to be
clarified; language on Form 797 varies.
4. Recommend moving the view that
shows that you submitted a form up at
the top rather than below because folks
thought it didn’t save and started to put
it in again.
a. FIX: Clarify instructions: after you
SAVE, scroll down, and click on NEXT.
(g) Section 4—Type of Benefit:
Recommendation is to delete this
section.
(h) Section 5—Applicant Name:
1. Move Applicant Name to the top of
the form with one form per person.
2. Confusion around selecting
individual or organization. Do we want
the individual’s contact info or their
attorney’s?
a. FIX: Make it clear we will not
contact a represented individual
directly.
3. One participant said completing
this section and #6 slows them down
because it is not easy to cut and paste
info from other sources into the form.
a. FIX: Ask developers if possible.
(i) Section 6—Contact Information:
1. Again, confusion about whose
information to enter.
a. FIX: add instructions at the top and
refer to Section 5.
b. The PDF version [with CX
revisions] includes these instructions:
1. Provide contact information for the
individual (applicant/petitioner) or
employer encountering difficulties with
USCIS.
2. If you provide a legal
representative’s contact information
instead of the individual or employer’s

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

contact information you must submit
the Notice of Entry of Appearance (Form
G–28) that you already have submitted
to USCIS for the application/petition for
which you seek our assistance. Full
legal representative contact information
can be added in Section 10 of this form.
2. Almost all participants were
confused about email vs. snail mail
options.
a. FIX: Box language has been
adjusted as of 9/20/24.
3. Adding USPS address verification
would be useful.
a. FIX: Added USPS address
verification code in November 2024.
(j) Section 7—Identification:
1. Unable to cut and paste in the ANumber.
a. FIX: Ask developers if possible.
(k) Section 8—Supporting Documents:
1. First mention of G–28; mention
earlier in the form?
a. FIX: Ask if submitter is an attorney,
congressional rep, or DSO up front. If
so, ask to upload appropriate form.
2. Suggest moving instructions in
footer to top of section: file size/name/
type.
a. Also add this information to the
General Instructions.
3. Some had difficulty uploading
documents, encountering either a delay
or a blank screen.
a. There is a virus scan ‘‘pending’’
message.
(l) Section 11—Beneficiary
Information:
1. Suggest delete this section if not
useful or only make it appear for I–129
petitioners, and if can be just for H–2A/
H–2B, even better.
2. If retained, add an N/A option.
When we last revised Form 7001, for
the first time we added an addendum to
allow certain petitioning employers to
include beneficiary employee
information that is needed for the CIS
Ombudsman to inquire with USCIS. In
the past, the CIS Ombudsman did not
have a designated place to collect this
beneficiary employee information and
as a result, this caused delays in seeking
assistance because the CIS Ombudsman
had to reach out to petitioning
employers for additional information.
If this information is not collected, the
CIS Ombudsman will not be able to
assist individuals and employers
experiencing problems who request our
assistance during the processing of an
immigration benefit with USCIS.
The CIS Ombudsman follows
fundamental ombudsman principles,
such as confidentiality, neutrality, and
independence while undertaking its
statutory mission. In addition:
(a) Section 1367 confidentiality and
prohibited source provisions prohibit

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

12173

employees of DHS, Department of State,
or Department of Justice from permitting
the use or disclosure of any information
relating to an individual for a pending
or approved application or petition for
victim-based immigration benefits to
anyone other than a sworn officer or
employee of these Departments for
legitimate agency purposes, unless one
of several exceptions apply.
Section 1367 is flagged for applicable
customers in their CAADI case record.
It can be set by the analyst but is also
triggered by the specific form types. We
follow USCIS procedures regarding
confidential cases.
(b) Pursuant to the Privacy Impact
Assessment for CAADI, any risk that
information in the CAADI system may
be accessed by individuals without the
proper clearances and without a need to
know is mitigated as follows: (1) CIS
Ombudsman personnel receive annual
privacy training and introductory
training on CAADI before they are given
an account name and password, and
specialized access and security control
training as a prerequisite for
authorization to use the system; and (2)
all staff are able to see information on
any case, but the ability to edit
information is restricted through user
permissions and standard DHS rules of
behavior.
The time estimate to complete the
current form was increased from 30 to
50 minutes based on the customer
usability study. However, the steps we
will and have taken to reduce
completion time using the new form are
summarized in the responses to
Questions 2 and 3.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

12174

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices

Analysis
Agency: Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
Title: Request for Case Assistance
Form.
OMB Number: 1601–0004.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Number of Respondents: 23,591.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 50
mins.
Total Burden Hours: 19,659.
Robert Dorr,
Executive Director, Business Management
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2025–03914 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9112–FL–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1432]

Certain Mobile Electronic Devices;
Notice of Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion To Amend the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 6) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting Complainant’s motion to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to allege infringement of
additional patent claims.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Namo Kim, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3459. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 23, 2025, based on a

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:09 Mar 13, 2025

Jkt 265001

complaint filed by Maxell, Ltd. of
Kyoto, Japan (‘‘Maxell’’). 90 FR 8032–33
(Jan. 23, 2025). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), based on the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain mobile
electronic devices by reason of the
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,130,280; U.S. Patent No.
11,490,004; U.S. Patent No. 11,750,915;
U.S. Patent No. 11,509,953; U.S. Patent
No. 12,108,103; and U.S. Patent No.
11,445,241 (‘‘the ’241 patent’’). Id. The
complaint further alleges that a
domestic industry exists. Id. The notice
of investigation names as respondents
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of
Suwon-Shi, Republic of Korea and
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of
New Jersey (collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’).
Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is not named as a party.
Id.
On February 6, 2025, Maxell filed a
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to add
infringement allegations as to claims 15
and 24 of the ’241 patent. Maxell
explained that, prior to institution, it
submitted a first public supplement to
assert claims 15 and 24 of the ’241
patent. The notice of investigation,
however, did not reflect this
supplement. Therefore, Maxell argued
that good cause exists because this
motion is to address a clerical error in
the notice of investigation.
On February 18, 2025, Samsung filed
an opposition to Maxell’s motion.
Samsung argued that there was no
clerical error in the notice of
investigation, and that Maxell failed to
properly add claims 15 and 24 of the
’241 patent during the pre-institution
stage because Maxell needed to file an
amended complaint pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.14(a), 19 CFR
210.14(a), to add any additional claims
as opposed filing a supplement.
Samsung also argued that it would be
unduly prejudiced if Maxell’s motion is
granted.
On February 21, 2025, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 6) granting
Maxell’s motion to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.14(b), 19 CFR
210.14(b). The ID finds that the notice
of investigation expressly acknowledged
Maxell’s public supplements, including
the first public supplement that alleged
infringement of claims 15 and 24 of the
’241 patent, and this acknowledgment is
‘‘indicative of a clerical oversight in the
listing of instituted asserted claims.’’ ID

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

at 2; see 90 FR at 8032. The ID also finds
that even if there was no clerical error,
Maxell has now moved in a timely
manner to add claims 15 and 24. Id. at
3. Lastly, the ID finds that any prejudice
to Samsung is low because Samsung
was on notice of Maxell’s intent to add
claims 15 and 24. Id. at 3–4.
No petitions for review of the ID were
filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on March 10,
2025.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 10, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025–04049 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—UHD Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 24, 2025, pursuant to section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), UHD
Alliance, Inc. (‘‘UHD Alliance’’) filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Optoma Technology, Inc., Fremont, CA,
has been added as a party to this
venture. Also, Teledyne LeCroy
(Quantum Data, Inc.), Elgin, IL, has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and UHD Alliance
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed
its original notification pursuant to

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1