PRE-SORTED FIRST-CLASS
MAIL POSTAGE
& FEES PAID EPA PERMIT
NO. G-35
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
OECA MC 2227A
WASHINGTON DC 20460
———————————————
Official Business
TIME SENSITIVE – RESPONSE NEEDED
Mailroom: Please forward to responsible office.
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO NPDES PERMITTEES
DMR-QA Study 43 Announcement
IMPORTANT DATES TO REMEMBER |
|
May 19, 2023 |
DMR-QA Study 43 begins. |
June 2, 2023 |
Submit address verification to State DMR-QA Coordinator. |
August 4, 2023 |
DMR-QA Study 43 ends. |
September 29, 2023 |
Submit DMR-QA 43 Results to State DMR-QA Coordinator. |
November 9, 2023 |
Submit corrective action reports and retest results to State DMR-QA Coordinator, if applicable. |
DMR-QA STUDY 43
Immediately verify receipt of DMR-QA Study 43 by either filling out the form below and mailing this page to your State DMR-QA Coordinator (listed on pages 10-11) or follow the e-mail instructions at the bottom of this page.
The mailed form must be postmarked on or before June 2, 2023.
NPDES PERMITTEE ADDRESS VERIFICATION FORM
Discharge Monitoring Report - Quality Assurance (DMR-QA) Study 43
Please provide corrections to the mailing address where all DMR-QA study paperwork should be sent.
NPDES Permit Number
|
(2-character State Code + 7-digit Permit Code as shown on the mailing label—for example, CT1234567)
If contact/address
information from the
mailing label or e-mail is correct, please
check this box only →
❏
Facility Name
|
||
Contact Name
|
Title
|
|
Mailing Address
|
||
City
|
State
|
Zip Code
|
Phone Number
|
Fax Number
|
|
E-mail Address
|
ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE
You may verify receipt electronically by sending an e-mail on or before June 2, 2023 to your State DMR-QA Coordinator (listed on pages 10-11 of the enclosed instructions). The e-mail should be composed in the following manner:
Subject line should contain ONLY the NPDES Permit number (2-character State Code + 7-digit Permit Code as shown on the mailing label, for example CT1234567).
If you require any changes to the mailing label on this announcement, the body of the e-mail should contain a list including:
Company name; Contact Name/Title; Mailing Address; City; State; Zip Code; and Facility Type (select one: federal, state, local or commercial/private). Otherwise, you may simply write “No changes to address or contact information” in the body of the e-mail.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OFFICE
OF
ENFORCEMENT AND
COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
May 15, 2023
Dear NPDES Permit Holder:
This letter initiates the 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report - Quality Assurance (DMR-QA) Study 43. By receipt of this letter, you are required under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 308 to participate in DMR-QA Study 43 unless your facility is covered by an EPA waiver.* Your participation plays a key role in monitoring the quality of data used to assure the integrity of the CWA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program and assures your ability to maintain compliance with NPDES permit requirements and conditions.
DMR-QA Study 43 covers major and select minor NPDES permit holders. You (the permittee) are responsible for ensuring that results of DMR-QA Study 43 tests, performed by your in-house and/or contract laboratories, are graded by an accredited Proficiency Testing (PT) Provider. If any graded test results are “Not Acceptable”, you must follow up with the laboratory to determine the cause of the deficiency and ensure corrective action is taken to prevent future occurrences. While performing tests and analyses, please ensure that your test methods/procedures follow 40 CFR part 136 regulations and applicable guidance. Use the same personnel and equipment as you would for routine NPDES permit compliance monitoring tests.
Recent Changes or Clarifications
Arkansas DMR-QA participants that report their results to Arkansas’ DMR-QA Coordinator can now submit their DMR-QA Permittee Data Report package through Arkansas DEQ’s e-portal, https://eportal.adeq.state.ar.us/.
Some language previously contained within the certification statement are now presented as Yes/No questions that must be answered by the person signing the Permittee Data Report Form. EPA will not accept submitted forms that do not answer all five questions immediately above the certification statement on Page 13.
Further Information
Permittees with valid e-mail addresses will receive the DMR-QA Study 43 package by e-mail. You may request a hard copy from EPA by sending an e‑mail to dmrqa@epa.gov. Questions on the national program should be addressed to Greg Savitske (dmrqa@epa.gov, 202-564-2601), EPA’s National DMR-QA Coordinator. State and EPA Regional DMR-QA contact information is provided on pages 9-11. Please reference your NPDES permit number on all correspondence.
Thank you for your attention to this CWA Section 308 requirement.
Sincerely,
/s/
Elizabeth Vizard, Acting Director
Monitoring, Assistance, and Media Programs Division
Office of Compliance
Enclosures
DMR-QA STUDY 43
Deadline* |
Permittee |
In-House and Contract Laboratories |
PT Providers |
May 19, 2023 |
|
|
|
June 2, 2023 |
|
|
|
August 4, 2023 |
|
|
|
September 1, 2023 |
|
|
▪ Laboratory ▪ State DMR-QA coordinators |
September 15, 2023 |
|
|
|
September 29, 2023 |
|
|
|
November 9, 2023 |
|
|
|
* All materials must be sent on or before the date provided.
Am I required to participate in this Discharge Monitoring Report - Quality Assurance (DMR-QA) Study?
NPDES major and select minor permit holders are required to participate in the DMR-QA studies. Be sure to verify the NPDES permit number on the front of this package or indicated in your e-mail. If you believe you received this study in error, contact your State DMR-QA Coordinator (pages 10-11). Some permit holders are not required to perform the DMR-QA study because they are located in a state that has a laboratory quality assurance program approved by EPA as a substitute for DMR-QA.†, ‡, §
What is the purpose of this DMR-QA Study?
The purpose of DMR-QA Study 43 is to ensure the integrity of data submitted by the permittee for DMR reporting requirements and evaluate performance of the laboratories to analyze wastewater samples.
What laboratory tests are required under DMR-QA?
Permittees are responsible for having their laboratory(ies) test wastewater analytes that are both in their NPDES permit and included in Study 43. For required Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) tests, permittees must participate even if the test conditions (e.g., temperature, time of acute test, synthetic seawater matrix, etc.) in the permit do not exactly match those in Study 43. Refer to “WET Testing Laboratory Instructions” (page 8) for more information.
How should laboratory personnel perform DMR-QA tests?
For all pollutant parameters, especially field test parameters (e.g., pH, residual chlorine), use the same personnel and equipment as required for NPDES permit compliance monitoring tests. Ensure your test methods and procedures follow 40 CFR part 136 regulations.
Where can laboratories get test samples?
Laboratories may order DMR-QA samples from a Proficiency Test (PT) Provider accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation or the ANSI National Accreditation Board. A list of accredited PT Providers is provided on page 9.
What should permittees and laboratories do first?
Permittees must first confirm receipt of this package by June 2, 2023 to their State DMR-QA Coordinator (pages 10-11) via e-mail or postal mail. Permittees must also send a copy of the enclosed instructions/checklists to all in-house and contract laboratories. The permittee specifies on the checklist which analyses the laboratory will perform. See Permittee Instructions (page 6) for more information. Upon receipt of instructions, laboratories must order samples from an accredited PT Provider (page 9). This should be done early to allow sufficient time to perform the required analyses and send ungraded test results to the PT Provider prior to the close of DMR-QA Study 43 (August 4, 2023). See Laboratory Instructions (pages 7-8) for more information.
Can I use a Water Pollution (WP) Study to satisfy DMR-QA requirements?
Yes, permittees may use a WP study to satisfy some or all the DMR-QA requirements. However, only test results from WP studies closing between January 1, 2023, and August 4, 2023, will be accepted. See Permittee Instructions for more information (Step 5 on page 6).
What steps do I take after the proficiency testing?
After laboratories report their data to the PT Providers, the PT Provider issues a report to the laboratory and the State DMR-QA Coordinator indicating the test results were “Acceptable” or “Not Acceptable”. The laboratory must then forward a copy of the graded report to the permittee. The permittee subsequently completes the checklists on pages 15-16, indicating the laboratory’s grade for each required analyte. One set of checklists must be used for each laboratory. The permittee must also fill out the NPDES Permittee Data Report Form (EPA Form 6400-01, pages 12-13) and submit a signed copy with the completed checklists and copies of the laboratory’s graded reports to the State DMR-QA Coordinator by September 29, 2023.
What do I do if a laboratory receives a “Not Acceptable” test result?
If any graded test results are “Not Acceptable”, the permittee must follow up with the laboratory to determine the cause of that test result and take corrective action to prevent future occurrences. The laboratory must order retesting samples, analyze them, and write a corrective action response for the permittee. The permittee then submits retest results and a corrective action report to the State DMR-QA Coordinator by November 9, 2023. Note: If the laboratory requires a retest to satisfy the corrective action, the laboratory must use a WP study or a quick turnaround PT sample. Data must be reported to the PT Provider by the PT Provider’s published closing date or by October 27, 2023, whichever is earlier.
Can I submit my Permittee Data Report Form electronically?
States may accept scanned, signed copies of the DMR-QA Permittee Data Report package by way of e-mail. Some states such as Arkansas now offer electronic reporting of their DMR-QA Permittee Data Report package. States listed on pages 10 and 11 that are marked with a dagger-style footnote (†) offer their own electronic form of the Study 43 Data Report package.
Where do I go for more information?
DMR-QA resources including fill-and-print forms are available at https://www.epa.gov/compliance/discharge-monitoring-report-quality-assurance-study-program.
Verify that your participation in DMR-QA Study 43 is required by confirming the NPDES permit number on the front of this package or in the e-mail announcement sent to you. If you believe you received this study in error or have questions about your exemption status, contact your State DMR-QA Coordinator (pages 10-11). Please refer to Footnotes 2, 3, and 4 of the Frequently Asked Questions page (page 5) for a list of exempted states.
Follow the instructions on the DMR-QA Study 43 Important Notice (inside front cover of study package) and immediately confirm receipt of this package to your State DMR-QA Coordinator via postal mail or e-mail. You must submit your response no later than June 2, 2023. If your permit is inactive, please contact your State DMR-QA Coordinator immediately.
Send copies of these instructions to each contract and in-house laboratory, if applicable. Ensure DMR-QA samples are analyzed by the same laboratories that routinely perform analyses for your Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) requirements. Indicate which tests the laboratory will perform by checking the appropriate boxes in the “Test Required” column in the enclosed tables (pages 15-16).
Ensure that each laboratory uses their U.S. EPA Laboratory Code on all reported test results. Make certain your laboratories understand and complete all requirements. Laboratories needing a new U.S. EPA Lab Code or wanting to confirm their existing U.S. EPA Lab Code, should contact their EPA Regional DMR-QA Coordinator listed on page 9. Submit all requests for lab codes at least one week before the DMR-QA Study 43 end date (August 4, 2023) or one week prior to the PT Provider’s WP study due date to allow time for response.
Instruct your laboratory to order samples for analytes that are both in your permit and included in DMR-QA Study 43. Your in-house and contract laboratories must order PT samples from an accredited PT Provider (page 9). Ensure your laboratory orders the samples early enough to allow time to perform the required analyses and send test results to the PT Provider prior to the close of DMR-QA Study 43 (August 4, 2023). Your laboratory should register your permit number with the PT Provider prior to August 4, 2023. Note: If your in-house or contract laboratory chooses to use a WP study to satisfy DMR-QA requirements, please inform the laboratory that all data must be reported to the PT Provider by the published WP study close date, even if it is prior to the DMR-QA deadline of August 4, 2023. WP studies are only valid for DMR-QA Study 43 if the WP study meets the following requirements:
Samples are offered by an accredited PT Provider (page 9).
The WP study closed between January 1, 2023, and August 4, 2023.
The PT Provider shows the WP test results from each of the permittee’s regulated analytes on the DMR-QA reporting form.
Permittees are responsible for ensuring that laboratories submit data on the permittee’s behalf to the PT Provider by the end of DMR-QA Study 43 (August 4, 2023). Laboratories must send ungraded data to the same PT Provider that provided the samples to the laboratory. By September 1, 2023, PT Provider-graded test results will be sent back to the laboratories. Permittees will not receive graded reports directly from PT Providers unless they are an in-house laboratory. Note: Permittees are not required to report ungraded data to the PT Provider on their laboratories’ behalf nor should permittees send ungraded data to their State DMR-QA Coordinator.
Permittees must require laboratories to forward the PT Provider-graded test results to them by September 15, 2023. Using these graded test results, permittees must fill out the Chemistry/Microbiology Analyte and WET Analyte checklists (pages 15-16) for each laboratory, indicating the analyte tests performed by the laboratory and whether the test result was “Acceptable” or “Not Acceptable”. Make sure the appropriate NPDES permit number and U.S. EPA Lab Code are on each checklist. If you use more than one laboratory, you must use a separate checklist for each laboratory. If a laboratory reports more than one test method to you for any single analyte, you must use a separate checklist for each test method reported.
Follow the directions on the “NPDES Permittee Data Report Form” (Form 6400-01, pages 12-14) and complete the information. You may use a “fill and print” form available at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/discharge-monitoring-report-quality-assurance-study-program. By September 29, 2023, you must send a copy of the signed Form 6400-01, graded test results, and completed checklists from step 7 for each of your permits to the State DMR-QA Coordinator.
However, if you (the Permittee) have verified that the PT Provider’s graded test results have been transmitted to the State DMR-QA Coordinator, you are only required to submit the signed Form 6400-01 and the applicable checklists to the State DMR-QA Coordinator. In this situation, the laboratory should provide a list of its permittees’ NPDES permit numbers associated with each required analyte to the PT Provider prior to the close of DMR-QA Study 43 or the WP study. Check with your laboratory to determine whether the PT Provider is sending the graded data directly to the State DMR-QA Coordinator.
Permittees must maintain a copy of the completed NPDES Permittee Data Report Form, checklists, and graded laboratory results as a record for at least three (3) years.
After receiving the PT Provider-graded test results, permittees must consult with the laboratory and investigate all test results graded by the PT Provider as “Not Acceptable”. Permittees must identify and report to the State DMR-QA Coordinator the causes of any discrepancies and must describe the analytical system changes required to correct the discrepancies. If the laboratory requires a retest to satisfy the corrective action, the laboratory must use a WP study or a quick turnaround PT sample. Data must be reported to the PT Provider by the PT Provider’s published closing date or by October 27, 2023, whichever is earlier. Laboratories must order retesting samples by September 15, 2023, for any “Not Acceptable” results and perform the retests as soon as possible. The corrective action report should include results from any retest/verification analysis performed and must be sent to the State DMR-QA Coordinator on or before November 9, 2023.
Your laboratory is designated to participate in DMR-QA Study 43 by a NPDES permittee because the permittee uses or plans to use your laboratory to perform chemistry/microbiology analyses to satisfy their NPDES permit requirements during 2023. For measurements of all pollutant parameters, especially field test parameters (pH, residual chlorine, etc.), use the same personnel and equipment as required for NPDES compliance monitoring analyses. Please ensure that your test methods/procedures follow 40 CFR part 136 regulations. Please note that for low level mercury, the concentration range is 20 - 100 ng/L (20 - 100 parts per trillion) and for low level total residual chlorine, the concentration range is 75 - 250 µg/L (75 - 250 parts per billion). If you have questions about whether you should perform the test using the normal or the low-level mercury and/or low-level total residual chlorine concentration, contact your State DMR-QA Coordinator.
Each permittee for whom you analyze or provide data in 2023 will determine which analyses you must perform by checking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed “Chemistry/Microbiology Analyte Checklist” (page 15).
Order DMR-QA Study 43 chemistry and microbiology samples from one of the Proficiency Test (PT) Providers (page 9). Be sure to allow yourself enough time to perform the analyses before the closing date of DMR-QA Study 43 (August 4, 2023). Maintain a copy of all completed order forms for your records.
Note: You may be able to utilize the test results from a Water Pollution (WP) study to meet the requirements of DMR-QA Study 43, if all the following conditions are met:
|
Each reported value must be produced from a single analytical run using the analytical system that routinely performs these analyses to produce compliance monitoring data required under your permittee’s NPDES permit. Your results must not be compared with results from other independent analyses conducted by you or any other laboratory before reporting your test results to the PT Provider.
Record your ungraded analytical data and your EPA Lab Code on the Data Reporting Forms that you received with your test samples. Be sure to follow the PT Provider’s instructions and deadlines that you received with these samples.
You are required to use the EPA-assigned Lab Code on all reported test results. If you need a new EPA Lab Code or need to verify your existing EPA Lab Code, please contact your EPA Regional DMR-QA Coordinator (see contact information on page 9).
Send the data requested by each of your permittees to the PT Provider for grading. You must send data to the same PT Provider that sent you the test samples. Make sure you provide the DMR-QA Study 43 or WP study results to the PT Provider by August 4, 2023. If you choose to use a WP study, you must report all data to the PT Provider by the PT Provider’s published WP study close date, even if it is prior to the DMR-QA deadline of August 4, 2023. Notify the PT Provider that the WP study is being used to satisfy DMR-QA Study 43 requirements and send them copies of the analyte checklist(s) if you are reporting via hard copy.
The PT Provider will grade your analyses and send the graded test results to you by September 1, 2023. If the PT Provider is submitting graded test results sorted by permit number to the State DMR-QA Coordinator, then you should register your permittees’ permit numbers associated with each required analyte with the PT Provider prior to the close of DMR-QA Study 43 or the WP study. Forward the graded test results of the analytes to the permittee by September 15, 2023, so the permittee can fill out the analyte checklist on page 15.
If any graded test results are “Not Acceptable”, laboratories should coordinate with the permittee to determine the cause of that test result and identify corrective action to prevent future occurrences. If the laboratory requires a retest to satisfy the corrective action, the laboratory must use a WP study or a quick-turnaround PT sample. Data must be reported to the PT Provider by the PT Provider’s published closing date or by October 27, 2023, whichever is earlier. Laboratories must order retest samples for “Not Acceptable” analyte test results by September 15, 2023. The corrective action report and graded retest results must be forwarded to the permittee as soon as possible, for the permittee is required to submit a completed corrective action report to their state DMR-QA coordinator by November 9, 2023.
Your laboratory is designated to participate in DMR-QA Study 43 by a NPDES permittee because the permittee uses or plans to use your laboratory to perform Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) analyses during 2023. For all analytes, use the same personnel and equipment as required for NPDES permit compliance monitoring analyses. Labs should ensure that WET test methods/procedures follow instructions from your PT Provider and EPA’s WET test manuals referenced below, which include both EPA’s promulgated WET test methods at 40 CFR part 136 and EPA’s recommended short-term chronic marine West Coast WET test methods (1995).
The permittee(s) determine which analyses you will perform by checking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed WET Analyte checklist (page 16). Labs should ensure that the permittee has selected the test organism(s), test conditions, and testing requirements that most closely resemble those required by the permit for which you are supplying test results. Use the guidelines immediately below and the table on page 16 to select the proper WET tests.
Guidelines for Choosing the Correct WET Test Organism/Conditions/Test Endpoint(s):
|
Order DMR-QA toxicity samples from an accredited PT Provider (page 9). Allow yourself enough time to perform the analyses before the closing date of DMR-QA Study 43 (August 4, 2023). Maintain a copy of all completed order forms for your records.
Each reported value must be produced from a single analytical run using the analytical system that routinely performs these analyses to produce compliance monitoring data required under your permittee’s NPDES permit. Your results must not be compared with results from other independent analyses conducted by you or any other laboratory before reporting your test results to the PT Provider.
Record your ungraded analytical data and EPA Lab Code on the Data Report Form received with your samples. Be sure to follow the PT Provider’s instructions and deadlines that you received with the samples. You must use the EPA-assigned Lab Code on all reported test results. If you need a new EPA Lab Code or need to verify your current code, contact your EPA Regional DMR-QA Coordinator (page 9).
Send the ungraded data requested by each of your permittees to the PT Provider for grading. You must send it to the same PT Provider that sent you the test samples. Make sure you provide the DMR-QA Study 43 study results by August 4, 2023.
The PT Provider will grade your test results and send them to you by September 1, 2023. If the PT Provider is submitting graded test results sorted by permit number to the State DMR-QA Coordinator, then you should register your permittees’ permit numbers associated with each required analyte with the PT Provider prior to the close of DMR-QA Study 43 or the WP study. Forward the graded test results of the analytes to the permittee by September 15, 2023, so the permittee can fill out the analyte checklist on page 16.
If any graded test results are “Not Acceptable”, laboratories should coordinate with the permittee to determine the cause of the result and identify corrective action to prevent future occurrences. If the laboratory requires a retest to satisfy the corrective action, the laboratory must use a WP study or a quick turnaround PT sample. Data must be reported to the PT Provider by their published closing date or by October 27, 2023, whichever is earlier. Laboratories must order retest samples for “Not Acceptable” analyte test results by September 15, 2023. The corrective action report and graded retest results must be forwarded to the permittee as soon as possible, for the permittee is required to submit a completed corrective action report to their state DMR-QA coordinator by November 9, 2023.
Reference Manuals: (see https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods/whole-effluent-toxicity-methods)
Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Fifth Edition, October 2002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, EPA 821-R-02-012.
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms, Fourth Edition, October 2002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, EPA 821-R-02-013.
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms, Third Edition, October 2002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, EPA 821-R-02-014.
Method Guidance and Recommendations for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing (40 CFR Part 136). July 2000. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, EPA-821-B -00-004.
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to West Coast Marine and Estuarine Organisms, 1st Ed., 1995, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, EPA/600/R-95/136. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=46584.
The following Proficiency Test (PT) Providers are accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) or the ANSI National Accreditation Board (ANAB). A2LA and ANAB have each been designated a Proficiency Testing Oversight Body/Proficiency Testing Provider Accreditor by The NELAC Institute (TNI). Find the following PT Providers on the internet at: http://www.nelac-institute.org/content/NEPTP/ptproviders.php.
NELAC-Accredited Provider |
Chem |
Micro |
WET |
Absolute Standards, Inc., Hamden, CT Mr. Stephen Arpie (203) 281-2917 or (800) 368-1131 |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Advanced Analytical Solutions, LLC, Parkersburg, WV Fred Anderson (304) 485-6325 |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), Golden, CO (800) 372-0122 |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
MilliporeSigma, Laramie, WY (800) 576-5690 |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
New York State Department of Health Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY Amy C. DeMarco (518) 473-1398 |
✔ |
✔ |
|
NSI Lab Solutions, Raleigh, NC Quentisha Forrester (800) 234-7837 |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Phenova Inc., Golden, CO (866) 942-2978 |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
EPA Region 1
(CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT)
Bhavita Patel
U.S. EPA Region 1
LSASD/LQAB
11 Technology Drive
North Chelmsford, MA 01863-2431
(617) 918-8322
EPA Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI)
Molly Hillenbrand
U.S. EPA Region II
LSASD/MAB/MOS
2890 Woodbridge Ave (MS 220)
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 321-4452
EPA Region 3 (DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV) Peter Gold
U.S. EPA Region III
ECAD/WB/NPDES
1650 Arch St (3ED32)
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 814-5236
EPA Region 4
(AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN)
Jeffrey Wilmoth
U.S. EPA Region IV
LSASD/QAPSB/QAS
980 College Station Rd
Athens, GA 30605-2720
(706) 355-8623
EPA Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI)
Kenneth Gunter
U.S. EPA Region V
ECAD/WECAB/WS1
77 W. Jackson Blvd (ECW-15J)
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 353-9076
EPA Region 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX)
Magda Vargas
U.S. EPA Region VI
ECAD/WTREB/WRS
1201 Elm St, Suite 500 (6ECDWR)
Dallas, TX 75270
(214) 665-7396
EPA Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE)
Peggy Mnich
U.S. EPA Region VII
ECAD/WB
11201 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(913) 551-7075
EPA Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY)
Lisa-kay Prideaux
U.S. EPA Region VIII
ECAD/WEB/NWES
10 West 15th Street (8MO)
Helena, MT 59626
(406) 457-5022
Trying
to find your
State DMR-QA Coordinator? Turn to pages 10
and 11
➜
EPA Region 9
(AS, AZ, CA, GU, HI, MP, MW, NN, NV)
Adam Howell
U.S. EPA Region IX
ECAD/WB/WS1
75 Hawthorne St (ENF-3-1)
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 972-4248
EPA Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA)
Stacey Kim
U.S. EPA Region X
ECAD/WEFB/SWES
1200 Sixth Ave
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1380
Alabama
Autumn Baughn
Alabama Dept. of Environmental Mgmt.
OEQ-QSU
1350 Coliseum Boulevard
Montgomery, AL 36110
(334) 271-4162
Alaska
John Clark
Alaska DEC - Division of Water
555 Cordova St
Anchorage, AK 99501-2617
(907) 269-3066
American Samoa
Adam Howell
U.S. EPA Region IX
ECAD/WB/WS1
75 Hawthorne St (ENF-3-1)
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 972-4248
Arizona
Michael Tenczar
AZPDES Individual Permits Unit
Arizona Dept of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington St
Phoenix, AZ 85007
(602) 771-4623
Yvette Wilkins
Arkansas Department of Energy
and Environment
5301 Northshore Drive
North Little Rock, AR 72118
(501) 682-0941
https://eportal.adeq.state.ar.us/
California*
Andrew Hamilton
Office of Information Mgmt & Analysis State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street, 16-39D
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 341-5286
QualityAssurance@waterboards.ca.gov
Colorado
Jocelyn Brink
Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment
Water Quality Control Division-CWE-B2
4300 S Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246
(720) 507-4518
Connecticut
Susan Unger
Connecticut DEEP
Bureau of Materials Management and Compliance Assurance
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106
(860) 424-3286
Delaware
Nicole Smith
Delaware DNREC - Division of Water
Surface Water Discharges Section
89 Kings Hwy - R and R Building
Dover, DE 19901
(302) 739-9946
District of Columbia
Joshua Rodriguez
District of Columbia Department of Environment - Water Quality Division
1200 First Street NE, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 535-2226
Florida
William Joyner
U.S. EPA Region IV, ECAD/WEB/WES
61 Forsyth St SW, MC-9T25
Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
(404) 562-8795
Georgia
Sam Wright
Georgia DNR
Environmental Protection Division
Watershed Protection Branch
2 MLK Jr. Dr., S.W., Suite 1152 East
Atlanta, GA 30334
(470) 524-1643
Guam
Maricar Quezon
Water Pollution Control Program
Guam EPA
P.O. Box 22439
Barrigada, GU 96921
(671) 475-1601
Hawaii
Randee Tubal
Hawaii Department of Health
Clean Water Branch
2827 Waimano Home Road, Room 225
Pearl City, HI 96782
(808) 586-4309
Idaho
Stacey Kim
U.S. EPA Region X
ECAD/WEFB/SWES
1200 Sixth Ave
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1380
Illinois
Michelle Rousey
Illinois EPA
Bureau of Water
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276 (Mail Code 15)
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
(217) 785-3944
Indiana
Becky Ruark
Indiana DEM/Office of Water Quality
100 North Senate Avenue
MC 65-42, IGCN N1255
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251
(317) 691-1909
Iowa
Peggy Mnich
U.S. EPA Region VII, ECAD/WB
11201 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(913) 551-7075
Kansas*
Paul Harrison
Kansas Dept. of Health & Environment
Kansas Health and Environmental Laboratories
6810 SE Dwight Street
Topeka, KS 66620
(785) 296-6198
Kentucky*
Patrick J. Garrity
Laboratory Certification Officer
Kentucky DEP - Division of Water
300 Sower Blvd, 3rd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 782-6954
Louisiana*
Sandy Coon
Louisiana DEQ
Office of Environmental Compliance
P.O. Box 4312
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312
(225) 219-3614
Maine*
Brett Goodrich
Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection
Division of Water Quality Management
17 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333
(207) 287-9034
Maryland
Ron Wicks
Maryland Dept. of the Environment
Water Management Administration
Compliance Program
1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 420
Baltimore, MD 21230
(410) 537-3607
Massachusetts
Ping Yee
Massachusetts DEP/Boston Office
100 Cambridge St, Suite 800
Boston, MA 02114
(617) 634-9744
Michigan
Chris Veldkamp
Michigan EGLE
Water Resources Division
State of Michigan Building
350 Ottawa Ave NW, Unit 10
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 401-1556
Minnesota
Sarah Yost
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Environmental Outcomes Division
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 757-2810
Mississippi
Beverly Ashmore-Bates
Mississippi DEQ
Office of Pollution Control
1542 Old Whitfield Road
Pearl, MS 39208
(601) 961-5737
Missouri
Peggy Mnich
U.S. EPA Region VII, ECAD/WB
11201 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(913) 551-7075
Montana
Gina Self
Montana DEQ
Water Protection Bureau
P.O. Box 200901
Helena, MT 59620-0901
(406) 444-5388
Nebraska
Reuel Anderson
Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy
Water Quality Division
P.O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509
(402) 471-1367
Nevada*
Donald E. LaFara
Bureau of Safe Drinking Water
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 687-9491
(List continues next page ➜)
New Hampshire‡‡
Stephanie Larson
New Hampshire DES - Water Division
P.O. Box 95
Concord, NH 03302-0095
(603) 271-1493
New Jersey*
Department of Environmental Protection
Office of Quality Assurance
Laboratory Certification Programs
P.O. Box 402, Mail Code 401-02D
Trenton, NJ 08625-0402
(609) 777-1749
New Mexico
Jason Martinez
New Mexico Environment Department
Surface Water Quality Bureau
Harold Runnels Bldg, N 2050
1190 South St. Francis Drive (8750S)
P.O. Box 5469
Santa Fe, NM 87505-5469
(505) 372-8376
psrs.program.manager@env.nm.gov
New York
Molly Hillenbrand
U.S. EPA Region II, LSASD/MAB/MOS
2890 Woodbridge Ave (MS 220)
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 321-4452
North Carolina*
Todd Crawford
North Carolina DEQ
Division of Water Resources
Laboratory Certification Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
(919) 733-3908, ext. 251
North Dakota
Marty Haroldson
North Dakota DEQ
Division of Water Quality
Permits Program
918 East Divide Ave., 4th Floor
Bismarck, ND 58501
(701) 328-5234
Northern Mariana Islands
Adam Howell
U.S. EPA Region IX
ECAD/WB/WS1
75 Hawthorne St (ENF-3-1)
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 972-4248
Ohio
Steve Roberts
Ohio EPA
8955 East Main Street
Reynoldsburg, OH 43068
(614) 644-4225
Oklahoma*
Lynzie Chan
Oklahoma DEQ
P.O. Box 1677
Oklahoma City, OK 73101
(405) 702-8243
Oregon
George Cannon
Oregon DEQ
Water Quality Permitting and Program Development
700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 600
Portland, OR 97232
(503) 734-9843
Pennsylvania*
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Laboratories
Attn: Laboratory Accreditation Program
P.O. Box 1467
Harrisburg, PA 17105-1467
Puerto Rico
Molly Hillenbrand
U.S. EPA Region II, LSASD/MAB/MOS
2890 Woodbridge Ave (MS 220)
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 321-4452
Rhode Island
Matthew Puglia, PE
Rhode Island DEM
Office of Water Resources
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
(401) 222-4700, ext. 7131
South Carolina*
Bennie L. Cockerel
Office of Environmental Lab Certification
SC DHEC Bureau of
Environmental Services
2600 Bull St
Columbia, SC 29201
(803) 896-0974
South Dakota
Tim Flor
South Dakota Dept of
Environment & Natural Resources
Surface Water Quality Program
523 East Capital
Pierre, SD 57501
(605) 773-3351
Tennessee
Barbara Loudermilk
Division of Water Resources
Compliance & Enforcement Unit
William R. Snodgrass TN Tower
312 Rosa Parks Blvd, 11th Floor
Nashville, TN 37243
(615) 686-9755 or (615) 313-5742
Texas
Penny Sterling
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 13087, MC 165
Austin, TX 78711
(512) 239-1617
Utah*
Lisa-kay Prideaux
U.S. EPA Region VIII
ECAD/WEB/NWES
10 West 15th Street (8MO)
Helena, MT 59626
(406) 457-5022
Vermont
Amy Polaczyk
Vermont DEC
1 National Life Dr. - Bldg Main 2
Montpelier, VT 05620-3522
(802) 490-6185
Virgin Islands
Molly Hillenbrand
U.S. EPA Region II, LSASD/MAB/MOS
2890 Woodbridge Ave (MS 220)
Edison, NJ 08837
(732) 321-4452
Virginia*
DCLS Laboratory Certification Office
600 N. 5th Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 648-4480
Washington
Rebecca Wood
Washington State Dept. of Ecology
Laboratory Accreditation Unit
P.O. Box 488
Manchester, WA 98353
(360) 871-8811
West Virginia*
Justin Carpenter
West Virginia DEP
601 57th Street, S.E.
Charleston, WV 25304
(304) 926-0499, ext. 43765
Wisconsin*
Wisconsin DNR
Laboratory Certification Program - SS/7
PO Box 7921
101 S Webster St.
Madison, WI 53707
(608) 264-6006
Wyoming
Steve E. Vien, PhD
Wyoming DEQ
Water Quality Division
208 South College Drive
Cheyenne, WY 82002
(307) 777-7654
Your coordinator may change.
Please visit https://www.epa.gov/compliance/state-discharge-monitoring-report-quality-assurance-dmr-qa-coordinators and https://www.epa.gov/compliance/regional-discharge-monitoring-report-quality-assurance-dmr-qa-coordinators for the latest list of coordinators.
For additional questions, contact US EPA Headquarters:
Greg Savitske
USEPA/OECA/OC/MAMPD
1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Mail Code 2227A
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 564-2601
|
United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance DMR-QA Study 43 (This data is collected under the authority of Section 308 of the Clean Water Act.) |
OMB Control No. 2080-0021 Approval expires xx/xx/xxxx |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 023 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Instructions for the NPDES Permittee Data Report Form:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement. This collection of information is approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2080-0021). Responses to this collection of information are mandatory for Major and select Minor NPDES permit holders under Clean Water Act section 308 [33 U.S.C. § 1318]. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 6.6 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to the Regulatory Support Division Director, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NPDES Permittee Data Report FormAttention: Follow the instructions on the previous page to complete this form and submit data for evaluation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Due September 29, 2023 |
NPDES Permit Number (State + 7-digit ID)
|
Permit Extension
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Permittee Name
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Current Permittee Mailing Address
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
City
|
State
|
Zip Code
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Phone Number
|
Fax Number
|
E-mail Address
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Optional: If WP Study was used, list PT Provider name(s):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Optional: IF WP Study was used, list WP Study Number(s):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
For DMR-QA Study 43, conducted in 2023, the Permittee ensured that their laboratory(ies) performing the required analyses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Received PT Samples |
Submitted Complete and Accurate Data by August 4, 2023 |
Received a Graded Report by |
|||||||||||||||||||
YES ❏ NO ❏ |
YES ❏ NO ❏ |
YES ❏ NO ❏ |
|||||||||||||||||||
Each reported value was produced from a single analytical run using the analytical system that routinely performs these analyses to produce compliance monitoring data under our NPDES permit. |
Neither I nor any of my subordinates compared our results with results from independent analyses conducted by us or any other laboratory before we reported our results to U.S. EPA. |
||||||||||||||||||||
YES ❏ NO ❏ |
YES ❏ NO ❏ |
||||||||||||||||||||
Certification by Permit Holder or Authorized Representative I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Certifying Official
|
Title
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Signature
|
Date
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Address, phone number and e-mail of certifying official are required if different from above. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Address
|
Phone Number
|
||||||||||||||||||||
City
|
State
|
Zip Code
|
E-mail Address
|
||||||||||||||||||
Permittee Name
|
NPDES Permit Number (State + 7-digit ID)
|
Permit Extension
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Identification of all CHEM, MICRO and WET laboratories who performed analyses for this permit |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory Name |
Laboratory Address |
U.S. EPA Lab Code |
Lab Analysis Check box(es) that apply |
Lab Type* |
State-certified Lab** |
||||||||||||||||
Chem |
Micro |
WET |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
|
❏ |
||||||||||||||
* Lab Types: C = Commercial; F = Federal; G = Local Government; I = Industrial; O = Other; S = State ** See Footnotes 2, 3, and 4 on page 5 (Frequently Asked Questions) for the current list of states with lab accreditation programs |
|||||||||||||||||||||
If you need additional space, please make a copy of this page for additional laboratories. |
Permittee Name |
|
NPDES Permit No. |
|
EPA Lab Code |
|
|
Chemistry/Microbiology Analyte ChecklistDMR-QA Study 43 |
2023 |
Analyte Test |
Test Required |
Method Number Used (Optional) |
Laboratory’s Graded Result |
Analyte determined by state-certified lab* |
|
Acceptable |
Not Acceptable (Corrective Action Required) |
||||
Microbiology |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
E. coli, MF or MPN |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Fecal Coliform, MF or MPN |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Coliform, MF or MPN |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Trace Metals |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
Aluminum |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Antimony |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Arsenic |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Barium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Beryllium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Cadmium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Chromium, total |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Chromium, hexavalent |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Cobalt |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Copper |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Iron |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Lead |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Manganese |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Mercury |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Mercury (Low-Level) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Molybdenum |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Nickel |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Selenium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Silver |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Thallium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Vanadium |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Zinc |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Demands |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
5-day BOD |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
5-day Carbonaceous BOD |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
COD |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
TOC |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Minerals |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
Alkalinity, total (CaCO3) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Chloride |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Fluoride |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Hardness, total (CaCO3) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Specific conductance (25°C) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Sulfate |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Dissolved Solids (180°C) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Nutrients |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
Ammonia as N |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Nitrate as N |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Nitrite as N |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Orthophosphate as P |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Kjeldahl-Nitrogen as N |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Phosphorus as P |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Misc. Analytes |
——— |
—————— |
——————— |
——————— |
——————— |
Non-Filterable Residue (TSS) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Oil and Grease |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
pH |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Cyanide |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Phenolics (4-AAP) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Residual Chlorine |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Total Residual Chlorine (Low-Level) |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Settleable Solids |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Turbidity |
❏ |
|
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Name |
|
Signature |
|
Date |
|
* See Footnotes 2 through 4 on page 5 Complete
a separate checklist for EACH lab.
Permittee Name |
|
NPDES Permit No. |
|
EPA Lab Code |
|
|
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Analyte ChecklistDMR-QA Study 43 |
2023 |
Analyte Number |
Organism / Conditions |
Endpoint |
Test Required |
Laboratory’s Graded Result |
Analyte determined by state-certified lab* |
|
Acceptable |
Not Acceptable (Corrective
Action |
|||||
Test Code 13 (refer to EPA Method 2000.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
754 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - MHSF 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 14 (refer to EPA Method 2000.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
755 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - 20% DMW |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 15 (refer to EPA Method 1000.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
756 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - MHSF |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
808 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - MHSF |
IC25** (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
810 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - MHSF |
NOEC (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 16 (refer to EPA Method 1000.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
759 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - 20% DMW |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
812 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - 20% DMW |
IC25** (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
814 |
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) - 20% DMW |
NOEC (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 19 (refer to EPA Method 2002.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
764 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia - MHSF 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 20 (refer to EPA Method 2002.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
765 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia - 20% DMW 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 21 (refer to EPA Method 1002.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
766 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia – MHSF |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
767 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia – MHSF |
IC25** REPRODUCTION |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
768 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia – MHSF |
NOEC REPRODUCTION |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 22 (refer to EPA Method 1002.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
769 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia - 20% DMW |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
770 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia - 20% DMW |
IC25** REPRODUCTION |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
771 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia - 20% DMW |
NOEC REPRODUCTION |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 32 (refer to EPA Method 2021.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
788 |
Daphnia magna - MHSF 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 38 (refer to EPA Method 2021.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
794 |
Daphnia pulex - MHSF 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 42 (refer to EPA Method 2007.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
798 |
Mysid (Americamysis bahia, Mysidopsis bahia) 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 43 (refer to EPA Method 1007.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
799 |
Mysid (Americamysis bahia, Mysidopsis bahia) |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
816 |
Mysid (Americamysis bahia, Mysidopsis bahia) |
IC25** (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
818 |
Mysid (Americamysis bahia, Mysidopsis bahia) |
NOEC (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 44 (refer to EPA Method 2006.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
803 |
Inland silverside (Menidia beryllina) 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 45 (refer to EPA Method 1006.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
824 |
Inland silverside (Menidia beryllina) |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
825 |
Inland silverside (Menidia beryllina) |
IC25** (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
826 |
Inland silverside (Menidia beryllina) |
NOEC (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 46 (refer to EPA Method 2004.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
804 |
Sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) 25°C |
LC50 |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Test Code 47 (refer to EPA Method 1004.0) |
——————— |
——— |
——— |
—————— |
————— |
|
805 |
Sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) |
NOEC SURVIVAL |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
820 |
Sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) |
IC25** (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
822 |
Sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) |
NOEC (ON) GROWTH |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
❏ |
Name |
|
Signature |
|
Date |
|
|
* See Footnotes 2 through 4 on page 5 ** Preferred endpoint for DMR-QA performance test reporting |
Complete a separate checklist for EACH lab. |
* EPA is authorized to collect this information under Section 308 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1318. This information request is enforceable under Section 309 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1319. EPA may grant a waiver from participating in DMR-QA to states with laboratory quality assurance programs approved by EPA as a substitute for the DMR-QA Study. Refer to the footnote on page 5 to determine if you are covered by an EPA waiver or contact your State DMR-QA Coordinator.
† As of April 1, 2023, permittees in the following states have laboratory quality assurance programs approved by EPA as a substitute for DMR-QA Study 43: California, Kansas, Kentucky, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
‡ Louisiana has an approved laboratory quality assurance program for commercial laboratories only.
§
NPDES permittees in Arkansas, Maine, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma
that have all their wastewater laboratories covered by their state
laboratory accreditation program are also exempted from DMR-QA Study
43; any permittee that has a laboratory not fully certified by the
state must perform the DMR-QA study.
Check with your State
DMR-QA Coordinator if you have questions about your state’s
waiver status.
** Some or all permittees in these states may not be required to participate in DMR-QA Study 43 due to a full or partial waiver agreement with EPA.
†† Some or all permittees in Arkansas can now submit their DMR-QA Study 43 results electronically through Arkansas DEQ’s ePortal website (see website link, above).
‡‡ Some or all permittees in these states may not be required to participate in DMR-QA Study 43 due to a full or partial waiver agreement with EPA.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | EPA Discharge Monitoring Report - Quality Assurance (DMR-QA) Study 43 (2023) |
Author | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2023-07-29 |