Instrument 1: Center-Based Only

Survey of Staff Recruitment, Training, and Professional Development in Early Head Start

Instrument 1 Survey of Staff Recruitment, Training, and Professional Development in EHS- Center-Based Only

Instrument 1: Center-Based Only

OMB: 0970-0629

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


Survey of Recruitment, Professional Development, and Training in Early Head Start

We are asking you to complete this survey because of your role in your Early Head Start (EHS) program. In this survey we will ask you questions about:

  • Your program’s strategies, successes, and challenges ensuring staff meet or exceed the Head Start Program Performance Standards (HSPPS) qualification and competency requirements.

  • How your program searched for and hired qualified staff.

  • How your program supported staff in their ongoing career development.




The Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This collection of information is voluntary and will be used to inform ACF’s understanding of the strategies EHS grant recipients use and the successes and challenges that they experience when searching for, hiring, and training teachers and home visitors who have the competencies and qualifications to provide high-quality services to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering, and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB number and expiration date for this collection are OMB #: 0970-XXXX, Exp: XX/XX/XXXX. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Diane Schilder; dschilder@urban.org.



Informed Consent

This survey is being conducted by researchers at the Urban Institute, a nonprofit research organization in Washington D.C., as part of a study funded through a contract with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This study is being led by Dr. Diane Schilder at the Urban Institute.

  1. Your participation in the survey is completely voluntary. 

  2. Your decision to participate in this study will not affect any services you may be receiving or your eligibility to receive funding from ACF. 

  3. We will never inform anyone outside of this study’s research team about your choice to participate in the study.

  4. All the answers you give are kept strictly private.

  5. We will combine the answers you provide with information from other EHS programs and report the information in summary form. Publications will not identify respondents or EHS grant recipients by name.

  6. Because all answers are private there are no legal risks to participating. Your answers will be linked to your program’s most recent Program Information Report. Your information and position are listed in the Program Information Report. The Program Information Report can be accessed by the public. Thus, we cannot promise that your participation in this research will be kept private. We believe any such risk is small due to the large, nationwide sample of EHS grant recipients invited to participate in this survey.

  7. Your program will not directly benefit from completing the survey. Potential indirect benefits of participating in this study include making an important contribution to the understanding of how EHS programs recruit, provide professional development and support training of staff.

  8. The survey takes about 30 minutes to complete. 

  9. You may skip any question you do not wish to answer without penalty, and you may end the survey at any time without penalty. 

  10. The information learned from the survey may be archived. These files, as part of the archive, will not include any names or quote anyone personally and the data will be modified to minimize the risk of you or your program being identified from the data. These files will only be available under restricted access.

Please click “Yes” to enter the survey. Remember you can fill out part of the survey now and use the same link to come back later if needed.

Please click “No” if you don’t agree to participate in the survey. You will be exited from the survey.

Do you consent to participating in this survey?

Yes, enter the survey

No, exit the survey



Survey Introduction

Thank you for agreeing to complete the Survey of Staff Recruitment, Professional Development, and Training in Early Head Start!


Just as a reminder…

  • You can take this survey on any device you choose. For the best experience, we recommend that you take this survey on a computer rather than a tablet or phone.

  • You can answer part of the survey now and come back later to edit and complete it.

  • Once you select an option, the box will turn blue. Please check that it is blue before continuing to complete the survey.

  • If you have questions or concerns, you can email StaffSurveyEHS@Urban.org




Program Option

  1. Select all the EHS program options that your program has offered since [insert timeframe].

Center-based

Home-based

Family child care

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE: the respondent only receives version 1 of this survey if they ONLY select “center-based” and/or “family child care" above.



Active search

The next questions ask you to describe your program’s recent active searches for new teachers. Teachers refers to classroom staff, including lead and assistant teachers.

Only consider active searches from [insert timeframe for last program year]

  • Only enter numbers below. Do not include extra characters such as spaces.

  • You will not be able to return to these questions once you click the “next” arrow. Please make sure your answers are complete and correct before you move on.



  1. How many EHS teaching vacancies were there?

________

  1. How many EHS teaching vacancies (part-time or full-time) was your program able to fill?

________

  1. How many EHS teacher vacancies did your program fill from existing staff (including substitutes and temporary staff) and families?

________


  1. How many EHS teacher vacancies did your program fill from outside your program?

________


  1. How many people, on average, applied for an open EHS teaching position?

________

  1. How many people, on average, did your program interview for each open EHS teaching position?

________



Searching for New EHS Teachers

In the next two sections, we ask about how your EHS program recruited and hired new EHS teachers.

  • Recruiting teachers refers to how your program searched for qualified and competent teachers to provide high-quality services.

  • Hiring teachers refers to how your program selected qualified and competent teachers to provide high-quality services.





Recruiting New Teachers

These questions ask about how your EHS program recruited new EHS teachers.

When was the last time your program had to recruit an EHS teacher?

  1. Month

1-12

  1. Year

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Before 2019

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE:

  • If respondent answers before 2019, skip to Hiring New Teachers

  • If respondent answers 0 to “How many EHS teaching vacancies were there?”, [insert timeframe] throughout the survey is replaced with the month and year given above.

  • If respondent answers 1 or greater to “How many EHS teaching vacancies were there?”, [insert timeframe] throughout the survey is replaced with the timeframe of the program year from when the survey is fielded.


Tell us what role the following people played in your program’s EHS teacher recruitment. Consider only recruitment from [insert timeframe].

  • People with these titles may have led and supported recruitment. Select the role each typically has in the process most of the time.

  • The title of the person in your program might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your staff's role. Only use the “Other” option if there isn’t a similar role on the list.

  • If one person has multiple roles in your program, provide the same response for each role. For example, if the EHS director led recruitment and they are also the program director put “led recruitment” for “EHS Director” and “Program Director.”


Led recruitment

Supported recruitment

Not involved in recruitment

I don’t know

Not applicable

  1. EHS Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Assistant Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Site Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Director/Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Staff

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Specialist

m

m

m

m

m

  1. EHS Teachers

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Policy Council Members

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape1



m

m

m

m

m




Recruitment plan

The next questions ask about your program’s recruitment plans. Recruitment plan refers to a written document that outlines the strategies your program plans to use to find qualified applicants for a vacant position.

  1. When recruiting new EHS teachers, how useful was your program’s recruitment plan? Consider only recruitment from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program didn’t have a recruitment plan, mark “We didn’t have a plan.”

We didn’t have a plan

Very useful

Somewhat useful

Not too useful

Not at all useful

I don’t know

m

m

m

m

m

m

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE: if respondent answers, “we didn’t have a plan”, skip next question (“Who was the primary staff person responsible for the recruitment plan from [insert timeframe]?”)



  1. Who was the primary staff person responsible for the recruitment plan from [insert timeframe]?

  • If more than one person updated the plan, please select the person who led the updates.

  • The title of the person in your program might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your staff’s role. Only use the “Other” option if there isn’t a similar role on the list.

EHS Director

m

Program Director

m

Assistant Program Director

m

Site Director

m

Human Resources Director/Manager

m

Human Resources Staff

m

Education Manager

m

Education Specialist

m

EHS Teachers

m

Policy Council Members

m

Other, please specify

Shape2



m




Recruitment approaches

When your program recruited new EHS teachers, how successful were the following approaches? Only consider recruitment efforts from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program didn’t use the approach, mark “We didn’t use this approach.”


We didn’t use this approach

Very Successful

Somewhat Successful

Not too successful

Not at all successful

I don’t know

  1. Increased the recruitment budget

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Asked staff, parents, and/or community members to share the job ad

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad to my organization’s website

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad on ECLKC job center

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad on job search websites that require a fee for employers (e.g., LinkedIn, CareerBuilder)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad on job search websites that are free for employers (e.g., Indeed)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad on social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Posted the job ad in the newspaper(s) (either printed or website)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Encouraged current/former families to apply

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Recruited from existing HS/EHS program

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Worked with external partners to find qualified applicants (e.g., colleges or government agencies)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape3




m

m

m

m

m

m

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE: if respondent answers, “we didn’t use this approach” or “I don’t know” to “Worked with external partners to find qualified applicants (e.g., colleges or government agencies)”, SKIP next question (“You said that your program worked with external partners to find applicants from [insert timeframe]. How useful were the following partnerships for recruiting qualified applicants?”)



Recruitment partners

You said that your program worked with external partners to find applicants from [insert timeframe]. How useful were the following partnerships for recruiting qualified applicants?

  • If your program does not work with a partner, mark “We didn’t work with this kind of partner”


We didn’t work with this kind of partner

Very useful

Somewhat useful

Not too useful

Not at all useful

I don’t know

  1. Colleges and universities (community, four-year, technical schools)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. High school/technical CDA program

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Religious organizations

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Health care providers (e.g., doctors, dentists, mental health)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Community centers and/or libraries

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other child care centers and/or family child care providers

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Parenting and home visiting programs in the community

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. State or territory programs serving infants, toddlers, and pregnant people (e.g., Women, Infants, and Children, early intervention, state or territory home visiting)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Child Care Resource and Referral agency

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Registered apprenticeship program

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. State-sponsored website or workforce registry

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Infant Toddler Specialist Network

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify type of partner

Shape4





m

m

m

m

m

m




Recruitment challenges

How difficult did each of the following make it to recruit qualified applicants for EHS teacher positions? Only consider recruitment efforts from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program did not experience one of the following, mark “We didn’t experience this.” If your program experienced one of the following but it was not a challenge, mark “Not at all difficult.”


We didn’t experience this

Very difficult

Somewhat difficult

Not too difficult

Not at all difficult

I don’t know

  1. Time to get the position approved by a governing body, Policy Council, or Board

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Time it took for person to lead the recruitment effort

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Recruitment budget

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Competition from other employers, including other child care providers

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape5





m

m

m

m

m

m





Hiring New Teachers

Next, we ask you about how your EHS program hired new EHS teachers.

  • As a reminder, hiring teachers refers to how your program selected qualified and competent teachers to provide high-quality services.

  • Hiring activities can start with reviewing applications and end with giving an applicant an offer of employment.




When was the last time your program had to hire an EHS teacher?

  1. Month

1-12

  1. Year

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Before 2019

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE:

  • If respondent answers “Before 2019”, skip to “Building Existing EHS Teachers’ Qualifications and Competencies”.

  • If respondent answers 0 to “How many EHS teaching vacancies (part-time or full-time) was your program able to fill?”, [insert timeframe] throughout the survey is replaced with the month and year given above.

  • If respondent answers 1 or greater to “How many EHS teaching vacancies (part-time or full-time) was your program able to fill?”, [insert timeframe] throughout the survey is replaced with the timeframe of the program year from when the survey is fielded.


Hiring Roles

Tell us what role the following people played in your program’s EHS teachers hiring. Only consider hiring from [insert timeframe].

  • People with these titles may have led and/or supported hiring. Select the role that each typically has in the hiring process most of the time.

  • The title of the person in your program might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your staff's role. Only use the “Other” option if there isn’t a similar role on the list.

  • If one person has multiple roles in your program, provide the same response for each role. For example, if the EHS director led hiring and they are also the program director put “led hiring” for “EHS Director” and “Program Director.”


Led hiring

Supported hiring

Not involved in hiring

I don’t know

Not applicable

  1. EHS Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Assistant Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Site Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Director/Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Staff

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Specialist

m

m

m

m

m

  1. EHS Teachers

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Policy Council Members

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape6





m

m

m

m

m




Assessing Qualifications and Competencies

When your program selected a teacher for a vacant position, how useful were the following activities for assessing the qualifications and competencies of an applicant? Only consider activities from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program did not do an activity, mark “We didn’t use this activity.”


We didn’t use this activity

Very useful

Somewhat useful

Not too useful

Not at all useful

I don’t know

  1. Reviewed resumes or CVs

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Conducted phone screens

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. HR/management conducted interviews

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Existing teachers conducted interviews

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Parents conducted interviews

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Asked applicant to describe how they would respond to a hypothetical situation

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Observed applicant in a classroom interacting with children

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Checked references (e.g., spoke to prior employers)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Reviewed education transcripts

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape7





m

m

m

m

m

m




Incentives and Benefits

When your program offered employment to teaching applicants, how successful were the following factors in convincing teaching applicants to accept offers? Only consider offers of employment from [insert timeframe].

  • Employment offers can include a compensation package (i.e., wages and benefits).

  • If your program did not use the approach, mark “We didn’t use this approach.”


We didn’t use this approach

Very Successful

Somewhat successful

Not too successful

Not at all successful

I don’t know

  1. Signing bonuses

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Competitive compensation

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Relocation assistance

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Paid time off (e.g., sick, family, vacation)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Paid summers off

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Medical insurance

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Dental insurance

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Group life insurance

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Retirement plan

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Tuition reimbursement (e.g., for college courses, CDA)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Housing, housing subsidies, or rent assistance

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Subsidized meals

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Subsidized transportation

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Free or reduced child care

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape8






m

m

m

m

m

m




Compensation Comparison

When your program put together an applicant’s compensation package (i.e., wages and benefits) for a teaching position, how often did your program consider information from the following sources? Only consider hiring efforts from [insert timeframe].


Always

Often

Sometimes

Rarely

Never

I don’t know

  1. Findings from a Wage Comparability Survey or other data on employee compensation in similar organizations

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Assessment of an applicant’s competencies (e.g., from an observation, interview, conversation with a prior employer)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicant’s highest level of education

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicant’s years of experience

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicant’s credential, certification, or license

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Available funds

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Compensation of your program’s existing teachers

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape9





m

m

m

m

m

m





Hiring Challenges

How difficult did the following make it to hire qualified EHS teachers? Only consider hiring efforts from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program didn’t have this experience, mark “We didn’t experience this.”


We didn’t experience this

Very difficult

Somewhat difficult

Not too difficult

Not at all difficult

I don’t know

  1. Number of qualified applicants

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Number of responsibilities that the person (e.g., intermediary between applicant and program) in charge of hiring had

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Time to get applicant approved by the governing body, Policy Council, or Board.

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Time to complete background checks and finger printing

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicant withdrawals

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Response times from past professional references

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Accuracy of applicants’ information

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicants’ ability to meet physical job requirements

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Applicants did not show up to the interviews

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Time to negotiate with applicant

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Shape10 Other, please specify





m

m

m

m

m

m




How often has your program used the following strategies to prevent being short-staffed? Only consider strategies your program used from [insert timeframe].

Short staffed refers to a time when a program may not have had enough EHS teachers.

  • If your program did not use any strategies to prevent being short-staffed, mark “never” for all.


Always

Often

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

I don’t know

Not applicable

  1. Reduced hours of operation

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Paused new enrollment

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Reduced the number of infants, toddlers, pregnant women, and/or families served.

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Increased teacher-child ratios (e.g., switching from 3:9 to 2:8)

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Closed classrooms

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Combined classrooms

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Arranged for long-term substitute teachers

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Engaged managers to temporarily work as teachers

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Engaged other qualified staff to temporarily work as teachers

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Trained and educated parents so they are qualified to be teachers

m

m

m

m

m

m

m



Building Existing EHS Teachers’ Qualifications and Competencies

In this section, we ask about how your program has supported EHS teachers in building their qualifications and competencies.




Assessing Teachers Training and Professional Development Needs

When your program individualized training and professional development for current EHS teachers, who carried out each of the following activities? Only consider training and professional development from [insert timeframe].

  • Multiple people may carry out these activities. Select the role of the person who usually led these activities even if multiple people were involved.

  • The title of the person in your program might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your staff's role. Only use the “Other” option if a similar role isn’t on the list.

  • If your program did not use the activity, mark “We didn’t do this activity.”



Conducted individual and group supervision

dropdown

Co-developed Individual Professional Development Plans (IPDP)

dropdown

Reviewed teachers’ lesson plans

dropdown

Reviewed performance reviews

dropdown

Used reflective dialogues

dropdown

Reviewed child assessment data

dropdown

Gathered input from supervisors or coaches about the needs of the teachers they supervise

dropdown

Asked EHS teachers directly about their training needs

dropdown

Asked EHS teachers for their ideas on how to improve career development

dropdown

Asked parents in the program about their satisfaction

dropdown

Reviewed scores from an observation of teachers in a classroom interacting with children (e.g., QCIT)

dropdown

Other, please specify

Shape11




dropdown

Dropdown:

We didn’t do this activity

m

EHS Director

m

Program Director

m

Assistant Program Director

m

Site Director

m

Human Resources Director/Manager or Staff

m

Education Manager

m

Education Specialist

m

EHS Teachers

m

Policy Council Members

m

Other, please specify

m

I don’t know

m

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE: if respondent answers, “I don’t know” or “We didn’t do this activity” to “Co-developed Individual Professional Development Plans (IPDP)”, skip to “Competency Framework 1”



IPDP Roles and Updates

Tell us what role the following people played in co-developing Individualized Professional Development Plans (IPDP) with EHS teachers? Only consider IPDPs from [insert timeframe].

  • People with these titles may have led and supported co-development of the IPDP. Select the role that they were in most of the time.

  • The title of the person in your program might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your staff's role. Only use the “Other” option if there isn’t a similar role on the list.

  • If one person has multiple roles in your program, provide the same response for each role. For example, if the EHS director led IPDP and they are also the program director put “led IPDP” for “EHS Director” and “Program Director.”


Led IPDP

Supported IPDP

Not involved in IPDP

I don’t know

Not applicable

  1. EHS Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Assistant Program Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Site Director

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Director/Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Human Resources Staff

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Manager

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Education Specialist

m

m

m

m

m

  1. EHS Teachers

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Policy Council Members

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify


Shape12




m

m

m

m

m


  1. How often has your program updated EHS teachers’ Individualized Professional Development Plans (IPDP)? Only consider IPDPs from [insert timeframe].



m

1 time per year

m

2 times per year

m

3 times per year

m

4+ times per year

m

As needed with no regular schedule

m

We never update IPDPs

m

I don’t know



Included in IPDP

Which of the following has your program typically included in EHS teachers’ Individualized Professional Development Plan (IPDP)? Only consider IPDPs from [insert timeframe].


Yes

No

I don’t know

  1. Steps teachers needed to take to meet the HSPPS qualifications

m

m

m

  1. Supports EHS teachers’ need to build competencies in current role

m

m

m

  1. EHS teachers’ career goals

m

m

m

  1. Steps to meet goal(s) defined in IPDP

m

m

m

  1. Resources needed to meet goal(s) defined in IPDP

m

m

m

  1. Time to complete goal(s) defined in IPDP

m

m

m

  1. Date teachers completed their goal(s)

m

m

m

  1. Potential challenges or barriers

m

m

m

  1. Date when teachers will review progress on goal(s)

m

m

m

  1. Place to describe progress toward goal(s)

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape13





m

m

m




Competency Framework 1

In this section, questions will ask about a “competency framework.” A competency framework refers to a document that describes a set of knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors that EHS teachers need to deliver high-quality services.

  1. Has your program used a competency framework from [insert timeframe]?

Yes

No

I don’t know

m

m

m

PROGRAMMER’S NOTE: if respondent answers “no”, skip to “Professional Development”




Competency Framework 2

Select whether your program used a competency framework to do the following. Only consider efforts from [insert timeframe].


Yes

No

I don’t know

  1. Used the competency framework to inform hiring decisions

m

m

m

  1. Used the competency framework to inform compensation packages or raises

m

m

m

  1. Assessed teachers’ competencies by observing them using an assessment tool aligned with the competency framework

m

m

m

  1. Offered professional development/trainings aligned with the competency framework

m

m

m

  1. Encouraged teachers to participate in a credential or degree program aligned with the competency framework

m

m

m

  1. Shape14 Other, please specify





m

m

m




Professional Development

Has your program partnered with the following types of organizations to support teachers with their qualifications and/or competencies from [insert timeframe]? Select all that apply.

  • If your program did not partner with this type of organization, leave the boxes unchecked.


Qualifications

Competencies

I don’t know

  1. Local colleges and universities

q

q

m

  1. High school/technical CDA program

q

q

m

  1. Local organizations offering trainings or professional development

q

q

m

  1. National organizations offering trainings (e.g., Zero To Three, Start Early)

q

q

m

  1. State or territory organizations serving infants, toddlers, and pregnant people offering trainings or professional development

q

q

m

  1. Child Care Resource and Referral agency

q

q

m

  1. Registered apprenticeship programs

q

q

m

  1. Infant Toddler Specialist Network

q

q

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape15





q

q

m




Apprenticeships

  1. Has your program used any of the following funding sources to participate in an apprenticeship program from [timeframe]? Select all that apply.

  • Apprenticeship is a workforce strategy that may support people who want to work in early childhood settings by providing employer involvement (paid time for courses and training), structured on-the-job learning (mentoring, coaching), related instruction, rewards (compensation) for skill gains, and/or a recognized national credential (CDA).

  • If your program did not participate in an apprenticeship program during [insert timeframe], mark “We did not participate in an apprenticeship program.”

We did not participate in an apprenticeship program

EHS grant

Other federal funding

State funding

Other, please specify

I don’t know

m

q

q

q

Shape16



m




Compensation

Has your program made any of the following changes specifically to improve EHS teacher compensation? Only consider any efforts from [insert timeframe].


Yes

No

I don’t know

  1. Reduced the overall number of funded enrollment slots

m

m

m

  1. Consolidated grants

m

m

m

  1. Restructured management or organizations

m

m

m

  1. Changed hours of operation

m

m

m

  1. Converted slots from HS to EHS

m

m

m

  1. Requested a waiver

m

m

m

  1. Decreased teacher-child ratios while maintaining alignment with the HSPPS

m

m

m

  1. Used non-EHS funding

m

m

m

  1. Shape17 Other, please specify





m

m

m


Successes and Challenges

When your program encouraged teachers to improve their qualifications or competencies, how successful was it to offer the following incentives? Only consider efforts from [insert timeframe].

  • If your program did not use an incentive, mark “We didn’t use this incentive.”


We didn’t use this incentive

Very Successful

Somewhat successful

Not too successful

Not at all successful

I don’t know

  1. Bonuses

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Transportation

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Paying to attend trainings outside of regular work hours

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Paying for training, professional development, or tuition (e.g., for college courses, CDA)

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Information about how to apply for and get a loan

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Support for enrolling in local colleges and universities or CDA programs

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Food and/or drinks at on-site trainings

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Offer child care for teachers’ children

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Provide a salary raise after the teacher completes the training

m

m

m

m

m

m

  1. Other, please specify

Shape18





m

m

m

m

m

m



Program and Respondent Characteristics

In this section, we ask you about your program as well as your role in your program and your years of experience.

  1. In the 2022-2023 PIR, your program reported [pipe in from PIR] for cumulative EHS enrollment. Select the cumulative program enrollment size that best describes your program from [insert timeframe]. As a reminder: cumulative enrollment is:

  • ALL EHS children whom your program enrolled and who have attended at least one class or, for programs with home-based options, received at least one home visit.

  • ALL pregnant women whom your program enrolled and received EHS services.

m

Small (less than 300)

m

Medium (301-600)

m

Large (601-1200)

m

Extra large (more than 1200)

m

I don’t know


  1. What is your role within your EHS program?

  • If you have more than one role within your program, please select all that apply.

  • Your title might be different than what is listed below. Select the title that is most similar to your role within your Early Head Start program. Only use the “Other” option if there isn’t a similar role on the list.

q

EHS Director

q

Program Director

q

Assistant Program Director

q

Site Director

q

Human Resources Director/Manager

q

Human Resources Staff

q

Education Manager

q

Education Specialist

q

EHS Teacher

q

Policy Council Member

q

Other

Shape19





  1. How long have you been in this role?

m

Less than 6 months

m

6 months – 1 year

m

1 – 2 years

m

2 – 5 years

m

5 -10 years

m

More than 10 years




End of Survey


We thank you for your time spent completing this survey. Your response has been recorded. Please contact us at StaffSurveyEHS@Urban.org if you have any questions.


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorBetancur, Laura
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2024-07-20

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy