Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures

Land Values Methodology and Quality
Measures
ISSN: 2167-1362
Released August 4, 2023, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).

Survey Methodology for Land Values
Scope and Purpose: Land values are estimated annually in August. Estimates are published for the United States and by
State, except Alaska and Hawaii, and include the value per acre of all farm real estate, cropland, and pasture. Value per
acre estimates are also published for States with a prevalence of both irrigated and non-irrigated cropland. In addition, the
publication contains estimates for the total value of all farm real estate by State, except Alaska and Hawaii, and for the
United States.
The data were collected as part of the June Area Survey (JAS), a multipurpose survey used to estimate crop acreages and
measure incompleteness of the NASS list frame for numerous other surveys. The JAS is conducted in all States except
Alaska and Hawaii.
Survey Timeline: Some presurvey screening is done starting in late March to identify farm operators to be interviewed.
Data collection is conducted from the end of May through mid-June. The reference date for the June Area Survey is
June 1. Regional Field Offices (RFOs) conduct editing and analysis from early June to the end of data collection. Once
editing is complete, the data are summarized. Following summarization, RFOs review the survey results for States within
their regions and submit State level recommendations to NASS headquarters in mid-July. A National review is completed
and National estimates are established. The land values estimates are published annually in early August.
Sampling: The target population for the land values estimates is all farms and ranches with $1,000 or more in agricultural
sales (or potential sales). The JAS utilizes an area sampling frame. The area frame consists of all land in all States, except
Alaska and Hawaii, and thus represents all farms and ranches. The frame in each State is divided into segments of land.
For more intense agricultural regions, segments are about one square mile in size. An optimal sample is selected in each
State with a National sample size of approximately 9,100 segments. The cost of building the frame and preparing
materials for enumeration is significant, so sampled segments are in the survey for five consecutive years. About
20 percent of the segments are rotated out and replaced with new ones each year.
Field enumerators divide the segments into tracts, each tract representing a unique operating arrangement. Some of the
tracts do not qualify under the farm definition and screen out; the remaining agricultural tracts become the sample for land
values. Tracts identified on American Indian Reservations in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah as well as tracts in
public land and non-agricultural land use strata in all States are excluded from the sample.
Data Collection: Each enumerator is responsible for several segments of land. Enumerators must account for all
operations and land contained in their assigned segments. Segment photos and county maps were mailed to respondents at
the start of data collection. Contact with each respondent is attempted by an enumerator and, when possible, a phone or in
person interview is conducted.
Questionnaire content and format are evaluated annually through a specifications process where requests for changes are
evaluated and approved or disapproved. Input may vary from question wording or formatting to a program change
involving the deletion or modification of current questions or addition of new ones. If there are significant changes to
either the content or format proposed, a NASS survey methodologist will pre-test the changes for usability.
All federal data collections require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). NASS must document the
public need for the data, show the design applies sound statistical practice, ensure the data do not already exist elsewhere,

and that the public is not excessively burdened. The questionnaire must display an active OMB number that gives NASS
the authority to conduct the survey, a statement of the purpose of the survey and the use of the data being collected, a
response burden statement that gives an estimate of the time required to complete the form. It must also include a
confidentiality statement that the respondent’s information will only be used for statistical purposes in combination with
other producers and a statement saying that response to the survey is voluntary and not required by law.
Survey Edit: As survey data are collected and captured, data are edited for consistency and reasonableness using
automated systems. Reported data are edited as a batch of data when first captured. The edit logic ensures the coding of
administrative data follows the methodological rules associated with the survey design. Relationships between data items
(i.e., responses to individual questions) on the current survey are verified. Some data items in the current survey are
compared to data items from earlier surveys to ensure certain relationships are logical. The edit will determine the status
of each record to be either “dirty” or “clean” (i.e., failing or passing the edit requirements for consistency and
reasonableness). Records that fail edit requirements must be updated or must be certified by an analyst to be exempt from
the failed edit requirement. Only records that pass edit requirements are eligible for final summary.
Analysis Tools: Edited data are processed through an interactive analysis tool which displays data for all reports by item.
The tool provides scatter plots, tables, charts, and special tabulations that allow the analyst to compare an individual
record to similar records. Atypical responses and unusual data relationships become evident and RFO and Headquarters
(HQ) staff review them to determine if they are correct. The tool allows comparison to an agricultural operation’s
previously reported data to detect large changes in the operation. Data found to be in error are corrected, while accepted
data are retained.
Outliers: Both RFO and HQ statisticians conduct a review of value outliers to ensure the most accurate data and
indications possible. The RFO statisticians review outliers for States within their regions and the HQ statistician examines
outliers across all States. A determination is made as to whether an adjustment to final estimates will be required for each
outlier. Many outliers trace back to unique situations that do not exist in the target population as much as the survey
weight would indicate.
Nonsampling Errors: Nonsampling errors are present in any survey process. These errors include reporting, recording,
and editing errors. Steps are taken to minimize these errors, such as comprehensive interviewer training, validation, and
verification of processing systems, application of detailed computer edits, and evaluation of the data via the analysis tools.
Nonresponse Adjustment: Response to the June Area Survey is voluntary. Some producers refuse to participate in the
survey, others cannot be located during the data collection period, and some submit incomplete reports. These
nonrespondents must be accounted for if accurate estimates of land values are to be made. The weights for data items
from reporting farms and ranches are not adjusted upward to account for the nonrespondents. For the land value
questions, missing item level data are calculated by an imputation algorithm. All other missing item level data are made
usable by manual imputation.
The land values imputation algorithm uses a nearest neighbor approach and requires a minimum of five complete reports
within the nonresponse group to calculate the imputed value. If five complete reports are not available, the groups are
collapsed until five complete reports are identified. The first nonresponse group is reports within the same segment. If five
complete reports are not found, it then moves on to reports within the same county and in similar strata, all reports in that
county, all reports in the same Agricultural Statistics District (ASD) and lastly the entire State.
Estimators: The primary estimators used to set land values estimates are the area frame item-to-item ratios. The
estimators calculate the weighted average value per acre by taking the ratio of total dollars to acres. Two area frame
estimators are utilized in the NASS estimation program. Items that pertain to data entirely within the segment boundaries
are weighted by the sampling weight associated with the segment. Items that pertain to entire farm level data are weighted
by the original segment sampling weight and by the proportion of the farm residing inside the segment boundaries.
Cropland and pasture values are based on land within the segment boundaries; thus, the numerator and denominator are
weighted by only the segment sampling weight. For farm real estate land values, the numerator and denominator are
multiplied by the proportion of the farm residing inside the segment and the original segment sampling weight. Ratio
indications are calculated excluding and including the imputed data.
2

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Estimation: The land values data are summarized from the June Area dataset. Since all RFOs conduct identical surveys,
the State data can be summarized and National survey point estimates, or indications, computed. RFOs are responsible for
performing a detailed review of the survey data for States within their regions. Any irregularities revealed by the analysis
must be investigated and, if necessary, resolved. The summary results provide multiple ratio indications for each data
series being estimated. RFOs interpret the survey indications and submit State recommendations to NASS headquarters,
providing justification in cases where recommendations deviate from survey results.
For the National estimates, NASS assembles a panel of statisticians to serve as the Agricultural Statistics Board (ASB)
which reviews the National results and establishes the National estimates. Since larger sample sizes yield more precise
results, NASS employs the “top-down” approach by determining the National estimates first and reconciling the State
recommendations to the National estimate. Using the acreage for each type of land for each State as a weight, State land
value estimates are weighted to the National estimate. The ASB also enjoys an advantage in being able to examine results
across States and compare the State recommendations. The same estimators used in the State summaries are produced by
the National summary. The ASB follows the same approach the RFOs do in determining the National estimate. The
historical relationship of the survey estimates to the official estimate is evaluated over time to determine accuracy and
bias using tables and graphs. Each ASB member completes an independent interpretation of the survey results which are
shared with the other members and a consensus is reached. Often the State recommendations weighted by acreage do not
equal the National estimate. ASB members must reexamine the State results and revise some States to make the product
of the State estimates agree with the National estimate.

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

3

Quality Metrics for Land Values
Purpose and Definitions: Under the guidance of the Statistical Policy Office of the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) provides data users
with quality metrics for its published data series. The metrics tables below describe the performance data for the survey
contributing to the publication. The accuracy of data products may be evaluated through sampling and nonsampling error.
The measurement of error due to sampling in the current period is evaluated by the coefficient of variation for each estimated
item. Nonsampling error is evaluated by response rates.
Farm Tract is a portion of a sampled segment that represents a unique operating arrangement that meets the
definition of a farm.
Sample Size is the total number of farm tracts found in the sampled segments in the survey excluding tracts on
American Indian Reservations in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah and tracts in public and non-agricultural
land use strata in all States.
Response rates measure the proportion of the farm tracts in the land values sample that responded to the survey.
Coefficient of Variation provides a measure of the size for the standard error relative to the point estimate and is
used to measure the precision of the results of a survey estimator.
Survey Sample Size and Response Rates: To assist in evaluating the performance of the estimates in the Land Values
report, the sample size and response rates are displayed. The sample size changes from year to year as the number of farm
tracts identified within the sampled segments varies.

4

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Sample Size and Response Rate – Region, State, and United States: 2022 and 2023
Region and State

Sample size
2022

Response rate
2023

(number)

2022

(number)

2023

(percent)

(percent)

Northeast .....................
Connecticut ..............
Delaware .................
Maine .......................
Maryland ..................
Massachusetts .........
New Hampshire .......
New Jersey ..............
New York .................
Pennsylvania ...........
Rhode Island ...........
Vermont ...................

1,047
15
50
48
162
25
13
64
247
331
15
77

1,020
15
55
41
152
26
6
63
238
353
10
61

51.7
33.3
28.0
52.1
39.5
72.0
23.1
50.0
69.6
51.7
26.7
42.9

53.2
73.3
7.3
53.7
28.9
46.2
50.0
76.2
64.3
59.5
50.0
50.8

Lake ............................
Michigan ..................
Minnesota ................
Wisconsin ................

2,699
579
1,429
691

2,715
607
1,417
691

56.5
68.9
50.8
58.0

61.8
73.3
56.6
62.2

Corn Belt .....................
Illinois ......................
Indiana .....................
Iowa .........................
Missouri ...................
Ohio .........................

6,642
1,624
941
1,576
1,515
986

6,574
1,673
938
1,560
1,404
999

55.9
65.6
51.9
54.3
41.5
68.5

58.7
53.4
67.6
58.1
48.6
74.3

Northern Plains ............
Kansas ....................
Nebraska .................
North Dakota ...........
South Dakota ...........

5,081
1,548
1,211
1,258
1,064

5,160
1,533
1,233
1,287
1,107

38.4
28.2
43.2
46.5
38.2

44.8
43.0
40.6
47.0
49.6

Appalachian .................
Kentucky ..................
North Carolina .........
Tennessee ...............
Virginia ....................
West Virginia ...........

2,614
666
585
815
325
223

2,801
755
596
876
320
254

57.6
43.7
54.2
66.9
52.3
82.1

59.0
49.8
59.1
63.9
50.0
80.3
--continued

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

5

Sample Size and Response Rate – Region, State, and United States: 2022 and 2023 (continued)
Region and State

Sample size

Response rate

2022

2023

2022

2023

(number)

(number)

(percent)

(percent)

Southeast ....................
Alabama ...................
Florida ......................
Georgia ....................
South Carolina .........

1,272
351
220
518
183

1,261
363
190
530
178

50.2
66.4
39.5
38.8
64.5

54.8
63.1
48.9
56.0
40.4

Delta ............................
Arkansas ..................
Louisiana .................
Mississippi ...............

1,611
756
323
532

1,646
737
341
568

69.0
66.5
75.9
68.4

68.3
66.4
71.6
69.0

Southern Plains ............
Oklahoma ................
Texas .......................

3,962
1,048
2,914

3,906
1,027
2,879

55.5
41.1
60.7

51.9
42.8
55.1

Mountain ......................
Arizona ....................
Colorado ..................
Idaho ........................
Montana ...................
Nevada ....................
New Mexico .............
Utah .........................
Wyoming ..................

2,646
114
623
455
740
14
286
263
151

2,664
122
607
450
751
9
274
293
158

46.6
56.1
42.2
37.1
59.1
57.1
39.9
46.4
36.4

45.5
59.0
40.9
28.2
61.0
11.1
28.1
59.0
34.8

Pacific ..........................
California ..................
Oregon .....................
Washington ..............

1,517
639
424
454

1,578
714
418
446

49.7
63.1
39.4
40.5

49.2
62.2
39.0
37.9

United States ...............

29,091

29,325

52.2

54.1

6

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Land Values Coefficient of Variation – Region, State, and United States: 2022 and 2023
Coefficient of variation
Region and State

Farm real estate
2022

Cropland
2023

(percent)

2022

(percent)

Pasture
2023

(percent)

2022

(percent)

2023

(percent)

(percent)

Northeast ...............
Connecticut ........
Delaware ...........
Maine .................
Maryland ............
Massachusetts ...
New Hampshire .
New Jersey ........
New York ...........
Pennsylvania .....
Rhode Island .....
Vermont .............

3.8
(Z)
(Z)
2.4
2.9
4.7
12.1
2.9
5.3
6.2
(Z)
2.6

6.7
12.2
(Z)
21.0
3.3
0.9
2.5
0.6
6.7
5.6
(Z)
4.5

3.5
(NA)
(Z)
(NA)
1.5
(NA)
(NA)
1.0
7.0
5.5
(NA)
(NA)

3.6
(NA)
(Z)
(NA)
2.1
(NA)
(NA)
0.6
4.8
5.9
(NA)
(NA)

8.7
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(Z)
11.8
12.7
(NA)
(NA)

10.1
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
(NA)
1.0
6.9
5.4
(NA)
(NA)

Lake ......................
Michigan ............
Minnesota ..........
Wisconsin ..........

1.1
3.1
1.4
2.1

1.2
2.5
1.4
2.7

1.2
2.4
1.5
3.1

1.4
3.5
1.7
2.8

4.4
6.2
5.1
4.3

5.6
5.1
6.6
5.9

Corn Belt ...............
Illinois ................
Indiana ...............
Iowa ...................
Missouri .............
Ohio ...................

0.9
1.2
2.7
0.9
0.9
3.4

1.1
1.0
4.3
1.0
2.5
3.2

0.7
1.1
1.7
0.9
1.4
2.8

0.6
1.0
1.5
0.9
1.8
2.1

3.0
3.0
7.2
2.4
3.2
11.0

3.1
5.4
6.9
4.2
4.0
9.2

Northern Plains ......
Kansas ..............
Nebraska ...........
North Dakota .....
South Dakota .....

1.3
1.6
3.6
1.4
2.2

1.3
1.7
2.6
2.2
2.3

1.0
1.3
2.3
1.5
1.9

0.9
2.1
1.9
1.4
1.9

2.0
2.5
5.2
3.5
3.0

2.1
2.4
6.7
2.9
2.4

Appalachian ...........
Kentucky ............
North Carolina ...
Tennessee .........
Virginia ..............
West Virginia .....

1.9
3.0
6.1
2.4
5.2
6.2

1.9
3.3
6.4
2.7
3.5
4.0

1.3
1.4
3.5
1.9
5.2
4.9

1.4
2.1
2.8
2.5
4.6
5.2

3.4
3.6
5.2
4.5
5.4
5.4

2.9
4.4
8.5
3.2
4.1
3.4

See footnote(s) at end of table.

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

--continued

7

Land Values Coefficient of Variation – Region, State, and United States: 2022 and 2023 (continued)
Coefficient of variation
Region and State

Farm real estate
2022

Cropland
2023

(percent)

2022

(percent)

Pasture
2023

(percent)

2022

(percent)

2023

(percent)

(percent)

Southeast ..............
Alabama .............
Florida ................
Georgia ..............
South Carolina ...

3.8
4.2
8.3
7.2
3.5

3.8
5.1
4.5
7.4
2.8

3.6
5.3
3.6
1.2
2.4

4.3
5.6
3.5
1.5
1.5

2.9
5.1
2.7
9.6
1.0

3.8
4.6
3.1
5.5
(Z)

Delta ......................
Arkansas ............
Louisiana ...........
Mississippi .........

1.7
2.6
3.0
3.6

1.3
1.2
2.6
2.8

1.0
1.6
1.9
1.5

0.9
1.1
2.4
1.9

1.8
2.3
4.6
2.0

3.5
0.8
2.4
11.2

Southern Plains ......
Oklahoma ..........
Texas .................

3.0
3.0
3.6

4.0
4.2
4.7

2.3
3.0
2.9

3.2
2.4
4.0

3.6
2.5
4.1

4.7
4.9
5.2

Mountain ................
Arizona ..............
Colorado ............
Idaho ..................
Montana .............
Nevada ..............
New Mexico .......
Utah ...................
Wyoming ............

8.4
7.6
8.1
9.3
30.5
20.2
0.4
39.5
5.1

12.8
0.7
6.7
12.1
30.8
(Z)
1.2
67.8
2.4

4.7
8.2
10.3
4.6
4.6
(NA)
9.7
17.9
2.7

6.2
5.6
5.0
6.0
5.1
(NA)
3.7
8.4
9.9

24.0
(NA)
4.4
35.0
37.7
(NA)
(Z)
19.8
0.1

8.4
(NA)
0.1
7.5
4.8
(NA)
(Z)
88.3
0.1

Pacific ....................
California ............
Oregon ...............
Washington ........

4.6
6.1
8.8
7.8

4.2
5.3
11.0
4.6

2.9
3.1
4.9
5.6

3.4
2.4
7.4
5.6

8.9
6.0
5.3
13.6

6.7
3.8
6.9
1.9

United States .........

1.5

1.8

0.6

0.7

6.7

3.1

(NA) Not available.
(Z) Less than half of the unit shown.

8

Land Values Methodology and Quality Measures (August 2023)
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Access to NASS Reports
For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways:
➢ All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov.
➢ Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free
subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on “National” or “State” in upper right corner above “search”
box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive.
➢ Cornell’s Mann Library has launched a new website housing NASS’s and other agency’s archived reports. The
new website, https://usda.library.cornell.edu. All email subscriptions containing reports will be sent from the new
website, https://usda.library.cornell.edu. To continue receiving the reports via e-mail, you will have to go to the
new website, create a new account and re-subscribe to the reports. If you need instructions to set up an account or
subscribe, they are located at: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/help. You should whitelist notifications@usdaesmis.library.cornell.edu in your email client to avoid the emails going into spam/junk folders.
For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540,
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@usda.gov.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for
employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where
applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's
income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program
or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination
Complaint Form (PDF), found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/filing-program-discrimination-complaint-usda-customer, or
at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the
information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax
(202) 690-7442 or email at program.intake@usda.gov.