9001-ORCF Lender Narrative Section 232/223(a)7 Refinance

Comprehensive Listing of Transactional Documents for Mortgagors, Mortgagees and Contractors

9001_orcf

Transactional Documents for Mortgagees and Contractors

OMB: 2502-0605

Document [docx]

Download: docx | pdf

Lender Narrative –

Section 232/223(a)7 Refinance

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Office of Residential

Care Facilities

OMB Approval No. 2502-0605

(exp. 11/30/2022)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 22 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The information is being collected to obtain the supportive documentation that must be submitted to HUD for approval, and is necessary to ensure that viable projects are developed and maintained. The Department will use this information to determine if properties meet HUD requirements with respect to development, operation and/or asset management, as well as ensuring the continued marketability of the properties. Response to this request for information is required in order to receive the benefits to be derived from the National Housing Act Section 232 Healthcare Facility Insurance Program. This agency may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. While no assurance of confidentiality is pledged to respondents, HUD generally discloses this data only in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

Warning: Anyone who knowingly submits a false claim or makes a false statement is subject to criminal and/or civil penalties, including confinement for up to 5 years, fines, and civil and administrative penalties. (18 U.S.C. §§ 287, 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. §3729, 3802).

INSTRUCTIONS:

The narrative is a document critical to the Lean Underwriting process. Each section of the narrative and all questions need to be completed and answered. If the lender’s underwriter disagrees and modifies any third-party report conclusions, provide sufficient detail to justify. The narrative should identify the strengths and weaknesses of the transactions and demonstrate how the weaknesses are mitigated by the underwriting.

Charts: The charts contained in this document have been created with versatility in mind; however, they will not be able to accommodate all situations. For this reason, you are allowed to alter the charts as the situation demands. Be sure to state how you have altered the charts along with your justification. Include all the information the form calls for. Charts that include blue text indicate names that should be modified by the lender as the situation dictates.

Applicability: If a section is not applicable, state so in that section and provide a reason. Do not delete a section heading that is not applicable. The narrative will be checked to make certain all sections are provided. If a major section is not applicable, add “– Not Applicable” to the heading and provide the reason. For instance:

Parent of the Operator – Not Applicable

This section is not applicable because there is no operator.

The rest of the subsections under the inapplicable section can then be deleted. This instruction page may also be deleted.

Format: In addition to submitting the PDF version of the Lender Narrative to HUD, please also submit an electronic Word version.

Instead of pasting large portions of text from third-party reports into the narrative, it is preferred that the lender simply reference the page number and the report. The focus of this document is for lender conclusions, analyses, and summaries.

Italicized text found between these characters <<EXAMPLE>> is instructional in nature, and may be deleted from the lender’s final version. Please use the gray shaded areas (e.g., ) for your responses. Double click on a check box and then change the default value to mark selection (e.g., ).

Executive Summary 6

Risk Factors 8

Program Eligibility 9

Project is Currently HUD- Insured 9

Prepayment Approval 9

Waivers 9

Underwriting Team 9

Lender 9

Identities of Interest 10

Special Underwriting Considerations 10

Occupancy 11

Term Extensions 12

Lender Site Visit 12

Net Operating Income Analysis 13

Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA) 14

Lender Modifications 15

Fire / Building Codes and HUD Standards 15

Accessibility for Persons With a Disability 15

Seismic Evaluation 15

Repairs 16

Critical Repairs 16

Non-Critical Repairs 16

Borrower Proposed Repairs 16

Completion and Inspection of Repairs 16

Replacement Reserves 16

ALTA/ACSM Land Survey 18

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II, Production, Chapter 7. 20

Phase I Site Assessment 20

Radon 22

Lender Comments 22

Other Environmental Concerns 22

Site Work, Ground Disturbance or Digging 24

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Clearance 25

Area of Potential Effects 26

Floodplain 26

(If citing 24 CFR Part 55.12(c)(7) for an exemption from floodplain management regulations, provide a narrative summary confirming that the project qualifies for the regulatory exception. Note that the permanent restrictive covenant or comparable restriction that must be placed on the property’s continued use to preserve the floodplain must run with the land and will not be dependent on the mortgage instrument.) >> 27

Program Eligibility 28

Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable) 28

Organization 28

Experience/Qualifications 29

Credit History 29

Financial Statements 29

Conclusion 31

Organization 31

Recommendation 31

New/Proposed Principal of the Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable) –<< enter Principal Name >> 32

Organization (not applicable to individuals) 32

Experience / Qualifications 33

Credit History 33

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications 33

Financial Statements 34

Conclusion 34

Operator 34

Organization 35

Experience / Qualifications 35

Credit History 35

Financial Statements 36

Net Income Analysis 37

Conclusion 37

Parent of the Operator (if applicable) 38

Organization 38

Experience/Qualifications 38

Credit History 39

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications 39

Other Facilities Owned, Operated or Managed 40

Financial Statements 40

Net Income Analysis 41

Conclusion 41

Operation of the Facility 41

Administrator 41

Subject’s State Surveys 42

Staffing 42

Operating Lease 42

Lease Payment Analysis 43

Responsibilities 44

Upper Payment Limit (UPL) Transaction Summary (if applicable) 44

Master Lease 45

Management Agent 46

Previous HUD Experience 47

Management Agent’s Duties and Responsibilities 48

Experience/Qualifications 48

Credit History 48

Other Facilities Owned, Operated or Managed 49

Past and Current Performance 49

Management Agreement 50

Management Certification 50

Conclusion 51

Compliance 51

Risk Management Program 51

(Note both Tier and Internal/External) 52

Accounts Receivable (AR) Financing 52

Terms and Conditions 53

Collateral Security 54

Permitted Uses and Payment Priorities 54

Financial Analysis 54

Recommendation 56

Insurance 57

Professional Liability Coverage 57

Lawsuits 59

Property Insurance 59

Fidelity Bond/Employee Dishonesty Coverage 59

Commercial General Liability Insurance 59

Property Insurance 60

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance 60

Commercial Auto Liability Coverage 60

Additional Insurances 60

Recommendation 60

Mortgage Loan Determinants 61

Overview 61

Original Principal Balance 61

Amount Based on the Cost to Refinance 61

Existing HUD-Insured Indebtedness 62

Cost Recapture 62

Other Eligible Existing Indebtedness 62

Prepayment Penalties 63

Additional Replacement Reserve Deposit 63

Repairs 64

Legal and Organizational Costs 64

Title and Recording Fees 64

HUD Fees 64

Lender Fees 64

Other Fees 65

Sources & Uses – Copied from HUD-92264a-ORCF 65

Secondary Sources 65

Surviving Debt 65

Type of Financing 65

Circumstances that May Require Additional Information 65

Special Commitment Conditions 65

Conclusion 66

Signatures 67

Executive Summary

Project Name:
Project Address:
City / State / Zip:
County:
Lender Name:

Shape1

Purpose of Loan:

<<Description of purpose of loan (e.g., lower interest rate, fund repairs, correct default, etc.)>  >

Licensed

Operating

Licensed

Operating

Type of facility:

Skilled Nursing (SNF):

beds

units

Assisted Living (AL):

beds

units

Memory Care (AL):

beds

units

Board & Care (B&C):

beds

units

Independent Living (IL):

beds

units

Total:

beds

units

Resident Type:	Elderly	Comments:
	Developmentally Disabled
	Other (describe)

Current insured loan(s):		Proposed 223(a)(7) loan terms
Original Section of the Act:		Date facility built:
FHA number:		FHA number:
Original loan amount:		Proposed loan amount:
Current interest rate:		Proposed interest rate:
Maturity date:		Proposed maturity date:
Original term (in months):		Proposed term (in months):
Principal & interest (monthly):		Principal & interest (monthly):
MIP (monthly):		MIP (monthly):
Total P+I+MIP (monthly):		Total P+I+MIP (monthly):
Debt service coverage:		Debt service coverage:
Principal balance:		Projected annual savings:
As of:		Occupancy rate:
Prepayment penalty:		Add’l. deposit to replacement reserve at closing (if any):
Replacement reserve balance:		Total repl. reserve deposit:
As of:		Proposed total repairs:
		Last REAC score:
		Cost recapture (in months):

Effective Gross Income:
Expenses:		Expense Ratio:
Replacement Reserves:
Net Operating Income:

Borrower:	<<Legal Name>>

Operator:	<<Legal Name>>				Operating Lease

Management Agent:	<<Legal Name>>

License held by:		<<Legal Name>>
Licensed issued by:		<<Legal Name>>
Effective date:			Through:
(If applicable,) An application to transfer the license was filed on:			Date:	Name of Entity:
Resident contracts with:		<<Entity with whom residents contract for services>>
Section 38 of the Regulatory Agreement shall apply to the following individuals and/or entities (list name(s)):

Risk Factors

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the lender requesting an increase in the loan term? If yes, a Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA) is required and the PCNA section of this document must be completed.
Have 10 or more years passed since a PCNA was provided to HUD? If yes, a PCNA is required and the PCNA section of this document must be completed.
Is the subject a skilled nursing facility that does not comply with the CMS requirement for all nursing facilities to be fully sprinklered by August 2013? If yes, a PCNA is required and the PCNA section of this document must be completed.
Are there any exceptions reflected on the pro forma title policy that materially affect HUD’s risk?
Will there be an interest rate premium? (Note: The interest rate premium may only benefit the borrower by covering a prepayment penalty on the current mortgage note or increasing the reserves for replacement. Any other distribution to the borrower’s benefit is not allowed.)
Is the borrower currently delinquent or has the borrower previously been delinquent on its mortgage loan payments?
Is the borrower or the operator (or any of their affiliates, renamed, or reformulated companies) currently in, filed for, or emerged from, bankruptcy within the last five years?
Does the community participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)? (A project located in a FEMA identified special flood hazard area where the community has been suspended from or does not participate in the NFIP is not eligible for mortgage insurance.)
Is the subject located within the 100-year floodplain?
Does the Standard Flood Hazard Determination Form indicate that the subject is located within the 100-year floodplain?
Is Flood Insurance required for this property?
Is the operator, parent company, affiliates or subsidiaries the subject of an ongoing investigation or judicial or administrative action involving and Federal, State, municipal and/or other regulatory authority, which could have a detrimental impact on the operator’s financial condition or may jeopardize the operator’s license and or its provider agreements?
Will there be a change in operations that departs from the historical number of potential resident days?
Is a change in participants proposed (owner, operator, management agent and/or any principals thereof) or has a change in participants occurred without HUD approval? If yes, please complete the appropriate corresponding sections and describe in detail.

If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, please address below.

<<Identify the risk factors. Analyze and clarify how they are mitigated.>>

Other Risk Factors Identified by Underwriter

Additionally, the underwriter has identified the following risk factors:

<<Provide discussion on other risk factors identified by the underwriter and how they are mitigated.>>

Program Eligibility

Project is Currently HUD- Insured

<<Affirmative statement confirming the existing loan is currently HUD-insured and not HUD-Held.>>

Prepayment Approval

<<Make an affirmative statement confirming that HUD has approved prepayment of the existing loan. Provide the date of HUD’s prepayment approval. Evidence of HUD’s approval should be included in the application.>>

Green MIP for Section 223(a)(7) Projects

<<Provide a narrative discussion. Green MIP Rates are eligible for 223(a)(7) applicants pursuing the Green MIP program and meeting program requirements. The program is also available to 223(a)(7) applicants when the existing mortgage has a Green MIP rate earned not more than 15 years prior to the date of application. In either circumstance, include the name of the existing or new green building certification and level that will be provided/pursued, (e.g., LEED, Silver, Gold, etc.). Include the Energy Star Score and provide the current baseline Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/ft²) as analyzed in the Statement of Energy Performance (SEP)Report. Confirm that the proposed energy and water reductions, the green building certification and the required Energy Star Score will be achieved per ORCFs Green MIP Program Guidance. Energy conservation measures must be designed for the entire project.>>

If the existing mortgage is FHA insured with a Green-MIP rate, and its green building certification is more than 15 years old, then the project must certify to the next level of retrofits/repairs.

Green MIP Eligibility

Key Questions Yes No

For Green MIP projects, did the project Architect or the energy design professional determine that the project will not achieve the selected green building certification, energy and water reductions, and Energy Star Score required for the reduction of the Green MIP rate? N/A
For Green MIP projects, are the energy conservation measures limited to the area of repairs, alterations, addition and/or a new construction rather than covering the entire project? N/A
For Green MIP projects, does the energy design professional lack the relevant experience and qualifications as provided in ORCFs Green MIP Program Guidance? N/A

<<If you answered “yes” to any of the questions above, this facility is not eligible under this program. Note: HUD will not consider changes to participate in the Green MIP program after the issuance of a Firm Commitment. >>

Waivers

<<Identify any waivers required for proposed financing. Identify specific provisions to be waived and justification for the waiver.>> 

Underwriting Team

Lender

Name:
Underwriter:
Underwriter Trainee:
Lender #:

<<UNDERWRITER>>

<<Brief description of qualifications>>

<<UNDERWRITER TRAINEE, if Applicable>>

<<Brief description of qualifications>>

<<INSPECTING UNDERWRITER, if Applicable>>

<<Brief description of qualifications.>>

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, 2.5N

Identities of Interest

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Have you, as the lender, identified any identities of interest on your certification?
Does the borrower’s certification indicate any identities of interest?
Are there any identities of interest involving the underwriting lender, the existing lender or note holders, or the mortgage broker?
Does the lender know or have any reason to believe that any of the assertions in the other Consolidated Certifications submitted herewith are inaccurate or incomplete?

<<If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, please briefly address below.

Example: Borrower and Operator: The borrower and operator are related parties – John Doe has ownership in both entities. No other identities of interest are disclosed.>>

Green MIP Program:

<<Project Architect or Professional Engineer (PE) for the Green MIP Program, if Applicable>>

<<Brief description of qualifications demonstrating that the energy design professional meets HUDs program requirements.>>

An energy design professional (Architect or PE) may not serve as both the energy design professional representing the Borrower and also the green building certification verifier/validator representing the standard-keeper of the green building certification.

Special Underwriting Considerations

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is this a Green MIP project (If yes, the Needs Assessor must specify all appliances and heating and air conditioning system as ENERGY STAR® when replaced in the new PCNA?)
Is there any non-FHA-insured debt associated with this project? If yes, and the borrower intends to include it with the project, the Other Eligible Existing Indebtedness section of this document must be completed.
Is a mortgage broker involved in this transaction?
Does the underwriting include income from adult day care? (Note: Non-resident adult day care space may not be located on a separate site. The adult day care space will not be considered commercial space; however, the space may not exceed 20% of the gross floor area of the facility and the income may not exceed 20% of gross income. Provide a Certificate of Need or operating license, if applicable.)
Is there income from other commercial leases?
Is there a ground lease?
Is there accounts receivable financing involved in this transaction? If yes, the Accounts Receivable Financing section of this document must be completed.
Are there any professional liability insurance issues that require special consideration?
Are any tax credits involved in this transaction?
Are any secondary funding sources involved in this transaction?
Is any real estate tax abatement or exemption included in the underwriting assumptions?
Are there any special escrows or reserves proposed for this transaction?
Are there any other issues that require special or atypical underwriting consideration?
Do you, as the underwriter, recommend or request any HUD technical reviews of issues, exhibits, or third-party reports related to this transaction?
Does the project propose repairs in excess of routine maintenance as defined in Notice CPD-16-02? If yes, the Environmental section of this document must be completed. (Note: HUD has a specific definition of routine maintenance, which may differ from other definitions of routine maintenance.)

If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, discuss the topic. If there are any associated risks, describe how they will be mitigated. 

Occupancy

Key Questions

	Beds		Units
How many beds/units is the facility licensed for?
How many beds/units does the facility currently offer/operate? (Please explain any deviations from the license below.)
How many beds/units are currently occupied? As of what date?
		Yes		No
Have any new beds/units been added or removed since the facility originally came into the FHA portfolio?
Will the beds/unit configuration be changing?
Has there been any change in resident type since the facility originally came into the FHA portfolio?
Is this a Certificate of Need (CON) state?
Is state regulatory approval needed for a license transfer?
Please provide the average occupancy rate for the past 3 years:

	Month/Year	Occupancy
Year-to-date
1 year ago
2 years ago
3 years ago

<<Please address any item(s) listed above that need explanation. If bed/unit additions or reductions have taken place, fully explain the terms of the approval obtained from HUD, including any escrow or principal paydown requirements.>>

Term Extensions

<<Complete these questions even if a term extension is not being requested.>>

Key Questions

	Responses
What is the length of the requested term extension?
Has the facility completed any substantial rehabilitation? (List dates and add explanation below.)	Yes No
Was HUD approval obtained for substantial rehabilitation? (If not, please address below.)	Yes No
Year facility built:
What amount, if any, is the borrower depositing to the replacement reserves at closing?
By what amount, if any, is the borrower increasing its annual deposits to the replacement reserves?
Current DSCR:
Prospective DSCR without the term extension:
Prospective DSCR with the term extension:
Annual savings to borrower without a term extension:
Annual savings to borrower with the term extension:
Difference in annual savings?
Does the project rely on Medicaid Waivers or State Plan Options for a significant portion of its resident population, MI/DD residents, or for residents in the assisted living portion of a combined SNF/ALF Facility? (Note: The narrative discussion to a “yes” answer to this question should include a discussion of the State’s progress in implementing the HCBS Settings Rule. The discussion might include references to the Statewide Transition Plan, CMS responses to or approval of the Plan, State Regulatory language, State Medicaid Agency input or a discussion of the facility’s compliance with the HCBS Settings requirements. If it appears that the facility will not, or will not be able, to comply with the Rule, the Lender should provide a Sensitivity Analysis showing the project’s ability to operate without these residents.)	Yes No
Why is the borrower asking for the extension? (Use the space below to explain the benefit to HUD of the extension.)

<<Please address any item(s) listed above that needs explanation.>>

Lender Site Visit

Key Questions

Date of visit:
Name and title of individual(s) with whom lender representative met while on site:
Please provide an overall assessment of the facility. Photographs are optional.

<<Please address any item(s) listed above that needs explanation.>>

Net Operating Income Analysis

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Will a decrease in debt service negatively impact the facility’s income?
Does the proposed loan increase the debt service payment?

If you answer “yes” to the above questions, please identify the specifics of the circumstance and describe how the underwriter justified or mitigated this risk. Note that a more detailed analysis of operating income may be required. If the debt service payments increase, a full three-year and year-to-date historical analysis must be provided (use Section 223f model).

<< A detailed analysis of the income and expenses may not be required. The debt service mortgage criterion can be based on a trailing 12-month operating statement. If the borrower is unable to supply historical income and expenses in the form of trailing 12-months, the most recent full year data is acceptable. Net operating income equals earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (EBITDAR). If either a decrease in reimbursement rate or an increase in net operating income is projected, a more detailed analysis of the net operating income must be provided.>>

Net Income*

In total $

20XX

YTD

(Indicate time frame)

Lender’s Underwritten Net Operating Income

*before depreciation, amortization, and any other non-cash expense

<<Provide an explanation of any Net Losses or declining Net Incomes for the year-to-date and last 3 fiscal years, as applicable.>> 

Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA)

NOTE: This section is applicable for Section 223(a)(7) when repairs are proposed If not applicable, check the box and move to the ALTA/ACSM Land Survey section. N/A

Date of Inspection:
PCNA Firm:
PCNA Needs Assessor:
Units Inspected:	units ( % of units)
Name of Energy Professional:

The scope of the inspection consisted of a visual evaluation of the project site, building exteriors, roof, interior common areas, all mechanical rooms, and a sampling of resident units (as indicated above). The report was prepared in accordance with HUD’s requirements, as provided in applicable guides or handbooks, for a Limited Scope PCNA. For Green MIP 223(a)(7) transactions, a PCNA must be submitted, and must have been prepared in accordance with the Green MIP Program Guidance.

A summary of the PCNA and underwriting conclusions

PCNA Repair Summary
	PCNA	Underwriter
Critical Repairs
Non-Critical Repairs
Green MIP Retrofits:
Borrower Proposed Repairs:
Total Repairs:

Key PCNA Questions

	Yes	No
Will the non-critical, energy conservation retrofits, and/or borrower-proposed repairs be less than 110% of the repair estimate?
Will the escrowed repairs take more than 12 months to complete?
Will replacement reserve funds be used to fund any of the required or proposed repairs?
Do any of the repairs require drawings and/or specifications?
Do any of the repairs require relocation of the tenants?
Will any of the repairs create vacancy issues requiring an operating deficit escrow?
Will any of the repairs require permits or locality approvals?
Will any of the repairs require a review by the State licensing authority?
Were any specialty reports (e.g., seismic, wood destroying organisms, etc.) required?
Has the lender suggested a lower dollar amount or fewer repairs than the Needs Assessor’s repair conclusions and are they justified?
Is further description and detail of the repairs needed in terms of inspectability (location and what the need is)?
Are there any non-compliance issues with regard to the Fair Housing Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, including the applicable accessibility requirements (e.g., the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS), ADA Standards, and Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines)?
Does the proposed underwriting require any increases to the annual replacement reserve deposit over the next 15 years?
Will the facility require repairs to be in compliance with the Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services final rule, entitled “Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire Safety Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities, Automatic Sprinkler Systems?”

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>> 

Lender Modifications

<<Provide a brief summary of modifications made by underwriter. If none, state none. Example: “The PCNA’s analysis of reserve requirements for major movable equipment included replacement of the facility’s bus/van. The underwriter has deleted this item as it is not eligible for reimbursement from the replacement reserve account.” Note: the lender or borrower cannot make any modifications to the energy conservation retrofits associated with the Green MIP reduction program. >> 

Fire / Building Codes and HUD Standards

<<Provide narrative description regarding needs assessor’s finding.>>

Accessibility for Persons With a Disability

Program Guidance: Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA) Statement of Work and Accessibility Matrix for Section 232, located at HUD.gov.

<< Provide a brief summary of modifications made by underwriter. If none, state none. Example: “Per the needs assessor, the facility is in substantial compliance with the Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines. The needs assessor calls for installation of enunciator/strobe light smoke detectors in one unit in each building under Section 504….>>

Seismic Evaluation

<< Provide narrative discussion. Example: “The facility is located within seismic zone 2B, an area of limited potential for earthquake ground shaking. No additional evaluation is required regarding seismic activity.”>>

Repairs

Critical Repairs

<<Provide a brief summary of the required critical repairs. If none, state none.

Example: The needs assessor identified the following non-critical repair items totaling $X:
Remove and replace  . Estimated cost: $ .

Install  in all units. Estimated Cost: $  >>

Non-Critical Repairs

<<Provide a brief summary of the required non-critical repairs. If none, state none.

Example: The needs assessor identified the following non-critical repair items totaling $ :

Remove and replace  . Estimated cost: $ .
Install   in all units. Estimated Cost: $  .

Additional Non-Critical Repairs, for Green MIP Eligibility:

<<Provide a brief summary of the required non-critical repairs for energy conservation retrofits.

Example: The energy design professional identified the following non-critical repair items totaling $ :

Remove and replace  . Estimated cost: $ .
Install   in all units. Estimated Cost: $  .

Borrower Proposed Repairs

<<Provide a brief summary of the borrower proposed repairs. If none, state none. >> 

Remove and replace  . Estimated cost: $ .
Install   in all units. Estimated Cost: $  .

Completion and Inspection of Repairs

The repair list attached to Exhibit C of the Draft Firm Commitment clearly describes the location of the repairs and what is required. The description is sufficiently detailed so that an experienced person can perform the work and that an experienced inspector can inspect with minimal additional direction or consultation. Exhibit C must delineate, separate and apart from any other repairs, those repairs related to eligibility for energy-related reduced Mortgage Insurance Premium. Such energy-related repairs must include all repairs identified by the energy design professional.

Replacement Reserves

Replacement Reserve Summary
			Amount	Per Unit
Initial Deposit			$	$
Annual Deposit	Years:	1-15	$	$

<<Annual deposits should not change from year to year.>>

General Review

The replacement reserve analysis includes a combined analysis of both capital items and major movable equipment. The underwriter has reviewed the replacement reserve schedule and provided a summary analysis below. The full 15-year replacement reserve schedule, including the major movable analysis, is provided as Exhibit B to the Draft Firm Commitment submitted with this narrative.

For Green MIP projects, the replacement reserve schedule must specify all appliances and heating and air conditioning systems as ENERGY STAR® when replaced. For lighting, electrical and mechanical equipment, and building envelope components with no available ENERGY STAR® label, the replacement reserve schedule must specify high performance and/or sustainable replacements. To meet the ongoing obligations with respect to the Green MIP, if the existing replacement reserve schedule does not specify replacement with ENERGY STAR® label items or high performance and/or sustainable items, as applicable, submit a new PCNA with an updated Reserve for Replacement schedule.

In the analysis below, the underwriter spreads the anticipated replacements by year based on the needs assessor’s replacement reserve analysis and assumes an interest rate of % and an inflation rate of %.

Reserve for Replacement Fund Schedule

(Double click inside the Excel Table to add information)

As you can see, the year-end balance for each year through year 15 is positive, indicating that the initial and annual deposits are sufficient based on these assumptions. The HUD program requires the lender to re-analyze the capital needs in year 10.

ALTA/ACSM Land Survey

Date:
Firm:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Are there any differences between the legal description on the survey and legal description included in pro forma title policy, Phase I (if applicable) and Exhibit A of the Firm Commitment?
Are there any revisions or modifications required to the survey prior to closing?
Does the survey indicate any boundary encroachments?
Does the survey evidence any buildings encroaching on utility or other easements or rights-of-way?
Are there any unusual circumstances or items that require special attention or conditions?
Have there been any material changes in the legal description of the property since the date of the last survey accepted by HUD (e.g., due to a partial release, the addition of property or both)?
Have any new easements affecting the property been granted or accepted since the date of the last survey accepted by HUD (other than blanket easements)?
Have any additional improvements (including driveways and parking areas) been constructed on the property since the date of the existing survey? If HUD approval was not obtained, please address below.

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated and the effect on value or the marketability of the project.

Example: Encroachments: The survey indicates an encroachment of the adjoining property fence on the easterly portion of the property…. An encroachment endorsement will be received at closing. There is no impact on the value or marketability of the project. >>

Title

Title Search

Date of Search:
Firm:
File Number:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the title currently vested in an entity or individual other than the proposed borrower?
Does the report indicate that delinquent real estate taxes are owed?
Does the report indicate any outstanding special assessments?
Does the report identify any outstanding debt that is not disclosed on the borrower’s listing of outstanding obligations?
Are there or will there be any Use and Maintenance Agreements associated with this facility?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. >> 

Pro Forma Policy

Date/Time:
Firm:
Policy Number:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the title vested in an entity or individual other than the proposed borrower?
Are there any covenants, encumbrances, liens, restrictions, or other exceptions indicated on Schedule B-1? If so, are any covenants, liens or restrictions related to environmental factors?
Are there any use or affordability restrictions remaining in effect on the property?
Are there any easements or rights-of-way listed that are not indicated on the survey?
Are there any endorsements included aside from the standard HUD requirement?
Are there any subordination agreements, encroachments or similar issues that require HUD’s approval?
Are there any other matters requiring special consideration, agreements, or conditions that require HUD’s attention?
Are there any easements, rights-of-way, encroachments, etc., identified on Schedules B-1 and B-2 that, in the lenders opinion, affect value or the marketability of the project or that involve environmental factors?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion regarding the topic. Example: Additional Endorsements: As described in the Risk Factors section of the narrative, the XXXX does not conform to the past or current zoning requirements. The lender recommends…>> 

Environmental

NOTE: This section is applicable for Section 223(a)(7) transactions if:

The facility has completed a building addition without having obtained HUD’s approval;
The project will acquire or has acquired land that was not insured under the original mortgage loan and the facility has yet to receive HUD’s approval of the additional land; or
The project involves repairs that do not qualify as routine maintenance per HUD Notice CPD-15-02. Note that HUD’s definition of routine maintenance may vary from other definitions of routine maintenance. Note that this qualification may also apply to energy conservation retrofits required for eligibility under the Green MIP program.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Program Eligibility section. N/A

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II, Production, Chapter 7.

It is the lender’s responsibility to review the Phase I and all other environmental review documentation to ensure that all environmental requirements are met.

Assistance Prior to Application Submission: Many Federal agencies require contact directly from HUD. This list includes, but is not limited to, State Coastal Zone Management councils, U.S. Fish and Wildlife service, and local/regional Native American tribes. In this instance, please contact LEANThinking@hud.gov in advance of the application submission.

Phase I Site Assessment

Date of Inspection:
Firm:
Consultant:
Was the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 (or the most current version)?	Yes	No
Was the Phase I consultant provided with an accurate description of all repairs, site work, construction and/or demolition to be completed?
Does the Phase I investigation include all of the following? A reconnaissance of the subject site and the immediate surrounding area, a review of regulatory agency information, a survey of local geological and topographical maps, a review of aerial photographic studies, a survey of water sources, and a review of historical information.

<< Explain any “no” answer above. >>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the Phase I ESA recommend a Phase II assessment, other reports, or additional testing?
Does the Phase I or Phase II assessment indicate that remediation is required or ongoing?
Does the Phase I ESA indicate that a monitoring well or testing well (operating or non-operating) is located on the site?
Does the report indicate evidence of any soil staining or distressed vegetation, unusual odors, pools of liquid, leaking containers or equipment, hazardous materials, or other unidentified substances?
Does the report indicate evidence of any chemical misuse or unlawful dumping at the site?
Does the report indicate the presence or suspected presence of any underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks on the site?
Does the report’s review of all major governmental databases for listings of potentially hazardous sites within the ASTM required search distances from the property identify any potential contamination concerns for the property?
Do the Phase I or II reports recommend any required repairs?
Does the Vapor Encroachment Screen identify a “vapor encroachment condition” (VEC)? (The vapor encroachment screen must be performed using Tier 1 “non-invasive” screening pursuant to ASTM E 2600-10 or most recent edition.)
Is the Phase I site inspection date more than 180 days before the date the firm commitment application was submitted? A Phase I that was conducted more than 180 days before the application’s submission, but not more than one-year before the submission, must be updated pursuant to ASTM E 1527-13 or the most recent edition. (A Phase I ESA that was originally conducted more than one year prior to the application’s submission date, even if updated within 180 days of submission, is not acceptable. ORCF is not able to waive this requirement.)
Does the land area in the Phase I differ from the land area in the survey and Exhibit A to the Firm Commitment?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. >> 

Radon

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II, Production, Chapter 7.8.

Date of Testing:
Firm:
Radon Professional:
Certification/License Information:
EPA Radon Zone:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Was the radon report conducted by a qualified Radon Professional?
Was testing performed no earlier than 1 year prior to application submission?
Were occupants informed of the testing in the manner described in ANSI-AARST MALB-2014 (or more recent edition)?
Is mitigation required due to radon levels at or above 4.0 picocuries per liter (4.0 pCi/L)? (If no, move on).
Is a mitigation plan in compliance with ANSI-AARST RMS-LB 2014, Radon Mitigation Standards for Schools and Large Buildings included in the repairs?
Was an Operations and Maintenance Plan included in the application?

<<Provide narrative discussion of radon risk applicable to the subject project. If a radon report was not required per HUD Handbook 4232.1, Chapter 7.8, please explain why the radon report was not required.>>

Lender Comments

<<Provide a brief summary of comments made by underwriter. If none, state none.>> 

Other Environmental Concerns

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the subject located within a designated coastal barrier resource area? (If no, provide evidence.)
Noise:
Is the subject located within 5 miles of a civil airport or within 15 miles of a military airfield?
Is the project located within 1,000 feet of major highways or busy roads?
Is the project located within 3,000 feet of a railroad?
Is the subject’s marketability impacted by noise?
Are there existing or proposed stationary tanks containing explosive or fire-prone materials on the site or nearby the site that are visible from satellite images or site reconnaissance?
Was a safety letter from the state or local fire department NOT provided for each tank? N/A
Was Handbook Chapter 7.5.G followed as requiredif there is an increase in units or beds (note that a tank safety letter IS NOT sufficient for projects that are increasing in units or beds. See Handbook Chapter 7.5.G.)? N/A
Are there any wetlands on or adjacent to the subject site?
If so, will the project impact or disturb wetland areas or their buffer zones?
Are any repairs or modifications to the project likely to affect any listed or proposed endangered or threatened species or critical habitats?
Is the subject located on a sole source aquifer?
Are there any known landfills within ½-mile of the site?
Is the project subject to an Activity and Use Limitation, Engineering Control, and/or Institutional Control related to an environmental concern? (If so, provide the information to the Phase I environmental consultant.)
Does the project utilize a private water supply? (If so provide evidence that the water quality meets local, state or Federal standards; for example, evidence that the water meets the EPA Primary Drinking Water Standards.)
Does the project involve a private sewage treatment system?
Are any on-site structures located within the easement of an overhead high voltage transmission line?
Are any buildings located in the fall zone of a support structure for high voltage transmission lines or any other towers?
Is any structure located within 10 feet of an easement for a high-pressure gas or liquid petroleum transportation pipeline?
Is a residential structure located within 300 feet of an operating or abandoned oil or gas well? (If so, refer to Handbook 4232.1, Section II, Production, 7.5.K.3.)
Do any of the repairs change the footprint of the building(s)?
Does the project site include a structure that was built before 1978? (If no, move on)
Was a comprehensive asbestos survey performed by a qualified asbestos inspector pursuant to the “baseline survey” requirements of ASTM E 2356-10 (or most recent edition) NOT provided? (Required for all buildings constructed before 1978. If provided, check “No.”)
Did the asbestos survey identify any friable and/or damaged asbestos?
Does the project involve asbestos removal? (Asbestos removal may involve additional risk, and may have a direct impact on residents and workers and ongoing facility operations. An operating deficit, for example, may need to be required if removal is to occur after endorsement.)
Does the proposal include demolition of a structure that was built before 1978? (If no, move on)
Was a comprehensive asbestos survey performed by a qualified inspector pursuant to the “pre-construction survey” requirements of ASTM E 2356-10 (or most recent edition) NOT provided?
Other than the aforementioned, are there any other environmental issues identified by the Phase I or II reports or lender’s due diligence?
Was a floodplain map with the subject site clearly marked on it NOT provided?
Was a preliminary or pending flood map of the project’s location available on the FEMA website? If so, provide a copy of this map with the subject site marked on it.
Was a wetland map with the subject site clearly marked on it NOT provided?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic. Describe any risk and how it will be mitigated. For example: “A preliminary flood map is available on the FEMA website (Preliminary Flood Map #XXXXXXXXX) which identifies the project’s flood zone as Zone X (shaded), a 500-year flood zone. Documentation for the completion of an abbreviated 8-step decision making process is provided at Exhibit X. The project has prepared and participates in an early warning system. An emergency evacuation and relocation plan has been implemented. Evacuation routes out of the 500-year floodplain have been identified; and the estimated flood level has been marked at 3 feet above ground level at the southerly and northerly elevations of the building. An example of the floodplain notice that will be signed by the resident or their agents is provided.”>> 

Site Work, Ground Disturbance or Digging

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, 7.5.

If the project includes any ground disturbance, contact LeanThinking@hud.gov in advance of application submission so that ORCF may initiate agency to agency contact. Include a project description including type of project, purpose of the project, the proposed activities/site work, and the current condition of the site (what is on the site now) as well as a location map, aerial view map, site layout map and a topographic map in your request to Lean Thinking.

Examples of ground disturbance include, but are not limited to, tree removal, burying a tank, new parking, increases in building footprint, adding a new fence, etc. If there is uncertainty regarding what may constitute ground disturbance, contact LeanThinking@hud.gov in advance of application submission.

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Will there be any site work, construction, ground disturbance or digging? (If no, move on)
Was a request for Tribal Consultation submitted to LeanThinking@hud.gov in advance of application submittal?
Was a site plan provided showing where site work, ground disturbance and/or digging will occur?
Was documentation provided showing that a Section 7 Endangered Species review was completed?
Was evidence that the project is in compliance with the State’s Coastal Zone Management Program provided if located in a designated coastal zone?
Did the correspondence with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) accurately reflect the proposed site work, ground disturbance or digging as well as any planned repairs and/or construction?
Are there any wetlands on or adjacent to the site that could be potentially impacted by the construction or site work either directly or indirectly via drainage, etc.?
If yes, was HUD contacted in advance to conduct an 8 step?
Is the project site located in a flood plain?
If the footprint of the building or pavement will be significantly increased, was HUD contacted in advance to conduct the 8-step decision making process (24 CFR Part 55.20)?

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Clearance

Program Guidance: Routine maintenance definition.

For SHPO review purposes, HUD has a specific definition of routine maintenance, which may differ from other definitions of routine maintenance. See Notice CPD-16-02 for HUD’s definition.

Note, if the answer to Key Questions 4 or 5 is yes, then the SHPO must be contacted. The lender may submit a Section 106 request to SHPO in order to expedite the process.

<<Provide narrative description indicating whether or not SHPO has been contacted, information sent to SHPO, and any response received. For example: “Since we are not making changes to the exterior of the building, and internal repairs are limited to routine maintenance as defined in Notice CPD-16-02 there is no impact on any historical property.”>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Was the SHPO contacted?
Was the SHPO website for the project’s state reviewed for any specific information required by that SHPO and was this information provided?
Was all correspondence with the SHPO provided in the application?
Are there any known historic preservation issues related to the subject?
Does the project involve repairs in excess of routine maintenance (as defined in Notice CPD-16-02), construction, or ground disturbance?
Have any other archeological or cultural resource centers been consulted?

<<As applicable, for each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic. For example: “We have received a letter from the XXXX State Historic Preservation Office, dated XXXX. It was determined that the site is of no historical or suspected cultural significance. No additional investigation was recommended by the State.” Please indicate if a response has not been received. If the SHPO concluded that the project will have an adverse effect, please explain how this will be mitigated.>>

Area of Potential Effects

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, Chapter 7.

In situations where the SHPO was contacted, provide a description of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) that was included in the correspondence that was sent to the SHPO.

<<Provide a narrative discussion on the Area of Potential Effects. For example: “The subject is located in the X Historic District, so we have determined that the APE is the entire Historic District.” Or, “The subject is not located near any properties that are on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, so the APE is only the subject site., etc. >> 

Floodplain

NFIP Map Panel #:		Date:
Flood Zone(s):

<< When in Zone X, indicate whether it is designated as X “(shaded)” or “(unshaded)”. When the site is located in multiple flood zones, identify each zone designation. For example: “X (unshaded), X (shaded), AE”.>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the community participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)? (A project located in a FEMA-identified special flood hazard area, where the community has been suspended for or does not participate in the NFIP, is not eligible for mortgage insurance.)
Is flood insurance required for this property?
Is the subject site located within a100- year floodplain (1% annual chance flood) or 500-year floodplain (0.2% chance of annual flood)? (If no, move on). (Use the effective FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) or, when FEMA provides interim flood hazard data such as Advisory Base Flood Elevations, preliminary or pending maps, use the latest of these sources except when the base flood elevations from interim data are lower than the elevations on the current FIRM.)
If located in a 100-year or 500-year floodplain*, is the 8-step documentation provided in the application materials? N/A
Preparation of and participation in an early flood warning system: Was the specific method(s) used to monitor weather conditions and flooding alerts provided?
Emergency evacuation and relocation plan: Was a relocation plan that includes names and addresses of like facilities that have agreements or contracts with the subject to serve as a temporary relocation site for the subject’s residents provided?
Identification of evacuation route(s) out of the 500-year floodplain: Were road maps and flood zone designations for the relocation sites provided?
Identification marks of past or estimated flood levels: Was evidence that identification marks showing past or estimated flood levels have been placed on the structure provided?
Resident Notification: Was an example resident notice to residents provided and does the notice advise residents of the portions of the site that are in the floodplain and that flood insurance is available for their personal property?

<< *Provide a narrative discussion evaluating the floodplain exhibits. Include the elevation of the property, the elevation of the floodplain, and the location of the life support systems.

(If citing 24 CFR Part 55.12(c)(7) for an exemption from floodplain management regulations, provide a narrative summary confirming that the project qualifies for the regulatory exception. Note that the permanent restrictive covenant or comparable restriction that must be placed on the property’s continued use to preserve the floodplain must run with the land and will not be dependent on the mortgage instrument.) >>

Program Eligibility

Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable)

Name:
State of Organization:
Date Formed:
Termination Date:
FYE Date:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the borrower/purchaser currently own any assets other than the subject property or participate in any other businesses?
Is or has the borrower/purchaser been delinquent on any federal debt?
Has the borrower/purchaser ever filed for bankruptcy or made compromised settlements with creditors?
Are there judgments recorded against the borrower/purchaser?
Are there any unsatisfied tax liens?
Is the single asset borrower/purchaser entity registered outside the United States and/or in a state other than where their corporate office is located?
Have any principals of the borrower changed or are any such changes proposed that have not been approved by HUD? If yes, the Principal of the Borrower section of this document must be completed.

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion regarding the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Organization

<<Provide an organization chart and narrative. At a minimum, all borrower principals must be identified.>>

New Borrower (Purchaser)

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when there has been a change, or a change is proposed, in the borrower entity.
	Yes	No
Has there or will there be a change in the ownership of the property via a deed transfer?
Has there or will there be a substitution of an existing borrower entity with a new borrower entity?
If the answer to either question above is yes, complete this section. If the answer to both questions is no, check the box and move to the Additional Proposed Changes to Existing Borrower section. N/A

Experience/Qualifications

<<Provide narrative description of the proposed borrower experience and qualifications. For example: “The proposed borrower entity is a single-asset entity that was established in {date} to own the subject project…”>>

Credit History

Report Date:	<<within 60 days of submission>>
Reporting Firm:
Score:

<<Provide an explanation of the credit score in terms of risk level (i.e., low, medium, or high). Also, if the score is evaluated numerically, explain what value the credit agency places on the score.>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the credit report identify any material derogatory information not previously discussed?
Does the underwriter have any concerns related to their review of the credit report?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Financial Statements

The application includes the following borrower financial statements:

Year-to-date:	<<dates for start and end of period>>
Fiscal year ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal year ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal year ending:	<<date – end of period>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Are less than 3-years of historical financial data available for the proposed borrower?
Are the financial statements missing any required information or schedules?
Do the financial statements provided include financial data from assets or liabilities not related to owning and operating this facility?
Do any of the financial statements indicate a loss prior to depreciation and amortization?
Do the Aging of Accounts Payable schedules show any material accounts payables (amounts in excess of 5% of effective gross income) over 90 days?
Do the Aging of Accounts Receivable schedules show any material accounts receivables (amounts in excess of 2% of gross income) over 120 days?
Are there any issues or discrepancies related to tenant deposit accounts (e.g., not fully funded)? (Generally not applicable for SNF.) N/A
Did your review and analysis of the financial statements indicate any other material concerns or weaknesses that need to be addressed?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: Tenant Security Deposits: The tenant security deposits do not appear to be fully funded. At closing, however, the borrower will not be the operator and the tenant deposit obligation will fall to the new operator. Therefore, the underwriter has included a commitment condition requiring the new operator to set up project accounts by closing and to provide an acceptable, certified Balance Sheet showing that the tenant security deposits are fully funded.

Owner-operated projects with material accounts receivables over 120 days that do not intend to have Accounts Receivable Financing should address the project State’s recent trends in length of time until reimbursement is made. The Lender should address these projects’ ability to handle delayed payments (e.g., access to sources of liquidity in an amount comparable to material accounts receivable over 120 days.) >>

General Overview

<<Provide Narrative and analysis of financial statements as appropriate. In addition to the Key Questions above, working capital should be discussed along with the general financial stability and position of the entity. >>

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion of underwriter’s conclusion and recommendation. For example: “The borrower entity has demonstrated an acceptable financial and credit history. The borrower has the experience to continue to successfully own this facility. The underwriter recommends this borrower for approval as an acceptable participant in this transaction.”>>

Additional Proposed Changes to Existing Borrower

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when there has been a change, or a change is proposed, in the borrower entity that does not involve a deed transfer or conveyance. Such changes include, but are not limited to, a change in an Internal Revenue Services Reporting Structure (i.e., when a Borrower converts from a limited partnership to a limited liability company). NOTE: this section does not apply to changes in principals – this section focuses on changes at the ownership entity level.
	Yes	No
Is there a change or proposed change in the borrower entity that does not involve a deed transfer or conveyance?
If the answer to either question above is yes, complete this section. If the answer to both questions is no, check the box and move to the Additional Proposed Changes to Existing Borrower section. N/A

Organization

<<Organization Chart and Narrative, as applicable.>>

Recommendation

<<Provide narrative recommendation regarding acceptability of the proposed change, as applicable. Discuss what is required for the change, including changes to the organizational documents, and what special conditions are appropriate. >>

New/Proposed Principal of the Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable) –<< enter Principal Name >>

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when there has been a change, or a change is proposed, in the principal ownership of the borrower entity. The section must be provided for each new or existing principal that has not been previously approved by HUD.
	Yes	No
Has there or will there be a change in a principal of the borrower entity?
If the answer to the above question is no, check the box and move to the Operator section. N/A

<<Provide this section for each principal of the borrower>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is any principal of the new borrower with operational decision-making authority not a United States citizen?
Is or has the principal of the borrower been delinquent on any federal debt?
Is or has the principal of the borrower been a defendant in any suit or legal action?
Has the principal of the borrower ever filed for bankruptcy or made compromised settlements with creditors?
Are there judgments or criminal convictions for fraud or larceny recorded against the principal of the borrower?
Are there any unsatisfied tax liens against the principal of the borrower?
Are any of the principals of the borrower, principals of any other HUD-insured projects or principals of a project(s) applying for HUD insurance within the next 18 months?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. >> 

Organization (not applicable to individuals)

<<If the principal is an entity, provide the following:>>

State of Organization:
Date Formed:
Termination Date:

<<Provide Organization Chart and Narrative, as applicable.>> 

Experience / Qualifications

<<Narrative description of principal’s experience and qualifications: Discussion should highlight direct experience and involvement in other HUD transactions. This section should clearly demonstrate that the principal has sufficient expertise from which to draw to successfully own the facility.>>

Credit History

Report Date:	<<within 60 days of submission>>
Firm:
Score:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the credit report identify any material derogatory information not previously discussed?
Does the underwriter have any concerns related to the credit report?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the Principal identify any other business concerns?
Do any of the other business concerns have pending judgments; legal actions or suits; or, bankruptcy claims? N/A
Do the credit reports on the 10% sampling of the other business concerns indicate any material derogatory information? N/A
Does the Principal identify any other Section 232 program (i.e., 223(f), 241(a), 223(a)(7), 232(i), or 223(d)) loans on the Consolidated Certification – Principal of Borrower (Form HUD-90014-ORCF) and Attachment 2 thereof?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.

Example: Other Section 232 Applications: XXXXX identified XX other Section 232 loan application – {projects}. The applications were submitted XXX and closed in XXX. As this is only XXXXX’s Xth HUD-insured healthcare loan, no additional reviews are required>>

Credit Reports for Other Business Concerns:

<<Provide narrative discussion on other business concerns. For example, “XXX identified XX other business concerns. The underwriter reviewed Dunn and Bradstreet credit reports for XX other business concerns identified by XXXX. {Discuss each report}. No reports indicated derogatory information that would prohibit XXXXX from participation in this loan transaction.>>

Name of Entity	Report Type (Commercial, etc.)	Report Date	Comments (i.e., any derogatory information, etc.)

Financial Statements

<<If borrower has sufficient financial strength, no review of a principal’s financials is required. If a review of the principal’s financials is required to support approval of the loan, provide an analysis similar to the one provided for a borrower.>>

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion of underwriter’s conclusion and recommendation. For example, “XXXXX has demonstrated an acceptable credit history and sufficient experience owning and operating this and other facilities. The underwriter recommends this principal as an acceptable participant in this transaction.”>>

Operator

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when a change in operator has occurred or is proposed. The information must be provided if the operator has not been previously approved by HUD for the subject property.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Parent of the Operator section. N/A

Name:
State of Organization:
Date Formed:
Termination Date:
FYE Date:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the operator currently own/operate any assets other than the property or participate in any other businesses?
Does the operator have shared expenses with other facilities?
Does the operator contract out nursing services other than temporary staffing through an agency and/or contracting for ancillary services (e.g., therapies, pharmaceuticals)?
Is or has the operator been delinquent on any federal debt?
Is or has the operator been a defendant in any suit or legal action?
Has the operator ever filed for bankruptcy or made compromised settlements with creditors?
Are there judgments recorded against the operator?
Are there any unsatisfied tax liens?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. >> 

Organization

<<Organization Chart and Narrative, as applicable.>>

Experience / Qualifications

<<Narrative description of Operator’s and principal’s experience and qualifications: Discussion should highlight direct experience and involvement in other HUD transactions. This section should clearly demonstrate that the operator and its principals have the expertise to successfully operate the facility.>>

Credit History

Report Date:	<<within 60 days of submission>>
Firm:
Score:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the credit report identify any material derogatory information not previously discussed?
Does the underwriter have any concerns related to the credit report?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Financial Statements

The application includes the following operator financial statements:

Year to date:	<<dates for start and end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Are less than 3-years of historical financial data available for the operator?
Are the financial statements missing any required information or schedules?
Do the financial statements indicate a loss prior to depreciation?
Do the Aging of Accounts Payable schedules show any material accounts payables (amounts in excess of 5% of effective gross income) over 90 days?
Do the Aging of Accounts Receivable schedules show any material accounts receivables (amounts in excess of 2% of gross income) over 120 days? (Note: Projects with material accounts receivables over 120 days that do not intend to have Accounts Receivable Financing should address the project State’s recent trends in length of time until reimbursement is made. The Lender should address these projects’ ability to handle delayed payments, e.g. access to sources of liquidity in an amount comparable to material accounts receivable over 120 days.)
Are there any issues or discrepancies related to tenant deposit accounts (e.g., not fully funded)?
Did your review and analysis of the financial statements indicate any other material concerns or weaknesses that need to be addressed?
Within the last 3 fiscal years was NOI negative or declining?

<<If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, please identify each risk factor and how it is mitigated below. The Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable analysis provides information regarding an entity’s collection and payment practices, policies, and potential risks to the new project. Discuss your analysis of these issues and how the lender determined they are an acceptable risk.

Example: No Financial Statements: The operator is a newly formed entity and does not have a financial history to report. At this time, the operation of this facility is the new entity’s sole purpose, so there is no need to review financial data from other facilities or sources.

Example: Tenant Security Deposits: The tenant security deposits do not appear to be fully funded. At closing, however, the borrower will not be the operator and the tenant deposit obligation will fall to the new operator; therefore, the underwriter has included a commitment condition requiring the new operator to set up project accounts by closing and to provide an acceptable, certified Balance Sheet showing that the tenant security deposits are fully funded.

Projects with material accounts receivables over 120 days that do not intend to have Accounts Receivable Financing should address the project State’s recent trends in length of time until reimbursement is made. The Lender should address these projects’ ability to handle delayed payments, e.g. access to sources of liquidity in an amount comparable to material accounts receivable over 120 days.)>>

General Overview

<<Provide narrative and analysis of financial statements as appropriate. In addition to the Key Questions above, working capital should be discussed along with the general financial stability and strength of the entity. >> 

Net Income Analysis

Net Income*

In total $

20XX

YTD

(Indicate time frame)

*before depreciation, amortization, and any other non-cash expense

<<Provide an explanation of any Net Losses or declining Net Incomes for the year-to-date and last 3 fiscal years, as applicable.>> 

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion of underwriter’s conclusion and recommendation. For example: “The operator entity has demonstrated an acceptable financial and credit history as discussed in our analysis of their financial statements and credit history above. The operator has the experience to continue to successfully operate this facility. The underwriter recommends this operator for approval as an acceptable participant in this transaction.”>>

Parent of the Operator (if applicable)

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when a change in the Parent of the Operator has occurred or is proposed. The information must be provided if the operator has not been previously approved by HUD for the subject property.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Operation of the Facility section. N/A

<<Provide this section for each parent organization of the operator. This section is not applicable to individuals who are principals unless you are depending on the person or persons for approval of the operator (e.g., newly formed entity). In that instance (individuals – follow the Principal of the Borrower section and modify it appropriately for an operator.>>

Name:
State of Organization:
Date Formed:
Termination Date:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the parent of the operator rated by S&P or another rating agency?
Is or has the parent of the operator been delinquent on any federal debt?
Is or has the parent of the operator been a defendant in any suit or legal action?
Has the parent of the operator ever filed for bankruptcy or made compromised settlements with creditors?
Are there judgments recorded against the parent of the operator?
Are there any unsatisfied tax liens?
Does the parent of the operator have other HUD properties which are master leased separately from the subject project?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: S&P Rating: The entity is rated X by S&P. The rating agency indicates the outlook for the company is X.>> 

Organization

<<Organization Chart and Narrative, as applicable.>>

Experience/Qualifications

<<Narrative description of experience and qualifications: Discussion should highlight direct experience and involvement in other HUD transactions. This section should clearly demonstrate the expertise to successfully operate the facility.>>

Credit History

Report Date:	<<within 60 days of submission>>
Firm:
Score:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the credit report identify any material derogatory information not previously discussed?
Does the underwriter have any concerns related to the credit report?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the parent of the operator identify any other business concerns?
Do any of the other business concerns have pending judgments; legal actions or suits; or, bankruptcy claims? N/A
Do the credit reports on the 10% sampling of the other business concerns indicate any material derogatory information? N/A
Does the Principal identify any other Section 232 program (i.e., 223(f), 241(a), 223(a)(7), 232(i), or 223(d)) loans on the Consolidated Certification – Parent of Operator (Form HUD-90016-ORCF) and Attachment 2 thereof?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: Other Business Concerns: XXXXX identified XX other business concerns in addition to the borrower and the newly formed operator discussed in this narrative. The underwriter reviewed Dunn and Bradstreet credit reports for XX Other Business Concerns identified by XXXX. {Discuss each report}. No reports indicated derogatory information that would prohibit XXXXX participation in this loan transaction.

Other Facilities Owned, Operated or Managed

Key Questions

		Yes	No
	Does the parent of the operator own, operate, or manage any other facilities?
Do any of the other facilities have pending judgments; legal actions or suits; or, bankruptcy claims? N/A
Do any of the other facilities have any open professional liability insurance claims? N/A
Do any of the other facilities have any open state findings related to instances of actual harm and/or immediate jeopardy (G or higher)? N/A
Does the parent of the operator a participant in 50+ residential healthcare facilities?
Does the parent of the operator carry one Professional Liability Insurance policy for its residential healthcare facilities?
Does the parent of the operator carry multiple Professional Liability Insurance policies for its residential healthcare facilities?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: Other Facilities: XXXXX identified XX other facilities it owns, operates, or manages in addition to the subject facility. PLI Insurance: XXXXXX identified XX facilities which are carried on the same PLI policy as the subject project. Other facilities of the parent of the operator are covered on XX separate PLI policies.>> 

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, 8.8.

Financial Statements

The application includes the following operator financial statements:

Year to date:	<<dates for start and end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>
Fiscal Year Ending:	<<date – end of period>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Are less than 3-years of historical financial data available for the parent of the operator?
Are the financial statements missing any required information or schedules?
Do the Aging of Accounts Payable schedules show any material accounts payables (amounts in excess of 5% of effective gross income) over 90 days?
Did your review and analysis of the financial statements indicate any other material concerns or weaknesses that need to be addressed?

<<If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, please identify each risk factor and how it is mitigated below. The Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable analysis provides information regarding an entities collection and payment practices, policies, and potential risks to the new project. Discuss your analysis of these issues and how the lender determined they are an acceptable risk. >>

General Review

<<Provide narrative and analysis of financial statements as appropriate. In addition to the Key Questions above, working capital should be discussed along with the general financial stability and strength of the entity.>>

Net Income Analysis

Net Income*

In total $

20XX

YTD

(Indicate time frame)

*before depreciation, amortization, and any other non-cash expense

<<Provide an explanation of any Net Losses or declining Net Incomes for the year to date and last three fiscal years, as applicable.>> 

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion of underwriter’s conclusion and recommendation. For example, “The parent of the operator entity has demonstrated an acceptable financial and credit history. The underwriter recommends this parent of the operator for approval as an acceptable participant in this transaction.”>>

Operation of the Facility

Administrator

Name:
Employed by:	<<Name of entity who employs/pays administrator>>
Facility Start Date:	<<Date started at this facility as Administrator>>

<<Narrative description of experience and qualifications - For example, “{Administrator} has been a licensed administrator since XXXX. Her current Residential Care Administrator’s license No. XXXXXXX expires XXXXX. It was issued by XXXXXX in the State of XXXX. Her experience includes… Since arriving at the facility, XXXX has helped to increase the revenues and profitability of the project, as evidenced by the increasing effective gross income and net operating income (NOI). XXXXX is well qualified and has demonstrated her ability to act as Administrator for the subject facility.”>>

Subject’s State Surveys

The application includes the following state surveys issued on the following dates over the last three (3) years of operations: (State when the survey was conducted and when the project was found in compliance.)

3 Years of Survey Inspections

Date of survey/inspection	Date state issued letter approving POC

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Do the state surveys identify any instances of actual harm and/or immediate jeopardy (during last 3 year period)?
Do prior surveys (during last 3 year period) contribute to a pattern of findings?
Are there currently any open findings?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: General Review and Findings: Provide narrative description of review. For example: “The {date} state survey inspection letter indicates that there were X deficiencies. The deficiencies…”>> 

Staffing

<<Provide narrative description of review. For example: “The appraiser and underwriter have reviewed the current and proposed staffing to be charged to the facility and found it to be acceptable and within reason…”>>

Operating Lease

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, Chapter 8.6, Operating Lease Requirements

Date of Agreement:
Current Lease Term Expires:
Description of Renewals:
Major Movable Equipment:
Current Ownership:	<<Borrower/Operator>>
Post-closing Ownership:	<<Borrower/Operator>>

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Has a change in the Operating Lease occurred that has not been approved by HUD, or is such a change proposed?
At closing, will the lease have a term that expires within 5 years with no lease renewal options (see guidance above)?
Does the lease contain any non-disturbance provisions?
Does the lease require the borrower to escrow any funds other than those associated with this loan?
Are there proposed changes to the current operating lease?
Has the lender recommended any special conditions concerning the lease?
Is state approval of the lease payment required?
Does the current lease payment need to be increased to provide sufficient debt coverage for the mortgage payment, MIP, other insurance premiums, taxes, reserves, or impounds?
Is the lease payment delinquent?

If you answer “yes” to any of the above questions, please identify specifics of the circumstance.

<<Describe how the underwriter justified or identified mitigation of all associated risks.>>

Lease Payment Analysis

The lease payments must be sufficient to (1) enable the borrower to meet debt service and impound requirements; and (2) enable the operator to properly maintain the project and cover operating expenses. The minimum annual lease payment must be at least 1.05 times the sum of the annual principal, interest, mortgage insurance premium, reserve for replacement deposit, property insurance, and property taxes. The underwriter has prepared an analysis demonstrating the minimum annual lease payment.

a.	Annual Principal and Interest	$
b.	Annual Mortgage Insurance Premium
c.	Annual Replacement Reserves
d.	Annual Property Insurance
e.	Annual Real Estate Taxes
f.	Total Debt Service and Impounds	$
i.	Minimum Annual Lease Payment	$

<<Compare the minimum annual lease payment to the current lease payment. If the lease payment needs to increase, add the following language: “The lease payment must be increased to $XX per year ($XX per month). The underwriter has included a special condition to the firm commitment requiring the lease payment be revised to meet or exceed this minimum.” If the lease payment does not need to increase, add the following language: “The current lease payment is sufficient. The recommended annual lease payment also provides the operator with an acceptable profit margin.”>>

Responsibilities

<<Provide a description of the responsibilities of the borrower and operator under the terms of the lease with regard to the following: payment of real estate taxes; maintenance of building; capital improvements; replacement of equipment; property insurance; etc.>>

Upper Payment Limit (UPL) Transaction Summary (if applicable)

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when the facility participates or will participate in the state’s Upper Payment Limit (UPL) Program. The information must be provided if the facility’s UPL Program has not been previously approved by HUD for the subject property.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Master Lease section. N/A

<< If the there is a new, proposed or changed UPL Program, provide a narrative discussion regarding the topic. As applicable, discuss the issue and its effect on the transaction. Describe any potential risks and the mitigants. For waivers, identify specific provisions to be waived and justification for the waiver.>> 

<<The state will require preliminary approval from HUD in order for the subject to participate in their UPL program. To obtain HUD approval, please provide the following:>>

Background

<<Provide narrative to explain how the state’s UPL program works and why the subject facility wants to participate in the program. Provide draft copies of any documents required by the state to participate in the UPL program as an attachment to this document (Exhibit A).>>

Proposed Structure

<<Provide narrative discussion and organization charts to describe the current and proposed organizational structure of the subject. Be sure to discuss the effect the proposed structure will have on any existing master lease, if applicable. Also, if applicable, discuss the effect of the proposed structure on any accounts receivable financing and what, if any, changes are needed to accommodate the new operator’s receipt of Medicare and Medicaid receivables.

Provide a Cash Flow Chart describing the current and proposed location of the Deposit Account Control Agreement (DACA) and Deposit Account Instructions and Services Agreement (DAISA).>> 

Material Provisions

<<Provide a narrative discussion of provisions in proposed sublease (e.g., “Under XXX state law, the hospital districts must file change of ownership applications for licensure and Medicaid at least XX days before the sublease becomes effective….”) and management agreement (e.g., “The new management agreement will require the current licensee to provide management services necessary to operate the facility…. The hospital district will pay the current licensee (as manager) a base management fee and incentive payments that are equal to XXX% of the net revenue of the facility plus XX% of the supplemental payments that the hospital district receives under the UPL Program”). Attach copies of sublease and management agreement as Exhibits B and C, respectively.>>

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion regarding how the proposed transaction will be of benefit. Complete income analysis in the table provided that compares financial operations with and without UPL participation.>>

Income Analysis
	Trailing 12 mos. without UPL participation* <<TTM thru Month-Year>>	Forecast with UPL participation
Effective Gross Income (EGI)	$	$
Expenses	$	$
Replacement Reserves	$	$
Net Operating Income (NOI)	$	$
Date UPL participation to begin (month, year):
*Use trailing 12-month (TTM) figures in this column. The TTM data is preferred; however, if TTM is not available, year-to-date annualized figures may be used (please indicate this in the heading).

Certification

<The borrower must certify that a change in operator will not occur until HUD has given its preliminary approval for the change. Additionally, if at any time the state determines that it will not fund the UPL Program, the borrower will immediately notify their lender and HUD.

Master Lease

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, Chapter 13. It is the lender’s responsibility to read the handbook chapter and provide HUD with a full set of documents for review of the proposed master lease or alternative master lease structure.

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the subject currently operated under a Master Lease Agreement?
Are three or more projects (or two projects with an aggregate total mortgage loan amount greater than $15 million) being submitted to HUD that are under common control or have the same ownership?
Have projects under common control or with the same ownership applied for mortgage insurance or a TPA within the past 18-months OR will projects under common control or with the same ownership apply for mortgage insurance or a full TPA within the next 18 months? N/A
Is the parent of the operator the same for all of these projects? N/A

If you answered “yes’ to all three questions, a master lease or master lease alternative is required.

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is a new master lease proposed for the subject project?
Will the subject project be joined to an existing HUD master lease?
Do the borrower principals currently participate in any other HUD master leases?
Does the parent of the operator currently participate in any other HUD master leases?

<<Provide a narrative describing the terms and conditions of the master lease proposed payments to and from the master tenant, lease agreements between borrower, master tenant and subtenants, the flow of funds from the subtenants to the master tenant and the borrower (including the AR lender if applicable), and any waivers or requests for modification to standard requirements.

If the subject is being joined to an existing master lease, list projects/project numbers already included in the master lease.

Describe any other HUD master leases the principals of the borrower or parent of the operator are party to, list projects/project numbers, and indicate the HUD lender who is party to the lease(s).>>

Management Agent

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when a change in Management Agent or the Management Agreement has occurred or is proposed. The section must be provided if the Management Agent or the change in Management Agreement has not been previously approved by HUD for the subject property. If the only change that has occurred or is proposed relates to the Management Agreement, skip to the Management Agreement section and complete the rest of this section.

If a change in Management Agent is not applicable, but there has been a change in the Management Agreement, check the box and move to the Management Agreement section.

If neither a change in Management Agent or Management Agreement has occurred, check the box and move to the Compliance section. N/A

Name:
Relation to Mortgagor:	<<Owner Managed/IOI Entity/Independent/Other>>
Principals/Officers:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the management agent have experience managing other HUD-insured properties?
Has the agent received any “unsatisfactory” management reviews from HUD?
Have any managed, owned, or operated properties received REAC scores lower than 60?
Does the management agent have less than 3-years of experience managing similar properties?
Is or has the management agent been delinquent on any federal debt?
Is or has the management agent been a defendant in any suit or legal action?
Has the management agent ever filed for bankruptcy or made compromised settlements with creditors?
Are there judgments recorded against the management agent?
Are there any unsatisfied tax liens?
Does (or will) the Management Agent hold the certificate of need, license to provide care, enter into provider agreement(s) with third party payor(s) such as Medicare, Medicaid, or Private Payors, or enter into contracts for patient services?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. 

Previous HUD Experience

Project Name	Project City	Project State	Type of Facility

Management Agent’s Duties and Responsibilities

<<Briefly describe the management agent’s duties and responsibilities (i.e., will the management agent control the operating accounts; contract for services; recruit, select or train employees; take responsibility for the management of the functional operation of the facility or the execution of the day-to-day policies of the facility; etc.). Also describe the nature of the management agent’s compensation and how it was calculated.>>

Experience/Qualifications

<<Provide a narrative description of experience and qualifications. Discussion should highlight direct experience and involvement in other HUD transactions. This section should clearly demonstrate the expertise to successfully manage the facility and meet the obligations of the management agreement.>>

Credit History

Report Date:	<<within 60 days of submission>>
Reporting Firm:
Score:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the credit report identify any material derogatory information not previously discussed?
Does the underwriter have any concerns related to their review of the credit report?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.>>

Other Facilities Owned, Operated or Managed

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the management agent own, operate, or manage any other facilities?
Do any of the other facilities have pending judgments; legal actions or suits; or, bankruptcy claims? N/A
Do any of the other facilities have any open professional liability insurance claims? N/A
Do any of the other facilities have any open state findings related to instances of actual harm and/or immediate jeopardy (G or higher)? N/A

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. Example: Other Facilities: XXXXX identified XX other facilities it owns, operates, or manages in addition to the subject facility.>> 

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, 8.8.

Past and Current Performance

Indicator	Findings
Billing	<<acceptable>>
Controlling operating expenses
Vacancy rates
Resident turnover
Rent collection and accounts receivable
Physical security
Physical condition and maintenance
Resident relations

<<Provide narrative support for review and finding. For example: “Based on interviews with the principals of the borrower and management agent, as well as a review of the management policies and procedures, the underwriter has concluded that the management agent has demonstrated acceptable past and current performance with regard to all of the above indicators.”>>

Management Agreement

Date of agreement:
Agreement expires:
Management fee:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the agreement fail to sufficiently describe the services the agent is responsible for performing and for which the agent will be paid management fees?
Does the agreement fail to state that the management fees will be computed and paid according to HUD requirements?
Does the agreement fail to state that HUD may require the owner to terminate the agreement without penalty and without cause upon written request by HUD and contain a provision that gives no more than a 30-day notice of termination?
Does the agreement fail to state that HUD’s rights and requirements will prevail in the event the management agreement conflicts with them?
Does the agreement fail to state that the management agent will turn over to the owner all of the project’s cash trust accounts, investments, and records immediately, but in no event more than 30 days after the date the management agreement is terminated?
Does the agreement exempt the agent from gross negligence and or willful misconduct?
Is the Form HUD-9839-ORCF inconsistent with the Management Agreement?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated. >> 

Management Certification

<<Provide narrative review. For example: “The Form HUD-9839-ORCF, Management Agent Certification, provided in the application package indicates a management fee of XX percent of the residential, commercial and miscellaneous income collected, which is in line with industry standards for projects of this size. The term of the agreement is for XX-years. The stated fee and term match those stated in the management agreement. The fee calculations on page 4 are coordinated with the underwriting conclusions.”>>

Conclusion

<<Provide narrative discussion of underwriter’s conclusion and recommendation. For example: “The management agent has demonstrated an acceptable credit history and has the experience to continue to successfully manage this facility. The underwriter recommends this management agent for approval as an acceptable participant in this transaction.”>>

Compliance

Key Questions	Yes	No
State Inspection: Are there currently any open findings of “G” or higher resulting from State survey inspections? If yes, include the State survey inspection in the firm application and explain below. N/A
Medicare Star Rating: Is the project currently rated 1 or 2 stars? N/A
REAC Inspection: Are there currently outstanding deficiencies resulting from the last REAC inspection? In the space below, summarize the most recent REAC Inspection Summary Report, HUD-93332-ORCF, Certification of Exigent Health & Safety (EH&S) Issues, and HUD-93333-ORCF, Project Owner’s Certification of Physical Condition Compliance.
Active Partners Performance Systems (APPS): Are there currently any open flags in APPS pertaining to the owners or the facility? Please explain below. (Note: The borrower may need to authorize ORCF to release this information to the proposed 223(a)(7) lender.)
Discrepancies on the Facility License: Does the operator entity name differ the entity name listed on the license?

If you answered “yes” to any of the above questions, please discuss any open findings or issues, and their resolutions.

Risk Management Program

Program Guidance: See Risk Management Program grid on the Section 232 program website for additional guidance. Note that the below tier descriptions are general descriptions and HUD retains discretion to require additional risk management measures, as warranted, on a case by case basis.

Risk Management Tier General Descriptions:

Tier 1 Baseline: For most assisted living and low-risk skilled nursing projects with no more than one incident of actual harm/immediate jeopardy in the past three years. In these instances, the risk management program may be administered internally or by a third party provided the party administering the program is qualified.

Tier 2 Elevated Risk: Higher risk projects with two more incidents of actual harm/immediate jeopardy within the past three years. In these instances the risk management program should be administered by a third party.

(Note both Tier and Internal/External)

Tier 1 Baseline	Internally Administered Risk Management Program
Tier 2 Elevated Risk	External 3^rd Party Administered Risk Management Program

Describe the Risk Management Program and how it meets the following requirements:

Real-time incident reporting and tracking that informs senior management:

Experience of Staff:

Training:

Continuous Improvement:

<<If a third party is involved, describe the contractual arrangement, what company has been contracted, what the contract provides for, when the contract was entered into, when it expires, what results have been seen thus far if the contract has been in place, etc.>>

Accounts Receivable (AR) Financing

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) loans when an addition or change in AR financing has occurred or is proposed.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Insurance section. N/A

AR Lender:
AR Borrower:
Maximum Loan Amount:
Interest Rate:
Current Balance:
Current Maturity Date:

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the AR loan require any guarantees from the borrower, operator, or parent of the operator, or any of those entities’ principals?
Are the guarantors guaranteeing performance on any other AR loans?
Does the AR loan involve multiple facilities or borrowers?
Does the AR loan involve any non-HUD-insured properties?
Is the subject being added to an existing AR line that has already been reviewed/approved by HUD?
Is there an identity of interest between the AR lender and the AR borrower?
Is there a conflict of interest between the AR lender and the borrower or its principals (as defined in Handbook 4232.1, 15.4.E or its successors)?
Does the maximum AR loan amount exceed 85% of the Medicaid, Medicare, and other governmental accounts receivable less than 121 days old?
Of the total Medicaid, Medicare and other governmental accounts receivable less than 121 days old, are more than 30% over 90 days old? N/A
Does the AR lender have less than 3 years of experience providing AR financing?
Does the AR lender NOT monitor the borrowing base on a regular basis (i.e. daily, weekly, or monthly basis)?
Is the borrower or operator out of compliance with any business agreements or loan covenants (i.e., in default on those agreements, not current on financial submissions, etc.)?
Is the AR loan being syndicated or participated?
Does the Intercreditor Agreement (ICA) propose additional obligations beyond those allowed as the types of AR Loan Obligations that may be secured by project collateral?
Does the ICA propose loan extensions or interest rate changes?
Does the ICA include any cross-default or cross-collateralization provisions?
Does the ICA identify a flow of funds consistent with the cash flow chart?

<< For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion regarding the topic. For projects being added to an existing HUD-Insured AR line, provide specific information on when the AR line was originated (date), when documents were reviewed/approved by HUD, which HUD OGC field office performed he review, and provide a listing of projects participating in the line (project name, FHA#).>>

Terms and Conditions

Describe the borrowing base formula (e.g., XX% of AR borrower’s accounts receivable up to 120 days):

Describe term and renewal options:

Describe the rate applied to the used and unused portions of the AR loan:

Describe other fees (i.e., financing fees, late payment fees, etc.):

Mechanisms for operator receipts, disbursements, and control of operator funds:

<<Describe the flow of all funds, into and out of accounts. Describe how deposit accounts are controlled (e.g., number of controlled accounts, hard or springing lockbox, daily sweeps, etc.). Attach cash flow chart.>>

Collateral Security

<<Provide narrative description of the AR lender’s collateral/security. Explain any unsecured AR financing.>>

Permitted Uses and Payment Priorities

<<Provide descriptions of the permitted uses of the AR loan funds in order of priority. For example: (1) debt service incurred in connection with the AR loan; (2) operating costs; and (3) distributions to the operator’s shareholders.>>

Financial Analysis

Calculations as of: (Date of AR aging report submitted with application)

Borrowing Base Analysis

(Double click inside the Excel Table to add information)

Historical AR Loan Costs

<<If there is an existing AR loan that is not yet approved by HUD, provide a financial analysis that explains how the cost of the AR loan has been factored into the NOI calculation. Complete the Historical AR Loan Costs table.>>

Historical AR Loan Costs

(Double click inside the Excel Table to add information)

Proposed AR Loan Costs

<<If the AR borrower is obtaining AR financing for the first time, provide a financial analysis that demonstrates that the AR borrower has sufficient financial capacity to pay all projected operating expenses, AR financing costs and loan payments, and all rent or debt service payments. The analysis must assume the maximum AR loan amount to stress test the AR financing based on the lesser of the operator’s 12-month trailing operating statements or the underwritten NOI. Calculate the impact on the borrower’s debt coverage after payment of the AR loan expenses and payments.>>

Assuming the $ maximum AR loan limit, an annual interest rate of %, and that the entire amount is outstanding for the year, the maximum annual interest expense would be $ . In addition to the interest, the other associated fees are the fees <<list types of fees>>, which total $ per year for the same assumed balance. An analysis of the operator’s 12 month trailing financial statement (Month 20XX – Month 20XX) is below:

Trailing 12-Month Operating History
Operating revenue	$
Less: Operating expenses
Net Operating Income (NOI)	$

Annual P&I + MIP	$
AR fee: Interest
AR fee: Other
Total annual mortgage and AR debt service	$

DSCR including AR

The underwriting assumed an NOI of $ . The 12-month trailing NOI is $ . The annual debt service including the MIP amount is $ per year. Adding the AR fees equates to a total mortgage and AR debt service expense of $ per year. This equates to prospective debt service coverage.

<<If multiple HUD-insured facilities have access to the AR loan, repeat the analysis above with the consolidated revenues and expenses for all those facilities.>>

Recommendation

<<The lender recommends approval of the AR loan.>>

Insurance

Professional Liability Coverage

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, Appendix 14.1

Name of insured:
Insurance company:
Rating:		Rater:
Insurance company is licensed in the United States:	Yes No
Statute of limitations:
Current coverage:	Per occurrence:
	Aggregate:
	Deductible:
Policy Basis:	Per occurrence Claims made
Current Expiration:
Retroactive Date:
Policy Premium:

Summary of Six-Year Loss History for New Operator or its Parent of Operator
	Year	Total claims paid under this policy (dollars)	Total claims paid under this policy (no. of claims)	Total bed count covered under the policy	Dollars paid in claims per bed
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total/average

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Does the insurance policy cover multiple properties?
Is less than 6 years of loss history available?
Does the loss history indicate any professional liability claims over $35,000?
Does the loss history or potential claims certification indicate any uncovered claims?
Does the loss history or potential claims certification indicate any claims that would exceed the per occurrence or aggregate coverage limits at the facility?
Has the facility been covered by a “claims made” policy at any time during the statute of limitations for the State in which the facility is located?
Is the policy funded on a “cash front” basis?
Is an actuarial study applicable (self-insurance)? (If yes, discuss results below.)
For all facilities Owned, Operated or Managed by the new operator and/or parent of the operator, are there any surveys/reports that have open G-level or higher citations outstanding? (As appropriate, provide a complete analysis of the surveys.)
Are any entities that provide resident care (as discussed in the Provider Agreements and Resident Care Agreements/Rental Agreements) not covered by the PLI policy?
Are there any PLI issues that require special consideration?

<<For each “yes” answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic describing the risk and how it will be mitigated.

Example: 1.Multiple properties: The lender notes that the professional liability policy is a ‘blanket’ policy covering XXX facilities, including the subject…{address potential impact of other facilities on the subject’s coverage}

Example: 2.Less than 6-year loss history: The claims history reports were examined for the period XX through XX. The lender determined that there were no professional liability XX claims during that period… {Address claims and sufficiency of coverage, etc. based on history}.

Example: Claims made coverage: The project’s previous professional liability insurance coverage was a “claims made” form policy with XXXX, which expired XXXX, when the current policy was put in place. In XXXX the borrower purchased a “nose coverage” policy which is the coverage needed when going from a “claims made” form of insurance to a “per occurrence” form of insurance. The premium for this “nose” coverage liability was a one-time charge and was paid in XXX. Because of that additional insurance coverage, the insurance expense for XXXX was substantially higher than the current expense. The current “per occurrence basis” insurance policy covers the entire statute of limitations. The project’s professional liability insurance is in compliance with HUD’s requirements. >>

Lawsuits

<< Identify all potential or expected professional liability insurance (PLI) claims in excess of $35,000 that have been or may be filed for all periods within the statute of limitations for the state where the claim occurred. Identify any reserves held for potential claims. Discuss the risk associate with each potential PLI claim. Discuss how that risk is mitigated. Describe the circumstances, identify the potential award amount, provide evidence and analysis showing that the suits are covered by PLI insurance, and if the insurance is not sufficient, does the insured demonstrate adequate funds to cover the potential excess? Describe any other information that mitigates the risk.

As applicable, discuss other types of lawsuits (non-PLI) and describe the potential risk related to the party’s participation in the proposed project. Discuss how that risk is mitigated. If the suit is closed, does it contribute to a pattern? Does it materially affect the party’s ability to participate in the project? If not closed, describe the circumstances, identify the potential award amount, provide evidence and analysis showing that the suits are covered by insurance (general liability), and if the insurance is not sufficient, do they demonstrate adequate funds to cover the potential excess? Describe any other information that mitigates the risk.>>

Property Insurance

<<Narrative discussion of review. For example, “Hazard and Liability insurance will be provided by XX. The insurance coverage will continue to comply with HUD requirements.”>>

Fidelity Bond/Employee Dishonesty Coverage

<<Narrative discussion of review. For example, “The subject has inadequate fidelity (crime/dishonesty) insurance. HUD requires coverage equal to at least two (2) months gross income or $_________ for 223(a)(7)s. Coverage that meets or exceeds the HUD minimum requirements must be in place prior to closing. The Lender and HUD (451 7th St S.W. Washington D.C. 20410) must be named as additional loss payees.” If not sufficient, recommend special condition.>>

Additional Insurances

<<Provide narrative discussion of other insurance currently in place, including amount of coverage and deductible.>> 

Commercial General Liability Insurance

<<If there has been an addition or change in the coverage, or a new Borrower is proposed, provide narrative discussion of policy coverage for bodily injury, property damage and personal injury. For example: General liability insurance will be provided by XX. The underwriter has confirmed estimates of the cost and coverage for underwriting and will re-verify this information prior to closing. The insurance coverage will comply with HUD requirements prior to closing.>>

Property Insurance

<< If there has been an addition or change in the coverage, or a new Borrower is proposed, provide narrative discussion of policy coverages as applicable, including property damage, ordinance and law coverage, and boiler and machinery/equipment breakdown insurance. For example: “Property insurance will be provided by XX. The lender has confirmed estimates of the cost and coverage for and will re-verify this information prior to closing. The insurance coverage will comply with HUD requirements prior to closing.”>>

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

<< If there has been an addition or change in the coverage, or a new Borrower is proposed, provide narrative discussion of policy coverages.>> 

Commercial Auto Liability Coverage

<< If there has been an addition or change in the coverage, or a new Borrower is proposed, provide narrative discussion of policy coverages.>> 

Additional Insurances

<< If there has been an addition or change in the coverage, or a new Borrower is proposed, provide narrative discussion of fidelity bond/crime insurance coverage. For example: “The current insurance policy reflects fidelity (crime) insurance with the limit of $XX and $XX deductible. The HUD requirement for at least two months potential gross income receipts would total $XX. The current level of coverage is sufficient for this project.” If not sufficient, recommend commitment condition.

Additionally, provide narrative discussion of business income coverage insurance, including amount of coverage and deductible.

Also, provide narrative discussion of coverage for the following, as applicable, including amount of coverage and deductible:

Earthquake insurance
Sinkhole/mine subsidence insurance
Windstorm coverage insurance
Flood insurance >>

Recommendation

<<Provide narrative recommendation regarding acceptability of professional and general liability insurance, and other coverages as applicable. For example: “The new borrower’s professional and general liability insurance was analyzed in accordance with Handbook 4232.1, Section II Production, Chapter 14 and Appendix 14.1. The property has XX current potential (threatened) insurance claims at this time as reflected on the certification provided by the borrower. It is {lender’s} opinion that the information provided above and in the application sufficiently demonstrates that the existing professional liability coverage meets HUD’s requirements and that the risk from professional liability issues is sufficiently addressed. No modifications to the current coverage are recommended.”>>

Mortgage Loan Determinants

Overview

The mortgage loan criteria shown on Form HUD-92264a-ORCF are summarized as follows:

Requested Loan Amount	$
Original Principal Balance:	$
Amount Based on the Cost to Refinance:	$

The proposed mortgage loan is $ and is constrained by . The underwritten debt service coverage, including debt service and MIP payment, is , which is % of the estimated net operating income

Original Principal Balance

The original principal balance is $ . <<Multiple FHA-insured mortgage loans on the same facility can be refinanced under one 223(a)(7) loan. For each insured loan provide the current loan information identified in the Executive Summary.>>

Amount Based on the Cost to Refinance

The costs to refinance associated with the project total $ on Form HUD-92264a-ORCF, which is used to calculate the mortgage loan amount for this criterion. This total includes the following:

Unpaid Principal Balance	$
Payoff Processing Fee
Final Month’s Interest
Prepayment Penalty
Other Eligible Existing Indebtedness
Additional Replacement Reserve Deposit
Critical Repairs
Non-Critical Repairs
Owner-Elected Repairs
Borrower Legal & Organizational
Title & Recording
HUD Application Fee
HUD MIP
Lender Financing Fee
Lender Legal Fee
GNMA Fee
Permanent Placement Fee
Lender Closing Fee
PCNA, if required
Survey, if required
Other <<identify>>
Total:	$

Existing HUD-Insured Indebtedness

Schedule of HUD-Insured Loans to Refinance

Lender	Pay-off Amount
	$
	$
	$
Total:	$

General Review

<<Narrative review of debt and payoff information. The discussion should explain each item that is included in the existing indebtedness, including the unpaid principal balance, payoff processing fees, final month’s interest, and anything else included in the payoff. For example, “Per the statement from XXX dated XXXX, the current existing indebtedness is $XXXX. The payoff balance will be reconfirmed prior to closing and only eligible payoff charges will be included in the cost certification.”>>

Cost Recapture

<<Divide the costs of the transaction by the debt service savings per month. Do not include replacement reserve deposits, required repairs, taxes, insurance, interest or MIP. If any portion of the prepayment penalty will be paid for by an interest rate premium, do not include that portion of the prepayment penalty in the Cost Recapture. The Cost Recapture must be less than 120 months.>>

Other Eligible Existing Indebtedness

This section is applicable to Section 223(a)(7) proposals that include refinancing of non-HUD-insured loans.

If not applicable, check the box and move to the Prepayment Penalties section. N/A

Schedule of Non-HUD-Insured Debt to Refinance

Lender	Payoff Amount
	$
	$
	$
Total:	$

Program Guidance: The non-HUD-insured debt is only eligible if you answer “yes” to Key Question 1 or 2. Accrued interest or fees associated with that debt are only eligible if you answer “yes” to Key Question 3. Evidence to support the details must be included in the application package and the underwriter must positively state that the evidence has been evaluated and concludes that it meets HUD guidelines for acceptance.

Key Questions

	Yes	No
Is the non-HUD-insured debt to be paid off recorded debt, such as a mechanic’s lien or a tax lien?
Is the non-HUD-insured debt to be paid off directly connected with the project (i.e., debt incurred to improve the property or cover operating deficits) and supported by documentation from the borrower?
Does the HUD lender confirm that all fees associated with the debt are reasonable and any accrued interest is correctly calculated?

<<For each answer above, provide a narrative discussion on the topic.>>

General Review

<<Narrative review of debt and payoff information: The narrative must provide full details of the underwriter’s analysis and determination that the debt is allowable per HUD guidelines including what it was for, who it is owed to, etc.>>

Prepayment Penalties

<<Describe any prepayment penalties associated with refinancing the existing obligations. Include the amount and explain how it is calculated. State when and by how much the prepayment penalty will decrease in the next 12 months. If none, state “None.”>>

Additional Replacement Reserve Deposit

<<If the proposal includes increasing the replacement reserve balance with loan proceeds, indicate the amount and provide justification for the increased balance. If none, state “None.”>>

Repairs

Program Guidance: Projects that involve repairs in excess of routine maintenance as defined in Notice CPD-16-02 require an environmental review. The lender must complete the Environmental section of this document. Please note that Notice CPD-16-02 has a specific definition of routine maintenance, which may differ from other definitions of routine maintenance.

<<If the proposal includes funding critical, non-critical, Green MIP retrofits, or owner-elected repairs, list the repairs, the estimated cost and provide justification. If none, state “None”>>

Critical:	$
Non-Critical:	$
Green MIP Retrofits:	$
Owner-Elected:	$

Does the lender propose to administer the non-critical repair escrow?

Yes No

Legal and Organizational Costs

The borrower’s legal and organization costs are estimated to total $ ($ for legal / $ for organizational expenses). The underwriter concluded that the budgeted amounts are reasonable.

Title and Recording Fees

Title and recording fees are estimated to cost $ . The underwriter concluded that the budgeted amount is reasonable.

HUD Fees

<<This section pertains to the Amount Based on the Cost to Refinance on the HUD-92264a-ORCF, and the fees calculated for that criterion may not match the actual fees in the sources and uses. If they do not match, provide both.>> The HUD fees total $ and are comprised of MIP totaling % of the mortgage loan amount ($ ) and the HUD application fee totaling 0.15% of the mortgage loan amount ($ ).

Program Guidance: Per HUD Handbook 4232.1, Part II, Production, 2.10D, there is no inspection fee required on Section 223(a)(7) transactions.

Lender Fees

<<This section pertains to the Amount Based on the Cost to Refinance on the HUD-92264a-ORCF, and the fees calculated for that criterion may not match the actual fees in the sources and uses. If they do not match, provide both. All fees paid to the lender are to be discussed. Maximum lender fees cannot exceed 2% of the mortgage loan.>> The financing fees payable to the lender total $ . These fees are further broken down as follows:

Lender	Pay-off Amount
Lender Financial Fee	$
Lender Legal Fee	$
GNMA Fee	$
Permanent Placement Fee	$
Lender Closing Fee	$
Other <<Identify.>	$
Total:	$

Other Fees

<<If other fees are included, provide a descriptive listing with the estimated cost. Provide justification for eligibility. If none, state “None.”>>

Sources & Uses – Copied from HUD-92264a-ORCF

<<Provide a statement of Sources and Uses of actual estimated cost at closing. Include all eligible and ineligible transaction costs.>>

Secondary Sources

<<List and discuss all secondary sources, including terms and conditions of each. Secondary sources include interest rate premiums, surplus cash notes, grants, loans, tax credits, lines of credit, and the like.>>

Surviving Debt

<<List and discuss all existing long-term debt that will survive closing. HUD must agree to the surviving debt and may require a surplus cash note. If none, state “None.”>>

Type of Financing

The type of financing available to the borrower upon issuance of the commitment will likely be in the form of .

Circumstances that May Require Additional Information

In addition to the information required in this narrative, depending upon the facility for which mortgage insurance is to be provided, the mortgagor, operator, management agent and such other parties involved in the operation of the facility, current economic conditions, or other factors or conditions as identified by HUD, HUD may require additional information from the lender to accurately determine the strengths and weaknesses of the transaction. If additional information is required, the questions will be included in an appendix that accompanies the narrative.

Special Commitment Conditions

<<List any recommended special conditions. If none, state “None.”>>

Conclusion

<<Narrative conclusion and recommendation>>

Signatures

Lender hereby certifies that the statements and representations of fact contained in this instrument and all documents submitted and executed by lender in connection with this transaction are, to the best of lender’s knowledge, true, accurate, and complete. This instrument has been made, presented, and delivered for the purpose of influencing an official action of HUD in insuring the loan and may be relied upon by HUD as a true statement of the facts contained therein.

Lender:
HUD Mortgagee/Lender No.:

This report was prepared by:

Date

This report was reviewed by:

Date

<<Name>>

<<Title>>

<<Phone>>

<<Email>>

<<Name>>

<<Title>>

<<Phone>>

<<Email>>

Previous versions obsolete Page 53 of 53 Form HUD-9001-ORCF (06/2019)

File Type	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Author	Johnson, Nicole M
File Modified	0000-00-00
File Created	2024-08-06

9001-ORCF Lender Narrative  Section 232/223(a)7 Refinance

Comprehensive Listing of Transactional Documents for Mortgagors, Mortgagees and Contractors

9001_orcf

Transactional Documents for Mortgagees and Contractors

OMB: 2502-0605

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Risk Factors

Program Eligibility

Project is Currently HUD- Insured

Prepayment Approval

Green MIP for Section 223(a)(7) Projects

Green MIP Eligibility

Waivers

Underwriting Team

Lender

Identities of Interest

Special Underwriting Considerations

Occupancy

Term Extensions

Lender Site Visit

Net Operating Income Analysis

Project Capital Needs Assessment (PCNA)

Lender Modifications

Fire / Building Codes and HUD Standards

Accessibility for Persons With a Disability

Seismic Evaluation

Repairs

Critical Repairs

Non-Critical Repairs

Additional Non-Critical Repairs, for Green MIP Eligibility:

Borrower Proposed Repairs

Completion and Inspection of Repairs

Replacement Reserves

ALTA/ACSM Land Survey

Title

Title Search

Pro Forma Policy

Environmental

Program Guidance: Handbook 4232.1, Section II, Production, Chapter 7.

Phase I Site Assessment

Radon

Lender Comments

Other Environmental Concerns

Site Work, Ground Disturbance or Digging

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Clearance

Area of Potential Effects

Floodplain

Program Eligibility

Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable)

Organization

Organization

Recommendation

New/Proposed Principal of the Borrower (or Purchaser, as applicable) –<< enter Principal Name >>

Organization (not applicable to individuals)

Experience / Qualifications

Credit History

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications

Financial Statements

Conclusion

Operator

Organization

Experience / Qualifications

Credit History

Financial Statements

Net Income Analysis

Conclusion

Parent of the Operator (if applicable)

Organization

Experience/Qualifications

Credit History

Other Business Concerns/232 Applications

Other Facilities Owned, Operated or Managed

Financial Statements

Net Income Analysis

Conclusion

Operation of the Facility

Administrator

Subject’s State Surveys

Staffing

9001-ORCF Lender Narrative Section 232/223(a)7 Refinance