OMB Control Number: 2030-0051
Expiration Date: MM/DD/YYYY
ECCR Training Participant Evaluation Survey
This collection of information is approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2030-0051). Responses to this collection of information are voluntary. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to be 32 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to Director, Information Engagement Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Conflict Prevention and Resolution Center (CPRC) requests your assistance in evaluating this training session. As a part of this evaluation, we ask participants who have partaken in this training session to provide us with information about their experience. The data compiled will be used to improve future training services provided by the CPRC.
The CPRC will not report information from this evaluation in a way that respondents or their organizations can be identified.
[Note: Green text is meant for in-person and blue for virtual]
Section 1: Agreement Reactions
[required question] Please select the type of training you attended:
In-person training
Virtual training
In-person reaction section (asked if Q1 = “In-person”]
[if Q1 = in person] Tell us about the facility and the materials used for the training. Using the scale provided, please rate your agreement with the following items:
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
NA |
The facility was conducive to effective training. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The materials were understandable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The handouts were valuable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see myself using the materials/handouts in the future as reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The slides used in this course contributed to my understanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The handouts were a valuable supplement to the training. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[if Q1 = in person] Were there aspects of the training facility that were particularly good or particularly problematic? If so, please describe.
{Open-ended text box}
[If Q1 = in person] Were there aspects of the materials used that were particularly good or particularly problematic? If so, please describe.
{Open-ended text box}
[if Q1 = in person] Did you encounter any issues with accessibility of the training (e.g., ability to access facility, necessary accommodations)?
Yes
No
If so, please describe.
{Open-ended text box}
Virtual reaction section [only asked if Q1 = “Virtual”]
[If Q1 = virtual] Tell us about the virtual platform and the materials used for the training. Using the scale provided, please rate your agreement with the following items:
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
NA |
The virtual platform was conducive for effective training. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was able to easily access the virtual training platform. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The materials were understandable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The handouts were valuable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see myself using the materials/handouts in the future as reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The slides used in this course contributed to my understanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The handouts were a valuable supplement to the training. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[If Q1 = virtual] Were there aspects of the virtual platform that were particularly good or particularly problematic? If so, please describe.
{Open-ended text box}
[If Q1 = virtual] Were there aspects of the materials used that were particularly good or particularly problematic? If so, please describe.
{Open-ended text box}
[If
Q1 = virtual] Did
you encounter any issues with the accessibility of the training
(e.g., sizes/readability of fonts, seeing all visual elements,
audio)?
Yes / No
If so, please describe.
[Would appear if they enter ”yes” to Q5 or Q9] Since you indicated that you had some issues with accessibility, would you like to discuss those issues with someone? If so, please provide an email below.
{Open-ended box}
Tell us about your training instructor. Using the scale provided, please rate your agreement with the following items:
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
NA |
The instructor(s) was/were knowledgeable about the topics discussed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The instructor (s)’s presentation of materials was effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The instructor (s) answered questions and encouraged participant contributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What were the instructor(s)’s strengths?
{Open-ended text box}
What could the instructor(s) improve?
{Open-ended text box}
In the next set of questions, we would like you to reflect on the benefits and value of the training session.
Tell us about what you learned and how you will use what you learned. Using the scale provided, please rate your agreement with the following items:
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
NA |
The training included adequate opportunities to practice new skills and apply concepts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I learned something new. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I learned something that will improve my job performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will use what I learned in the next six months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What were the most important things you learned?
{Open-ended text box}
What were your reasons for taking this training? (Please select all that apply)
___ Training was required
___ Training helped me meet continuing education requirements
___ Thought it was directly applicable to my work
___ Fit my schedule
___ Asked or strongly suggested to take the training
___ Interest in the topic
___ Recommendation from colleague(s)
___ Other (please specify) ____________________________________
Tell us about your overall impressions of the training. Using the scale provided, please rate your agreement with the following items:
|
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
NA |
The training was an effective use of my time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would recommend this training to my colleagues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, how satisfied are you with the training you received?
__ Very satisfied
__ Somewhat satisfied
__ Somewhat dissatisfied
__ Very dissatisfied
Do you have any suggestions for improving this training you’d like to share?
{Open-ended text box}
Are there other training topics you would like to see CPRC offer?
{Open-ended text box}
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire!
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WHO REQUIRE ALTERNATIVE MEANS FOR COMMUNICATION OF PROGRAM EVALUATION INFORMATION SHOULD CONTACT THE CPRC OFFICE.
Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 32 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggestions for reducing the burden, including the use of automated collection techniques to:
CONFLICT PREVENTION AND RESOLUTION CENTER
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MC: 2388A)
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460
Telephone: 202.564.0214, Fax: 202.501.1715
Website: www.epa.gov/adr
Email: adr@epa.gov
EPA Form: 5800-036
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Lou Nadeau |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2024-11-02 |