Instrument 1: Fidelity Log
Digital Citizenship: Internet safety lessons for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities
Online Fidelity Log
Instructions: Please complete one fidelity log per implementation session within 24-hours of facilitating the lesson. The fidelity log should only include activities completed during that session. For example, if it takes two days to deliver the content in Lesson 1: Chatting and Red Flags, you should complete two separate fidelity logs that each describe the activities and engagement for the specific implementation session.
Facilitator ID [pre-populated]:
School or organization name [pre-populated]:
Date:
Period or block when programming was delivered (if applicable):
Did you have a co-facilitator or classroom aide assist with delivering the lesson?
Yes
No, skip to the activity log (table 1)
If yes, what is the role of the co-facilitator in your classroom?
Table 1. Lesson 1: Chatting and Red Flags activity log
Activity |
Time [in minutes spent on this lesson] |
Completion [select one] |
If completed with changes, describe the changes made and why; whether changes were planned or spontaneous; and how students reacted to any changes. Note: Changes might include changing the names in a scenario, adding new content or activities, using other materials, or changing the way you teach something (e.g., making something into a game or using pairs or small groups instead of a large group for an activity). |
On
a scale of 1 to 5, to what extent did students participate during
this activity? |
On a scale of 1 to 5, to what extent did students understand the content and main messages from this activity? [Select one] |
Response options |
[open response] |
|
[open response] |
1-
Students did not listen or interact at all |
1- Students did not understand any part of the activity 2- 3- Students understood about half of the content 4- 5- Students understood all the content in the activity |
Lesson 1: Chatting and red flags |
|
||||
Pre-teach and comprehension check |
|
|
|
|
|
Consider: Risky online relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
Reflect: Texting scenario |
|
|
|
|
|
Explore: Sheyna's situation |
|
|
|
|
|
Group assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Lesson 2: Rewarding Relationships activity log
Activity |
Time [in minutes spent on this lesson] |
Completion [select one] |
If completed with changes, describe the changes made and why; whether changes were planned or spontaneous; and how students reacted to any changes. Note: Changes might include changing the names in a scenario, adding new content or activities, using other materials, or changing the way you teach something (e.g., making something into a game or using pairs or small groups instead of a large group for an activity). |
On
a scale of 1 to 5, to what extent did students participate during
this activity? |
On a scale of 1 to 5, to what extent did students understand the content and main messages from this activity? [Select one] |
Response options |
[open response] |
|
[open response] |
1-
Students did not listen or interact at all |
1- Students did not understand any part of the activity 2- 3- Students understood about half of the content 4- 5- Students understood all the content in the activity |
Lesson 2: Rewarding relationships |
|
||||
Consider: Texting and talking |
|
|
|
|
|
Explore: Friendships and feelings |
|
|
|
|
|
Analyze: Flag it |
|
|
|
|
|
Group assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, on a scale from 1 to 5 (with 5 being extremely satisfied and 1 being extremely unsatisfied): How satisfied were you with the implementation of today’s lesson(s)? [Select a rating from 1 to 5]
Please use this field to share any notes on how the activities or slides could be adapted and/or improved to make the lesson more engaging and/or accessible for your students? [open ended]
Please use this field to share any notes about the facilitator instructions. For example, how they could be changed to improve instruction clarity. [open ended]
Please use this field to share any additional notes about session overall. For example, elaborating on positive aspects or challenges with student comprehension or engagement. [open ended]
DRAFT
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Mathematica Report Template |
Author | Katie Adamek |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-10-07 |