Download:
pdf |
pdf73136
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2024 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–20169 Filed 9–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–641, OMB Control No.
3235–0685]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: Rules 3a68–2 and
3a68–4(c)
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) is
soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in
Rules 3a68–2 and 3a68–4(c) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
The SEC plans to submit this existing
collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Rule 3a68–2 creates a process for
interested persons to request a joint
interpretation by the SEC and the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) (together with
the SEC, the ‘‘Commissions’’) regarding
whether a particular instrument (or
class of instruments) is a swap, a
security-based swap, or both (i.e., a
mixed swap). Under Rule 3a68–2, a
person provides to the Commissions a
copy of all material information
regarding the terms of, and a statement
of the economic characteristics and
purpose of, each relevant agreement,
contract, or transaction (or class
thereof), along with that person’s
determination as to whether each such
agreement, contract, or transaction (or
class thereof) should be characterized as
a swap, security-based swap, or both
(i.e., a mixed swap). The Commissions
also may request the submitting person
to provide additional information.
The SEC expects 25 requests pursuant
to Rule 3a68–2 per year. The SEC
estimates the total paperwork burden
associated with preparing and
submitting each request would be 20
hours to retrieve, review, and submit the
information associated with the
10 17
1 The burdens imposed by the CFTC are included
in this collection of information.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 06, 2024
submission. This 20-hour burden is
divided between the SEC and the CFTC,
with 10 hours per response regarding
reporting to the SEC and 10 hours of
response regarding third party
disclosure to the CFTC.1 The SEC
estimates this would result in an
aggregate annual burden of 500 hours
(25 requests × 20 hours/request).
The SEC estimates that the total costs
resulting from a submission under Rule
3a68–2 would be approximately $17,520
for outside attorneys to retrieve, review,
and submit the information associated
with the submission. The SEC estimates
this would result in aggregate costs each
year of $438,000 (25 requests × 30
hours/request × $584).
Rule 3a68–4(c) establishes a process
for persons to request that the
Commissions issue a joint order
permitting such persons (and any other
person or persons that subsequently
lists, trades, or clears that class of mixed
swap) to comply, as to parallel
provisions only, with specified parallel
provisions of either the Commodity
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) or the Exchange
Act, and related rules and regulations
(collectively ‘‘specified parallel
provisions’’), instead of being required
to comply with parallel provisions of
both the CEA and the Exchange Act.
The SEC expects ten requests
pursuant to Rule 3a68–4(c) per year.
The SEC estimates that nine of these
requests will have also been made in a
request for a joint interpretation
pursuant to Rule 3a68–2, and one will
not have been. The SEC estimates the
total burden for the one request for
which the joint interpretation pursuant
to 3a68–2 was not requested would be
30 hours, and the total burden
associated with the other nine requests
would be 20 hours per request because
some of the information required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 3a68–4(c)
would have already been submitted
pursuant to Rule 3a68–2. The burden in
both cases is evenly divided between
the SEC and the CFTC.
The SEC estimates that the total costs
resulting from a submission under Rule
3a68–4(c) would be approximately
$29,200 for the services of outside
attorneys to retrieve, review, and submit
the information associated with the
submission of the one request for which
a request for a joint interpretation
pursuant to Rule 3a68–2 was not
previously made (1 request × 50 hours/
request × $584). For the nine requests
for which a request for a joint
interpretation pursuant to Rule 3a68–2
was previously made, the SEC estimates
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the total costs associated with preparing
and submitting a party’s request
pursuant to Rule 3a68–4(c) would be
$8,760 less per request because, as
discussed above, some of the
information required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 3a68–4(c) already
would have been submitted pursuant to
Rule 3a68–2. The SEC estimates this
would result in an aggregate cost each
year of $183,960 for the services of
outside attorneys (9 requests × 35 hours/
request × $584).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the SEC,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the SEC’s estimates of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
by November 8, 2024.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments
to: Austin Gerig, Director/Chief Data
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Oluwaseun Ajayi, 100
F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or
send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
sec.gov.
Dated: September 3, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–20202 Filed 9–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–451, OMB Control No.
3235–0509]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: Rule 301 of
Regulation ATS
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the existing collection of information
provided for in Rule 301 of Regulation
ATS (17 CFR 242.301) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Regulation ATS provides a regulatory
structure for alternative trading systems.
Rule 301 of Regulation ATS contains
certain record keeping and reporting
requirements, as well as additional
obligations that apply only to alternative
trading systems with significant volume.
The Rule requires all alternative trading
systems that wish to comply with
Regulation ATS to file an initial
operation report on Form ATS.
Alternative trading systems are also
required to supply updates on Form
ATS to the Commission describing
material changes to the system, file
quarterly transaction reports on Form
ATS–R, and file cessation of operations
reports on Form ATS. An alternative
trading system with significant volume
is required to comply with requirements
for fair access and systems capacity,
integrity, and security.
The Commission staff estimates that
entities subject to the requirements of
Rule 301 will spend a total of
approximately 2,983 hours a year to
comply with the Rule.
Regulation ATS requires ATSs to
preserve any records, for at least three
years, made in the process of complying
with the system’s capacity, integrity and
security requirements.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 06, 2024
Jkt 262001
comments and suggestions submitted by
November 8, 2024.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments
to: Austin Gerig, Director/Chief Data
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Oluwaseun Ajayi, 100
F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or
send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
sec.gov.
Dated: September 3, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–20199 Filed 9–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100901; File No. SR–
SAPPHIRE–2024–26]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
Sapphire, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Establish Fees for
Purge Ports
September 3, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
21, 2024, MIAX Sapphire, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Sapphire’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Sapphire Fee
Schedule (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to adopt
certain non-transaction fees for Purge
Ports as described below.
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73137
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/
us-options/miax-sapphire/rule-filings, at
the Exchange’s principal office, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On July 15, 2024, the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) approved the
Exchange’s Form 1 application to
register as a national securities exchange
under Section 6 of the Exchange Act,3
and the Exchange began operations on
August 12, 2024. The Exchange initially
filed this proposal on August 9, 2024
(SR–SAPPHIRE–2024–15) to establish
fees for Purge Ports, which is
functionality that enables Marker
Makers 4 to cancel all open orders or a
subset of open orders through a single
cancel message. The Exchange
withdrew SR–SAPPHIRE–2024–15 on
August 21, 2024, and submitted this
proposal.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100539
(July 15, 2024), 89 FR 58848 (July 19, 2024) (File
No. 10–240) (order approving application of MIAX
Sapphire, LLC for registration as a national
securities exchange).
4 The term ‘‘Market Maker’’ or ‘‘MM’’ means a
Member registered with the Exchange for the
purpose of making markets in options contracts
traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the
rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VI
of the Exchange Rules. See the Definitions Section
of the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2024-09-07 |
File Created | 2024-09-07 |