Petition for Finding under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 3(40)
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
01/12/2026
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
01/31/2026
1
10
37
370
10
87
The term “multiple employer welfare
arrangement” (MEWA) is defined in Section 3(40) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) as an employee
welfare benefit plan or any other arrangement which is established
or maintained for the purpose of offering or providing [welfare
plan benefits] to the employees of two or more employers,
(including one or more self-employed individuals), or their
beneficiaries, except that such term does not include any such plan
or other arrangement which is established or maintained under or
pursuant to one or more agreements which the Secretary of Labor
(the Secretary) finds to be collective bargaining agreements. Under
Section 514(b)(6) of ERISA, an employee welfare benefit plan that
is a MEWA is generally subject to state insurance law. The
Department's regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3-40 sets forth criteria for
determining when an employee welfare benefit plan is established or
maintained under or pursuant to collective bargaining agreements
for purposes of section 3(40) of ERISA. The Department's
regulations at 29 CFR part 2570, subpart H set forth procedures for
administrative hearings to obtain a determination by the Secretary
as to whether a particular entity is an employee welfare benefit
plan established or maintained under or pursuant to one or more
collective bargaining agreements for purposes of section 3(40) of
ERISA. To initiate adjudicatory proceedings, an entity is required
to file a petition for a determination under Section 3(40) of ERISA
with an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The petition must identify
the parties, describe the basis on which the petition is being
filed and the entity in question, provide evidence that the entity
satisfies the criteria to be an employee welfare benefit plan, and
include affidavits as to both the competency of the affiant to
testify and the facts that allegedly establish the entity as a plan
established under or pursuant to agreements that the Secretary
finds to be a collective bargaining agreement.
US Code:
29
USC 1003(40) Name of Law: Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974
US Code: 29
USC 1135 Name of Law: Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974
The number of entities that
will annually petition for an administrative hearing under the
Department’s procedures has been adjusted from 10 to 1. This is
based on the Department's experience that such petitions are rare.
The burden estimates have also been adjusted to account for the
updated wage and postage rates. As a result, the number of
responses has decreased by 9, the hour burden has decreased by 33
hours, and the cost burden has decreased by $77.
$0
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
James Butikofer 202 693-8434
Butikofer.James@dol.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.