Form Instrument 1 Instrument 1 Instrument 1. Review Panelist Survey

Attachment A: Instruments
Instrument 1. Review Panelist Survey
The Na�onal Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is conduc�ng an evalua�on of ArtsHERE to beter
understand the project ac�vi�es supported through this program and how grantees approached the
work. The evalua�on will result in a summary of lessons learned that will be shared with other arts
funders, organiza�ons, and cultural prac��oners seeking to do similar work. Addi�onally, the evalua�on
will inform the implementa�on of the ArtsHERE program.
The purpose of this voluntary survey is to hear from you about your perspec�ves, understanding, and
experience with the ArtsHERE panel review process. The informa�on and feedback you provide will
generate informa�on and learning that can be used by ArtsHERE funders (Regional Arts Organiza�ons
and the NEA) to assess progress toward the program’s goals and inform the replica�on and scale-up of
effec�ve ArtsHERE prac�ces and components.
These data will be made available to the program Evaluator and will not be shared with the NEA, South
Arts, and RAOs except as described below. Informa�on collected for evalua�on purposes, including
individual informa�on deemed sensi�ve in nature, is considered confiden�al and will remain anonymous
and private to the extent permited by law. When results of the ArtsHERE evalua�on are shared with the
public via reports, presenta�ons, and other materials, these results will only be shared in aggregate form
(percentages, means, summaries) to protect the iden�ty of par�cipants. Any subject-iden�fiable
informa�on (including names, contact informa�on, etc.) will not be released without a par�cipant’s
explicit permission. The Evaluator may ask to iden�fy a par�cipant to atribute direct quotes or case
studies to it in reports, presenta�ons, or other materials, and the par�cipant may choose to remain
anonymous.
Your responses in this survey will not impact your current or future awards from the NEA or its partners.
You will not receive any compensa�on for responding to the survey. You may decline to answer any
ques�on you wish. Under the Paperwork Reduc�on Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a
collec�on of informa�on unless such collec�on displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number. The OMB control number for this survey is OMB No. 3135-XXXX, which expires
XX/XX/XXX.
We realize how limited your �me is; the survey should take an average of 20 minutes to complete.
If you have any ques�ons, please contact Dr. Patricia Moore Shaffer, lead for the evalua�on, at
shafferp@arts.gov.
Instruc�ons: Please complete the following informa�on about your experience as an ArtsHERE panel
reviewer.

Demographics/Panelist Backgrounds
1. Did you par�cipate as a volunteer screener conduc�ng independent review of Part 1 applica�ons
for ArtsHERE (i.e. Statement of Interest)?
☐ Yes
☐ No
1

2. For which Regional Arts Organiza�on did you serve as an ArtsHERE peer panel reviewer? Please
select from the drop-down list.
☐ Arts Midwest
☐ Mid-America Arts Alliance
☐ Mid Atlan�c Arts
☐ New England Founda�on for the Arts
☐ South Arts
☐ Western States Arts Federa�on
3. Have you or an organiza�on you represent been awarded a grant from an ArtsHERE funder
(Regional Arts Organiza�ons and/or the Na�onal Endowment for the Arts) in the past 5 to 10
years?
☐ Yes
☐ No
4. What sector(s) do you most closely associate your background and experience with? Please select
all that are relevant.
☐ Arts and cultural sector
☐ Child development
☐ Child welfare system
☐ Community center or mul�-use nonresiden�al facility where people meet for social, educa�onal,
and/or recrea�onal ac�vi�es.
☐ Educa�on  
☐ Economic/business development
☐ Faith-based organiza�ons
☐ Family services  
☐ Health 
☐ Housing  
☐ Military support
☐ Rehabilita�on, treatment, and recovery services/programs (substance abuse)
☐ Re-entry programs/Jus�ce (juvenile, adult)
☐ Senior services  
☐ Youth services  
☐ Other (please describe): 
a. Please select the category that best describes your affilia�on: Please select all that are
relevant.
☐ Government
☐ Non-profit with 501(c)(3) status
☐ Federally recognized tribe
☐ Non-federally recognized tribe with 501(c)(3)
2

☐ For-profit organiza�on
☐ Self-employed
☐ Other, please specify: (open comment box)
5. Is this your first �me serving on a review panel for a program of any ArtsHERE funders (Regional
Arts Organiza�ons and/or the Na�onal Endowment for the Arts)?
☐ Yes
☐ No

a. If no, please es�mate of the number of ArtsHERE funder review panels you have served on
in the past:
☐ 1-3 other panels
☐ 4 or more
b. [if relevant] To what extent, if any, has your experience on the ArtsHERE review panel
differed from your prior experience(s)?

Perspec�ves on the ArtsHERE Panel Review Process
6. Panelist Orienta�on Process. Please provide your perspec�ves on the panel review process.
Indicate your level of agreement with the following statements.
Statement:

Strongly Agree
agree

Neither Agree Disagree Strongly
nor Disagree 
disagree

The orienta�on clearly communicated
panel expecta�ons.
I was adequately oriented to the goals of
ArtsHERE.
The panelist training handbook provided
helpful informa�on on the review process
and was easy to use.
The GO Smart Grants Management System
training prepared me to effec�vely use the
pla�orm to access the necessary
documenta�on for my reviews.
My ques�ons about ArtsHERE and the
panel process were adequately addressed.
A�er the orienta�on, I felt confident in my
understanding of how to apply criteria to
applica�ons.
A�er the orienta�on I had a clear
understanding of the scoring rubric.
6a. Please provide any addi�onal feedback you have on the orienta�on provided to you.
7. Sa�sfac�on. Please rate your level of sa�sfac�on with the following indicators of your experience
as a panelist.

3

Indicator:

Very
sa�sfied

Sa�sfied

Neutral

Unsa�sfied Very
Unsa�sfied

Pacing and flow of panel review process
Number of applica�ons you were assigned
to review
Robustness and relevance of material
received to review and score applica�ons
Quality of ArtsHERE applications

Stipend amount relevant to time and effort
needed to complete reviews

Quality of reviews by other panelists
RAO facilita�on of the panel discussions
Overall level of reviewer par�cipa�on in
the panel discussions
Extent to which my perspec�ves were
valued
Processes for addressing differences in
opinions among panelists
Level of consensus among panelists
Fairness of final panel ra�ngs
Overall review process
[if respondent indicated neutral to very unsa�sfied in the table above, they will receive the following
prompt(s)]: Please briefly expand on your ra�ng of [statement].
Overall Reflec�ons (narra�ve responses)
8. What worked well with the panel review process?
9. Please provide sugges�ons for improving the panel review process.
Addi�onal Feedback
10. Is there anything else you would like to share about your experience as a panelist for ArtsHERE?

4

0