Feedback from Grant Participants at Child Care and Development Fund Lead Agencies Meetings

_{OMB Control Number:} 0970-0401; Expiration Date: 6/30/2024

Center to Support Research and Evaluation Capacity of CCDF Lead Agencies (CSRE) Meeting Feedback from Grant Participants

The purpose of this voluntary information collection is to solicit feedback from participants of the community of practice meetings run by the Center to Support Research and Evaluation Capacity of CCDF Lead Agencies (CSRE). The participants are ACF grant team members participating in any of the Communities of Practice (CoPs) which are aiming to support cross-project support and collaboration. Participant feedback will be collected during or after the community of practice meetings (including annual meetings) through a link to an online survey, a paper form, or a small group discussion. This feedback will help the government understand the grant recipients’ experiences and preferences and will be used to improve future meetings and other supports for these grant recipients.

NOTE: The feedback form included with this request includes a universe of possible meeting feedback questions. The feedback form will be administered up to 4 times across 24 months.

A question may be asked more than once, using alternate versions of the information in brackets. We also may make additional small tweaks in wording to fit the circumstances. Many of the questions are drawn from previously approved polls for the individual Communities of Practice over the past 3-4 years (i.e., the CCDBG, CCPRP-2019, PROSPR, or CCPRP-2022 Community of Practice) but approval to use them has lapsed or they are only allowed to be used for one Community of Practice.

Question Bank

1. Please indicate which community of practice you belong to (choose all that apply):

   1. CCPRP-2019

   2. CCPRP-2022

   3. [Other Community of Practice name]

2. What is your role on your project team?

   1. Principal Investigator (PI) or co-PI

   2. Other Research Staff

   3. State or Tribal Partner

   4. Other

3. How did you attend the meeting?

   1. In-person

   2. Virtually

4. Please choose which joint breakout session you attended:

   1. Quality in family child care

   2. COVID-19 funding cliffs

   3. Evaluating effects of policy changes on the ECE workforce

   4. Using publicly available datasets to capture the workforce (ACS vs. QWI)

   5. Communicating with policy makers and other non-researchers

   6. [new topic to be identified]

5. Please select a number to indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement.

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Neither Agree Nor Disagree 4=Agree 5=Strongly Agree

CCPRP-2022 Cross-Project Collaboration Session	Strongly --------------------------- Strongly Disagree ___________ Agree_
I was interested in the session content.	1 2 3 4 5
The session was relevant to my or my agency’s needs.	1 2 3 4 5
CCPRP-2019 teams sharing findings
I was interested in the session content.	1 2 3 4 5
The session was relevant to my or my agency’s needs.	1 2 3 4 5
Joint Plenary Session with CCPRP-2019 & 2022 with ACF Speaker
I was interested in the session content.	1 2 3 4 5
The session was relevant to my or my agency’s needs.	1 2 3 4 5
Joint Breakout Sessions
I was interested in the session content.	1 2 3 4 5
The session was relevant to my or my agency’s needs.	1 2 3 4 5
Overall Meeting
As a whole, the meeting was a good use of my time.	1 2 3 4 5
I was comfortable asking questions & contributing to discussion.	1 2 3 4 5
I will be able to apply what I learned in this meeting to my work.	1 2 3 4 5

6. If you disagreed (2) or strongly disagreed (1) with any statements, please explain further.

Presentations led by grant teams	More time	About the same	Less time
Presentations led by guest speakers	More time	About the same	Less time
Individual CoP Team Session	More time	About the same	Less time
Joint Breakout Rooms	More time	About the same	Less time
Informal networking and discussion	More time	About the same	Less time

7. Thinking about the day as a whole, please circle a response to indicate if you would have preferred to spend more time, about the same amount of time, or less time on each of the following.

8. What aspects of the meeting did you find most useful?

9. What aspects did you find least useful?

10. Do you have any additional comments for the meeting organizers?

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to help ACF understand grant recipient preferences for future meetings and other supports. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 06/30/2024. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact Teresa Derrick-Mills at tderrick-mills@urban.org.

5