9600-034 Section 4 CFR 766 Submission

20%&RQWURO1R([SLUHV
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Section 4 Submission
This is an original submission:

This is an amendment:

✔
CERTIFICATION

rS

ub

m

is

si

on

I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all information entered on this form is
complete and accurate. I further certify that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2613(c), for all claims for
protection for any confidential information made with this submission, all information submitted to
substantiate such claims is true and correct, and that it is true and correct that the person submitting
the claim has:
(i) taken reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of the information;
(ii) determined that the information is not required to be disclosed or otherwise made available to
the public under any other Federal law;
(iii) a reasonable basis to conclude that disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial
harm to the competitive position of the person; and
(iv) a reasonable basis to believe that the information is not readily discoverable through reverse
engineering.
Any knowing and willful misrepresentation is subject to criminal penalty pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1001.

fo

Signature:

ES/William Brigman
Contact Person:

ot

William K. Brigman

Official Title:

consultant
Email Address:

william.brigman@cgifederal.com

Date Signed:

Contact Information

Submission
Information

Submission Type:

N

PART 1

CFR766

Form Alias:

CFR766-20230105-14:57:37 EST

Date Submitted:

Submitter
Information

Company Name:

CDX Test Org
Contact Person:

William K. Brigman
Phone Number:

8289191634
EPA Form 9600-034

Address:

123 Main St
Virginia Beach, VA, 23462
United States
Email Address:

william.brigman@cgifederal.com

Paperwork Reduction Act: This collection of information is approved by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2070-0033). Responses to this collection of information are mandatory for certain
persons, as specified at 15 U.S.C. 2601 et. seq. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is
estimated to be 137 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any
suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to the Regulatory Support Division Director, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this
address.

SEC4 Submission Page 2

Technical Contact
Information

CBI

Yes: ✔ No:
Company Name:

Address:

CDX Test Org

123 Main St
Virginia Beach, VA, 23462
United States

Contact Person:

Mr William K. Brigman
Phone Number:

Email Address:

william.brigman@cgifederal.com

on

8289191634
CBI

Chemical
Identification

Yes:

No:

✔

Chemical Name:

si

CASRN:

2,4-Dibromophenol

Letter Of Intent

Sponsoring Firms

CBI

Yes:

No:

✔

Company Name:

ub

CGI Federal

m

PART 2

is

615-58-7

Phone Number:

rS

8281111234
PART 3

File Name:

fo

TEST ATTACHMENTSANITIZED_1.docx

CBI

ot

Yes: ✔ No:

N

12601 Fairlakes Cir.
Fairfax, VA, 22033
United States

Protocol

Attached
Document(s)

Effects:

Environmental Fate

PART 4

Test Results

Attached
Document(s)

File Name:

TEST ATTACHMENT-1.docx
CBI

Yes: ✔ No:
Effects:

Ecotoxicity
PART 5

Address:

CBI Substantiations

Attachment Date:

01/05/2023
Sanitized Document Upload:

TEST ATTACHMENT-2.docx
Endpoints:

Photo transformation in water

Attachment Date:

01/05/2023
Sanitized Document Upload:

TEST ATTACHMENT-3.docx
Endpoints:

Long-term toxicity to fish

SEC4 Submission Page 3

Substantiation
Questions

Below are a list of Substantiation questions and the responses filled out in the
CBI Substantiation page.
Data Identifier:

Technical Contact Information

on

1. Please specifically explain what harm to the competitive position of your business would be likely to result from the
release of the information claimed as confidential. How would that harm be substantial? Why is the substantial harm to
your competitive position likely (i.e., probable) to be caused by release of the information rather than just possible? If
you claimed multiple types of information to be confidential (e.g. site information, exposure information, environmental
release information, etc.), explain how disclosure of each type of information would be likely to cause substantial harm to
the competitive position of your business.

si

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

m

is

2. Has your business taken precautions to protect the confidentiality of the disclosed information? If yes, please explain
and identify the specific measures, including but not limited to internal controls, that your business has taken to protect
the information claimed as confidential. If the same or similar information was previously reported to EPA as nonconfidential (such as in an earlier version of this submission), please explain the circumstances of that prior submission
and reasons for believing the information is nonetheless still confidential.

ub

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

rS

3A. Is any of the information claimed as confidential required to be publicly disclosed under any other Federal law? If
yes, please explain.

N

ot

fo

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

3B. Does any of the information claimed as confidential otherwise appear in any public documents, including (but not
limited to) safety data sheets; advertising or promotional material; professional or trade publications; state, local, or
Federal agency files; or any other media or publications available to the general public? If yes, please explain why the
information should be treated as confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
3C. Has a patent been published for the chemical identity you claim confidential? What chemical identity information is
not revealed by the patent? How is release of that specific information likely to cause substantial competitive harm? And
failure to explain this harm may lead to denial of your confidentiality claim.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

SEC4 Submission Page 4

4. Is the claim of confidentiality intended to last less than 10 years (see TSCA section 14(e)(1)(B))? If yes, please
indicate the number of years (between 1-10 years) or the specific date after which the claim is withdrawn.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
5. Has EPA, another federal agency, or court made any confidentiality determination regarding information associated
with this chemical substance? If yes, please provide the circumstances associated with the prior determination, whether
the information was found to be entitled to confidential treatment, the entity that made the decision, and the date of the
determination.

si

on

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
Data Identifier:

is

Protocol Document Management - TEST ATTACHMENT- SANITIZED_1.docx

ub

m

1. Please specifically explain what harm to the competitive position of your business would be likely to result from the
release of the information claimed as confidential. How would that harm be substantial? Why is the substantial harm to
your competitive position likely (i.e., probable) to be caused by release of the information rather than just possible? If
you claimed multiple types of information to be confidential (e.g. site information, exposure information, environmental
release information, etc.), explain how disclosure of each type of information would be likely to cause substantial harm to
the competitive position of your business.

rS

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

N

ot

fo

2. Has your business taken precautions to protect the confidentiality of the disclosed information? If yes, please explain
and identify the specific measures, including but not limited to internal controls, that your business has taken to protect
the information claimed as confidential. If the same or similar information was previously reported to EPA as nonconfidential (such as in an earlier version of this submission), please explain the circumstances of that prior submission
and reasons for believing the information is nonetheless still confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

3A. Is any of the information claimed as confidential required to be publicly disclosed under any other Federal law? If
yes, please explain.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
3B. Does any of the information claimed as confidential otherwise appear in any public documents, including (but not
limited to) safety data sheets; advertising or promotional material; professional or trade publications; state, local, or
Federal agency files; or any other media or publications available to the general public? If yes, please explain why the
information should be treated as confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

SEC4 Submission Page 5

3C. Has a patent been published for the chemical identity you claim confidential? What chemical identity information is
not revealed by the patent? How is release of that specific information likely to cause substantial competitive harm? And
failure to explain this harm may lead to denial of your confidentiality claim.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
4. Is the claim of confidentiality intended to last less than 10 years (see TSCA section 14(e)(1)(B))? If yes, please
indicate the number of years (between 1-10 years) or the specific date after which the claim is withdrawn.

on

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

ub

Data Identifier:

m

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

is

si

5. Has EPA, another federal agency, or court made any confidentiality determination regarding information associated
with this chemical substance? If yes, please provide the circumstances associated with the prior determination, whether
the information was found to be entitled to confidential treatment, the entity that made the decision, and the date of the
determination.

Results Document Management - TEST ATTACHMENT-1.docx

rS

1. Please specifically explain what harm to the competitive position of your business would be likely to result from the
release of the information claimed as confidential. How would that harm be substantial? Why is the substantial harm to
your competitive position likely (i.e., probable) to be caused by release of the information rather than just possible? If
you claimed multiple types of information to be confidential (e.g. site information, exposure information, environmental
release information, etc.), explain how disclosure of each type of information would be likely to cause substantial harm to
the competitive position of your business.

N

ot

fo

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

2. Has your business taken precautions to protect the confidentiality of the disclosed information? If yes, please explain
and identify the specific measures, including but not limited to internal controls, that your business has taken to protect
the information claimed as confidential. If the same or similar information was previously reported to EPA as nonconfidential (such as in an earlier version of this submission), please explain the circumstances of that prior submission
and reasons for believing the information is nonetheless still confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
3A. Is any of the information claimed as confidential required to be publicly disclosed under any other Federal law? If
yes, please explain.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

SEC4 Submission Page 6

3B. Does any of the information claimed as confidential otherwise appear in any public documents, including (but not
limited to) safety data sheets; advertising or promotional material; professional or trade publications; state, local, or
Federal agency files; or any other media or publications available to the general public? If yes, please explain why the
information should be treated as confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

on

3C. Has a patent been published for the chemical identity you claim confidential? What chemical identity information is
not revealed by the patent? How is release of that specific information likely to cause substantial competitive harm? And
failure to explain this harm may lead to denial of your confidentiality claim.

si

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

m

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

is

4. Is the claim of confidentiality intended to last less than 10 years (see TSCA section 14(e)(1)(B))? If yes, please
indicate the number of years (between 1-10 years) or the specific date after which the claim is withdrawn.

ub

5. Has EPA, another federal agency, or court made any confidentiality determination regarding information associated
with this chemical substance? If yes, please provide the circumstances associated with the prior determination, whether
the information was found to be entitled to confidential treatment, the entity that made the decision, and the date of the
determination.

rS

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

fo

Data Identifier:

N

ot

Submitting Official Information

1. Please specifically explain what harm to the competitive position of your business would be likely to result from the
release of the information claimed as confidential. How would that harm be substantial? Why is the substantial harm to
your competitive position likely (i.e., probable) to be caused by release of the information rather than just possible? If
you claimed multiple types of information to be confidential (e.g. site information, exposure information, environmental
release information, etc.), explain how disclosure of each type of information would be likely to cause substantial harm to
the competitive position of your business.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

SEC4 Submission Page 7

2. Has your business taken precautions to protect the confidentiality of the disclosed information? If yes, please explain
and identify the specific measures, including but not limited to internal controls, that your business has taken to protect
the information claimed as confidential. If the same or similar information was previously reported to EPA as nonconfidential (such as in an earlier version of this submission), please explain the circumstances of that prior submission
and reasons for believing the information is nonetheless still confidential.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

on

3A. Is any of the information claimed as confidential required to be publicly disclosed under any other Federal law? If
yes, please explain.

si

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

ub

m

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

is

3B. Does any of the information claimed as confidential otherwise appear in any public documents, including (but not
limited to) safety data sheets; advertising or promotional material; professional or trade publications; state, local, or
Federal agency files; or any other media or publications available to the general public? If yes, please explain why the
information should be treated as confidential.

rS

3C. Has a patent been published for the chemical identity you claim confidential? What chemical identity information is
not revealed by the patent? How is release of that specific information likely to cause substantial competitive harm? And
failure to explain this harm may lead to denial of your confidentiality claim.

fo

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

N

ot

4. Is the claim of confidentiality intended to last less than 10 years (see TSCA section 14(e)(1)(B))? If yes, please
indicate the number of years (between 1-10 years) or the specific date after which the claim is withdrawn.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test

5. Has EPA, another federal agency, or court made any confidentiality determination regarding information associated
with this chemical substance? If yes, please provide the circumstances associated with the prior determination, whether
the information was found to be entitled to confidential treatment, the entity that made the decision, and the date of the
determination.

CBI: No
Response: Yes
Response Text: test
Paperwork Reduction Act: The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (44 U.S.C. 3501) provides that, when practicable, Federal organizations use electronic forms, electronic filings, and
electronic signatures to conduct official business with the public. EPA's Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) (40 CFR part 3), published in the Federal Register on October 13,
2005 (70 FR 59848) (FRL-7977-1)(Ref. 2), provides that any requirement in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to submit a report directly to EPA can be satisfied with an electronic
submission that meets certain conditions once the Agency published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that EPA is prepared to receive certain documents in electronic form. For more
information about CROMERR, go to http://www.epa.gov/cromerr/.