2137t12

---

Overview

Regulated Sources_Overview
Table 1a-Year 1
Table 1a-Year 2
Table 1a-Year 3
Table 1a-Avg
Table 1b-Year 1
Table 1b-Year 2
Table 1b-Year 3
Table 1b-Avg
Table 1c-Year 1
Table 1c-Year 2
Table 1c-Year 3
Table 1c-Avg
Table 2-Year 1
Table 2-Year 2
Table 2-Year 3
Table 2-Avg
Annual Responses-Year 1
Annual Responses-Year 2
Annual Responses-Year 3
Annual Responses-Avg
%CEMSCPMSvs.testing_2137.13
%CEMSCPMSvs.testing_2137.12

---

Sheet 1: Regulated Sources_Overview

Overview - Number of Facilities and CEMS/CPMS Subject to ICR
Cells highlighted in blue denote values updated by ERG. All other cells use values EPA provided from calculations for the previous ICR.
	Number of Facilities Subject to ICR		2137.06			2137.07			2137.08					2137.12 (2024)
			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	Existing Facilities		1,244	1,246	1,248	1,250	1,252	1,254	727	727	727			372	372	372
	New Facilities		2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	0			0	0	0
	Number of CEMS/CPMS Subject to ICR	HAP	2137.06			2137.07			2137.08					2137.12 (2024)
			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	A. Existing CEMS	PM	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,250	1,252	1,254	723	723	723		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)	0	0	0
		HCl	N/A	N/A	N/A	259	261	263	607	607	607		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)	0	0	0
		Hg	700	700	700	1,101	1,103	1,105	555	555	555		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)	0	0	0
		HF	N/A	N/A	N/A	0	0	0	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)	0	0	0
		Total Existing CEMS/CPMS	700	700	700	2,610	2,616	2,622	1,884	1,884	1,884			0	0	0
	B. New CEMS	PM	1,246	1,248	1,250	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)	0	0	0
		HCl	255	257	259	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)	0	0	0
		Hg	397	399	401	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)	0	0	0
		HF	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)	0	0	0
		Total New CEMS/CPMS	1,898	1,904	1,910	6	6	6	0	0	0			0	0	0
	C. Total CEMS in Operation	PM	1,246	1,248	1,250	1,252	1,254	1,256	723	723	723			0	0	0
		HCl	255	257	259	261	263	265	607	607	607			0	0	0
		Hg	1,097	1,099	1,101	1,103	1,105	1,107	555	555	555			0	0	0
		HF	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			0	0	0
		Total CEMS/CPMS	2,598	2,604	2,610	2,616	2,622	2,628	1,884	1,884	1,884			0	0	0
	Average CEMS/CPMS per Facility		2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	2.59	2.59	2.59			0.00	0.00	0.00
	Supporting Information
		ICR Year				PM			HCl	SO2	Hg	HF	Notes
			EGU Type	New	Existing	M5, M202	M29	M29	M320	M6A	M30B	M320
	Calculations for 2137.06	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,046	1,048	1,048	0	255	0	1,048		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required		0.966728280961183
			Total	2	1,244	1,246	1,097	0	255	0	1,097	0
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,048	1,050	1,050	0	257	0	1,050		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Total	2	1,246	1,248	1,099	0	257	0	1,099	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,050	1,052	1,052	0	259	0	1,052		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Total	2	1,248	1,250	1,101	0	259	0	1,101	0
	Calculations for 2137.07	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,052	1,054	1,054	0	261	0	1,054
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11				0.966911764705882
			Total	2	1,250	1,252	1,103	0	261	0	1,103	0
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,054	1,056	1,056	0	263	0	1,056
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11
			Total	2	1,252	1,254	1,105	0	263	0	1,105	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,056	1,058	1,058	0	265	0	1,058
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11
			Total	2	1,254	1,256	1,107	0	265	0	1,107	0
	Calculations for 2137.08	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	630	630	0	580	0	529		Updated existing unit counts based on data provided by OAQPS for RTR, with no new units for next 3 year prd		50		8%
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22		Revised # of units with CEMS/CPMS based on data provided by OAQPS, see %CEMSCPMSvstesting tab
			IGCC	0	3	3	3		0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	60	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	8	8	0	7	0	4				0.960365853658536
			Total	0	727	723	663	0	607	0	555	0		1.47730398899587	0.004126547455296
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	630	630	0	580	0	529				0.882352941176471
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22
			IGCC	0	3	3	3	0	0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	60	60	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	8	8	0	7	0	4
			Total	0	727	723	723	0	607	0	555	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	630	630	0	580	0	529
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22
			IGCC	0	3	3	3		0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	60	60	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	8	8	0	7	0	4
			Total	0	727	723	723	0	607	0	555	0
	Calculations for 2137.12 (2024)	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	62	301								Not really new sources but units that are required to install PM CEMS divided by 3; all units must install PM CEMS over the course of this ICR (32% of units)
			Coal-fired <8,300	3	13								For unit counts, assuming 96% of total 314 coal-fired units are >8,300 and 4% are <8,300		314
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	11	51								For unit counts, assuming 88% of total 58 O/G steam units are liquid oil fired and 12% are solid oil-fired		58
			solid oil-fired	1	7
			Total	77	[Threaded comment] Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924 Comment: this should total 372 372							0	0	372
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	62	301								0
			Coal-fired <8,300	3	13								0
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	11	51
			solid oil-fired	1	7
			Total	77	372							0	0	372
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	62	301								0
			Coal-fired <8,300	3	13								0
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	11	51
			solid oil-fired	1	7
			Total	77	372							0
	Calculations for 2137.12 (2025)	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	0	301								Change in rule to no longer require the installation of PM CEMS
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	13								For unit counts, assuming 96% of total 314 coal-fired units are >8,300 and 4% are <8,300		314
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	0	51								For unit counts, assuming 88% of total 58 O/G steam units are liquid oil fired and 12% are solid oil-fired		58
			solid oil-fired	0	7
			Total	0	[Threaded comment] Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924 Comment: this should total 372 372							0	0	372
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	0	301								0
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	13								0
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	0	51
			solid oil-fired	0	7
			Total	0	372							0	0	372
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	0	301								0
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	13								0
			IGCC	0	0
			liq oil-fired	0	51
			solid oil-fired	0	7
			Total	0	372							0
				Year 1	PM CEMS Units	141			309		283
					Total facilities	192		160	private
								32	public
					PM CEMS units per facility	1.94			facilities
		new PM CEMS units	0
			0	private
			0	public
			new PM CEMS	units
		Total facilities with new PM CEMS per year	0
			0	private
			0	public
			new PM CEMS	facilities
		Total EGUs per year	372
			310	private
			62	public
			existing	EGUs

---

Sheet 2: Table 1a-Year 1

Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Private Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b				relative response audit (RRA) and response correlation audit (RCA)
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	160	160	8.0	16.0	$27,810.79	facility
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	192	5,341	267	534	928,734	EGU			PM stack test					1340574	0.692788529204676	277.333038476628
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	53	1,391	70	139	241,829	EGU								247590	0.97673048634371	53.9367515417951
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	74	2,068	103	207	359,510	EGU								411476	0.873708424416425	85.1246476063305
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	257	2,572	129	257	$447,232	EGU
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	257	37,553	1,877.6	3,755.3	$6,529,590	EGU
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	257	23,470	1,173.52	2,347.0	$4,080,994	EGU
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	257	3,601	180.0	360.1	$626,125.11	EGU
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Method 5)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0	EGU			Method 5 would only be used for initial correlations, RRAs and RCAs.
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	31.0	310	15.5	31.0	$53,883	EGU
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	310	40,286	2,014	4,029	$7,004,842	EGU
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	310	6,198	310	620	1,077,668	EGU
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	31.0	155	8	15	26,942	EGU
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0	EGU
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								141,570			$21,405,161
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660	EGU
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660	EGU
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	310	7,437	371.9	743.7	$1,293,202	EGU
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0	EGU
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0	EGU
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0	facility
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								9,408			$1,422,522
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								151,000			$22,800,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$41,100,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$64,000,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 83.3% are owned by private industry. 83.3% of 192 facilities are private facilities = 160. 83.3% of 372 units are at private facilities = 310 units; 62% of 310 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 192. The remaining 118 units had PM CEMS.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $157.25 (technical), $181.99 (managerial), and $75.31 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2024, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number privately-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 192 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 53 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 74 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 83.3% of those are privately-owned = 257.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Unloaded	Rate (110%)
				Technical (Management, professional, and related: Professional and related)	$157.25	$74.88	2.1
				Managerial (Management, professional, and related: Management, business and financial)	$181.99	$86.66	2.1
				Clerical (Sales and office: Office and administrative support)	$75.31	$35.86	2.1
											CRF	0.109794624701007	I (1+i)^n		7% interest and 15 year life
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing									(1+i)^n -1
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	192	$992,761						0.193132207850073
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	53	$1,077,038						1.75903154071533
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	74	$1,487,929
				Total	$45,617	319	$3,557,727						0.109794624701007
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$3,557,727
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	118	$3,295,251
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	257	$10,704,557
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	236	$23,553,232
				Total						$37,553,039
										$41,110,766
										$8,239,319
										$49,350,085

---

Sheet 3: Table 1a-Year 2

Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Private Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b				relative response audit (RRA) and response correlation audit (RCA)
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	160	160	8.0	16.0	$27,810.79
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	192	5,341	267	534	928,734				PM stack test					1340574	0.692788529204676	277.333038476628
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	53	1,391	70	139	241,829									247590	0.97673048634371	53.9367515417951
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	74	2,068	103	207	359,510									411476	0.873708424416425	85.1246476063305
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	257	2,572	129	257	$447,232
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	257	37,553	1,877.6	3,755.3	$6,529,590
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	257	23,470	1,173.52	2,347.0	$4,080,994
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	257	3,601	180.0	360.1	$626,125
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Method 5)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0				Method 5 would only be used for initial correlations, RRAs and RCAs.
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	31.0	310	15.5	31.0	$53,883
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	310	40,286	2,014	4,029	$7,004,842
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	310	6,198	310	620	1,077,668
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	31.0	155	8	15	26,942
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								141,570			$21,405,161
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	310	7,437	371.9	743.7	$1,293,202
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								9,408			$1,422,522
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								151,000			$22,800,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$41,100,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$64,000,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 83.3% are owned by private industry. 83.3% of 192 facilities are private facilities = 160. 83.3% of 372 units are at private facilities = 310 units; 62% of 310 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 192. The remaining 118 units had PM CEMS.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $157.25 (technical), $181.99 (managerial), and $75.31 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2024, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number privately-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 192 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 53 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 74 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 83.3% of those are privately-owned = 257.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Unloaded	Rate (110%)
				Technical (Management, professional, and related: Professional and related)	$157.25	$74.88	2.1
				Managerial (Management, professional, and related: Management, business and financial)	$181.99	$86.66	2.1
				Clerical (Sales and office: Office and administrative support)	$75.31	$35.86	2.1
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	192	$992,761
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	53	$1,077,038
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	74	$1,487,929
				Total	$45,617	319	$3,557,727
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$3,557,727
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	118	$3,295,251
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	257	$10,704,557
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	236	$23,553,232
				Total						$37,553,039
										$41,110,766
										$8,239,319
										$49,350,085

---

Sheet 4: Table 1a-Year 3

Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Private Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b				relative response audit (RRA) and response correlation audit (RCA)
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	160	160	8.0	16.0	$27,810.79
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	192	5,341	267	534	928,734				PM stack test					1340574	0.692788529204676	277.333038476628
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	53	1,391	70	139	241,829									247590	0.97673048634371	53.9367515417951
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	74	2,068	103	207	359,510									411476	0.873708424416425	85.1246476063305
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	257	2,572	129	257	$447,232
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	257	37,553	1,877.6	3,755.3	$6,529,590
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	257	23,470	1,173.52	2,347.0	$4,080,994
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	257	3,601	180.0	360.1	$626,125
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Method 5)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0				Method 5 would only be used for initial correlations, RRAs and RCAs.
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	31.0	310	15.5	31.0	$53,883
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	310	40,286	2,014	4,029	$7,004,842
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	310	6,198	310	620	1,077,668
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	31.0	155	8	15	26,942
		New sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								141,570			$21,405,161
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	$64,660
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	310	7,437	371.9	743.7	$1,293,202
		New PM CEMS sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								9,408			$1,422,522
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								151,000			$22,800,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$41,100,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$64,000,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 83.3% are owned by private industry. 83.3% of 192 facilities are private facilities = 160. 83.3% of 372 units are at private facilities = 310 units; 62% of 310 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 192. The remaining 118 units had PM CEMS.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $157.25 (technical), $181.99 (managerial), and $75.31 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2024, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number privately-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 192 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 53 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 74 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 83.3% of those are privately-owned = 257.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Unloaded	Rate (110%)
				Technical (Management, professional, and related: Professional and related)	$157.25	$74.88	2.1
				Managerial (Management, professional, and related: Management, business and financial)	$181.99	$86.66	2.1
				Clerical (Sales and office: Office and administrative support)	$75.31	$35.86	2.1
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	192	$992,761	$992,761
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	53	$1,077,038	$0
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	74	$1,487,929	$0
				Total	$45,617	319	$3,557,727	$992,761
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$3,557,727
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	118	$3,295,251
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	257	$10,704,557
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	236	$23,553,232
				Total						$37,553,039
										$41,110,766
										$8,239,319
										$49,350,085

---

Sheet 5: Table 1a-Avg

Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Private Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b				relative response audit (RRA) and response correlation audit (RCA)
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	160	160	8.0	16.0	27,811
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	192	5,341	267	534	928,734				PM stack test					1340574	0.692788529204676	277.333038476628
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	53	1,391	70	139	241,829									247590	0.97673048634371	53.9367515417951
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	74	2,068	103	207	359,510									411476	0.873708424416425	85.1246476063305
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	257	2,572	129	257	447,232
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	257	37,553	1,877.6	3,755.3	6,529,590
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	257	23,470	1,173.52	2,347.0	4,080,994
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	257	3,601	180.0	360.1	626,125
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Method 5)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0				Method 5 would only be used for initial correlations, RRAs and RCAs.
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	31.0	310	15.5	31.0	53,883
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	310	40,286	2,014	4,029	7,004,842
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	310	6,198	310	620	1,077,668
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	31.0	155	8	15	26,942
		New sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								140,000			21,405,161
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	64,660
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	31.0	372	18.6	37.2	64,660
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	310	7,437	371.9	743.7	1,293,202
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								9,400			$1,422,522
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								149,000			$22,800,000	179,000	$24,500,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$41,100,000		$49,300,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$64,000,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 83.3% are owned by private industry. 83.3% of 192 facilities are private facilities = 160. 83.3% of 372 units are at private facilities = 310 units; 62% of 310 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests each year = 192. The remaining 118 units had PM CEMS.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $157.25 (technical), $181.99 (managerial), and $75.31 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2024, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number privately-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 192 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 53 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 74 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 83.3% of those are privately-owned = 257.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Unloaded	Rate (110%)
				Technical (Management, professional, and related: Professional and related)	$157.25	$74.88	2.1
				Managerial (Management, professional, and related: Management, business and financial)	$181.99	$86.66	2.1
				Clerical (Sales and office: Office and administrative support)	$75.31	$35.86	2.1
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	192	$992,761
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	53	$1,077,038
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	74	$1,487,929
				Total	$45,617	319	$3,557,727
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$3,557,727
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	118	$3,295,251
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	257	$10,704,557
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	236	$23,553,232
				Total						$37,553,039
										$41,110,766
										$8,239,319
										$49,350,085

---

Sheet 6: Table 1b-Year 1

Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Public Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	32	32	1.6	3.2	$2,051.74
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	39	1,070	54	107	68,517				PM stack test
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	11	279	14	28	17,841
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	15	414	21	41	26,523
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	52	515	26	52	$32,994.56
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	52	7,526	376.3	752.6	$481,720.63
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	52	4,704	235.19	470.4	$301,075.40
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	52	722	36.1	72.2	$46,192.39
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	6	62	3.1	6.2	$3,975.25
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	62	8,074	404	807	$516,782.33
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	62	1,242	62	124	79,505								45735	1.73838358954468	35.7273426075218
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	6	31	2	3	1,988
		New sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								28,373			$1,579,166
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	62	1,491	74.5	149.1	$95,405.97
		New PM CEMS sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								1,886			$104,947
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								30,000			$1,700,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$8,200,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e									32,000		$9,900,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 16.7% are public facilities. 16.7% of 192 facilities are public facilities = 32. 16.7% of 372 units at public facilities = 62; 62% of 62 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 39. The remaining 24 units had PM CEMS.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2023, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c Estimates are based on the number of publicly owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 39 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 11 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 15 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 16.7% of those are publicly-owned = 52.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Multiplier	Unloaded	Updated to agency rates
				Technical (Grade 12, Step 1)	$57.07	1.6	$35.67
				Managerial (Grade 13, Step 5)	$76.91	1.6	$48.07
				Clerical (Grade 6, Step 3)	$30.88	1.6	$19.30
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	39	$198,967
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	11	$215,857
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	15	$298,207
				Total	$45,617	64	$713,031
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$713,031
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	24	$660,426.05
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	52	$2,145,381
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	47	$4,720,481
				Total						$7,526,288
										$8,239,319

---

Sheet 7: Table 1b-Year 2

Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Public Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	32	32	1.6	3.2	$2,051.74
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	39	1,070	54	107	68,517				PM stack test
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	11	279	14	28	17,841
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	15	414	21	41	26,523
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	52	515	26	52	$32,994.56
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	52	7,526	376.3	752.6	$481,720.63
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	52	4,704	235.19	470.4	$301,075.40
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	52	722	36.1	72.2	$46,192.39
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	6	62	3.1	6.2	$3,975.25
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	62	8,074	404	807	$516,782.33
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	62	1,242	62	124	79,505								45735	1.73838358954468	35.7273426075218
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	6	31	2	3	1,988
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								28,373			$1,579,166
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	62	1,491	74.5	149.1	$95,405.97
		New PM CEMS sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								1,886			$104,947
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								30,000			$1,700,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$8,200,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e									32,000		$9,900,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 16.7% are public facilities. 16.7% of 192 facilities are public facilities = 32. 16.7% of 372 units at public facilities = 63; 62% of 63 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 39.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2023, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c Estimates are based on the number of publicly owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 39 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 11 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 15 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 16.7% of those are publicly-owned = 52.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Multiplier	Unloaded	Updated to agency rates
				Technical (Grade 12, Step 1)	$57.07	1.6	$35.67
				Managerial (Grade 13, Step 5)	$76.91	1.6	$48.07
				Clerical (Grade 6, Step 3)	$30.88	1.6	$19.30
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	39	$198,967
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	11	$215,857
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	15	$298,207
				Total	$45,617	64	$713,031
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$713,031
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	24	$660,426.05
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	52	$2,145,381
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	47	$4,720,481
				Total						$7,526,288
										$8,239,319

---

Sheet 8: Table 1b-Year 3

Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Public Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	32	32	1.6	3.2	$2,051.74
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	39	1,070	54	107	68,517				PM stack test
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	11	279	14	28	17,841
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	15	414	21	41	26,523
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	52	515	26	52	$32,994.56
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	52	7,526	376.3	752.6	$481,720.63
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	52	4,704	235.19	470.4	$301,075.40
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	52	722	36.1	72.2	$46,192.39
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	6	62	3.1	6.2	$3,975.25
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	62	8,074	404	807	$516,782.33
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	62	1,242	62	124	79,505								45735	1.73838358954468	35.7273426075218
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	6	31	2	3	1,988
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								28,373			$1,579,166
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	$4,770.30
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	62	1,491	74.5	149.1	$95,405.97
		New PM CEMS sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								1,886			$104,947
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								30,000			$1,700,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$8,200,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e									32,000		$9,900,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 16.7% are public facilities. 16.7% of 192 facilities are public facilities = 32. 16.7% of 372 units at public facilities = 63; 62% of 63 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 39.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2023, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c Estimates are based on the number of publicly owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 39 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 11 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 15 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 16.7% of those are publicly-owned = 52.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Multiplier	Unloaded	Updated to agency rates
				Technical (Grade 12, Step 1)	$57.07	1.6	$35.67
				Managerial (Grade 13, Step 5)	$76.91	1.6	$48.07
				Clerical (Grade 6, Step 3)	$30.88	1.6	$19.30
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	39	$198,967
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	11	$215,857
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	15	$298,207
				Total	$45,617	64	$713,031
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$713,031
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	24	$660,426.05
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	52	$2,145,381
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	47	$4,720,481
				Total						$7,526,288
										$8,239,319

---

Sheet 9: Table 1b-Avg

Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Public Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	32	32	1.6	3.2	2,052
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Annual performance test (PM, Method 5) c	27.8	1	27.8	39	1,070	54	107	68,517				PM stack test
			Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	11	279	14	28	17,841
			Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	15	414	21	41	26,523
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	52	515	26	52	32,995
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	52	7,526	376.3	752.6	481,721
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	52	4,704	235.19	470.4	301,075
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	52	722	36.1	72.2	46,192
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	6	62	3.1	6.2	3,975
			Semiannual compliance report	65	2	130	62	8,074	404	807	516,782
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	62	1,242	62	124	79,505								45735	1.73838358954468	35.7273426075218
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	6	31	2	3	1,988
		New PM CEMS sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								28,000			1,579,166
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	4,770
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	6.2	75	3.7	7.5	4,770
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	62	1,491	74.5	149.1	95,406
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0.0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								1,900			$105,000
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								30,000			$1,700,000		30,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$8,200,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$9,900,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 372 units at 192 existing facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 16.7% are public facilities. 16.7% of 192 facilities are public facilities = 32. 16.7% of 372 units at public facilities = 63; 62% of 63 previously had PM CPMS or conducted PM stack tests = 39.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2024, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c Estimates are based on the number of publicly owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 39 EGUs conducting Method 5 testing, 11 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 15 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 309 EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs and 16.7% of those are publicly-owned = 52.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Multiplier	Unloaded
				Technical (Grade 12, Step 1)	$57.07	1.6	$35.67
				Managerial (Grade 13, Step 5)	$76.91	1.6	$48.07
				Clerical (Grade 6, Step 3)	$30.88	1.6	$19.30
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	PS-11 using M5	$5,167	39	$198,967
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	11	$215,857
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	15	$298,207
				Total	$45,617	64	$713,031
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$7,941	0	$0
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$292,987	0	$0		$4,270,758
					Total Capital Cost:		$713,031
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$0	$14,290	$13,693	$27,983	24	$660,426
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	52	$2,145,381
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	47	$4,720,481
				Total						$7,526,288
										$8,239,319

---

Sheet 10: Table 1c-Year 1

Table 1c: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Breakdown by Affected Sector – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Affected Sector	Number of Responses	Labor Hours			Labor Cost	Capital Cost	O&M Cost	Total Cost
		Reporting	Recordkeeping	Total
Private	1,311	141,570	9,408	150,979	$22,800,000	$3,557,727	$37,553,039	$63,910,766
Public (State/Local/Tribal)	263	28,373	1,886	30,259	$1,700,000	$713,031	$7,526,288	$9,939,319
Total (rounded)	1,574	169,943	11,294	181,237	$24,500,000	$4,270,758	$45,079,327	$73,850,085	115	hrs/response
Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
2011 Final Rule		% by sector	Current		% by sector
Total # facilities:	575		Total # of facilities :	192		372					0.454160789844852	191.655853314528
Total private sector:	479	83.3%	Total private sector	160	83.3%	310
Total public sector:	96	16.7%	Total public sector	32	16.7%	62
				1.9375	Units per facility (footprint)

---

Sheet 11: Table 1c-Year 2

Table 1c: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Breakdown by Affected Sector – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Affected Sector	Number of Responses	Labor Hours			Labor Cost	Capital Cost	O&M Cost	Total Cost
		Reporting	Recordkeeping	Total
Private	1,311	141,570	9,408	150,979	$22,800,000	$3,557,727	$37,553,039	$63,910,766
Public (State/Local/Tribal)	263	28,373	1,886	30,259	$1,700,000	$713,031	$7,526,288	$9,939,319
Total (rounded)	1,574	169,943	11,294	181,237	$24,500,000	$4,270,758	$45,079,327	$73,850,085	115	hrs/response
Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
2011 Final Rule		% by sector	Current		% by sector
Total # facilities:	575		Total # of facilities :	192		372					0.454160789844852	191.655853314528
Total private sector:	479	83.3%	Total private sector	160	83.3%	310
Total public sector:	96	16.7%	Total public sector	32	16.7%	62
				1.9375	Units per facility (footprint)

---

Sheet 12: Table 1c-Year 3

Table 1c: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Breakdown by Affected Sector – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Affected Sector	Number of Responses	Labor Hours			Labor Cost	Capital Cost	O&M Cost	Total Cost
		Reporting	Recordkeeping	Total
Private	1,311	141,570	9,408	150,979	$22,800,000	$3,557,727	$37,553,039	$63,910,766
Public (State/Local/Tribal)	263	28,373	1,886	30,259	$1,700,000	$713,031	$7,526,288	$9,939,319
Total (rounded)	1,574	169,943	11,294	181,237	$24,500,000	$4,270,758	$45,079,327	$73,850,085	115	hrs/response
Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
2011 Final Rule		% by sector	Current		% by sector
Total # facilities:	575		Total # of facilities :	192		372
Total private sector:	479	83.3%	Total private sector	160	83.3%	310
Total public sector:	96	16.7%	Total public sector	32	16.7%	62
				1.9375	Units per facility (footprint)

---

Sheet 13: Table 1c-Avg

Table 1c: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Breakdown by Affected Sector – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Affected Sector	Number of Responses	Labor Hours			Labor Cost	Capital Cost	O&M Cost	Total Cost					Difference from 2137.12 (2024 version)				Difference from 2137.10
		Reporting	Recordkeeping	Total									Labor	Capital and O&M	Total		Labor	Capital and O&M	Total
Private	1,311	142,000	9,400	151,000	$22,800,000	$3,600,000	$37,600,000	$63,900,000					$(26,300,000)	$(3,300,000)	$(29,700,000)		$(1,900,000)	$(43,600,000)	$(46,100,000)
Public (State/Local/Tribal)	263	28,400	1,900	30,000	$1,700,000	$700,000	$7,500,000	$9,900,000					$(2,300,000)	$(700,000)	$(3,100,000)		$(400,000)	$(8,800,000)	$(9,200,000)
Total (rounded)	1,574	170,000	11,300	181,000	$24,500,000	$4,300,000	$45,100,000	$73,800,000	115	hrs/response			$(28,600,000)	$(4,000,000)	$(32,800,000)		$(2,300,000)	$(52,600,000)	$(55,200,000)
Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
2011 Final Rule		% by sector	Current		% by sector
Total # facilities:	575		Total # of facilities :	192		372					0.454160789844852	191.655853314528
Total private sector:	479	83.3%	Total private sector	160	83.3%	310
Total public sector:	96	16.7%	Total public sector	32	16.7%	62
				1.9375	Units per facility (footprint)

---

Sheet 14: Table 2-Year 1

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
	Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
Observe initial performance test c	24	1	24	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Observe repeat performance test d	24	0.2	4.8	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review initial notification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review notification of CEMS demonstration	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review notification of initial performance test	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review quality assurance program certification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	8	1	8	37.2	298	14.88	29.76	$19,048		EGU
Review semiannual compliance report	8	1	8	372	2,976	148.8	297.6	$190,481		EGU
Review notification of compliance status	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0		EGU
Review site-specific performance evaluation test plan	8	1	8	372	2,976	149	298	190,481		EGU
Review request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.5	1	0.5	37.2	19	1	2	1,191		EGU
Travel Expenses e								$0
TOTAL (ROUNDED) f					7,210			$401,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates 372 existing EGUs will be subject to the NESHAP each year.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2024, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c EPA estimates it will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
d EPA assumes 20% of initial performance tests must be repeated due to failure.
e EPA estimates annual travel expenses to be $400 per plant and assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year = (1 person x 0 plants/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 18 plants/year) = $0/year.
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Assumptions and calculation area:
	Agency Labor Rates		Unloaded Labor Rate	Multiplier	Loaded Labor Rate
	GS-12 Step 1	Technical	$35.67	1.6	$57.07
	GS-13 Step 5	Managerial	$48.07	1.6	$76.91
	GS-06 Step 3	Clerical	$19.30	1.6	$30.88
		Travel Expenses
		$400
	Travel Expenses
	Travel Expenses* = (1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year
Travel Expenses* =		$400
	assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year			0

---

Sheet 15: Table 2-Year 2

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
	Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
Observe initial performance test c	24	1	24	0	0	0	0	0
Observe repeat performance test d	24	0.2	4.8	0	0	0	0	0
Review initial notification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of CEMS demonstration	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of initial performance test	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0
Review quality assurance program certification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	8	1	8	37.2	298	14.88	29.76	$19,048
Review semiannual compliance report	8	1	8	372	2,976	148.8	297.6	$190,481
Review notification of compliance status	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review site-specific performance evaluation test plan	8	1	8	372	2,976	149	298	190,481
Review request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.5	1	0.5	37.2	19	1	2	1,191
Travel Expenses e								$0
TOTAL (ROUNDED) f					7,210			$401,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates 372 existing EGUs will be subject to the NESHAP each year.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2024, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c EPA estimates it will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
d EPA assumes 20% of initial performance tests must be repeated due to failure.
e EPA estimates annual travel expenses to be $400 per plant and assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year = (1 person x 0 plants/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 18 plants/year) = $0/year.
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Assumptions and calculation area:
	Agency Labor Rates		Unloaded Labor Rate	Multiplier	Loaded Labor Rate
	GS-12 Step 1	Technical	$35.67	1.6	$57.07
	GS-13 Step 5	Managerial	$48.07	1.6	$76.91
	GS-06 Step 3	Clerical	$19.30	1.6	$30.88
		Travel Expenses
	SALARY TABLE 2011-GS	$400
	Travel Expenses
	Travel Expenses* = (1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year
Travel Expenses* =		$400
	assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year			0

---

Sheet 16: Table 2-Year 3

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
	Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
Observe initial performance test c	24	1	24	0	0	0	0	0
Observe repeat performance test d	24	0.2	4.8	0	0	0	0	0
Review initial notification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of CEMS demonstration	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of initial performance test	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0
Review quality assurance program certification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	8	1	8	37.2	298	14.88	29.76	$19,048
Review semiannual compliance report	8	1	8	372	2,976	148.8	297.6	$190,481
Review notification of compliance status	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review site-specific performance evaluation test plan	8	1	8	372	2,976	149	298	190,481
Review request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.5	1	0.5	37.2	19	1	2	1,191
Travel Expenses e								$0
TOTAL (ROUNDED) f					7,210			$401,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates 372 existing EGUs will be subject to the NESHAP each year.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2024, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c EPA estimates it will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
d EPA assumes 20% of initial performance tests must be repeated due to failure.
e EPA estimates annual travel expenses to be $400 per plant and assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year = (1 person x 0 plants/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 18 plants/year) = $0/year.
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Assumptions and calculation area:
	Agency Labor Rates		Unloaded Labor Rate	Multiplier	Loaded Labor Rate
	GS-12 Step 1	Technical	$35.67	1.6	$57.07
	GS-13 Step 5	Managerial	$48.07	1.6	$76.91
	GS-06 Step 3	Clerical	$19.30	1.6	$30.88
		Travel Expenses
	SALARY TABLE 2011-GS	$400
	Travel Expenses
	Travel Expenses* = (1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year
Travel Expenses* =		$400
	assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year			0

---

Sheet 17: Table 2-Avg

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU)
Burden Item	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
	Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
Observe initial performance test c	24	1	24	0	0	0	0	0
Observe repeat performance test d	24	0.2	4.8	0	0	0	0	0
Review initial notification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of CEMS demonstration	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of initial performance test	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0
Review quality assurance program certification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	8	1	8	37.2	298	14.88	29.76	$19,048
Review semiannual compliance report	8	1	8	372	2,976	148.8	297.6	$190,481
Review notification of compliance status	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review site-specific performance evaluation test plan	8	1	8	372	2,976	149	298	190,481
Review request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.5	1	0.5	37.2	19	1	2	1,191
Travel Expenses e								$0
TOTAL (ROUNDED) f					7,210			$401,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates 372 existing EGUs will be subject to the NESHAP each year.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $57.07 (technical), $76.91 (managerial), and $30.88 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 General Schedule, effective January 2024, which excludes locality rates of pay: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS_h.pdf. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c EPA estimates it will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
d EPA assumes 20% of initial performance tests must be repeated due to failure.
e EPA estimates annual travel expenses to be $400 per plant and assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year = (1 person x 0 plants/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 18 plants/year) = $0/year.
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Assumptions and calculation area:
	Agency Labor Rates		Unloaded Labor Rate	Multiplier	Loaded Labor Rate
	GS-12 Step 1	Technical	$35.67	1.6	$57.07
	GS-13 Step 5	Managerial	$48.07	1.6	$76.91
	GS-06 Step 3	Clerical	$19.30	1.6	$30.88
		Travel Expenses
	SALARY TABLE 2011-GS	$400
	Travel Expenses
	Travel Expenses* = (1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year
Travel Expenses* =		$400
	assumes EPA will visit 0 plants per year			0

---

Sheet 18: Annual Responses-Year 1

Total Annual Responses
	Total Annual Responses
	(A) Information Collection Activity	(B) Number of Respondents	(C) Number of Responses per year	(D) Number of Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports	(E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
	Existing Sources
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	383	1	0	383
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	Semiannual compliance report	372	2	0	744
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	372	1	0	372
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	New PM CEMS Sources
	Initial notification	0	1	0	0
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	0	1	0	0
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Semiannual compliance report	0	2	0	0
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	0	1	0	0
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Total Annual Responses				1,574
				Hrs/Response =	115

---

Sheet 19: Annual Responses-Year 2

Total Annual Responses
	Total Annual Responses
	(A) Information Collection Activity	(B) Number of Respondents	(C) Number of Responses per year	(D) Number of Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports	(E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
	Existing Sources
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	383	1	0	383
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	Semiannual compliance report	372	2	0	744
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	372	1	0	372
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	New PM CEMS Sources
	Initial notification	0	1	0	0
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	0	1	0	0
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Semiannual compliance report	0	2	0	0
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	0	1	0	0
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Total Annual Responses				1,574
				Hrs/Response =	115

---

Sheet 20: Annual Responses-Year 3

Total Annual Responses
	Total Annual Responses
	(A) Information Collection Activity	(B) Number of Respondents	(C) Number of Responses per year	(D) Number of Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports	(E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
	Existing Sources
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	383	1	0	383
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	Semiannual compliance report	372	2	0	744
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	372	1	0	372
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	New PM CEMS Sources
	Initial notification	0	1	0	0
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	0	1	0	0
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Semiannual compliance report	0	2	0	0
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	0	1	0	0
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Total Annual Responses				1,574
				Hrs/Response =	115

---

Sheet 21: Annual Responses-Avg

Total Annual Responses
	Total Annual Responses
	(A) Information Collection Activity	(B) Number of Respondents	(C) Number of Responses per year	(D) Number of Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports	(E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
	Existing Sources
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	383	1	0	383
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	Semiannual compliance report	372	2	0	744
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	372	1	0	372
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	37.2	1	0	37.2
	New PM CEMS Sources
	Initial notification	0	1	0	0
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	0	1	0	0
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Semiannual compliance report	0	2	0	0
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	0	1	0	0
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.0	1	0	0.0
	Total Annual Responses				1,574
				Hrs/Response =	115

---

Sheet 22: %CEMSCPMSvs.testing_2137.13

No. Release Pts	Hg Compliance Method				PM Compliance Method				AG Compliance Method								3 years	PM Compliance Method			This number of existing units will use each compliance method each year	3 year compliance
610	All	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%							All Units	Counts	[Threaded comment] Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924 Comment: Updated % per email from Sarah Benish on 12/11/23 %		Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
372	Hg CMS*	283	76		PM CMS**	372	100		HCl CEMS	4	1		Average % Units Using CEMS				47.12	PM CEMS	141	38%	PM CEMS	141	141	141
									SO2 CEMS	305	82		0.863				2.48	PM CPMS	7	2.0%	PM CPMS	7.4400	7.4400	7.4400
	Stack Test	89	24		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	63	17		Average % Units Testing				74.4	Stack Test	223	60%	Stack Test	223	223	223
													0.137
	Coal: Bituminous Coal, Subbituminous Coal, Waste Coal - anthracite culm, bituminous gob, fine coal, lignite waste, waste coal																	Coal: Bituminous Coal, Subbituminous Coal, Waste Coal - anthracite culm, bituminous gob, fine coal, lignite waste, waste coal			This number of new PM CEMS units each year
522	C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%							C	Counts	%	PM CEMS	0	0	0			Private new PM CEMS		0.000
0.855737704918033	Hg CMS*	264	84		PM CMS**	314	100		HCl CEMS	3	1							PM CMS**	113	36							Public new PM CEMS		0.000
314									SO2 CEMS	286	91											Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	Stack Test	50	16		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	25	8		Average % Units Testing from 2137.10					Stack Test	201	64	Private PM CEMS	118	118	118
													0.363								Public PM CEMS	24	24	24
	Lignite Coal																	Lignite Coal
23	L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%							L	Counts	%
0.044061302681992	Hg CMS*	14	83		PM CMS**	16	100		HCl CEMS	0	0							PM CMS**	4	22	Private PM stack test	192	192	192
16									SO2 CEMS	13	78										Public PM stack test	39	39	39
	Stack Test	3	17		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	4	22							Stack Test	13	78
	IGCC																	IGCC			private Hg CEMS	236	236	236
3	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%							PTC	Counts	%	public Hg CEMS	47	47	47
0.130434782608696	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	49	100		HCl CEMS	0	0							PM CMS**	0	0
49
	Stack Test	49	100		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	49	100							Stack Test	49	100	private HCl/SO2 stack test	53	53	53
																					public HCl/SO2 stack test	11	11	11
	Oil: Oil, Diesel Oil, Residual Oil, Other Oil																	Oil: Oil, Diesel Oil, Residual Oil, Other Oil
56	OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%							OIL	Counts	%
0.091803278688525	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	34	100		HCl CEMS		0							PM CMS**	2	7	private Hg stack test	74	74	74
34										0											public Hg stack test	15	15	15
	Stack Test	34	100		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	34	100							Stack Test	32	93
	Petroleum Coke																	Petroleum Coke			private HCl/SO2 CEMS	257	257	257
6	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%							PTC	Counts	%	public HCl/SO2 CEMS	52	52	52
0.107142857142857	Hg CMS*	20	50		PM CMS**	40	100		HCl CEMS	7	17							PM CMS**	7	17
40								6.64	SO2 CEMS	26	66
	Stack Test	20	50		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	7	17							Stack Test	33	83
	* Hg CEMS or Hg sorbent traps				** PM CEMS or PM CPMS													** PM CEMS or PM CPMS

---

Sheet 23: %CEMSCPMSvs.testing_2137.12

No. Release Pts	Hg Compliance Method				PM Compliance Method				AG Compliance Method								3 years	PM Compliance Method			This number of existing units will use each compliance method each year	3 year compliance
610	All	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%							All Units	Counts	[Threaded comment] Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924 Comment: Updated % per email from Sarah Benish on 12/11/23 %		Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
372	Hg CMS*	283	76		PM CMS**	372	100		HCl CEMS	4	1		Average % Units Using CEMS				47.12	PM CEMS	141	38%	PM CEMS	218	295	372
									SO2 CEMS	305	82		0.863				2.48	PM CPMS	7	2.0%	PM CPMS	4.9600	2.4800	0
	Stack Test	89	24		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	63	17		Average % Units Testing				74.4	Stack Test	223	60%	Stack Test	149	74	0
													0.137
	Coal: Bituminous Coal, Subbituminous Coal, Waste Coal - anthracite culm, bituminous gob, fine coal, lignite waste, waste coal																	Coal: Bituminous Coal, Subbituminous Coal, Waste Coal - anthracite culm, bituminous gob, fine coal, lignite waste, waste coal			This number of new PM CEMS units each year
522	C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%							C	Counts	%	PM CEMS	76.88	76.88	76.88			Private new PM CEMS		64.044
0.855737704918033	Hg CMS*	264	84		PM CMS**	314	100		HCl CEMS	3	1							PM CMS**	113	36							Public new PM CEMS		12.836
314									SO2 CEMS	286	91											Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	Stack Test	50	16		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	25	8		Average % Units Testing from 2137.10					Stack Test	201	64	Private PM CEMS	182	246	310
													0.363								Public PM CEMS	36	49	62
	Lignite Coal																	Lignite Coal
23	L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%							L	Counts	%
0.044061302681992	Hg CMS*	14	83		PM CMS**	16	100		HCl CEMS	0	0							PM CMS**	4	22	Private PM stack test	124	62	0
16									SO2 CEMS	13	78										Public PM stack test	25	12	0
	Stack Test	3	17		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	4	22							Stack Test	13	78
	IGCC																	IGCC			private Hg CEMS	236	236	236
3	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%							PTC	Counts	%	public Hg CEMS	47	47	47
0.130434782608696	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	49	100		HCl CEMS	0	0							PM CMS**	0	0
49
	Stack Test	49	100		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	49	100							Stack Test	49	100	private HCl/SO2 stack test	53	53	53
																					public HCl/SO2 stack test	11	11	11
	Oil: Oil, Diesel Oil, Residual Oil, Other Oil																	Oil: Oil, Diesel Oil, Residual Oil, Other Oil
56	OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%							OIL	Counts	%
0.091803278688525	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	34	100		HCl CEMS		0							PM CMS**	2	7	private Hg stack test	74	74	74
34										0											public Hg stack test	15	15	15
	Stack Test	34	100		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	34	100							Stack Test	32	93
	Petroleum Coke																	Petroleum Coke			private HCl/SO2 CEMS	257	257	257
6	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%							PTC	Counts	%	public HCl/SO2 CEMS	52	52	52
0.107142857142857	Hg CMS*	20	50		PM CMS**	40	100		HCl CEMS	7	17							PM CMS**	7	17
40								6.64	SO2 CEMS	26	66
	Stack Test	20	50		Stack Test	0	0		Stack Test	7	17							Stack Test	33	83
	* Hg CEMS or Hg sorbent traps				** PM CEMS or PM CPMS													** PM CEMS or PM CPMS