Evaluation of the HUD-DOJ Pay
for Success Permanent Supportive Housing Demonstration
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
10/23/2024
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
12/31/2024
133
156
89
184
0
0
In 2016, the U.S. Departments of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department of Justice
(DOJ) entered into an innovative interagency collaboration that
combines DOJ’s mission to promote safer communities by focusing on
the reentry population with HUD’s mission to end chronic
homelessness. This collaboration resulted in the Pay for Success
Permanent Supportive Housing Demonstration, with $8.68M awarded in
June 2016 to seven communities to develop permanent supportive
housing (PSH) for persons cycling between the jail or prison
systems using Pay for Success (PFS) as a funding mechanism. The PFS
Demonstration grant supports activities throughout the PFS
lifecycle. In January 2017, HUD awarded the evaluation contract to
the Urban Institute, to assess whether PFS is a viable model for
scaling supportive housing to improve outcomes for a re-entry
population. The overarching goal of this formative evaluation is to
learn how the PFS model is implemented in diverse settings with
different structures, populations, and community contexts.
Throughout the evaluation, two data collection instruments (Annual
Partnership Survey and Time Use Survey) have been used to collect
information regarding the implementation of the PFS PSH
demonstration directly from staff at demonstration partner agencies
in each of the study sites. The first OMB approval was in October
2018, the second approval was in 2021, and now the third approval
is sought this year. This information collection renewal request
includes: (1) the HUD-DOJ PFS Key Project Partners Annual Web-based
Partnership Survey (referred to as the Partnership Survey), which
is focused on the development and functioning of partnerships and
community-level collaborations that may benefit the target
population, and (2) the HUD-DOJ PFS Key Project Partners Quarterly
Time Use Survey (referred to as the Time Use Survey), which is
being conducted as part of a study of the staff time that is used
to develop each PFS project, through the phases of its PFS life
cycle of feasibility analysis, transaction structuring, and project
implementation. The authority to collect information is in Sections
501 and 502 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970
(Public Law 91-609) (12 U.S.C. §§ 1701z-1; 1701z-2(d) and (g)).
Please see Appendix A for the relevant section of HUD’s statutory
authority.
US Code:
12
USC 1701z-1 Name of Law: Research and Demonstrations
This data collection is part of
the ongoing national evaluation, managed by the Office of Policy
Development and Research (PD&R) at HUD, which is designed to
help HUD and DOJ assess whether PFS is a viable model for scaling
supportive housing to improve outcomes for a re-entry population.
The Urban Institute has used the information collected to document
and assess how the PFS model is implemented in diverse settings
with different structures, populations, and community contexts
across the demonstration sites. The Urban Institute has analyzed
and presented their findings in four reports documenting the sites’
progress implementing the demonstration and used the data collected
to explain each site’s experience in terms of implementing the PFS
model and the time spent. HUD has published the completed reports
to share the initial and interim findings with members of the
public, organizations, and communities that are interested in PFS,
PSH, and helping individuals returning from jails and prisons to
obtain in stable housing and avoid reincarceration.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.