Download:
docx |
pdf
Supporting
Family Economic Well-Being through Home Visiting (HomeEc)
The HomeEc team will use this guide to:
Learn
about the home visiting programs participating in the formative
evaluation
Understand
the need each program will focus on for the formative evaluation
Design a
solution to address the need and determine how to implement and
test the solution in iterative learning cycles
Review the
findings from each learning cycle and determine next steps
Note: This is a guide, not a script.
Facilitators will tailor the guide for the program, the phase of
the evaluation, and the mix of staff we expect to attend the
meeting. Facilitators can refer to Table 1 for objectives for each
meeting. Facilitators will tailor questions in Table 2 to the
specific program and add probes to explore the experiences and
perspectives of meeting participants.
The strategic planning meetings are meant to be collaborative
discussions between the HomeEc team and program staff. During
these meetings, program staff will contribute their knowledge and
expertise of their program’s unique circumstances and the
caregivers they work with, and the HomeEc facilitators will
contribute information learned from available research and
evidence. During the discussions, the HomeEc facilitators will
probe, follow-up, and clarify questions and responses as
appropriate. The HomeEc facilitators may use human-centered design
activities during the meetings to provide staff with an interactive
way to answer the questions.
DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR STRATEGIC
PLANNING MEETINGS
A. Introduction and Informed Consent
Thank you for
joining us today. Today’s meeting will focus on [objectives(s)
from Table 1]. The meeting will last about 90 minutes. Your
participation to the meeting is voluntary. Being part of this meeting
is up to you, and it will have no consequences if otherwise. [If
applicable: We will use an online whiteboard called Mural
(https://mural.co/) to facilitate today’s activities and
discussion. Mural allows everyone to participate anonymously. There
are no right or wrong answers to our questions; you only have to
share information you want to share, and you don’t have to
answer any questions you don’t want to answer. Information
you provide during these meetings will not affect your home visiting
grant. There
are no direct benefits and no risks associated with participation in
the study. The information you share will be kept private to the
extent permitted by law, except if you say something that suggests
you are very likely to harm yourself, that you are planning to hurt
another person or child, or that someone is likely to harm you. The
information will be used to help decide the next steps for the
formative evaluation in your program. We might summarize the
information in a public final report on what we learn; however, we
will not use any of your names in our reports. If you want more
information or have questions about the study or your privacy rights,
you can call the project director, Katie Eddins at 202-838-3614.
Do you agree
to participate in this discussion? [Obtain verbal consent from
each person individually]
Do you have
any questions before we get started?
Great, let’s
start with a recap of our last meeting and what has happened since we
last met. [Insert recap here.]
Facilitator
note: Customize this discussion guide ahead of the meeting
based on your current understanding of the program, the objectives
for the meeting, and activities and questions you will use to
facilitate the discussion. Refer to Table 1 for possible objectives
and Table 2 for guiding questions for each meeting.
Table
1. Meeting objectives and outputs, based on status in the formative
evaluation process
Objectives
|
Output
|
Number
of meetings per site
|
Create
a shared understanding of program’s goals and its current
services to support participants’ economic well-being
Clarify
motivations for change
Identify
the specific challenges involved in providing services that
support economic well-being
Explore
root causes and effects of challenges
|
Potential
focal need to address
|
1
|
|
Prioritized
list of practices to address need
|
1
|
Create
a shared understanding of plans to implement the selected
practice, including: 1) the people that will implement the
practice; 2) processes and policies to support the practice; 3)
products, tools or resources needed to support the practice; and
4) principles that will guide proper implementation
Create
a shared understanding of plans to test the practice, including
information collection plans for who will collect the
information, how will it be collected, and how it will be
analyzed and used
|
Implementation
and testing plans
|
1
|
Review
findings from the learning cycle by sharing findings with
relevant staff and discussing the implications for the practice
Created
a shared understanding of next steps for implementing the
practice, such as if program intends to maintain or scale the
practice, adapt it and test it again, or abandon the practice
|
Plan
for next steps for practice
|
Up
to 3
|
Table
2. Guiding questions for meetings
Guiding
question for meetings
|
Meeting
1: Identify potential focal need to address
|
What
do we do well as a program to support economic well-being for
the families we serve? [Or, if program doesn’t currently
address family economic well-being: What are your goals in
supporting economic well-being within your home visiting
program?]
|
What
are the challenges in what we are currently doing to support
family economic well-being? [Or, if program doesn’t
currently address family economic well-being: What family
economic well-being needs should the program address?]
|
What
opportunities are there to improve our services to support
economic well-being?
|
What
economic well-being need(s), challenge(s), or opportunity(ies)
for growth is/are highest priority to address?
|
How
does the need affect the people involved (home visitors, program
staff, families)? Why is it important?
|
What
root causes contribute to the need?
|
What
are the consequences and effects resulting from this need (for
the program and/or participants)? What are the benefits (for
families, home visiting staff, the program) if we can overcome
the need?
|
Of
the root causes and effects that the program could influence,
which are most important to address? Which of them are within
your home visiting program’s control?
|
Meeting
2: Brainstorm and prioritize practices to address focal need
|
Reflecting
on our last discussion about what the program does well,
challenges, and opportunities to improve, how might we address
[focal need identified in previous meeting]?
|
What
practice(s) can we create or adapt to address the need we chose?
|
How
might each practice help families improve their economic
well-being? (For example, meet and sustain basic human needs,
have present and future financial security, gain control over
financial decisions, and/or achieve security and satisfaction in
employment)
|
What
practices are the highest priority? (Probes: Consider likelihood
of success, target priority outcomes for families, practices
staff are most motivated to try, etc.)
|
How
might we structure the practices (for example, the tool and
delivery method) to limit additional burden and stress on home
visitors, other program staff, partner staff, and/or
participants?
|
How
can we use research and evidence (such as home visiting
research, behavioral science, or implementation science) to
inform the design of these practices? (The
HomeEc team will provide information about available research
and evidence relevant to the practice.)
|
Meeting
3: Create implementation and testing plan
|
Who
will implement the practice, how often, and with whom?
|
How
will the program build its knowledge and capacity to implement
the practice well? What tools or resources (such as manuals,
supervision, or coaching) are needed to support implementers?
|
What
is the plan for testing the practice in this learning cycle? (By
learning cycle, we mean the process where staff and/or
caregivers try using the practice and provide feedback on it
over a short period of time.) When will the test start and end?
|
What
data will be collected during the test? How can data collection
be integrated into the design of the practice? How will the data
be collected? Who will collect them?
|
Can
we leverage any existing data collection efforts during the
test? If so, how will we incorporate this data into the test?
|
How
will we review data collected during the test? How often? Who
will be included in the review?
|
How
will we share data collected during the test with other
important audiences? Who are those audiences?
|
Who
will oversee the test and make sure it is executed as planned?
|
Meetings
4-6: Review findings and discuss next steps
|
What
worked well in the implementation of the practice? What was
challenging?
|
Did
staff implement the practice with fidelity to the implementation
plan and training?
|
How
did families receive the practice? Did they understand its
purpose and how to use it?
|
How
well did staff think that training and associated supports
prepared them to implement the practice?
|
Did
staff have enough support to implement the practice? If not,
what other supports would be useful? Were any of the supports
provided during the test unnecessary? (If yes, explain.)
|
How
could we improve the practice’s implementation going
forward? What do staff suggest improving about the practice? How
do families suggest improving it?
|
What
are our next steps with the practice (for example, tweak its
implementation and test it again)?
|
Paperwork
Reduction Act Statement: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB
control number for this collection is 0970-0531 and it expires
XX/XX/XXXX.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Margaret Sanderson |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-10-06 |