CURE MDI Mentoring Cohort Survey

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

MDI Mentoring Cohort Evaluation Questions_010121

CURE MDI Mentoring Cohort Survey

OMB: 3133-0188

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

National Credit Union Administration OMB No. 3133-0188


2020-2021 MDI Mentoring Cohort Evaluation Questions


The following questions will be answered with the choices: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree.


No.

Mentees

Mentors

1

The activities of the Cohort [are helping, helped or continue to help] me meet the needs identified in my application.

The activities of the Cohort are [are helping, helped or continue to help] me better assist the mentee credit union in meeting their identified needs.

2

The activities of the Cohort [are helping, helped or continue to help] me meet my project objectives.

The activities of the Cohort [are helping, helped or continue to help] me better assist the mentee credit union in meeting their project narratives.

3

The subject matter experts exposed to through the Cohort [are providing or provided] information and support that is relevant to identified needs or granted-related projects.

The subject matter experts exposed to through the Cohort [are providing or provided] information and support that is relevant to identified needs or granted-related projects of the mentee credit union.

4

Participation in the Cohort [is helping, helped or continue to help] me develop a framework for successfully collaborating or partnering with other organizations.

Same as for Mentees.

5

The following sessions were beneficial to my credit union:

  • December: Orientation

  • January: [Topic TBD]

  • February: [Topic TBD]

  • March: [Topic TBD]

  • April: [Topic TBD]

  • May: [Topic TBD]

  • June: [Topic TBD]

  • July: [Topic TBD]

  • August: [Topic TBD]

  • September: [Topic TBD]

  • October: [Topic TBD]

  • November: [Topic TBD]

  • December: [Topic TBD]

Same as for Mentees. Each bullet should be rated individually

6

The following aspects of the Cohort administration were well managed and coordinated:

  • Overall administration

  • Meeting frequency

  • Meeting length

  • Overall time commitment to the cohort excluding the mentor project

  • Level of engagement of NCUA staff

  • Level of engagement of cohort member

  • Opportunities for input by cohort members

  • Network building among the cohort members

Same as for Mentees. Each bullet should be rated individually

The following questions will be multiple choice, single answer questions.


7

Did the Cohort exceed, meet or fall short of your expectations?

  • Exceeded

  • Met

  • Did not meet


Same as for Mentees.

8

The Cohort meetings were held:

  • Too frequently

  • Just right

  • Not frequent enough


Same as for Mentees.

9

The length of the Cohort meetings was:

  • Too long

  • Just right

  • Too short


Same as for Mentees.

10

The quality of the content provided during the Cohort meetings was:

  • Above average

  • Average

  • Below average

Same as for Mentees.






The following questions will be answered by filling in the blank.


11

What was MOST useful about this Cohort?


Same as for Mentees.

12

What was LEAST useful about this Cohort?


Same as for Mentees.

13

What would you suggest to improve the Cohort?


Same as for Mentees.

14

Please share any other comments about your experience participating in the Cohort.


Same as for Mentees.


DRAFT 2

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorGoode, Ronald J
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2024-09-06

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy