Guide to the International Hague Agreement

Hague Guide for Users
Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 9
The Guide ............................................................................................................................. 9
The Hague System: general overview ................................................................................ 10
Who may use the System?............................................................................................. 10
No prior national application or registration .................................................................... 10
Contents of the application ............................................................................................. 10
Transmitting the international application to the International Bureau ............................. 11
Formal examination by the International Bureau ............................................................ 11
Publication ..................................................................................................................... 11
Substantive examination by the Office of each designated Contracting Party:
possibility of notifying a refusal of protection .................................................................. 12
Statement of grant of protection ..................................................................................... 12
Protection governed by domestic law ............................................................................. 13
Duration of protection ..................................................................................................... 13
Changes in the International Register............................................................................. 13
Advantages of the Hague System ....................................................................................... 13
Becoming party to the Hague Agreement ............................................................................ 14
States ............................................................................................................................. 14
Intergovernmental organizations .................................................................................... 14
Entry into force of the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act with respect to a given Contracting
Party .............................................................................................................................. 15
Determination of which Act is applicable in respect of the designation of a given
Contracting Party ........................................................................................................... 16
Determination of the Act or Acts which govern an international application as a whole .. 16
Declarations by Contracting Parties .................................................................................... 17
Examining Office ............................................................................................................ 18
Submission of declarations............................................................................................. 18
Effective date of declarations ......................................................................................... 18
Mandatory declaration .................................................................................................... 18
Duration of protection – maximum duration of protection ............................................. 18
Declarations that are mandatory in certain circumstances .............................................. 19
Deferment of publication .............................................................................................. 19
Deferred publication for a period that is less than the prescribed period .................. 19
No deferment of publication ..................................................................................... 19
Optional declarations...................................................................................................... 19
Prohibition on filing through national Office.................................................................. 20
Prohibition on self-designation ..................................................................................... 20

page 2

Hague Guide for Users

Security clearance ....................................................................................................... 20
Designation fees (declaration) ..................................................................................... 20
Individual designation fees ....................................................................................... 20
Standard designation fees ....................................................................................... 22
Mandatory contents of an international application (declaration) ................................. 23
Identity of the creator ............................................................................................... 23
Brief description ....................................................................................................... 23
Claim ....................................................................................................................... 24
Special requirements concerning the applicant and the creator (Rule 8) (declaration) . 24
Filing in name of the creator ..................................................................................... 24
Oath or declaration of the creator............................................................................. 24
Unity of design............................................................................................................. 25
Refusal of protection.................................................................................................... 26
Extension of period for notification of refusal (Rule 18(1)(b)) .................................... 26
Date of effect of international registration .................................................................... 26
Date of effect of international registration (Rule 18(1)(c)(i)) ...................................... 26
Date of effect of international registration (Rule 18(1)(c)(ii)) ..................................... 26
Effect of change in ownership...................................................................................... 27
Common Office of several states ................................................................................. 27
Official records ............................................................................................................... 27
Extracts and certified copies ........................................................................................... 27
Priority documents and WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS) .......................................... 28
Data dissemination ......................................................................................................... 28
General .................................................................................................................................. 29
Communications with the International Bureau.................................................................... 29
Modalities of communications with the International Bureau........................................... 29
Communications sent by mail ...................................................................................... 29
Communications sent by facsimile [Deleted] ............................................................... 30
Communications sent by electronic means.................................................................. 30
Official forms .................................................................................................................. 30
Continuation sheets........................................................................................................ 31
Indication of dates .......................................................................................................... 31
Unofficial forms .............................................................................................................. 31
Calculation of time limits ...................................................................................................... 31
Excuse of delay in meeting time limits ................................................................................. 33
Languages .......................................................................................................................... 34
International applications ................................................................................................ 34

Hague Guide for Users

page 3

Translation ..................................................................................................................... 35
Payment of fees to the International Bureau ........................................................................ 35
Currency of payment ...................................................................................................... 35
Mode of payment ........................................................................................................... 35
Date of payment ............................................................................................................. 36
Change in the amount of fee .......................................................................................... 36
Representation before the International Bureau .................................................................. 37
Method of appointment of a representative .................................................................... 37
In the international application ..................................................................................... 37
In a request for the recording of a change ................................................................... 38
In a separate communication....................................................................................... 38
Only one representative ................................................................................................. 38
Irregular appointment ..................................................................................................... 38
Recording and notification of appointment ...................................................................... 39
Effect of the appointment................................................................................................ 39
Cancellation of appointment ........................................................................................... 40
No fees........................................................................................................................... 40
International procedure .......................................................................................................... 41
Harmonization of terminology .............................................................................................. 41
Entitlement to file an international application ...................................................................... 41
Determination of the State of origin (under the 1960 Act) and determination of the
applicant’s Contracting Party (under the 1999 Act) ......................................................... 42
Determination of the State of origin under the 1960 Act............................................... 42
Determination of the applicant’s Contracting Party under the 1999 Act ....................... 43
Plurality of entitlements .................................................................................................. 43
Several applicants .......................................................................................................... 43
Contents of the international application .............................................................................. 44
Mandatory contents ........................................................................................................ 44
Additional mandatory contents ....................................................................................... 44
Optional contents ........................................................................................................... 44
Special requirements under the law of a Contracting Party ............................................ 46
Special requirements concerning the applicant and the creator ................................... 46
Special requirements concerning the unity of the design ............................................. 47
Language of the international application ....................................................................... 47
How to submit an international application to the International Bureau:
eHague or DM/1 form .......................................................................................................... 49
How to complete the international application (form DM/1 or eHague)? ......................... 50
Item 1: Applicant (mandatory)..................................................................................... 50
Name ....................................................................................................................... 50

page 4

Hague Guide for Users

Several applicants.................................................................................................... 50
Address ................................................................................................................... 50
Item 2: Entitlement to file (mandatory) ........................................................................ 51
Entitlement via an intergovernmental organization ................................................... 51
Multiple entitlements ................................................................................................ 51
Item 3: Applicant’s Contracting Party (mandatory where the 1999 Act applies) .......... 52
Item 4: Address for correspondence ........................................................................... 52
Several applicants: address for correspondence ..................................................... 52
Phone and email address ........................................................................................ 52
Item 5: Appointment of a representative (if any) ......................................................... 52
Item 6: Number of industrial designs, reproductions and/or specimens (mandatory) .. 53
Item 7: Designated Contracting Parties (mandatory) .................................................. 54
What Contracting Parties may be designated? ........................................................ 55
Protection in the State of origin and in the applicant’s Contracting Party .................. 55
Application filed in the name of the creator............................................................... 56
Item 8: Products which constitute the industrial design or in relation to
which it is to be used (mandatory) ............................................................................... 56
Item 9: Description ..................................................................................................... 57
Item 10: Description of the reproductions (legends) .................................................... 57
Item 11: Identity of the creator .................................................................................... 58
Item 12: Claim (applicable only to the designation of the United States
of America or Viet Nam) .............................................................................................. 59
Item 13: Priority claim – Article 4 of the Paris Convention ........................................... 59
WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS) ............................................................................ 61
Item 14: International exhibition – Article 11 of the Paris Convention .......................... 62
Item 15: Exception to lack of novelty (optional element applicable only to the
designation of Japan and/or Republic of Korea) .......................................................... 62
Item 16: Relation with a principal design (optional element applicable only to the
designation of Japan and/or Republic of Korea) .......................................................... 62
Item 17: Publication of the international registration.................................................... 63
Immediate publication .............................................................................................. 64
Deferred publication ................................................................................................. 64
Item 18: Reduction of the individual designation fee (applicable
only to the designation of Israel, Mexico or the United States of America) ................... 64
Item 19: Signature by the applicant or representative (mandatory) ............................. 65
Name of contact person ........................................................................................... 65
Payment of fees .......................................................................................................... 65

Hague Guide for Users

page 5

Fees due .................................................................................................................. 66
Reduction of fees for applicants from Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ............... 66
Individual designation fee payable in two parts (applicable
only to the designation of Mexico and the United States of America) ....................... 67
Annex I: Oath or declaration of the creator ................................................................. 68
Annex II: Supporting document(s) concerning a declaration
to the exception to lack of novelty ................................................................................ 69
Annex III: Information on eligibility for protection......................................................... 69
Annex IV: Reduction of United States individual designation fee ................................ 70
Annex V: Supporting document(s) concerning priority claim ....................................... 70
The reproductions of the industrial designs ......................................................................... 72
Guidance........................................................................................................................ 72
Mode of reproduction ..................................................................................................... 72
Representation of the industrial design........................................................................... 73
Disclaimers and matter that does not form part of the claimed design ............................ 74
Number of reproductions ................................................................................................ 74
Numbering of reproductions and legends ....................................................................... 74
Dimensions of the reproductions .................................................................................... 75
Specific views................................................................................................................. 75
Quality of the reproductions............................................................................................ 75
Filing of specimens under the 1999 Act .......................................................................... 76
Filing of specimens under the 1960 Act .......................................................................... 76
Requirements concerning specimens ............................................................................. 76
No additional matter ....................................................................................................... 77
Presentation of the international application to the International Bureau.............................. 77
Channels of communication ........................................................................................... 77
Filing date of the international application ....................................................................... 78
Irregularities in the international application .................................................................... 78
Time limit for correcting irregularities ........................................................................... 78
Irregularities entailing a postponement of the filing date of the international
application ................................................................................................................... 79
Irregularities concerning special requirement notified by a Contracting Party or
regarding the identity of the creator, description and claim .......................................... 79
Publication of the international registration .......................................................................... 80
Publication cycle ............................................................................................................ 81
Timing of publication ...................................................................................................... 81
Deferment of publication ................................................................................................ 81
Consequences of deferred publication ........................................................................ 81
Periods of deferment ................................................................................................... 82

page 6

Hague Guide for Users

Events during period of deferment.................................................................................. 84
Request for earlier publication ..................................................................................... 84
Request to provide extract or authorize access ........................................................... 84
Renunciation or limitation ............................................................................................ 84
Furnishing of confidential copies to Examining Offices; confidentiality ........................ 85
Updating of data concerning the international registration ........................................... 86
The international registration ............................................................................................... 86
Registration in the International Register ........................................................................ 86
Crediting of fees ............................................................................................................. 87
Date of the international registration ............................................................................... 87
Refusal of protection ........................................................................................................... 87
Notion of refusal ............................................................................................................. 87
Grounds for refusal......................................................................................................... 88
Unity of design............................................................................................................. 88
Specific views or sufficient disclosure of the design ..................................................... 89
Time limits for refusal ..................................................................................................... 89
Procedure for refusal of protection ................................................................................. 90
Contents of the notification .......................................................................................... 90
Recording and publication of the refusal; transmittal to the holder .............................. 91
Language of the notification of refusal ......................................................................... 91
Irregular notifications of refusal.................................................................................... 91
Procedure following notification of refusal.................................................................... 92
Notification of withdrawal of refusal and statement of grant of protection............................. 94
Notification of withdrawal of refusal ................................................................................ 94
Statement of grant of protection following a refusal ........................................................ 94
Statement of grant of protection in the absence of a prior notification of refusal ............. 95
Effects of the international registration................................................................................. 96
Effects of the international registration in respect of
Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act ........................................................ 96
Effect as a national application and effect as a grant of protection............................... 96
Postponed international registration date..................................................................... 98
Payment of the second part of the individual designation fee ...................................... 99
Effects of the international registration in respect of Contracting Parties
designated under the 1960 Act ....................................................................................... 99
Term of protection of international registrations in respect of Contracting Parties
designated under the 1999 Act ..................................................................................... 100
Term of protection of international registrations in respect of Contracting Parties
designated under the 1960 Act ..................................................................................... 100
Changes in the international registration ........................................................................... 100

Hague Guide for Users

page 7

Types of changes ......................................................................................................... 100
Change in ownership......................................................................................................... 101
Entitlement to be recorded as new holder .................................................................... 102
Refusal period ........................................................................................................... 103
Deferment of publication ............................................................................................ 103
Individual renewal fees .............................................................................................. 103
Entitlements of the new owner in several contracting parties bound by
different acts (plurality of entitlements) ...................................................................... 103
Who can present the request ....................................................................................... 104
Contents of the request ................................................................................................ 104
Appointment of a representative ................................................................................... 105
Irregular or inadmissible requests................................................................................. 105
Request not admissible ............................................................................................. 105
Irregular request ........................................................................................................ 105
Partial change in ownership – numbering ..................................................................... 105
Merger.......................................................................................................................... 106
Recording, notification and publication ......................................................................... 106
Effect of the recording of a change in ownership .......................................................... 106
Refusal of the effects of the recording of a change in ownership
issued by the Office of a designated Contracting Party ................................................ 107
Change in the name and/or address of the holder ............................................................. 108
Item 1: International registration number .................................................................. 108
Item 2: Holder ........................................................................................................... 108
Item 3: Change ......................................................................................................... 109
Item 4: Address for correspondence ......................................................................... 109
Item 5: Appointment of a representative ................................................................... 109
Item 6: Signature by the holder or representative ..................................................... 109
Fee calculation sheet................................................................................................. 110
Irregular requests ......................................................................................................... 110
Recording, notification and publication ......................................................................... 110
Renunciation ..................................................................................................................... 110
Item 1: International registration number .................................................................. 110
Item 2: Holder ........................................................................................................... 111
Item 3: Appointment of a representative ................................................................... 111
Item 4: Contracting Parties ....................................................................................... 111
Item 5: Signature by the holder or representative ..................................................... 111
Fee calculation sheet................................................................................................. 111
Irregular requests ......................................................................................................... 112

page 8

Hague Guide for Users

Recording, notification and publication ......................................................................... 112
Limitation........................................................................................................................... 112
Item 1: International registration number .................................................................. 112
Item 2: Holder ........................................................................................................... 112
Item 3: Appointment of a representative ................................................................... 113
Item 4: Industrial designs .......................................................................................... 113
Item 5: Contracting Parties ....................................................................................... 113
Item 6: Signature by the holder or representative ..................................................... 113
Fee calculation sheet................................................................................................. 113
Irregular requests ......................................................................................................... 113
Recording, notification and publication ......................................................................... 114
It is not possible to record a license in the International Register....................................... 114
Corrections in the International Register............................................................................ 114
Renewal of the international registration............................................................................ 114
Renewal following refusal or invalidation ...................................................................... 115
Procedure for renewal .................................................................................................. 116
Fees for renewal........................................................................................................ 117
Individual designation fee and renewal for the United States of America ................... 117
Insufficient fees paid .................................................................................................. 118
Recording of the renewal; certificate and publication ................................................... 118
Crediting of fees ........................................................................................................... 119
Non-renewal ................................................................................................................. 119
Invalidation in a designated Contracting Party ................................................................... 120
Termination of the 1934 Act ................................................................................................. 121
Implications of the freezing of the application of the 1934 Act ........................................... 121
International registrations resulting from international applications
governed exclusively by the 1934 Act ............................................................................... 121
Language ..................................................................................................................... 122
No refusal of protection ................................................................................................ 122
Change in ownership.................................................................................................... 122
Renewal ....................................................................................................................... 122
International registrations resulting from international applications
governed partly by the 1934 Act ........................................................................................ 123
No refusal of protection ................................................................................................ 123
Change in ownership.................................................................................................... 123
Renewal ....................................................................................................................... 123
Termination of the 1934 Act .............................................................................................. 124

Hague Guide for Users

page 9

Introduction
The Guide
This is a Guide to the international registration of industrial designs. The Hague System for
international registration of industrial designs is based on the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Registration of Industrial Designs, which is constituted by two different Acts,
namely:
• the Geneva Act (1999), hereinafter referred to as the 1999 Act, which was adopted

on July 2, 1999, and entered into force on December 23, 2003, and
• the Hague Act (1960), hereinafter referred to as the 1960 Act, which was adopted

on November 28, 1960, and entered into force on August 1, 1984.
The London Act (1934) of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of
Industrial Designs, which was adopted on June 2, 1934, and entered into force in June 1939,
was terminated on October 18, 2016, in accordance with the decision taken by the 15
Contracting Parties to that Act, namely, Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, France, Germany,
Indonesia, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Morocco, the Netherlands, Senegal, Spain, Suriname,
Switzerland and Tunisia, at their Extraordinary Meeting on September 24, 2009 (refer to
“Termination of the 1934 Act”). This Guide therefore focuses on the 1960 and 1999 Acts.
The application of the 1960 and 1999 Acts is supplemented by the Common Regulations
and the Administrative Instructions.
The system for international registration of industrial designs is referred to as the “Hague
System”.
This Guide is structured as follows:
• The “Introduction” includes explanations as to how a State or an intergovernmental

organization may become a Contracting Party to the Hague Agreement and
provides an outline of the various declarations and notifications that may be made
under the Hague System.
• “General” covers communications with the International Bureau, calculation of time
limits, languages, payment of fees to the International Bureau and representation
before the International Bureau.
• The “International procedure (1999 and 1960 Acts)” deals with the international
registration procedure and other procedures required for the recording of events
which may affect an international registration (such as changes in ownership,
refusals of protection, etc.).
Wherever possible, the provisions of the 1999 and 1960 Acts, the Common Regulations and
the Administrative Instructions that are relevant to a particular paragraph of the Guide are
cited underneath that paragraph. Such provisions are cited in the following manner:
•
•
•
•

“99 Article xx” refers to an Article of the 1999 Act;
“60 Article xx” refers to an Article of the 1960 Act;
“Rule xx” refers to a Rule of the Common Regulations; and
“A.I. Section xx” refers to a Section of the Administrative Instructions.

page 10

Hague Guide for Users

The Hague System: general overview
In simple terms, the Hague Agreement offers the possibility of obtaining protection for
industrial designs in several Contracting Parties by means of a single international
application filed with the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland. Thus, under the Hague System, one international
application replaces a whole series of applications which would otherwise have to be filed
with different national offices.
The Hague System is administered by the International Bureau of WIPO. The International
Bureau maintains the International Register and publishes the International Designs Bulletin
(I.D.B).
The paragraphs below are intended only to represent a broad outline of the international
procedure under the 1999 and the 1960 Acts. For more details concerning each of the
matters concerned, refer to “International procedure”.

Who may use the System?
The entitlement to file an international application under the Hague Agreement is limited to
natural persons or legal entities having a real and effective industrial or commercial
establishment, or a domicile, in at least one of the Contracting Parties to the Hague
Agreement, or being a national of one of these Contracting Parties, or of a member State of
an intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party.
60 Article 3; 99 Article 3
In addition, but only under the 1999 Act, an international application may be filed on the
basis of habitual residence in a Contracting Party.
The Contracting Party with respect to which the applicant fulfills the above condition is
referred to as the “State of origin” under the 1960 Act and the “applicant’s Contracting Party”
under the 1999 Act.

No prior national application or registration
The filing of an international application does not require any prior national application or
registration. Protection for an industrial design can therefore be applied for at the
international level through the Hague Agreement for the first time.

Contents of the application
A single international application may comprise several different designs (“multiple
application”), up to a maximum of 100. All designs included in the same application must,
however, belong to the same class of the international classification of Locarno. In other
words, the international application is “monoclass”.
60 Article 5; 99 Article 5; Rule 7
An international application must be filed on the official form, either through the eHague
interface or by using the paper application form, made available by the International Bureau
or on the website of the Office of a Contracting Party. An international application must

Hague Guide for Users

page 11

contain,
inter alia, a reproduction of the industrial design concerned, together with the designation of
the Contracting Parties in which protection is sought. It must be filed in English, French, or
Spanish.
Rule 1(1)(vi); Rule 7
The applicant may request that publication be deferred for a period which may not exceed
12 months (under the 1960 Act) or 30 months (under the 1999 Act) from the date of filing or,
where priority is claimed, from the priority date.
60 Articles 5(3)(a) and 6(4); 99 Article 5(5)
An international application is subject to the payment of three types of fees: a basic fee, a
publication fee and, in respect of each Contracting Party where protection is sought, either a
standard or an individual designation fee. As regards standard fees, a three-level structure
of standard fees applies, reflecting the level of examination carried out by the Office of a
Contracting Party.
60 Article 15; 99 Article 7; 99 Article 5(1)(vi); Rule 12

Transmitting the international application to the International Bureau
An international application is normally sent directly to the International Bureau by the
applicant, in which case either the eHagueinterface or the paper application form may be
used. Under the 1960 Act, however, a Contracting Party is entitled to require that, where it
is considered to be the State of origin, the application be filed through its national Office. In
that case, only the paper form may be used.
99 Article 4(1); 60 Article 4

Formal examination by the International Bureau
Upon receipt of the international application, the International Bureau checks that it complies
with the prescribed formal requirements. The International Bureau does not appraise or
concern itself in any way with the novelty of the design and it is therefore not entitled to
reject an international application on this or any other substantive ground.

Publication
An international application that complies with the prescribed formal requirements is
recorded in the International Register and, in due course, published in the I.D.B.. This
weekly publication takes place electronically on the WIPO website every Friday and contains
all the relevant data concerning the international registration, including a reproduction of the
industrial designs. The date on which each issue of the Bulletin is made available on the
WIPO website is communicated electronically by the International Bureau to the Office of a
Contracting Party, if the latter wishes to receive the said communication.

page 12

Hague Guide for Users

Substantive examination by the Office of each designated Contracting
Party: possibility of notifying a refusal of protection
Upon publication of the international registration in the I.D.B., the Office of each designated
Contracting Party can proceed with the substantive examination, if any, provided for by its
own legislation. As a result of that examination, the Office may notify to the International
Bureau a refusal of protection for its territory. However, an international registration may not
be refused on grounds of non-compliance with formal requirements, since such
requirements must be considered satisfied following the examination carried out by the
International Bureau.
60 Article 8(1); 99 Article 12(1)
A refusal of protection, if any, must be notified to the International Bureau within six months
from the date of publication of the international registration. Under the 1999 Act, however,
any Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office, or whose law provides for the
possibility of opposition to the grant of protection, may declare that the refusal period of
six months is replaced by a period of 12 months.
60 Article 8(2); 99 Article 12(2); Rule 18(1)
In the event of notification of a refusal, the holder has the same remedies as he would have
if he had filed the application in question directly with the national Office concerned.
60 Article 8(3); 99 Article 12(3)
If the holder contests the refusal, the ensuing procedure devolves exclusively at the national
level, according to the requirements and procedures provided for by the applicable domestic
legislation. The International Bureau is not involved in this procedure. An appeal against a
refusal of protection must be submitted to the competent authorities of the Contracting Party
concerned within the time limit and in accordance with the conditions laid down in that
Contracting Party’s own legislation.

Statement of grant of protection
The Office of a designated Contracting Party which has not communicated a notification of
refusal may, within the applicable refusal period, send to the International Bureau a
statement to the effect that protection is granted to the industrial designs that are the subject
of the international registration in the Contracting Party concerned.
Rule 18bis(1)
However, no legal consequences result from the fact that such a statement of grant of
protection has not been sent by an Office. It remains the case that the industrial designs
that are the subject of the international registration are protected if no notification of refusal
has been sent within the applicable refusal period.

Hague Guide for Users

page 13

Protection governed by domestic law
In each designated Contracting Party, where the Office has not communicated a refusal (or
has subsequently withdrawn its refusal), the international registration produces the same
effect as a grant of protection for an industrial design under the law of that Contracting Party.
60 Article 7; 99 Article 14

Duration of protection
International registrations are valid for an initial period of five years. They can be renewed
for one or more additional periods of five years, in respect of each designated Contracting
Party, up to the expiry of the total term of protection allowed by those Contracting Parties’
respective laws. In other words, the maximum duration of protection in each designated
Contracting Party corresponds to the maximum duration provided for by the law of that
Contracting Party.
60 Article 11; 99 Article 17

Changes in the International Register
The following changes may be recorded in the International Register:
• a change in the name or address of the holder or his representative (refer to

“Change in the name and/or address of the holder”);
• a change in the ownership of an international registration (in respect of all or only

some of the designated Contracting Parties and in respect of all or some of the
designs included in the registration) (refer to “Change in ownership”);
• a renunciation of all the designs that are the subject of the international registration,
in respect of any or all of the designated Contracting Parties (refer to
“Renunciation”);
• a limitation of some of the industrial designs that are the subject of the international
registration, in respect of any or all of the designated Contracting Parties (refer to
“Limitation”).
Requests for such recordings must be presented to the International Bureau on the relevant
official forms and must be accompanied by the prescribed fees.
60 Article 12(1); 99 Article 16(1); Rule 21

Advantages of the Hague System
The Hague System arose from a need for simplicity and economy. In effect, it enables
design owners originating from a Contracting Party to obtain protection for their designs with
a minimum of formality and expense.
In particular, design owners are relieved from the need to make a separate national
application in each of the Contracting Parties in which they require protection, thereby
avoiding the complexities arising from procedures which may differ from State to State.
Thus, they do not have to file documentation in various languages, nor keep a watch on the
deadlines for renewal of a whole series of national registrations, varying from one State to
the other. In addition, they avoid the need to pay fees in various currencies. Under the
Hague Agreement, the same result can be obtained by means of a single international

page 14

Hague Guide for Users

application, in one language, accompanied by the payment of a single set of fees, in one
currency and with one Office (the International Bureau).
Moreover, by having a single international registration with effect in several Contracting
Parties, the subsequent management of the protection obtained is also considerably
facilitated. For instance, a change in ownership, or in the name or address of the holder,
can be recorded in the International Register and have effect in all the designated
Contracting Parties, by means of one simple procedural step.

Becoming party to the Hague Agreement
The 1999 and the 1960 Acts of the Hague Agreement are autonomous and totally
independent of each other. Each Act consists of a fully-fledged international treaty, so that
(with the exception of intergovernmental organizations) a potential Contracting Party may
decide to become party to either one of the Acts, or to both.

States
To become a Contracting Party to the 1960 Act, a State must be bound by the Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.
60 Article 1(2)
To become a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act, a State must be a member of the
Convention Establishing WIPO. While it is not required that the State also be party to the
Paris Convention, any State that is a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act is, however, required
under Article 2(2) of that Act to comply with the provisions of the Paris Convention which
concern industrial designs (even if that State is not bound by the Paris Convention).
99 Article 27(1)

Intergovernmental organizations
An intergovernmental organization cannot become party to the 1960 Act, the membership of
this treaty being open to States only.
60 Article 1(2)
On the other hand, such organization may become party to the 1999 Act, provided the
following conditions are fulfilled:
• at least one of the member States of the intergovernmental organization is a

member of WIPO, and
• the organization maintains an Office through which protection of industrial designs

may be obtained with effect in the territory in which the constituting treaty of the
intergovernmental organization applies.
99 Article 27(1)(ii)
The expression “Contracting Party” includes any State or intergovernmental organization
which is Party to the 1999 Act and/or the 1960 Act.

Hague Guide for Users

page 15

Instruments of ratification or accession must be deposited with the Director General of
WIPO. The Director General notifies all Contracting Parties of any deposits of instruments of
ratification of, or accession to, the Act to which they are a party, and of any declarations
which are included in such instruments, or made at a later stage.

Entry into force of the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act with respect to a
given Contracting Party
As regards the 1960 Act, the accession or ratification of a given Contracting Party enters into
force one month after its instrument of ratification or accession has been notified by the
Director General of WIPO to the other relevant Contracting Parties, unless a later date is
indicated in the instrument.
60 Article 26(1)
As far as the 1999 Act is concerned, the accession or ratification of a given Contracting
Party becomes effective three months after the date on which its instrument of ratification or
accession has been deposited with the Director General of WIPO, or at any later date
indicated in that instrument.
99 Article 28(3)(b)
However:
• in respect of States for which protection of industrial designs can be obtained solely

through the Office maintained by an intergovernmental organization1, the deposit of
an instrument of ratification or accession cannot become effective before the date of
deposit of the instrument of the intergovernmental organization to which those
States belong, and
99 Article 27(3)(b)
• with regard to States which have made a declaration to the effect that a common

Office will act as national Office for all of them2, the 1999 Act and/or the 1960 Act
enters into force three months or one month, as the case may be, from the date on
which the last instrument of the Member States of that group of States has been
deposited.
99 Article 27(3)(c)
A prospective Contracting Party wishing to ensure that it will not be bound by the 1999 Act
unless one or several other Contracting Parties are also bound by that Act, may conditionally
ratify or accede to that Act. In such case, the ratification or accession takes effect only if,
and when, one or several other Contracting Parties, expressly designated, also deposit their
instruments of ratification or accession. The conditional instrument of ratification or
accession is then deemed to have been deposited on the day on which that condition is
satisfied (namely, the day on which the other Contracting Party(ies) concerned deposit(s) its
(their) instrument(s) of ratification or accession).
99 Article 27(3)(d)
The date on which each Contracting Party became bound by the 1999 Act and/or the
1960 Act can be found in the list of members of the Hague Agreement3.

page 16

Hague Guide for Users

Determination of which Act is applicable in respect of the designation
of a given Contracting Party
To the extent that one and the same Contracting Party may be bound by either one or both
Acts of the Hague Agreement (the 1960 Act and/or the 1999 Act), the question arises as to
which of these Acts applies in respect of a given Contracting Party designated in an
international application.
The Act applicable to a designated Contracting Party depends on the Act(s) to which are
bound, on the one hand, the Contracting Party of the applicant and, on the other, the given
designated Contracting Party. The applicable principles may be summarized as follows:
• where there is only one common Act between the two Contracting Parties

concerned, it is such Act which governs the designation of a given Contracting
Party. For example, if an applicant originates from a Contracting Party bound by
both the 1999 and the 1960 Acts and designates a Contracting Party bound
exclusively by the 1960 Act, such designation is governed by the single common
Act (the 1960 Act);
60 Article 31(2); 99 Article 31(2)
• where both Contracting Parties concerned are bound by more than one common

Act, it is the most recent Act which applies with respect to the designated
Contracting Party. For example, if an applicant originates from a Contracting Party
bound by both the 1960 and the 1999 Acts and designates a Contracting Party also
bound by both the 1960 and the 1999 Acts, such designation is governed by the
more recent Act (the 1999 Act).
60 Article 31(1); 99 Article 31(1)
It should be noted that, in line with the aforementioned principles, the designation of a
Contracting Party bound by several Acts will also be governed by the most recent of these
Acts where the applicant enjoyed cumulative but independent entitlement connections under
each of the same Acts (refer to “Entitlement to file”). For example, if an applicant originates
from Contracting Party A, bound by the 1960 Act, but Contracting Party A is also a State
member of an intergovernmental organization bound by the 1999 Act (Contracting Party B),
the designation of a Contracting Party C that is bound by both the 1960 and the 1999 Acts is
governed by the most recent of these two Acts, that is, the 1999 Act.
The determination of the applicable Act is to be made on the date of filing of the international
application concerned. It cannot be reviewed afterwards, should one of the Contracting
Parties concerned accede to another Act of the Hague Agreement subsequent-to the filing of
the international application.

Determination of the Act or Acts which govern an international
application as a whole
While the designation of a Contracting Party can only be governed by one Act, several Acts
may, however, apply in respect of a single international application. This depends on
whether, in respect of any given international application, Contracting Parties have been
designated under the 1999 Act and/or the 1960 Act.

Hague Guide for Users

page 17

It is important for an applicant to know which Act or Acts govern(s) the international
application, since this will determine such matters as the possibility of requesting deferment
of publication, and the fees which are payable.
In all, three kinds of international application will be possible. An international application
may be governed:
• exclusively by the 1999 Act, i.e., all the Contracting Parties designated in the

international application have been designated under the 1999 Act;
Rule 1(1)(xii)
• exclusively by the 1960 Act, i.e., all the Contracting Parties designated in the

international application have been designated under the 1960 Act;
Rule 1(1)(xiii)
• by both the 1999 and the 1960 Acts, i.e., the Contracting Parties designated in the

international application include
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act, and
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1960 Act.
Rule 1(1)(xiv)
These rules may be illustrated with the following example: an applicant originates from a
Contracting Party bound by both the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act and it is assumed first of all
that he designates in his international application Contracting Parties “A”, “B” and “C”, all of
which are bound by the 1999 Act. To the extent that each of these designations is governed
by the 1999 Act (the most recent Act), it follows that the international application as a whole
is governed exclusively by the 1999 Act.
If, in respect of the same international application, the applicant also designates Contracting
Party “D” which is bound only by the 1960 Act: the designation of that Contracting Party “D”
is governed by the 1960 Act (the single common Act), and it follows that the international
application concerned is governed by both the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act. In other words,
with respect to that international application, the 1999 Act applies in respect of Contracting
Parties “A”, “B” and “C” and the 1960 Act applies in respect of Contracting Party “D”.

Declarations by Contracting Parties
The Hague System provides for the possibility for Contracting Parties to make certain
declarations concerning the operation of the international registration system so that certain
features of their national/regional laws concerning industrial design protection can be taken
into account when they are being designated in an international application. For a complete
list of possible declarations a Contracting Party may make under the 1999 Act or the
Common Regulations, please refer to “Declarations Made by Contracting Parties under the
1999 Act and the Common Regulations under the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act”.
It is to be noted that although the prerequisite for making certain declarations is that the
Office of the Contracting Party is an “Examining Office”, there is no obligation under the
Hague System to make any of those declarations.

page 18

Hague Guide for Users

More specific information in respect of the specific elements of the international application
and procedures before the International Bureau that result from declarations being made by
designated Contracting Parties is provided under “Contents of the International Application”,
“International Application” and “Effect of the Recording of a Change in Ownership”.

Examining Office
The term “Examining Office” is defined in the 1999 Act (Article 1(xvii)) and means an Office
which ex officio examines applications filed with it for the protection of industrial designs, at
least to determine whether the industrial designs satisfy the condition of novelty.
In light of the above definition, in order to be considered as an “Examining Office”, the Office
must carry out, ex officio, a prior art search that matches with the condition of novelty
required under the applicable law. This means that, if the criterion for the validity of the
design right is worldwide novelty, the prior art search should consider not only pending
and/or registered designs in a database but also extend to designs known anywhere in the
world.

Submission of declarations
Declarations may be made either simultaneously with the deposit of the instrument of
accession or ratification, or after the deposit. Before submission of the declarations to the
Director General of WIPO, it is advised that the Legal Section of the Hague Registry be
consulted to make sure that the requirements under the 1999 Act, the Common Regulations
or the national law for making any declarations, respectively, are satisfied.

Effective date of declarations
If the declaration is submitted together with the instrument of ratification/accession, it
becomes effective on the date on which the Contracting Party becomes bound by the
1999 Act. If the declaration is submitted afterwards, it becomes effective three months after
the date of receipt of the declaration by the Director General of WIPO, or at any later date
indicated in the declaration.
Furthermore, any declaration made after the deposit of the instrument of accession or
ratification will apply only in respect of international registrations whose date of registration is
the same as, or later than, the effective date of the declaration.

Mandatory declaration
Duration of protection – maximum duration of protection
Under the 1999 Act, an international registration is initially effected for a period of five years
and may be renewed for two additional terms of five years (Articles 17(1) and (2)). Thus,
under the 1999 Act, the minimum term of protection that a Contracting Party must provide is
15 years. If the national legislation of a Contracting Party provides for a duration of
protection that is longer than 15 years, then the international registration may be renewed
with respect to such Contracting Party for additional periods of five years, up to the expiry of
the total duration of protection at the national level.

Hague Guide for Users

page 19

On acceding to the 1999 Act, a Contracting Party must notify the Director General of WIPO
of the maximum duration of protection provided for by its law.
99 Article 17(3)(c); Rule 36(2)

Declarations that are mandatory in certain circumstances
Deferment of publication
Deferred publication for a period that is less than the prescribed period
Under the 1999 Act, the general principle is that each Contracting Party is assumed to
permit the prescribed period of deferment of 30 months from the filing date, or where priority
is claimed, from the priority date of the application in question (Rule 16(1)(a)).
Where the law of a Contracting Party that is acceding to the Geneva Act provides for
deferment of publication for a period that is less than the prescribed period of 30 months,
that Contracting Party must, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO of the
allowable period of deferment.
99 Article 11(1)(a)
No deferment of publication
Where the law of a Contracting Party bound by the 1999 Act does not provide for the
deferment of publication, that Contracting Party must, in a declaration, notify the Director
General of WIPO of that fact.
99 Article 11(1)(b)

Optional declarations
All optional declarations are listed below, some of which are open only to a Contracting Party
whose Office is an “Examining Office”. Those declarations are namely:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

declaration under Article 5(2),
declaration under Article 7(2),
declaration under Article 13(1),
declaration under Article 14(3),
declaration under Article 16(2),
declaration under Article 19(1),
declaration under Rule 8(1),
declaration under Rule 9(3),
declaration under Rule 12(1)(c),
declaration under Rule 13(4), and
declaration under Rule 18(1).

The term “Examining Office” is defined in the 1999 Act (Article 1(xvii)) and means “an Office
which ex officio examines applications filed with it for the protection of industrial designs, at
least to determine whether the industrial designs satisfy the condition of novelty”.
It is understood that, in light of the above definition, in order to be considered as an
“Examining Office”, the Office must carry out, ex officio, a prior art search that matches with

page 20

Hague Guide for Users

the condition of novelty required under the applicable law. This means that, if the criterion
for the validity of the design right is worldwide novelty, the prior art search should consider
not only pending and/or registered designs in a database but also extend to designs known
anywhere in the world.

Prohibition on filing through national Office
In general, an international application may be filed, at the option of the applicant, either
directly with the International Bureau or through the Office of the applicant’s Contracting
Party. However, under the 1999 Act, any Contracting Party may, by declaration, notify the
Director General of WIPO that international applications may not be filed through its Office.
When such a declaration is made, all international design applications from applicants
attached to that Contracting Party must be filed directly with the International Bureau.
99 Article 4(1)(b)

Prohibition on self-designation
Under the 1999 Act a Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office may, by
declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that, where it is the applicant’s Contracting
Party, the designation of that Contracting Party in an international application has no effect,
in other words, it is prohibited to self-designate.
99 Article 14(3)

Security clearance
Any Contracting Party whose law, at the time that it becomes party to the 1999 Act, requires
security clearance, may, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that the period
of one month allowed for its Office to transmit an international application to the International
Bureau shall be replaced by a period of six months.
Rule 13(4)

Designation fees (declaration)
Individual designation fees
Any country that is acceding to the 1999 Act and whose Office is an Examining Office and
any intergovernmental organization acceding to the 1999 Act, may notify the Director
General of WIPO that, in connection with each international registration in respect of which it
is designated, and in connection with the renewal of such international registration, it wishes
to receive an “individual designation fee”, instead of a share of the standard fees.
Pursuant to Rule 12(3), a declaration under Article 7(2) may specify that the individual
designation fee to be paid in respect of the Contracting Party concerned comprises two
parts, the first to be paid at the time of filing the international application and the second part
to be paid at a later date which is determined in accordance with the law of the Contracting
Party concerned.
The amount of the individual designation fee must not be higher than the equivalent of the
amount which the Office of that Contracting Party would be entitled to receive from an
applicant for a grant of protection for an equivalent period to the same number of industrial

Hague Guide for Users

page 21

designs, that amount being diminished by the savings resulting from the international
procedure.
If this notification is made, then it is required that the amount of the individual designation
fees be expressed in the national currency. Subsequently, the Director General will, in
consultation with the Registrar, establish the amount of the fees in Swiss currency on the
basis of the official exchange rate of the United Nations.
99 Article 7(2)
Reduction of individual fees for Least Developed Countries

A Contracting Party making a notification requiring individual designation fees might wish to
implement the recommendation made by the Assembly of the Hague Union, which reads as
follows:
“Contracting Parties that make, or that have made, a declaration under Article 7(2) of
the 1999 Act or under Rule 36(1) of the Common Regulations are encouraged to
indicate, in that declaration or in a new declaration, that for international applications
filed by applicants whose sole entitlement is a connection with a Least Developed
Country, in accordance with the list established by the United Nations, or with an
intergovernmental organization the majority of whose member States are Least
Developed Countries, the individual fee payable with respect to their designation is
reduced to 10 per cent of the fixed amount (rounded, where appropriate, to the nearest
full figure). Those Contracting Parties are further encouraged to indicate that the
reduction also applies in respect of an international application filed by an applicant
whose entitlement is not solely a connection with such an intergovernmental
organization, provided that any other entitlement of the applicant is a connection with a
Contracting Party which is a Least Developed Country or, if not a Least Developed
Country, is a member State of that intergovernmental organization and the
international application is governed exclusively by the 1999 Act.”
Individual designation fee: international applications only

Any Contracting Party bound by the 1960 Act whose Office is an Examining Office may, in a
declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that, in connection with any international
application in which it is designated under the 1960 Act, the standard designation fee is to be
replaced by an individual designation fee, whose amount should be indicated in the
declaration and can be changed in further declarations. The declaration may also specify
that the individual designation fee to be paid comprises two parts (refer to “Individual
designation fees”). The said amount may not be higher than the equivalent of the amount
which the Office of that Contracting Party would be entitled to receive from an applicant for a
grant of protection for an equivalent period for the same number of industrial designs, that
amount being diminished by the savings resulting from the international procedure.

60 Article 15(1), item 2(b); Rule 12(1)(a)(iii); Rule 12(3); Rule 36(1)

Amount of the individual designation fee
A declaration concerning individual designation fees (refer to “Standard designation fees”
and “Individual designation fees”) must indicate the amount of such fees, expressed in the
currency used by the Office concerned and, where applicable, any change in the amount.

page 22

Hague Guide for Users

Where this currency is other than Swiss currency, the Director General of WIPO, in
consultation with the Office, establishes the amount of the fees in Swiss currency on the
basis of the official exchange rate of the United Nations.
99 Article 7(2)
Where, for more than three consecutive months, the official exchange rate of the United
Nations between a Contracting Party’s currency and Swiss currency is higher or lower by at
least 5% than the last exchange rate used to establish the amount of the individual fees in
Swiss currency, the Office of that Contracting Party may ask the Director General of WIPO
to establish new amounts in Swiss currency for the individual fees.
Rule 28(2)(c)
Where, for more than three consecutive months, this exchange rate is lower by at least 10%
than the last rate applied, the Director General of WIPO, at his own initiative, establishes
new amounts in Swiss currency for the individual fees. The amounts so fixed are published
on the WIPO website and become applicable at a date to be fixed by the Director General of
WIPO, which is between one and two months after such publication.
Rule 28(2)(d)
Standard designation fees
A Contracting Party that has not made an individual designation fees declaration under
Article 7 will be entitled to a standard fee under Rule 12(1).
There are three different levels of standard designation fee, reflecting the scope of
examination carried out by an Office. For level two or three to apply it is necessary to make
a declaration to that effect.
The levels are as follows:
• level one, for Contracting Parties whose Office does not carry out examination on

substantive grounds – this level will apply automatically in the absence of any
declaration;
• level two, for Contracting Parties whose Office carries out examination on
substantive grounds other than novelty (for example, on issues such as the
definition of a “design”, public order and morality, or the protection of State
emblems);
• level three, for Contracting Parties whose Office carries out examination on
substantive grounds, including a limited examination as to novelty (for example, an
examination as to local novelty only even if the criterion for the validity of the design
right is worldwide novelty), or examination as to novelty following opposition by third
parties.
It should be noted that an Office that is an Examining Office, and thus is entitled to make the
notification requiring an individual designation fee, may, instead, for example, make the
declaration requiring the level two or three standard designation fee.
Rule 12(1)

Hague Guide for Users

page 23

Mandatory contents of an international application (declaration)
Any Contracting Party bound by the 1999 Act whose Office is an Examining Office and
whose law, at the time it becomes party to that Act, requires that an application for the grant
of protection for an industrial design should contain any of the following
elements - (i) indications concerning the identity of the creator, (ii) a brief description and/or
(iii) a claim – in order for that application to be accorded a filing date under that law may, in a
declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO of those elements.
99 Article 5(2); Rule 7(4); Rule 11
Identity of the creator
In order that a country acceding to the 1999 Act can make a declaration requiring that an
international application shall contain indications concerning the identity of the creator of the
industrial design that is the subject of that application, two conditions must be fulfilled:
• the Office must be an “Examining Office”, and
• the national law must provide that, in order that a national industrial design

application be granted a filing date such application must contain indications
concerning the identity of the creator of the industrial design that is the subject of
the application.
Otherwise, this declaration cannot be made.
99 Article 5(2)(b)(i)
Brief description
In order that a country acceding to the 1999 Act can make a declaration requiring that an
international application shall contain a brief description of the reproduction or of the
characteristic features of the industrial design that is the subject of that application, two
conditions must be fulfilled:
• the Office must be an “Examining Office”, and
• the national law must provide that, in order that a national industrial design

application be granted a filing date such application must contain a brief description
of the reproduction or of the characteristic features of the industrial design that is
the subject of that application.
Otherwise, this declaration cannot be made.
The requirement to furnish a brief description is to be distinguished from the requirement to
furnish reproductions or representations of a design. It is already an established
requirement of the Hague System that the latter be furnished (refer to Article 5(1)(iii) and

Rule 9(1)). Similarly, it is required by Article 5(1)(iv) that an indication of the product or
products that constitute the industrial design or in relation to which the industrial design is to
be used be indicated in an international application (item 9 of the international application
form).
99 Article 5(2)(b)(ii)

page 24

Hague Guide for Users

Claim
In order that a country acceding to the 1999 Act can make a declaration requiring that an
international application shall contain a claim, two conditions must be fulfilled:
• the Office must be an “Examining Office”, and
• the national law must provide that, in order that a national industrial design

application be granted a filing date, such application must contain a claim.
Otherwise, this declaration cannot be made. In accordance with Rule 11(3), the declaration
under Article 5(2)(b)(iii) must specify the exact wording of the required claim.
99 Article 5(2)(b)(iii)

Special requirements concerning the applicant and the creator (Rule 8)
(declaration)
Filing in name of the creator
If the national law of a country that is acceding to the 1999 Act contains a requirement that a
national application for the protection of an industrial design must be filed in the name of the
creator, that country may make a declaration notifying the Director General of WIPO of that
fact.
This declaration should be distinguished from that referred to under “Identity of the creator”.
In such case, where the person identified as the creator is a person other than the person
named as the applicant, Rule 8(2)(ii) requires that the international application shall be
accompanied by a statement or document to the effect that the international application has
been assigned by the creator to the applicant, and it is the applicant who will be recorded as
holder.
This declaration has been made by five Contracting Parties, namely Finland, Ghana,
Hungary, Iceland and Mexico. However, rather than requiring the furnishing of such a
statement or document, these Contracting Parties have availed of the facility provided in
item 11 of the international application form, which states as follows:
“If Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and/or Mexico is/are designated, it is
compulsory to indicate, in item 11, the identity of the creator. The latter declares that
he believes himself to be the creator of the industrial design. Where the person
identified as the creator is a person other than the applicant, it is hereby stated that the
present international application has been assigned by the creator to the applicant.”
Otherwise, in principle, the declaration should specify the form and content of any statement
or document required.
Rule 8(1)(a)(i)
Oath or declaration of the creator
If the national law of a country that is bound by the 1999 Act contains a requirement that an
oath or declaration of the creator must be furnished, that country may make a declaration

Hague Guide for Users

page 25

notifying the Director General of WIPO of that fact. The declaration must specify the form
and content of any statement or document required.
This declaration should be distinguished from that referred to under “Identity of the creator”.
The international application containing the designation of the Contracting Party which has
made the declaration must also contain indications concerning the identity of the creator of
the industrial design.
Rule 8(1)(a)(ii)

Unity of design
If the national law of a country that is acceding to the 1999 Act contains a requirement that
designs which are the subject of the same application should conform to a requirement of
unity of design, unity of production or unity of use, or that the designs should belong to the
same set or composition of items, or that only one independent and distinct design be
claimed in a single application, that country may make a declaration notifying the Director
General of WIPO of that fact. The declaration should be comprehensive, detailed and
specific as to the requirements in question.
The Office of the Contracting Party that made the declaration may refuse the effects of the
international registration pending compliance with the specified requirement of unity of
design. Following a notification of such refusal, the international registration may be divided
before the Office of that Contracting Party in order to overcome the refusal ground.
It is recalled that the requirement of unity of design does not affect the applicant’s right to
include up to 100 designs in the international application even if a Contracting Party that has
made the declaration is being designated. However, to forestall possible refusals on the
ground that the designs in the international registration do not conform with the requirement
of unity of design under the applicable law, the applicant may wish to take into consideration
any declaration of unity of design made by a Contracting Party, in which protection is sought
(refer to “How to submit an international application: eHague or DM/1 form ?”, “Item 6:
Number of industrial designs, reproductions and/or specimens (mandatory)”, or “Refusal of
Protection”, “Unity of design”).
99 Article 13(1)
Requirements concerning views
If the Office of a country that is acceding to the 1999 Act requires certain specified views of
the product or products which constitute the industrial design or in relation to which the
industrial design is to be used, that country may make a declaration notifying the Director
General of WIPO, specifying the views that are required and the circumstances in which they
are required. However, the declaration may not require more than one view where the
industrial design or product is two-dimensional, or more than six views where the product is
three-dimensional.
The effect of the declaration is that the Office of the country that made the declaration can
refuse the effects of the international registration pending compliance with the specified
requirement of views (refer to “Refusal of Protection”, “Specific views or sufficient disclosure
of the design”).
Rule 9(3)

page 26

Hague Guide for Users

Refusal of protection
Extension of period for notification of refusal (Rule 18(1)(b))
In principle, the period within which an Office must notify a refusal is six months. However,
for a country acceding to the 1999 Act, this period may be extended to 12 months in the
following cases:
• the Office is an “Examining Office”, or
• the national law provides for a procedure for opposition to the registration of an

industrial design.
A procedure of opposition referred to in the second condition, above, is to be distinguished
from a so-called “invalidation” procedure which should normally take place after granting
protection, in which case, the refusal period would not need to be extended.
Rule 18(1)(b)

Date of effect of international registration
Date of effect of international registration (Rule 18(1)(c)(i))
The declaration referred to under “Extension of period for notification of refusal
(Rule 18(1)(b))”, above, may also state that the international registration shall produce the
effect referred to in Article 14(2)(a) at the latest at a time specified in the declaration which
may be later than the date referred to in that Article but which shall not be more than six
months after the said date.
The effect of this declaration is to establish the regime under which the international
registration may produce the effect as a grant of protection under the national law after the
expiry date of the refusal period, but which must be within six months from that expiry date.
It is to be noted that, where the Office of the country that made the declaration has not found
any grounds for refusal, it is obliged to issue a statement of grant of protection provided for
in Rule 18bis(1) with respect to an international registration designating that country.
Rule 18(1)(c)(i)
Date of effect of international registration (Rule 18(1)(c)(ii))
The declaration referred to under “Extension of period for notification of refusal
(Rule 18(1)(b))”, above, may also state that the international registration shall produce the
effect referred to in Article 14(2)(a) at a time at [OH1]which protection is granted according to
the law of the Contracting Party where a decision regarding the grant of protection was
unintentionally not communicated within the applicable refusal period.
The effect of this declaration is to safeguard certain exceptional circumstances under which
the Office cannot complete substantive examination as required by the national law within
the applicable refusal period, for instance, due to an unforeseeable circumstance , such as
natural disaster. The application of this declaration should therefore be limited to
exceptional cases, and on an individual case basis, as opposed to a declaration referred to
under “Date of effect of international registration (Rule 18(1)(c)(i))”, above.

Hague Guide for Users

page 27

It is to be noted that, where the Office of the country that made the declaration has not found
any grounds for refusal, it is obliged to issue a statement of grant of protection provided for
in Rule 18bis(1) with respect to an international registration designating that country.
Rule 18(1)(c)(ii)

Effect of change in ownership
Any country may, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that the recording in
the International Register of a change in ownership of an international registration shall not
have effect in that country until its Office has received the statements or documents
specified in that declaration.
99 Article 16(2)

Common Office of several states
If several States have effected the unification of their domestic legislation on industrial
designs, they may notify the Director General of WIPO:
• that a common Office is to be substituted for the national Office of each of them,

and
• that the whole of their respective territories to which the unified legislation applies is
to be deemed to be a single Contracting Party for the purposes of the Hague
Agreement.
60 Article 30(1); 99 Article 19(1)

Official records
The I.D.B. is the official publication of the recordings made in the International Register of
the Hague System.

Extracts and certified copies
Extracts and certified copies are official information from the International Register. Extracts
and certified copies are also useful for claiming priority under the Paris Convention.
An international application and registration remains confidential in relation to third parties
until publication of the international registration. With respect to any published international
registration, any person may request the International Bureau to provide, against the
payment of the prescribed fees, the following information:
• extracts from the International Register;
• certified copies of recordings made in the International Register or of items in the

file of the international registration (typically, “priority documents”);
• uncertified copies of recordings made in the International Register or of items in the

file of the international registration;
• written information on the contents of the International Register or of the file of the
international registration;
• photographs of specimens.
The fees for these information services are included in the Schedule of Fees.

page 28

Hague Guide for Users

To obtain these extracts, copies or information, the request must indicate the international
registration number or the application number (nine-digit number or “WIPO” + number)
assigned by the International Bureau. It is recommended to submit the request through
Contact Hague.
It is to be noted that the possibility to ask for an extract, copy or information in relation to any
international application or international registration which has not been published is limited
to the applicant or holder of that international application or registration or their appointed
representative before the International Bureau.

Priority documents and WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS)
An international application may itself serve as a basis for claiming priority in a subsequent
national, regional or international application. The International Bureau participates in the
WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS) as a “depositing Office” with respect to priority
documents for industrial design applications. With regard to DAS, refer to “Item 13: Priority
claim – Article 4 of the Paris Convention”.
Where the applicant or holder requests the International Bureau to provide a certified copy of
an international application (“priority document”), the International Bureau will provide a DAS
code, in addition to the requested priority document. This DAS code can be communicated
to Offices allowing them to retrieve the priority document from DAS if they participate in DAS
as an “accessing Office” with respect to priority documents for industrial design applications.
For more information about DAS and its participating Offices, refer to the WIPO website.

Data dissemination
Data from the I.D.B. is available in computer-readable format, XML, via FTP server.
The following standards apply:
• Standard ST.3: Two-letter codes for the representation of states, other entities and

organizations;
• Standard ST.96: Processing of industrial property Information using XML.

1.
This applies, for instance, to the member States of the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI)
but not to the member States of the European Union (where protection of industrial designs can also be obtained
through their own national Offices).
2.
This situation corresponds to the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP), which is the common
Office to Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands (the Benelux countries).
3.
This list also concerns the members of the Hague Agreement bound by the 1934 Act.

page 29

Hague Guide for Users

General
Communications with the International Bureau
Three routes of communication are possible as part of the international procedure, namely:
• between the International Bureau and the Office of a Contracting Party;
• between the International Bureau and the applicant or holder, or his representative1;
• between the applicant or holder (or representative) and the Office of a Contracting

Party. These latter communications, which do not involve the International Bureau,
are outside the scope of the Hague Agreement. The modalities of such
communications are exclusively a matter for the law and practice of the Contracting
Party concerned. For example, the question as to whether an appeal against a
refusal of protection may be filed by post, facsimile or by electronic means with a
given Office is a matter for determination by the legislation and/or practice of that
particular Contracting Party.
Rule 1(1)(v); Rule 2

Modalities of communications with the International Bureau
Communications addressed by an applicant, holder or an Office to the International Bureau
must be in writing and be typed or otherwise printed. Handwritten communications are not
acceptable. The communication must be signed. The signature may be handwritten, printed
or stamped, or may be replaced by a seal. As regards electronic communication and
communications through user accounts available on the WIPO website, the signature must
be made in the manner determined by the International Bureau or agreed upon between the
International Bureau and the Office concerned, as the case may be. Pursuant to
Section 205(a) of the Administrative Instructions, communications through user accounts
must be authenticated through the use of the account holder’s user name and password.
A.I. Section 201(a); A.I. Section 202; A.I. Section 205(a)
Communications addressed to the International Bureau may be delivered by hand, sent by
mail or by electronic means.

Communications sent by mail
Any communication may be sent to the International Bureau by mail, through a postal or
other delivery service, at the following address:
World Intellectual Property Organization
34, Chemin des Colombettes, P.O. Box 18,
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland

page 30

Hague Guide for Users

If several documents are mailed to the International Bureau in one envelope, they should be
accompanied by a list identifying each one of them. The International Bureau informs the
sender of any discrepancy between the list and what is actually received.
A.I. Section 201(b)

Communications sent by facsimile [Deleted]
The use of facsimile for communication with the International Bureau was terminated on
January 1, 2019, as a result of the deletion of Section 203 of the Administrative Instructions.

Communications sent by electronic means
Any communication between, on the one hand, an applicant or holder or Office of a
Contracting Party and, on the other hand, the International Bureau, including the
presentation of an international application, may be made by electronic means, for example,
through the electronic filing (eHague) interface with user accounts or the interface for the
renewal of international registrations (eRenewal). Notwithstanding the above, electronic
communications between an Office and the International Bureau may take place in a way
agreed upon between the International Bureau and the Office concerned. Each Office
wishing to receive communications sent by electronic means shall indicate to the
International Bureau the email address to which the said communication shall be sent.
Where a communication is transmitted to the International Bureau by electronic means and,
because of the time difference between the place from where the communication is sent and
Geneva, the date on which the sending started is different from the date of receipt by the
International Bureau of the complete communication, the earlier of the two dates shall be
considered as the date of receipt by the International Bureau.
A.I. Section 204(a); A.I. Section 205; A.I. Section 204(c)
Provided the sender can be identified and can be reached, the International Bureau will
promptly inform him, also by electronic transmission, of the receipt of the electronic
communication, and of any deficiencies in the transmission (for example, if it is incomplete or
illegible). Such an acknowledgement shall contain the date of receipt in the case of an
international application.
A.I. Section 204(b)

Official forms
All official forms are established by the International Bureau. Official forms include both
paper forms, as well as electronic interfaces (eHague). Further electronic interfaces may be
made available on the WIPO website or on the website of the Office of a Contracting Party.
It is recalled that a Contracting Party allowing, in line with Article 4(1) of the 1999 Act, an
indirect filing, may make an E-filing interface available on the website of its Office.
99 Article 4(1); Rule 1(1)(vi)
As an alternative to using a paper form produced by the International Bureau, Offices,
applicants or holders may generate their own forms. Such self-generated forms are
acceptable to the International Bureau provided that they have the same contents and
format as the official forms.
Rule 1(1)(vi)

Hague Guide for Users

page 31

The items in such self-generated forms need not have the same spacing and layout as in the
forms established by the International Bureau. Indeed, one advantage of producing such
forms is that as much space can be allocated to a given item as is needed; for example,
where an international application is in the names of several applicants, or there is a
particularly large number of industrial designs, use of such forms can avoid the need for
continuation sheets. The following prescriptions must, however, be observed:
• the form must be on A4 paper, written on one side only;
• it must contain the same items, with their numbering and titles, in the same order,

as the official form established by the International Bureau;
• where an item is not used or is not applicable, the item should not be omitted, but

should be included with an appropriate indication, such as “not applicable”, “nil” or
“not used”; for example, if an international application submitted on a self-generated
form does not include a claim to priority, the form should still include the relevant
entry, between items 12 and 14, with an appropriate indication, such as: “Priority
Claim: Not applicable”.

Continuation sheets
Where the space available in any part of a form is insufficient (for example, in the case of an
international application, because there is more than one applicant, or more than one priority
claim) one or more continuation sheets should be used (unless a self-generated form has
been used). On the continuation sheet, it is necessary to indicate “Continuation of item
number ....”, the information then being presented in the same manner as required in the
form itself. The number of continuation sheets used should be indicated in the box provided
at the beginning of the form.

Indication of dates
Any indication of a date in an official form must consist of the day in two digits, followed by
the number of the month in two digits, followed by the number of the year in four digits, all in
Arabic numerals and day, month and year being separated by slashes (/). For example, the
date April 1, 2014, is to be written as “01/04/2014”.

Unofficial forms
In addition to the official forms, several unofficial forms are available, for example for
renewing an international registration. The use of these forms is not compulsory; they are
provided by the International Bureau for the convenience of users.

Calculation of time limits
The Hague System lays down time limits within which certain communications must be
made. Normally the date on which the time limit expires is the date on which the
communication must be received by the International Bureau. An exception to this is the
time limit within which the Office of a designated Contracting Party may notify refusal of
protection; in this case, it is the date on which the Office sends the notification to the
International Bureau which is decisive (refer also to A.I. section 501). Any communication
from the International Bureau which refers to a time limit indicates the date of expiry of that
time limit, calculated in accordance with the following rules:
• any period expressed in years expires, in the relevant subsequent year, on the

same day and month as the event from which the period started to run, except that
a period which started on February 29, and ends in a year in which there is no such

page 32

Hague Guide for Users

date, will expire on February 28. For example, a period of 10 years from
February 20, 2008, will expire on February 20, 2018; a period of 10 years from
February 29, 2008, will expire on February 28, 2018;
Rule 4(1)
• any period expressed in months expires, in the relevant subsequent month, on the

day having the same number as the day of the event from which the period started
to run, except that if there is no day with that number, the period expires on the last
day of the month. For example, a period of two months which begins on
January 31 ends on March 31, while a period of three months which begins on the
same date ends on April 30;
Rule 4(2)
• any period expressed in days starts on the day following the day on which the

relevant event occurred. For example, a period of ten days which is to be reckoned
from an event which occurred on the twelfth day of a month will expire on the
twenty-second day of that month.
Rule 4(3)
• If a period within which a communication must be received by the International

Bureau would expire on a day on which the International Bureau is not open to the
public, it will expire on the next subsequent day on which the Bureau is open. The
following examples will illustrate the situation: Firstly, if a period within which a
communication must be received by the International Bureau ends on a Saturday or
Sunday, the deadline will be met if the communication is received on the following
Monday (assuming that the Monday is not a holiday). Secondly, a period of three
months starting from October 1 will not expire on January 1 (which is an official
holiday at the International Bureau), but on the next working day. A list of the days
on which the International Bureau is not scheduled to be open to the public during
the current and the following calendar year is published on the WIPO website.
Rule 4(4); Rule 26(2)
Likewise, if the period within which a communication (such as a notification of refusal of
protection) must be sent by an Office to the International Bureau would expire on a day on
which the Office concerned is not open to the public, it will expire on the next subsequent
day on which the Office is open. It should be noted that this applies only where the period in
question is specified in terms of the communication being sent by an Office within that
period. On the other hand, where the period is specified in terms of the communication
being received by the International Bureau within that period, it is the previous paragraph
that applies; in such a case, late receipt of the communication by the International Bureau
cannot be excused on the ground that its dispatch was delayed because the Office which
sent it was closed.
Rule 4(4)

Hague Guide for Users

page 33

Excuse of delay in meeting time limits
Where a time limit is not met because a communication addressed to the International
Bureau by an applicant or holder or by an Office is unduly delayed or is lost because of an
irregularity in a postal or delivery service, this may be excused, provided due care has been
exercised by the sender and the communication was dispatched in good time. The rule is
that failure to meet a time limit will be excused if the party which sent the communication
submits evidence showing, to the satisfaction of the International Bureau:
• that the communication was mailed or sent to the International Bureau at least five

days prior to the expiry of the time limit, or, where the postal or delivery service was,
on any of the 10 days preceding the day of expiry of the time limit, interrupted on
account of war, revolution, civil disorder, strike, natural calamity, or other like
reason, that the communication was mailed or sent not later than five days after
postal or delivery service was resumed;
• that the mailing of the communication was registered, or details of the
communication were recorded by the postal or delivery service at the time of
mailing; and
• in the case of a communication sent by a postal service from a location from which
not all classes of mail normally reach the International Bureau within two days of
mailing, that the communication was either mailed by a class of mail which normally
reaches the International Bureau within two days of mailing, or was sent by airmail.
Rule 5(1) and (2)
Failure by an applicant or holder or by an Office to meet a time limit for a communication
addressed to the International Bureau that was sent electronically, would be excused where
the party concerned submits satisfactory evidence showing that the time limit was not met
because of a failure in the electronic communication with the International Bureau or a failure
that affects the locality of the interested party due to extraordinary circumstances beyond the
control of the interested party. It should be noted that the latter applies to outages affecting a
high number of users, such as all users in a large area of a city or country, rather than
localized problems within a particular building. In such circumstance, a new communication
should be effected no later than five days after the electronic communication service is
resumed.
Rule 5(3)
Failure to meet a time limit will be excused only if the evidence referred to in the previous
paragraphs, and the communication, or, where applicable, a duplicate thereof, are received
by the International Bureau not later than six months after the expiry of the time limit.
Rule 5(4)

page 34

Hague Guide for Users

It is recalled that pursuant to Rule 12(3) of the Common Regulations, a declaration under
Article 7(2) of the 1999 Act concerning an individual designation fee, may specify that the
individual designation fee to be paid in respect of the Contracting Party concerned
comprises two parts, the first to be paid at the time of filing the international application and
the second part to be paid at a later date which is determined in accordance with the law of
the Contracting Party concerned. Given that the applicable law provides for the time limit for
the payment of the second part of the individual designation fee, including conditions for
excuse of a delay in meeting that time limit, and that the second part of the individual
designation fee may also be paid to the national Office concerned, paragraph (5) states that
Rule 5 shall not apply to the payment of the second part of the individual designation fee
through the International Bureau.
Rule 5(5)

Languages
International applications
An international application may be filed in English, French or Spanish at the applicant’s
option.
Rule 6(1)
Any communication concerning an international application or an international registration
must be
• in English, French or Spanish, where such communication is addressed to the

International Bureau by an applicant, holder, or Office2;
• in the language of the international application, where the communication is
addressed by the International Bureau to an Office, unless that Office has notified
the International Bureau that any such communications are to be in English,
French, or Spanish;
• in the language of the international application, where the communication is
addressed by the International Bureau to the applicant or holder, unless that
applicant or holder has expressed the wish that all such communications be in
English, French, or Spanish.
Rule 6(3)
The recording in the International Register and the publication in the I.D.B. of an
international registration and of any data to be both recorded and published in respect of that
international registration takes place in English, French and Spanish.
Rule 6(2)
In respect of international applications filed before April 1, 2010 and international
registrations resulting from such applications, Rule 6 as in force before April 1, 2010,
continues to apply. As a consequence, the recording in the International Register and the
publication in the I.D.B. of an international registration and of any data to be both recorded
and published in respect of that international registration only take place in English and in
French.
Rule 37(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 35

Translation
The necessary translation of the recordings to be made in the International Register and
their publication in the I.D.B. is performed by the International Bureau. The applicant may
annex to the international application a proposed translation of any text contained in the
international application. If the proposed translation is not considered by the International
Bureau to be correct, it is corrected by the International Bureau after having invited the
applicant to make, within one month from the invitation, observations on the proposed
correction.
Rule 6(4)

Payment of fees to the International Bureau
The amounts of the fees payable in connection with an international application or
registration are either prescribed in the Schedule of Fees appended to the Common
Regulations or, in the case of individual fees, fixed by the Contracting Party concerned.
Rule 27(1)
Fees may be paid by the applicant or holder directly to the International Bureau. As regards,
in particular, an international application, the fees may also be paid through the Office of the
applicant’s Contracting Party if the application is filed through that Office and the Office
accepts to collect and forward such fees to the International Bureau.
Rule 27(2)(a) and (b)

Currency of payment
All payments to the International Bureau must be made in Swiss currency. An Office which
accepts to collect and forward fees may collect payments from the applicant in another
currency, but the payment forwarded to the International Bureau by the Office must be in
Swiss currency.
Rule 28(1)

Mode of payment
Fees may be paid to the International Bureau:
•
•
•
•

by debit to a current account at WIPO;
by payment into the WIPO bank account or WIPO postal account;
through the Office of indirect filing (e.g. USPTO);
through an online payment system made available when using eHague or
eRenewal, which offer a range of payment methods according to the user account
profile.
A.I. Section 801

An applicant, holder, representative, or an Office having frequent dealings with the
International Bureau, may find it useful to maintain a current account at WIPO. This greatly
simplifies the payment of fees and reduces the risk of irregularities due to late or incorrect
payment.

page 36

Hague Guide for Users

Whenever a fee is paid to the International Bureau, the purpose of the payment must be
indicated, together with information identifying the application or registration concerned.
This information should include:
• at the stage of the international application, the name of the applicant and the

industrial design to which the payment relates;
• in connection with international registrations, the name of the holder and the

international registration number.
Rule 27(4)
Where payment is made other than by debit from a current account at WIPO, the amount
should be stated. Where payment is made from a current account at WIPO, it is sufficient to
give a general instruction to the International Bureau to debit whatever is the correct amount
for the transaction in question (by ticking the appropriate box on the fee payment sheet
which is part of the official form).
Nevertheless, if a specific amount is indicated, the International Bureau treats it as indicative
only, debits the correct amount and notifies accordingly the party (applicant, holder,
representative or Office) that gave the instruction.

Date of payment
The fees are considered to have been paid on the date on which the International Bureau
received the required amount. However, in the case of a renewal, if a payment is received
by the International Bureau earlier than three months before the date on which the renewal
of the international registration is due, it is considered as having been received three months
before that date.
Rule 27(5)(a); Rule 24(1)(d)

Change in the amount of fee
Where an international application is filed through the Office of the applicant’s Contracting
Party and the amount of the fee payable changes between the date on which the application
was received by such Office and the date on which it was received by the International
Bureau, it is the fee that was valid on the date of reception of the international application by
the Office that is applicable.
Rule 27(6)(a)
Where the renewal of an international registration is requested and the amount of the fee
payable changes between the date of payment and the date on which renewal is due, then
• where payment is made not more than three months before the date on which

renewal is due, it is the fee that was valid on the date of payment that is applicable;
Rule 27(6)(b)

Hague Guide for Users

page 37

• where the fee is paid more than three months before the date on which renewal is

due, the payment is considered to have been received three months before the due
date, and it is the fee that was valid three months before the due date that is
applicable (refer to “Date of payment”).
Rule 24(1)(d)
Where the renewal fee is paid after the due date, it is the fee that was valid on the due date
that is applicable.
Rule 27(6)(b)
In any other case, the applicable amount is that which was valid on the date on which the
payment was received by the International Bureau.
Rule 27(6)(c)

Representation before the International Bureau
An international application may be filed with the International Bureau directly by the
applicant. If so wished, a representative may be appointed to act on the applicant’s behalf
before the International Bureau.
Rule 3(1)(a)
The provisions of the Hague System relate only to the representation before the International
Bureau. Requirements as to the appointment of a representative before the Office of a
Contracting Party (in the event, for example, that an appeal is lodged against a refusal of
protection) are outside the scope of the Hague System and are exclusively a matter for the
law and practice of the Contracting Party concerned.
With respect to who may be appointed as a representative before the International Bureau,
the Hague System does not provide for any requirement as to professional qualification,
nationality or domicile.

Method of appointment of a representative
In the international application
A representative may be appointed in an international application by indicating the name and
address of such representative in item 5 of the international application form or in the
corresponding section of the electronic filing (eHague) interface. A representative appointed
in such a manner may sign the international application in item 19 (no power of attorney
required). This being said, the international application may still be signed by the applicant
or be accompanied by a power of attorney (refer to “Item 5: Appointment of a
representative”). A power of attorney in PDF format may be uploaded in the eHague
interface.
Rule 3(2)(a)

page 38

Hague Guide for Users

In a request for the recording of a change
A representative may be appointed in a request for the recording of a change (limitation,
renunciation, change in ownership, change in the name and/or address of the holder) by
indicating the name and address of such representative in the corresponding item of the
form concerned. For the appointment of the representative to be effective, the request must
be signed by the holder or be accompanied by a power of attorney or form DM/7 duly
completed (and the appropriate box ticked accordingly) (refer to “Appointment of a
representative“, “Change in the name and/or address of the holder“, “Renunciation“ and
“Limitation“). To date, it is not possible to submit a request for the recording of a change
through an electronic interface.

In a separate communication
The appointment of a representative may also be made at any time in a separate
communication. Such separate communication must be signed by the applicant or holder.
Rule 3(2)(b)
The communication may be a simple letter. It suffices that it clearly identifies the person
making the appointment, the name and address of the appointed representative and the
international application or registration concerned. Although not compulsory, an unofficial
form (DM/7) for appointing a representative is available from the International Bureau for the
convenience of applicants and holders.
Such an appointment may relate to any number of international applications or registrations,
provided they are all clearly and individually identified. The International Bureau cannot
accept, as an appointment of a representative, a communication which simply refers to all
international applications and registrations in the name of the same applicant or holder.

Only one representative
Only one representative may be appointed in respect of a given international application or
registration. Therefore, if the appointment indicates more than one representative in respect
of the same international application or registration, only the one indicated first is considered
to have been appointed. Where a partnership or firm of attorneys or patent or trademark
agents has been indicated, this is regarded as a single representative.
Rule 3(1)(b); Rule 3(1)(c)

Irregular appointment
Where the appointment of a representative does not comply with the applicable
requirements, the International Bureau considers the appointment as irregular. It notifies
accordingly the applicant or holder and the purported representative and, failing the required
correction, it sends all relevant communications to the applicant or holder or their previously
appointed representative.
Rule 3(2)(c)

Hague Guide for Users

page 39

Recording and notification of appointment
If the appointment of the representative complies with the applicable requirements, the
International Bureau records that fact, along with the name and address of the
representative in the International Register, and notifies both the applicant or holder and the
representative concerned.
Rule 3(3)(a) and (b)

Effect of the appointment
The appointment of a representative has effect as of the date on which the International
Bureau receives the communication (international application, request to record a change or
separate communication) in which the appointment has been made.
Rule 3(3)(a)
A duly recorded representative may always sign a communication, or carry out any other
procedural step, in place of the applicant or holder. Any communication addressed by the
representative to the International Bureau has the same effect as if it had been addressed to
the International Bureau by the applicant or holder. Similarly, where a representative is
recorded, the International Bureau sends to this representative any communication which
would have been sent to the applicant or holder. Any such communication has the same
effect as if it had been addressed to the applicant or holder.
Rule 3(4)(a), (b) and (c)
Where a representative is appointed, the International Bureau does not normally send
communications also to the applicant or holder. There are a number of exceptions to this
rule:
• where cancellation of the appointment is requested, the International Bureau so

informs both the applicant or holder and the representative (refer to “Cancellation of
appointment”);
Rule 3(5)(c)
• six months before the expiry of a five-year term of protection, the International

Bureau sends an unofficial notice to both the holder and the representative;
Rule 23
• where insufficient fees are paid for the purpose of renewal, the International Bureau

notifies both the holder and the representative.
Rule 24(3)
Apart from these exceptions, whenever this Guide refers to anything being sent to, or done
by, an applicant or holder, this should be understood as a reference to it being sent to, or
allowed to be done by, a duly-recorded representative.

page 40

Hague Guide for Users

Cancellation of appointment
The recording of a representative is canceled upon receipt of a corresponding request
signed by the applicant, holder or representative. Cancellation may be requested by means
of a simple letter or on the unofficial form DM/9. The cancellation of the recording may be
effected for all the international applications or registrations of the same applicant or holder
in respect of which the representative has been duly appointed, or for any specified
international applications or registrations of that applicant or holder.
Rule 3(5)(a)
The recording of a representative is canceled ex officio by the International Bureau where a
new representative has been duly appointed. As noted above, only one representative may
be recognized at any one time; the appointment of a new representative is therefore
assumed to replace any representative previously appointed.
Rule 3(5)(a)
The recording of a representative is also canceled ex officio by the International Bureau
where a change in ownership has been recorded and no representative has been appointed
by the new holder.
Rule 3(5)(a)
The cancellation becomes effective from the date on which the International Bureau receives
the communication leading to the cancellation.
Rule 3(5)(b)
Once the cancellation becomes effective, the International Bureau notifies the cancellation
and its effective date to the applicant or holder and to the representative whose appointment
has been canceled. It sends all future communications either to the new representative or,
where no new representative has been recorded, to the applicant or holder.
Rule 3(5)(c)

No fees
The recording of the appointment of a representative, of any change concerning the
representative, or of the cancellation of the recording of a representative, is exempted from
the payment of fees.

1.
Unless otherwise specified, where this Guide refers to a communication being sent to or by an applicant
or holder, this is to be understood as meaning that, where a representative is recorded in the International
Register for that applicant or holder, the communication will be sent to, or may validly be sent by, that
representative (refer to “Effect of the appointment”).
2.
Notwithstanding Rule 6(3)(i), where the international registration was amended in a procedure before the
Office, the information on amendments referred to in Rule 18(4)(c), 18bis(1)(c) and (2)(c), could be provided in
the language in which the Office detains it, even if it is a language other than the working language used for the
statement or notification concerned.

Hague Guide for Users

page 41

International procedure
The life of an international registration starts with the international application and proceeds
through to the recording of the international registration. Various events can occur following
an international registration, such as refusal of protection, requests for the recording of
certain changes (change in name or address, change in ownership, limitation, renunciation
or cancellation) and renewal of the international registration.

Harmonization of terminology
The 1960 Act, on the one hand, and the 1999 Act, on the other hand, refer at times to
identical concepts while using different terminology. Therefore, for the sake of simplicity and
consistency and throughout the Common Regulations, the terminology of the 1960 Act has
been brought into line with the more modern terminology used in the 1999 Act. For the
purpose of the Common Regulations, five terms contained in the 1960 Act have been
harmonized with those contained in the 1999 Act:
• reference to “international application” or “international registration” is deemed to
•
•
•

•

include a reference to “international deposit”, as referred to in the 1960 Act;
reference to “applicant” or “holder” is deemed to include a reference to,
respectively, “depositor” or “owner” as referred to in the 1960 Act;
reference to “Contracting Party” is deemed to include a reference to a State party to
the 1960 Act;
reference to “Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office” is deemed to
include a reference to “State having a novelty examination” as defined in Article 2 of
the 1960 Act;
reference to “individual designation fee” is deemed to include a reference to the fee
mentioned in Article 15(1)2(b) of the 1960 Act.
Rule 1(2)

Entitlement to file an international application
To be entitled to file an international application, an applicant must satisfy at least one of the
following conditions:
• be a national of a State that is a Contracting Party or of a State member of an

intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party, or
• have a domicile in the territory of a State that is a Contracting Party or in the
territory in which the treaty establishing an intergovernmental organization that is a
Contracting Party applies, or
• have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the territory of a
State that is a Contracting Party or in the territory in which the treaty establishing an
intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party applies.
60 Article 3; 99 Article 3
In addition, but only under the 1999 Act, an international application may be filed on the
basis of a habitual residence in a Contracting Party.
The interpretation of “national”, “domicile”, “habitual residence” and “real and effective
commercial or industrial establishment” is exclusively a matter for the laws of the Contracting
Parties to determine. This Guide can therefore only give some guidance in that regard.

page 42

Hague Guide for Users

The term “national” is intended to have the same meaning as in Articles 2 and 3 of the Paris
Convention. It is taken to be capable of including both natural and legal persons. The
question as to whether a natural person is a national of a particular country, and the criteria
for deciding whether a legal entity is regarded as a national of that country (for example,
place of incorporation or headquarters), are matters for the law of such country.
The concept of “domicile” can have different meanings, depending on national legislation. It
is for the law of a Contracting Party to determine the criteria for either a natural person or a
legal entity to be regarded as domiciled in that Contracting Party. Under some legislations a
natural person can obtain domicile only by virtue of an official authorization. Other
legislations interpret “domicile” as more or less equivalent to “residence”. It is generally
believed that the Paris Convention did not seek, by using the expression “domicile”, to
indicate a legal situation, but rather a more or less permanent situation of fact, so that a
foreign national residing in a Contracting Party would, in most cases, be eligible to claim
entitlement through domicile. With respect to legal entities, their “domicile” can be
considered to be the place of their actual headquarters.
The term “habitual residence” is taken from the Berne Convention for the Protection of
Literary and Artistic Works. It has been used in the 1999 Act in order to compensate for any
excessively narrow interpretation that might be given to the concept of “domicile” under
domestic laws.
The expression “real and effective industrial or commercial establishment” is taken from
Article 3 of the Paris Convention, to which it was added at the first conference for the
revision of the Convention which took place in Brussels in 1897 - 1900. It was felt that the
original provision, which referred simply to “an establishment”, was too broad and should be
restricted. The intention was that, by using the French term “sérieux” (“real” in English),
fraudulent or fictitious establishments would be excluded. The term “effective” makes it clear
that, while the establishment must be one at which some industrial or commercial activity
takes place (as distinct from a mere warehouse), it need not be the principal place of
business (at the Brussels Conference, the proposal by one of the States party to the Madrid
Agreement to narrow down the requirement of the establishment to the principal place of
business was not adopted).

Determination of the State of origin (under the 1960 Act) and
determination of the applicant’s Contracting Party (under the
1999 Act)
The “State of origin” under the 1960 Act and the “applicant’s Contracting Party” under the
1999 Act both correspond to the Contracting Party in respect of which the applicant derives
his right to file an international application under the Hague Agreement, i.e., the Contracting
Party with which the applicant has the required entitlement (through establishment, domicile,
nationality or, in respect of the 1999 Act, habitual residence).
However, where an applicant has an entitlement with several Contracting Parties (refer to
“Item 2: Entitlement to file”), the “State of origin” and the “applicant’s Contracting Party” are
determined according to different principles under, respectively, the 1960 Act and the
1999 Act.

Determination of the State of origin under the 1960 Act
The State of origin is determined as:
• the Contracting State to the 1960 Act in which the applicant has a real and effective

industrial or commercial establishment; or

Hague Guide for Users

page 43

• if he has no such establishment in such a State, the Contracting State to the

1960 Act in which he has his domicile; or
• if he has neither an establishment nor a domicile in such a State, the Contracting

State to the 1960 Act of which he is a national.
60 Article 2
Thus, where an applicant has multiple entitlements in different Contracting Parties, the State
of origin cannot be freely chosen by that applicant; it is to be determined in accordance with
the above described hierarchy.

Determination of the applicant’s Contracting Party under the 1999 Act
The “applicant’s Contracting Party” is defined by the 1999 Act in such a way as to permit the
applicant to freely choose his Contracting Party on the basis of establishment, domicile,
habitual residence or nationality. For example, if an applicant indicates a domicile in
Contracting Party A, bound by the 1999 Act, and the nationality of Contracting Party B, also
bound by the 1999 Act, the applicant’s Contracting Party is, among Contracting Parties A
and B, the one which is indicated as such by the applicant in the international application
(refer to “Item 2: Entitlement to file”).
99 Article 1(xiv)

Plurality of entitlements
An applicant enjoying multiple and independent entitlements may cumulate these with a view
to obtaining protection on a broader geographical scale. For example, an applicant having
the nationality of Contracting Party A, bound exclusively by the 1960 Act and whose domicile
is located in Contracting Party B, bound exclusively by the 1999 Act, could, as a result,
designate all Contracting Parties bound by the 1960 and/or 1999 Acts.
A special case of plurality of entitlements arises in respect of States member of an
intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act, where those
States are themselves bound by the 1960 Act. For example, an applicant having the
nationality of Contracting Party A, bound exclusively by the 1960 Act, that is a member State
of the European Union, could, as a result, designate all Contracting Parties bound by the
1960 and/or 1999 Acts, as the European Union is a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act.
Where an applicant enjoying a plurality of independent entitlements under the 1960 and
1999 Acts designates a Contracting Party bound by the same Acts, the designation of that
Contracting Party will be governed by the 1999 Act, which is the most recent Act refer to
“Determination of which Act is applicable in respect of the designation of a given Contracting
Party”).

Several applicants
Two or more parties (whether natural persons or legal entities) may jointly file an
international application, provided that each of them is in a position to establish an
entitlement through a Contracting Party bound by the same Act or Acts. It is not necessary
that the Contracting Party concerned be the same in respect of each applicant, nor is it
necessary that the nature of the entitlement (nationality, domicile, habitual residence or
establishment) be the same for each applicant. For example, where Applicant 1 is a national
of Contracting Party A, bound by the 1999 Act, and Applicant 2 has a domicile in Contracting
Party B, also bound by the 1999 Act, these applicants may jointly file an international
application.

page 44

Hague Guide for Users

Contents of the international application
The contents of an international application may be divided into three categories, namely,
the mandatory contents, the additional mandatory contents where certain Contracting
Parties are designated and the optional contents.

Mandatory contents
The mandatory contents consist of the information which must be contained in every
international application or accompany it (such as the prescribed particulars concerning the
applicant, a reproduction of the designs for which protection is sought or the indication of the
designated Contracting Parties; refer to “International application”).
Rule 7(3)

Additional mandatory contents
The additional mandatory contents of an international application consist of elements that,
under certain conditions, may be notified by a Contracting Party and which must be included
in an international application where such Contracting Party has been designated.
Furthermore, with respect to Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act, the
international application shall contain the indication of the applicant’s Contracting Party. The
elements that may be notified by a Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office
are the following:
• information concerning the identity of the creator1;
• a brief description of the reproduction or of the characteristic features of the

industrial design in respect of which the application is filed2; and/or
• a claim3.
Those three additional elements correspond to the requirements that certain Contracting
Parties require in order for a national application to be accorded a filing date under their
domestic legislation (refer to “Identity of the creator” and “Mandatory contents of an
international application (declaration)”). Finally, in accordance with its national law, a
Contracting Party may notify that the application must be made in the name of the creator
and/or that an oath or declaration by the creator must be furnished (refer to “Special
requirements concerning the applicant and the creator” in “Contents of the international
application”, “Item 11: Identity of the creator” and “Special requirements concerning the
applicant and the creator (declaration)” in “The Hague System: general overview”)4 5.
99 Article 5(2)(a) and (b); Rule 7(4); Rule 8(3)

Optional contents
Even where information concerning the identity of the creator, or a brief description, is not
required for a designation of a Contracting Party which has not made the declaration under
Article 5(2)(a), such elements may nevertheless be included in the international application,
at the applicant’s choice. Since, in this case, they are not mandatory elements, their
absence does not cause an irregularity in the international application. In contrast, a claim
cannot be indicated by the applicant or an oath or declaration of the creator be furnished, if
the international application has not designated a Contracting Party requiring them.
Rule 7(5)(a)

Hague Guide for Users

page 45

In addition to the elements mentioned in the previous paragraph, a number of prescribed
optional elements may be provided by the applicant but their absence does not constitute an
irregularity in the international application. The optional contents are: the appointment of a
representative, priority claim, declaration of disclosure at an international exhibition, request
for immediate publication or deferment of publication under Rule 17(1), a declaration,
statement or other relevant indication as specified in the Administrative Instructions or a
statement that identifies information known by the holder to be material to the eligibility for
the protection of the industrial design concerned (refer to “Item 13: Priority claim” and
“Item 14: International exhibition”). Pursuant to Rule 7(6), the International Bureau shall
delete ex officio any non-required and non-permitted matter in the international application.
Furthermore, if the international application is accompanied by any document other than
those required or permitted, the International Bureau may dispose of the said document.
Rule 7(5)(b) to (g); Rule 7(6)
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the international application may contain any
declaration, statement or other relevant indication as may be specified in the Administrative
Instructions. Section 407 has been introduced into the Administrative Instructions to address
the specific features in some jurisdictions concerning the relation with a principal industrial
design or a principal application or registration. In these jurisdictions, the law provides for a
“similar design” system or a “related design” system, so that, under certain circumstances, a
reference to the “principal design” must be indicated in an application for the registration of a
“similar design” or “related design”. The Offices of the concerned Contracting Parties need
to identify the “principal design” since a “similar design” or a “related design” can only be
registered if the latter is considered by the Office to be similar or related to the “principal
design” and if both the “similar design” or “related design” and the “principal design” belong
to the same applicant/holder. In principle, if the international application complies with this
requirement, the “principal design” will not be considered as a prior design that would
prevent its “similar design” or “related design” from being registered. This information may

only be included in the international application if the law of a designated Contracting Party
provides for a “similar design” or a “related design” system (refer to “Item 16: Relation with a
principal design (Optional element applicable to the designation of Japan and/or Republic
of Korea only)”)6.
Rule 7(5)(f); A.I. Section 407
The international application may contain a declaration claiming the priority of an earlier filing
under Article 4 of the Paris Convention. Where the applicant has claimed priority of an
earlier filing in the international application, the Office of a Contracting Party may require that
a copy of the application on which the priority is based be submitted directly to it.
Alternatively, pursuant to Section 408(a) of the Administrative Instructions the said claim in
the international application may be accompanied by a Digital Access Service (DAS) code
allowing to retrieve the earlier filing in the DAS system.
Rule 7(5)(c) and (f); A.I. Section 408(a)

page 46

Hague Guide for Users

As prescribed in Section 408(b), the international application may additionally contain an
indication or a claim of the applicant’s economic status which would allow the applicant to
benefit from a reduction of an individual designation fee concerning the designation of
certain Contracting Parties, as indicated in the declaration made by those Contracting
Parties, respectively7 (refer to “Item 18: Reduction of individual designation fee”).
99 Article 7(2); Rule 7(5)(f); A.I. Section 408(b)
The international application may likewise contain a declaration concerning an exception to
lack of novelty and its supporting documentation. This would allow the applicant to claim
benefits from exceptional treatment for disclosure of an industrial design during the grace
period provided for in the national law of certain Contracting Parties. This information may
only be included in the international application if the law of a designated Contracting Party
provides for a “declaration concerning an exception to lack of novelty8 (refer to “Item 15:
Declaration concerning exception to lack of novelty and its supporting documentation”).
Rule 7(5)(f); A.I. Section 408(c)
The international application may similarly be accompanied by a statement that identifies
information known by the applicant to be material to the eligibility for protection of the
industrial design concerned. This information could, for example, concern the patentability
of the design for which protection is claimed9 (refer to Annex III: Information on eligibility for
protection).
Rule 7(5)(g); A.I. Section 408(d)

Special requirements under the law of a Contracting Party
Special requirements concerning the applicant and the creator
Any Contracting Party whose legislation requires an application for the registration of an
industrial design to be filed in the name of the creator of the design may notify that fact to the
Director General of WIPO (refer to “Additional mandatory contents”). If that Contracting
Party is designated in the international application, the identity of the creator of the industrial
design must be furnished and that person is deemed to be the applicant for the purposes of
the Contracting Party concerned, whether or not the international application was filed in his
name. Furthermore, if the person mentioned in the international application as the creator is
not the same as the person named as the applicant, the international application must be
accompanied by a statement or document, depending on what the Contracting Party
concerned may require, to the effect that the international application has been assigned by
the person identified in the international application as the creator to the person named as
the applicant (refer to “Application filed in the name of the creator”)10. A standard statement
for that purpose is included in item 7 of international application form DM/1 and in the
relevant section of the eHague interface11.
Rule 7(4)(c); Rule 8(1)(a)(i) and (b); Rule 8(2)
Any Contracting Party whose legislation requires the furnishing of an oath or declaration of
the creator may notify that fact to the Director General of WIPO. If that Contracting Party is
designated in the international application, the international application shall be
accompanied by an oath or declaration of the creator and contain indications concerning the
identity of the creator of the industrial design12 (refer to “Annex I: Oath or Declaration of the
Creator”).
Rule 7(4)(c); Rule 8(1)(a)(ii) and (b); Rule 8(3)

Hague Guide for Users

page 47

Special requirements concerning the unity of the design
Any Contracting Party whose law, at the time of its becoming party to the 1999 Act, contains
a requirement of unity of design (according to which, generally speaking, two or more
industrial designs included in the same application have to conform to the same creative
concept) may notify that fact to the Director General of WIPO13. The requirement of unity of
design may vary from one Contracting Party to another. For example, in some jurisdictions
only one independent and distinct design may be claimed in a single application, whereas in
another several independent designs may be included in a single application if they belong
to a set.
The requirement of unity of design notified by a Contracting Party under the 1999 Act does
not affect the applicant’s right to include up to 100 industrial designs in the international
application even if that Contracting Party is being designated. The purpose of the
notification of such a requirement is to enable the Office of the Contracting Party that has
made it to refuse the effects of the international registration, pending compliance with the
requirement in question14. In that case, the international registration may be divided before
the Office concerned in order to overcome the ground of refusal based on lack of unity of
design. The Office is entitled to charge the holder of that registration as many additional
fees as divisions prove necessary. The mode of payment of additional fees for this type of
transaction is not governed by the Hague System; they will be specified by each Contracting
Party concerned, which will collect them directly from the owner (refer to “Procedure
following notification of refusal”).
99 Article 13
Where an international registration has been divided before the Office of a designated
Contracting Party following a notification of refusal based upon lack of unity of design, that
Office must notify the International Bureau of that fact, together with the following additional
particulars:
• the Office making the notification;
• the number of the international registration concerned;
• the numbers of the industrial designs which have been the subject of the division

with the Office concerned; and
• the resulting national or regional application numbers or registration numbers.

A.I. Section 502

Language of the international application
An international application may be in English, French, or Spanish, at the applicant’s option.
However, where an international application is presented to the International Bureau through
the intermediary of an Office, that Office may restrict the choice of the applicant and require
the application to be in any one or two of those three languages.
Rule 6
If the international application is not in one of the prescribed languages, this constitutes an
irregularity entailing a postponement of the filing date of the international application (refer to
“Irregularities entailing a postponement of the filing date of the international application”).
Rule 14(2)(a)

page 48

Hague Guide for Users

With regard to the language of communications relating to an international application or to
the resulting international registration, refer to “International applications” under
“Languages”.

1.
Romania is the only Contracting Party that has made a declaration under Article 5(2)(b)(i) concerning the
identity of the creator as additional mandatory content.
2.
Romania, the Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam have made a declaration under Article 5(2)(b)(ii)
concerning a brief description as additional mandatory content.
3.
The United States of America and Viet Nam have made a declaration concerning a claim under Article
5(2)(a) and (b)(iii).
4.
Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and Mexico have made a declaration under Rule 8(1) that the
international application must be made in the name of the creator.
5.
The United States of America is the only Contracting Party that has made a declaration under Rule 8(1)(ii)
requiring the furnishing of an oath or declaration of the creator.
6.
Section 407 is applicable for the designation of Japan and the Republic of Korea.
7.
Israel, Mexico and the United States of America have indicated in their declaration under Article 7(2)
different amounts of individual designation fees, depending on the status of the applicant.
8.
This provision is applicable for the designation of Japan and the Republic of Korea.
9.
Section 408(d) applies for the designation of the United States of America only. The duty of disclosure
under the national law of the United States of America continues even after the filing date and shall be monitored
by the holder of the international registration.
10.
Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and Mexico have made a declaration under Rule 8(1) that the
international application must be made in the name of the creator.
11.
The national laws of Bulgaria, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Serbia, Tajikistan and
Turkey require that the identity of the creator be mentioned. Although this indication is not mandatory within the
framework of the Hague System, applicants are advised to declare the identity of the creator as a matter of
course, when those Contracting Parties are designated in the international application. Given that this is an
optional indication under the international procedure, the International Bureau will not examine whether this
requirement has been complied with or not.
12.
The United States of America is the only Contracting Party that has made the declaration under
Rule 8(1)(a)(ii).
13.
Estonia, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Romania, Russian Federation, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, the
United States of America and Viet Nam have made a declaration under Article 13(1).
14.
Although Japan has made the declaration under Article 13 according to which the national law requires
that only one independent and distinct design may be claimed in a single application, its Office does not refuse
the effects of the international registration on the ground that two or more designs are contained in a single
international registration. The international registration containing several designs is to be deemed as a bundle
of several applications and divided ex officio by the Office in its examination process.

Hague Guide for Users

page 49

How to submit an international application to the
International Bureau: eHague or DM/1 form
An international application may be presented to the International Bureau, either through the
electronic filing (eHague) interface or on the relevant official form (form DM/1) made
available by the International Bureau. If an international application, governed exclusively by
the 1999 Act, has been presented to the International Bureau through an Office, the Office
should indicate the date on which it received the international application in the separate box
“For use by the Office indirect filing”. This date is important since it will become, in principle,
the date of the international registration (refer to “Date of the international registration”).
Where an item of form DM/1 is mandatory, it is indicated in parenthesis next to its title
“(Mandatory)”. Where an item is mandatory following a certain designation, it is indicated in
a footnote at the end of the item. The eHague interface automatically checks the said
mandatory and additional mandatory contents of the application. In principle, paper
applications may be submitted either directly to the International Bureau or via the Office of a
Contracting Party (refer to “Channels of communication”).
Rule 7(1)
Annex I to form DM/1 allows the applicant to submit a “Declaration of Inventorship” or, if not
possible, a “Substitute Statement in Lieu of a Declaration of Inventorship”, in respect of a
designation of the United States of America. It is mandatory if the United States of America
is designated. Annex II allows the applicant to submit supporting documentation
accompanying an international application in support of a declaration concerning exception
to lack of novelty to the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Annex III serves to
submit a statement that identifies information known by the applicant to be material to the
eligibility for protection of the industrial design concerned. It is only relevant for the
designation of the United States of America. Annex IV allows the applicant to support a
claim of micro entity status with a micro entity certification in order to benefit from a reduction
of the individual designation fee in respect of a designation of the United States of America.
Annex V allows the applicant to submit (a) document(s) in support of a priority claim (priority
document) to the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).
Sections corresponding to Annexes I, II, III, IV and V are also included in the eHague
interface.
The eHague interface has the following advantages:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•

personalized workbench environment (Portfolio Manager);
uploading of multiple reproductions simultaneously;
real-time checking of certain formalities;
saving of applications in progress;
a fully integrated fee calculator;
online payment options according to the user profile;
faster delivery of the application;
lower fees when the application contains many reproductions of the industrial
designs to be registered, since reproductions submitted on paper are subject to a fee
for each page beyond the first (refer to “Fees due” in “Payment of fees”);
instant acknowledgement of receipt with all the details of the submitted application;
sending corrections to irregularities or defects (including corrected reproductions and
documents) to the International Bureau;
receiving and downloading notifications from the International Bureau relating to
international applications; and
retrieving in real-time the current status of international applications.

page 50

Hague Guide for Users

When a notification concerning an international application filed through the eHague
interface is available, the user who filed an international application will receive an e-mail
alert. The e-mail address used is the one used to create the user account. The alert will
provide an invitation to log into the secure environment in order to consult the notification.
For security reasons, attachments or links are not included in the e-mail alert. The
International Bureau, however, will send notifications by regular mail in all cases.
However, please note that the eHague interface may not be used if the applicant wishes to
include specimens of the industrial design(s) instead of reproductions.
Rule 9(1); A.I. Section 401(c)

How to complete the international application (form DM/1 or eHague)?
The following explanations follow the structure of the official paper form for an international
application (form DM/1) and refer to the successive items contained in the form. It is
understood that these explanations apply mutatis mutandis to the eHague interface.
In the separate box of form DM/1, the applicant may indicate: own reference, number of
continuation sheets (if any), and the Annexes accompanying the international application (if
any).

Item 1: Applicant (mandatory)
Name
Where the applicant is a natural person, the name to be indicated is the family (or principal)
name and the given (or secondary) name(s) of the natural person, as customarily used by
that person and in the order in which they are customarily used. Where the applicant is a
legal entity, its full official designation must be given. Where the name of the applicant is in
characters other than Latin characters, the name must be indicated as a transliteration into
Latin characters, following the phonetics of the language of the international application.
Where the applicant is a legal entity, the transliteration may be replaced by a translation into
the language of the international application.
Rule 7(3)(i); A.I. Section 301
Several applicants
Where there is more than one applicant, the appropriate box should be ticked and the
relevant information regarding each of the other applicants should be furnished on a
continuation sheet. The eHague interface also allows the indication of several applicants.
Address
The address of the applicant must be given in such a way as to satisfy the customary
requirements for prompt postal delivery and should consist, at least, of all the relevant
administrative units up to, and including, the house number, if any. In addition, telephone
number and an email address may be given. For eHague, an email address has to be
indicated.
Rule 7(3)(ii); A.I. Section 205(1); A.I. Section 301(d)

Hague Guide for Users

page 51

Item 2: Entitlement to file (mandatory)
Although only one entitlement with one Contracting Party is required in order to file an
international application, more than one Contracting Party may be indicated for each
criterion in item 2. The applicant is required to indicate in item 2 the Contracting Party(ies) in
which the applicant has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment (if any),
as well as the Contracting Party(ies) in which the applicant has a domicile (if any), and also
the Contracting Party(ies) of which the applicant is a national (if applicable).
Rule 7(3)(iii)
In addition, the applicant is required to indicate the Contracting Party(ies) in which the
applicant has habitual residence (if any), provided that such Contracting Party is bound by
the 1999 Act. In fact, the possibility of claiming an entitlement through habitual residence is
contemplated only by the 1999 Act, and not by the 1960 Act.
For a paper application, the full name of the Contracting Party should be indicated. For an
electronic application, the official two-letter code for the Contracting Party should be selected
from the corresponding dropdown list.
The indications concerning each of the above criteria must all be completed, even if the
Contracting Party concerned is the same in each case. If any criterion is not applicable, the
applicant should simply write “None”.
Entitlement via an intergovernmental organization
Intergovernmental organizations may become party to the 1999 Act. There are currently two
such Contracting Parties: the European Union (EU) and the African Intellectual Property
Organization (OAPI).
Applicants having a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment, a domicile or a
habitual residence, in a Contracting Party that is a member State of an intergovernmental
organization that is a Contracting Party, or being a national of a Contracting Party that is a
member State of an intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party, should
indicate both that Contracting Party and that intergovernmental organization. However,
where entitlement is derived from a connection with a member State of an intergovernmental
organization but which is not itself a Contracting Party, only the name of the
intergovernmental organization should be indicated.
Multiple entitlements
It is important for the applicant to indicate possible multiple entitlements in different
Contracting Parties, since that applicant would then be in a position to cumulate those
multiple entitlements with a view to obtaining protection on a broader geographical scale.
For example, an applicant having the nationality of Contracting Party A, bound exclusively by
the 1960 Act and whose domicile is located in Contracting Party B, bound exclusively by the
1999 Act, could, as a result, designate all Contracting Parties bound by the 1960 and/or
1999 Acts.
Where an applicant enjoying a plurality of independent entitlements under the 1960 and
1999 Acts designates a Contracting Party bound by the same Acts, the designation of that
Contracting Party will be governed by the 1999 Act, which is the most recent Act (refer to
“Determination of which Act is applicable in respect of the designation of a given Contracting
Party”).

page 52

Hague Guide for Users

Item 3: Applicant’s Contracting Party (mandatory where the 1999 Act applies)
Under the 1999 Act, the applicant’s Contracting Party is the Contracting Party through which
the applicant derives the right to file an international application. If only one Contracting
Party bound by the 1999 Act is indicated under item 2, that Contracting Party must also be
indicated under item 3. On the other hand, if several Contracting Parties bound by the
1999 Act are indicated under item 2, one of them must be selected as the applicant’s
Contracting Party. That Contracting Party must be specified by the applicant in any
international application governed exclusively or partly by the 1999 Act (as regards the
determination of the applicant’s Contracting Party, refer to “Determination of the applicant's
Contracting Party under the 1999 Act”).
99 Article 1(xiv); Rule 7(4)(a)
The indication of the State of origin under the 1960 Act is not required in international
applications since such indication does not have any effect on the examination carried out by
the International Bureau. It may however be deduced through the indications of the
entitlements claimed in the international application form (as regards the determination of the
State of origin, refer to “Determination of the State of origin under the 1960 Act”).

Item 4: Address for correspondence
Where the name and address of a representative has been given in item 5 of the
international application form, all communications which are required to be sent by the
International Bureau to the applicant are sent to that address. Otherwise, all
communications are sent to the address of the applicant, as indicated in item 1 of the
application form.
Where, however, an applicant has not indicated the name and address of a representative
and requires that correspondence be sent to an address other than that indicated in item 1 of
the application form, an address for correspondence should then be indicated in item 4. In
other words, when there is just one applicant, the field “Address for Correspondence” should
be completed only (a), where no representative has been appointed and (b), the address to
which communications should be sent differs from that indicated in item 1.
Several applicants: address for correspondence
Where there are several applicants with different addresses and the name and address of a
representative has not been indicated in item 5 of the application form, a separate address
for correspondence must be indicated. In default of such indication in the application form,
the address of the first person named as the applicant in item 1 is treated as the address for
correspondence.
A.I. Section 302
Phone and email address
The phone number or email address given should be those of the person whom the
International Bureau should contact if and when it needs to get in touch with the applicant.

Item 5: Appointment of a representative (if any)
If the applicant wishes to be represented before the International Bureau, the name and
address of the representative should be given in this part of the form. The information
should be sufficient to enable correspondence to be sent to the representative, and should

Hague Guide for Users

page 53

preferably include telephone number and any email address. For eHague, the email
address has to be indicated as the International Bureau will confirm receipt of the
international application at that email address.
Rule 3; Rule 7(5)(b); A.I. Section 301
Where the name of the representative is in characters other than Latin characters, the name
must be indicated as a transliteration into Latin characters, following the phonetics of the
language of the international application. Where the representative is a legal entity, the
transliteration may be replaced by a translation into the language of the international
application.
A.I. Section 301(c)
A representative may be appointed in an international application by indicating the name and
address of such representative in this item or in the corresponding section of the
eHagueinterface. Where a representative is appointed, the international application form
may be signed either by the applicant or representative in item 19. No power of attorney is
required, but may be submitted and the appropriate box should be ticked in item 5. A power
of attorney in PDF format may be uploaded in the eHague interface.
Rule 3(2)(a)
The Hague System does not contain any restriction or requirement as to who may be
appointed as representative before the International Bureau (concerning, for example,
professional qualification, nationality or residence). It follows that an applicant may appoint a
representative residing or carrying on business in a Contracting Party which is not the State
of origin or the applicant’s Contracting Party, and it is not even necessary that the
representative be residing or carrying on business in a Contracting Party.
The appointment of a representative in the international application empowers the
representative to act only before the International Bureau. It may subsequently become
necessary to appoint one or more further representatives to act before the Offices of
designated Contracting Parties, for example, in the event of a refusal of protection notified by
such an Office. In such case, the appointment of a representative is governed by the
requirements of the Contracting Party concerned.
The International Bureau records in the International Register the appointment of a
representative and any other relevant fact concerning such representative.

Item 6: Number of industrial designs, reproductions and/or specimens
(mandatory)
The following must be indicated in item 6 of the international application form:
• the total number of industrial designs included in the international application –

which may not exceed 100,
• the total number of reproductions, in black and white, and in color,
• the total number of A4 pages comprising reproductions (refer to “The reproductions

of the industrial designs”), and
• the total number of specimens, if any (refer to “Filing of specimens under the

1999 Act” and “Filing of specimens under the 1960 Act”).
Rule 7(3)(v)

page 54

Hague Guide for Users

For eHague, paragraphs (a) and (b) under item 6 will be filled in automatically based on the
information and reproductions provided. Information in respect of paragraph (c) is not
relevant when filing electronically. Furthermore, eHague is unavailable if the application
includes specimens of the industrial design(s) instead of reproductions.
If a Contracting Party that has notified a requirement of unity of the design under
Article 13(1) is designated under the 1999 Act and this requirement is not satisfied, the
designs may nonetheless be filed in the same international application, but the Office
concerned may refuse protection pending compliance through a procedure of division of the
international registration before that Office (refer to “Procedure following notification of
refusal”)1.
In particular, the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), the Federal Service for
Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT), the United States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) and the Intellectual Property Office of Viet Nam (IP Viet Nam) are likely to refuse
the effects of an international registration pending compliance with the requirement of unity
of design under their respective laws.
As specified in the declaration made by Mexico, an international application may only
contain one industrial design or a group of industrial designs which are interrelated in such a
way as to form a single concept.
As specified in the declaration made by the Russian Federation, the industrial designs that
are the subject of the same international registration shall meet the requirement of the unity
of a single creative concept. This requirement is met where there is:
• one independent and distinct design; or
• one design and its variants differing from that design by visually insignificant
features and/or by color combination; or
• a group of designs belonging to the same set of products, as well as one or more
designs for separate products belonging to the same set of products.
Furthermore, as specified in the declaration made by the United States of America, only one
independent and distinct design may be claimed in a single application. This requirement is
met where there is only one design in the international registration, or where the designs in
the international registration are patentably indistinct.
Finally, as specified in the declaration made by Viet Nam, only one independent and distinct
design may be claimed in a single international application, except that:
•
•

designs that are the subject of the same international application must belong to
the same set of composition of items and conform to a requirement of unity of
design, unity of use or accompaniment of each other in use, or
a design may be accompanied by single or multiple options, that are variations, of
that design, which must conform to a requirement of unity of design and be
insignificantly different from that design.

Item 7: Designated Contracting Parties (mandatory)
The applicant must, by ticking the appropriate box, designate each Contracting Party where
protection is sought. If filing electronically, only those Contracting Parties which may be
designated appear in the eHague interface. It is mandatory to indicate all Contracting
Parties for which protection is sought. No Contracting Parties may be added afterwards.
60 Article 5(2); 99 Article 5(1)(v); Rule 7(3)(vi)

Hague Guide for Users

page 55

What Contracting Parties may be designated?
Each designated Contracting Party must be bound by an Act – the 1999 Act and/or the
1960 Act – to which one of the Contracting Parties indicated in item 2 (Entitlement to file) is
also bound. A table of Contracting Parties, with an indication of the Act or Acts to which
each particular State is party, is annexed to official form DM/1. In the eHague interface, the
selection of Contracting Parties that may be designated is determined automatically on the
basis of the entitlement to file data provided under item 2.
For example, if an applicant has indicated that he has an establishment only in Country A,
which is bound exclusively by the 1999 Act, and has not indicated any other entitlements, he
may only designate Contracting Parties which are bound by the 1999 Act, whether or not
such Contracting Parties are also bound by the 1960 Act. He may not, however, designate
Contracting Parties bound exclusively by the 1960 Act.
If, instead, the applicant has indicated that he has an establishment in Country A, which is
bound by the 1960 Act, and that he also has a domicile in Country B, which is bound by the
1999 Act, the application may cumulatively designate Contracting Parties which are party to
either the 1960 Act exclusively, the 1999 Act exclusively, or to both the 1960 Act and the
1999 Act.
A special case of plurality of entitlements arises in respect of States members of an
intergovernmental organization that is a Contracting Party, where those States are
themselves bound by the 1960 Act. For example, an applicant having the nationality of
Contracting Party A, bound exclusively by the 1960 Act, that is a member State of the
European Union, could, as a result, designate all Contracting Parties bound by the 1960 or
1999 Acts, as the European Union is a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act.
Where an applicant enjoying a plurality of independent entitlements under the 1960 and
1999 Acts designates a Contracting Party bound by the same Acts, the designation of that
Contracting Party will be governed by the 1999 Act (refer to “Determination of which Act is
applicable in respect of the designation of a given Contracting Party”).
It is essential that an applicant designates, at the time of filing of the international application,
all those Contracting Parties where it is intended to seek protection for an industrial design.
If it subsequently becomes necessary to extend protection to additional Contracting Parties,
this can only be done by means of filing a new international application.
Protection in the State of origin and in the applicant’s Contracting Party
As a matter of principle, it is possible for an applicant under the Hague System to request
protection in the State of origin and in the applicant’s Contracting Party (refer to “Entitlement
to file an international application”).
The 1960 Act provides as a principle that an international registration has effect in the State
of origin, unless otherwise specified in its national legislation. Given that information
concerning such exclusion is not required to be communicated to the Director General of
WIPO, the International Bureau does not carry out an examination in that respect.
60 Article 7(2)
The 1999 Act expressly provides that any Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining
Office may, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that, where it is the
applicant’s Contracting Party, its designation in an international registration has no effect.
Where a Contracting Party which has made that declaration is indicated in an international

page 56

Hague Guide for Users

application both as the applicant’s Contracting Party and as a designated Contracting Party,
the International Bureau disregards the designation of the Contracting Party in question.
99 Article 14(3)
Application filed in the name of the creator
If the person identified as the creator in item 11 of the application form is other than the
applicant, through designating the Contracting Party having made a declaration under
Rule (8)(1)(a)(i) that its legislation requires an application for the registration of an industrial
design to be filed in the name of the creator of the design, the applicant states that the
present international application has been assigned by the creator to him and that the
creator declares that he believes himself to be the creator of the industrial design (refer to
“Special requirements concerning the applicant” and “Item 11: Identity of the creator”)2.
Rule 8(1)

Item 8: Products which constitute the industrial design or in relation to which
it is to be used (mandatory)
Item 8 provides for a table in which the applicant must indicate what the industrial designs
consist of. Such indication must be considered differently, depending upon whether one is
concerned with a two-dimensional or a three-dimensional design:
• if the industrial design consists of a product, the usual generic name of that product

should be indicated, for example: “chair”;
• if the industrial design consists of a decorative motif in two-dimensions destined to

be used in relation to a product, that product should be indicated, for example:
“drawing to be used on dishes” or “motif for textiles”.
These indications must be given for each industrial design, in numerical order.
60 Article 5(2); 99 Article 5(1)(iv)
The laws of Japan and the Republic of Korea prescribe that the scope of protection of an
industrial design be determined by the indication of a product, in addition to the
representation of an industrial design. Pursuant to the laws of those Contracting Parties, the
indication of a product using a comprehensive term, for example: “material for construction”
is not allowed, since, in such a case, the scope of protection would be too broad. Therefore,
where an applicant designates those Contracting Parties in the international application, it is
recommended that the product be indicated by terms by which the purpose of the product
can be clearly understood (for example, “window profile”) in order to avoid receiving refusal
upon that ground3.
The applicant may also indicate the (single) class of the Locarno Classification to which
those industrial designs belong. In the case of several designs included in the same
international application, all those designs must belong to the same class of the Locarno
Classification (refer to “Contents of the application”)4.
Rule 7(7)
In addition, in the right-hand side of the table, the sub-class to which the product(s)
concerned belong may also be indicated.

Hague Guide for Users

page 57

The indications relating to the class and sub-class(es) are not compulsory and therefore
failure to provide them does not result in an irregularity being raised by the International
Bureau. However, if the International Bureau finds that several designs included in the same
international application belong to different classes of the Locarno classification, this
constitutes an irregularity which will have to be remedied (refer to “Time limit for correcting
irregularities”).

Item 9: Description
As a matter of principle, the description is an optional indication which may be included in
any international application. If a description is provided, it should relate to the characteristic
visual features of the industrial designs that appear in the reproductions, or describe the type
of the reproduction(s) (refer to “Item 10: Description of the reproductions (legends)”). For
example, a legend(s) may define a specific view of the product (e.g. “front view”, “top view”,
etc.)5 (refer to “Representation of the industrial design” and “Numbering of reproductions and
legends”). The description may disclose the operation or possible use of the industrial
design as long as this description is not technical. If the description exceeds 100 words, an
additional fee of 2 Swiss francs per word exceeding 100 is payable. If the Russian
Federation is designated, ROSPATENT recommends that a brief description of the
characteristic features of the industrial design be provided.
Rule 7(5)(a); A.I Section 405(c)
However, under the 1999 Act, any Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office
and whose law requires that an application for the grant of protection to an industrial design
should contain a description in order for that application to be accorded a filing date may, in
a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO accordingly. Romania, the Syrian Arab
Republic and Viet Nam have made that declaration. Where such Contracting Party is
designated under the 1999 Act, the international application should contain the required
description. Failure to provide the necessary description results in the international
application being considered as irregular and may entail the postponement of the date of the
international registration (refer to “Irregularities concerning special requirement notified by a
Contracting Party or regarding the identity of the creator, description and claim”). Both the
paper form (DM/1) and the eHague interface clearly indicate in respect of which Contracting
Parties the description is required.
99 Article 5(2)(b)(ii); Rule 7(4)(b)
The description may also serve as a way of disclaiming protection in respect of some
characteristics of the industrial designs. Furthermore, matter which is shown in a
reproduction but for which protection is not sought may be indicated in the description
(and/or by means of dotted or broken lines or coloring in the reproduction (refer to
“Disclaimers and matter that does not form part of the claimed design”)). Even if the
disclaimed part of the design or the matter other than the design is indicated by those means
in the reproductions, it is recommended to explain in the description how they are indicated
in the reproductions to avoid any confusion by the Office of the Contracting Party.
A.I. Section 403

Item 10: Description of the reproductions (legends)
In item 10, the corresponding code of a legend (for example, No. 1 for perspective view,
No. 2 for front view, etc.) may be indicated. If code No. 00 is indicated, other legends may
be indicated (limited to 40 characters). It is recommended that a legend be provided when
designating Japan and/or the United States of America.

page 58

Hague Guide for Users

Item 11: Identity of the creator
As a matter of principle, the identity of the creator of the designs is an optional indication
which may be included in any international application. However, such indication may be
mandatory in some circumstances under the 1960 and/or the 1999 Act.
Under the 1960 Act, the law of a Contracting Party may require such information where it is
designated under that Act (without the need to make a corresponding notification to the
Director General of WIPO). Therefore, whenever such a Contracting Party is designated
under the 1960 Act, the international application should contain the identity of the creator.
Failure to provide this indication may lead to a refusal of protection being issued by the
Office of the Contracting Party in question. However, given that the requirement to furnish
the identity of the creator does not have to be notified to the Director General of WIPO under
the 1960 Act, the International Bureau does not carry out an examination in that respect.
60 Article 8(4)(a)
Under the 1999 Act, any Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office and whose
law requires that an application for the grant of protection to an industrial design should
contain the identity of the creator in order for that application to be accorded a filing date
may, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO accordingly. Romania is the only
Contracting Party that has made this declaration. Therefore, if Romania is designated under
the 1999 Act, the international application shall contain indications concerning the identity of
the creator.
99 Article 5(2)(b)(i)
In addition, any Contracting Party to the 1999 Act whose legislation requires an application
for the registration of an industrial design to be filed in the name of the creator of the design
or requires the furnishing of an oath or declaration of the creator may notify that fact to the
Director General of WIPO. Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and Mexico have made such a
declaration to the effect that the application be filed in the name of the creator, therefore
applicants who designate Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and/or Mexico in their
international applications shall indicate the identity of the creator as a matter of course under
this item. If the person identified as the creator is other than the applicant, when designating
such a Contracting Party, the applicant also states under item 11 of the form that the present
international application has been assigned by the creator to him and that the creator
declares that he believes himself to be the creator of the industrial design (refer to “Special
requirements concerning the applicant and the creator” and “Application filed in the name of
the creator”). Both the paper form (DM/1) and the eHague interface clearly indicate in
respect of which Contracting Parties the indication of a creator is required.
In the case that a Contracting Party having made a declaration requiring the furnishing of an
oath or a declaration of the creator is designated in an international application, the
international application shall be accompanied by an oath or declaration of the creator and
contain indications of the identity of the creator. At present, only the United States of
America has made such a declaration. Annex I to form DM/1 (refer to “Annex I: Oath or
Declaration of the Creator”) and the eHague interface allows the applicant to submit a
declaration of inventorship (or, if not possible, a substitute statement in lieu of a declaration
of inventorship) for the designation of the United States of America. It is mandatory content
for an international application designating the United States of America.
99 Article 10(2)(b); Rule 7(4)(b); Rule 8(1),(2) and (3))

Hague Guide for Users

page 59

Finally, the law of a Contracting Party may require that the identity of the creator be
indicated. Bulgaria, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Serbia, Tajikistan and
Turkey have informed the International Bureau that their respective national laws require that
element. Applicants who designate Bulgaria, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation,
Serbia, Tajikistan or Turkey are thus advised to declare the identity of the creator as a matter
of course. However, given that this is an optional indication under the international
procedure as such the International Bureau will not examine whether this requirement has
been complied with or not.

Item 12: Claim (applicable only to the designation of the United States
of America or Viet Nam)
Where the international application contains the designation of the United States of America
or Viet Nam, a claim with the wording as specified in the declaration under Article 5(2)(a) of
the 1999 Act made by the United States of America or Viet Nam must be contained in the
international application (United States of America: “the ornamental design for [indicate an
article] as shown and described”; Viet Nam: “Application for overall protection for industrial
design(s) as shown and described”). That wording is reproduced in the DM/1 form and the
eHague interface.
If neither the United States of America nor Viet Nam is designated, a claim may not be
included in the international application.

Item 13: Priority claim – Article 4 of the Paris Convention
Priority of an earlier filing may be claimed under Article 4 of the Paris Convention. Priority
may be claimed on the basis of a first filing made in one of the States party to the Paris
Convention or any member of the World Trade Organization.
60 Article 5(2); 99 Article 6(1)(a)
Conversely, since an international application for registration of industrial designs may be a
first application under the Hague System, it may itself also serve as a basis for claiming
priority with regard to a subsequent national or regional application.
Where it is intended to claim priority, this should be indicated in item 13, by ticking the
appropriate box. The priority claim may be to a single earlier filing or to multiple earlier
filings.
Where priority is claimed, there must be indicated the name of the Office with which the
earlier filing was made, together with the number of the earlier filing (if available), and the
date of the earlier filing (in the order of day, month and year). A priority claim to an earlier
filed international application for registration of industrial designs should indicate the
International Bureau as the Office of earlier filing and identify the number of the earlier filing
either by the international registration number or by the application number (nine-digit
number or “WIPO” + number) assigned by the International Bureau6. Where priority is
claimed from more than one earlier filing and all the relevant indications cannot be
accommodated in the space provided, then (unless a self-generated form is used) those with
the earliest date should be indicated in item 13 and the remainder should be set out on a
continuation sheet.
Rule 7(5)(c)
Where the earlier filing does not relate to all the designs included in the international
application, the applicant should indicate those designs for which priority is claimed. Such

page 60

Hague Guide for Users

indication should be made by reference to the numbers of the designs in question. If no
indication is made in this part of item 13, it will be assumed by the International Bureau that
the priority relates to all the designs.
The International Bureau disregards any claimed priority which bears a date which is more
than six months earlier than the filing date of the international application, and so informs the
applicant.
Under the national law of Israel, where an applicant claims the priority of an earlier
application, the applicant cannot benefit from a reduced individual designation fee.
Where an applicant claims the priority of an earlier application, copies of the earlier
application upon which priority is based (“priority document(s)”) should not be included with
the international application sent to the International Bureau, neither is the “late” submission
of copies of the earlier application to the International Bureau allowed. Any priority
document submitted to the International Bureau will be disposed of, with the exception of the
submission of priority documents using Annex V (or corresponding section in the eHague
interface), for the purpose of a designation of the Republic of Korea, as explained below.
The International Bureau confines itself to establishing only that the required particulars have
been included in the international application form. As explained above, the International
Bureau cannot accept a priority document as such. This does not, however, preclude an
Office of a designated Contracting Party from requesting that the holder, in any particular
case, furnish a copy of the priority document to it directly. Such a request could, for
example, be made in the context of a refusal where the Office takes the view that the priority
document is necessary in order to establish novelty, because of disclosure during the period
covered by the priority claim.
Notwithstanding the general principle above, Japan and the Republic of Korea have
indicated that their national laws require that a priority document be furnished to their
Offices, in all cases, in order to support priority claims, within three months from the date of
publication of the international registration in the International Designs Bulletin, and such a
priority document be certified by the Office in which the earlier application was filed (“certified
priority document”).
For both Japan and the Republic of Korea, the period for submitting a certified priority
document is three months from the date of publication of the international registration in the
I.D.B., failing which the right of priority will be lost and, as a consequence, their Offices may
refuse the international registration. In particular, it should be noted that pursuant to the
national legislation of Japan and the Republic of Korea, the international registration may be
refused on the ground of lack of novelty if the first filing on which the priority is based was
published prior the date of the international registration (which in most cases is the same as
the filing date of the international application), and no certified priority document was
submitted within the above mentioned three-month period from the publication date.
Moreover, if the holder resides outside the country (i.e., Japan or the Republic of Korea, as
the case may be), the certified priority document must be submitted through a local
representative. The Japan Patent Office (JPO) requires an original certified priority
document, while the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) accepts a copy of the
certified priority document.

Hague Guide for Users

page 61

This being said, KIPO accepts a copy of the certified priority document submitted through
the International Bureau. In such a case, the document may be furnished when filing
through the eHague interface, or by using Annex V to form DM/1. The submission of a
certified priority document through the International Bureau in this manner is only possible at
the time of filing the international application and only to support the priority claim for the
designation of the Republic of Korea.
For the United States of America, a certified priority document must be submitted during the
pendency of the application for patent before the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) (i.e. prior to the issuance of the patent or abandonment) and, furthermore,
should be submitted on or before the date of the payment of the issue fee (second part of
the individual designation fee for the United States of America). If the certified priority
document is submitted after the date of payment of the second part of the individual
designation fee, the patent will not include the priority claim unless corrected in accordance
with United States law (refer to 37 CFR 1.55). The submission of the certified priority
document should be accompanied by a cover letter identifying the international registration
to which the certified priority document is directed. Such a letter must be signed either by a
patent practitioner registered to practice before the USPTO or by the applicant, provided that
the applicant is not a juristic entity.
For the Russian Federation, an original certified priority document must be submitted to the
Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT), in support of a priority claim, within
three months from the date of publication of the international registration in the International
Designs Bulletin. If the required original certified priority document is not submitted within
the above-mentioned three-month period, the priority claim will be disregarded. The
submission of that document should be accompanied by a cover letter identifying the
international registration to which it is directed. A local patent attorney is not required to
submit this document to the Office.
For Mexico, a certified priority document must be submitted to the Mexican Institute of
Industrial Property (IMPI), in support of a priority claim, within three months from the date of
publication of the international registration in the International Designs Bulletin. If the
required certified priority document is not submitted to IMPI within the above-mentioned
three-month period, it will be deemed that no priority claim is made. The submission of a
certified priority document should be accompanied by a Spanish translation if the said
document is not in Spanish, as well as a proof of payment of the applicable fee.
Rule 7(6)
WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS)
The WIPO Digital Access Service (DAS) is an electronic system allowing priority documents
to be securely exchanged between participating IP Offices. If the Office of the earlier filing
participates in DAS as a “depositing Office” with respect to priority documents for industrial
design applications, an access code may be obtained from that Office. If the Office of a
designated Contracting Party also participates in DAS as an “accessing Office” with respect
to priority documents for industrial design applications, the applicant may provide the access
code in this item so that the latter Office is able to access the priority document via DAS.
For more information about DAS and its participating Offices, refer to the WIPO website.
A.I. Section 408(a)

page 62

Hague Guide for Users

Item 14: International exhibition – Article 11 of the Paris Convention
Temporary protection of designs exhibited at certain exhibitions may be claimed under
Article 11 of the Paris Convention. If it is intended to claim exhibition priority in the
international application, the applicant should so indicate, by ticking the relevant box in
item 14 of the international application form.
Rule 7(5)(d)
In addition, the application form must indicate where the exhibition took place, the date on
which the product was first exhibited and the number of each industrial design shown at the
exhibition.
Where the claim does not relate to all the designs included in the international application,
then the applicant has the option of indicating either those designs for which exhibition
priority is claimed, or is not claimed, depending on which is more convenient. If no design is
indicated, it is assumed by the International Bureau that all the designs were shown at the
exhibition in question.

Item 15: Exception to lack of novelty (optional element applicable only to the
designation of Japan and/or Republic of Korea)
Item 15 allows the applicant to make a declaration concerning an exception to lack of novelty
in respect of (a) designation(s) of Japan and/or the Republic of Korea. The applicant shall
indicate the industrial design(s) for which he claims the benefit from exceptional treatment
provided for in the design law of the Contracting Party(ies) concerned.
With respect to the designation of the Republic of Korea, the supporting documentation may
be submitted along with the international application using Annex II or directly to the Korean
Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). The documentation duly received by the International
Bureau will be electronically distributed to KIPO.
With respect to the designation of Japan, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) requires that the
supporting documentation be submitted to it directly within 30 days from the date of
publication of the international registration in the I.D.B.. The documentation submitted
directly to the JPO or KIPO should furthermore be presented through a local representative,
where the holder resides outside of the country.
It should be noted that a declaration concerning exception to lack of novelty might affect the
applicant’s rights in other jurisdictions. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that
his rights are preserved.
A.I. Section 408(c)

Item 16: Relation with a principal design (optional element applicable only to
the designation of Japan and/or Republic of Korea)
Item 16 is optional content of the international application. It is applicable for the designation
of Japan and the Republic of Korea only (refer to “Optional contents”). Under the related
design systems of those countries, a design may be registered as a design related to
another design to which it is similar and identified as a principal design, under the condition
that both designs belong to the same applicant/holder. Failure to do so may lead to a refusal
by the Office concerned on the ground of conflict with a prior similar design.

Hague Guide for Users

page 63

Accordingly, in order to forestall a possible refusal, the applicant may indicate that some or
all of the industrial designs contained in the international application are to be considered in
relation to a principal design that
• is contained in the present international application (in such a case, that design

should be indicated as the principal design);
• is contained in, or is the subject of, a prior application or registration (national or

international).
Furthermore, where the principal design is not the subject of the same international
application, the international application containing the design(s) which is(are) requested to
be registered as related design(s) has to be filed within the prescribed periods : under the
national law of Japan, before the lapse of 10 years from the date of the national application
or international registration containing the fundamental design or, where priority is claimed
from the priority date of the application concerned (the first selected principal design is the
fundamental design of all subsequent related designs), and under the national law of the
Republic of Korea, within one year from the filing date of the national or international
application containing the principal design.
Examination as to whether or not a design may be registered as a related design will be
conducted by the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO),
respectively. In the event of a notification of refusal of the effects of the international
registration issued by the Office on the ground of missing/erroneous indication of the
principal design, the holder of the international registration may, in his reply to the Office,
request the addition or deletion of the indication of the principal design so as to overcome
such a refusal ground.
Detailed information on the related design system is available on the JPO website (in
English) and on the KIPO website (in English).
A.I. Section 407

Item 17: Publication of the international registration
With regard to the timing of publication, the general rule is that publication takes place six
months after the date of the international registration, unless the applicant requests
otherwise (refer to “Timing of publication”). The period of six months takes account of the
fact that, under some national and regional laws on the protection of industrial designs,
deferment of publication is not allowed but a certain period of time elapses before the
registration of an industrial design is published, since the examination (whether it be formal
or substantive) and the technical preparations for publication require that period of time.
Therefore, by providing for the period of six months, the Common Regulations, in effect,
grant to the holder of an international registration the same benefit of de facto deferment that
the holder would have enjoyed if he had filed national and regional applications.
Rule 17(1)(iii)
There are two exceptions to the general rule that an international registration is published six
months after the date of the international registration, namely, where an applicant requests
immediate publication or requests deferment of publication.

page 64

Hague Guide for Users

Immediate publication
An applicant may request immediate publication by ticking the appropriate box in item 17.
There may be situations where early publication could be an advantage. For instance, under
a national or regional law it may be the case that the right flowing from registration of an
industrial design may only be enforced after it has been published. However, the notion of
“immediate” publication should in any event also take account of the time required by the
International Bureau to carry out the relevant technical preparations.
Rule 17(1)(i)
Deferred publication
An applicant may request that publication of the international registration be deferred, by
ticking the appropriate box at item 17 on the international application form. In such case, the
period of deferment which is required should be indicated in the appropriate part of this item,
expressed in months.
Rule 17(1)(ii)
With regard to the duration of deferment which may be requested, refer to “Periods of
deferment”. Both the paper form (DM/1) and the eHague interface clearly indicate the
periods of deferment which may be requested in respect of certain Contracting Parties.

Item 18: Reduction of the individual designation fee (applicable only to the
designation of Israel, Mexico or the United States of America)
Israel, Mexico and the United States of America have made the declaration referred to in
Article 7(2) of the 1999 Act that, in connection with an international application in which they
are designated, the prescribed designation fee shall be replaced by an individual designation
fee.
Israel, Mexico and the United States of America are the only Contracting Parties that provide
for a reduction of the individual designation fee for certain applicants.
The declaration made by Israel has specified a reduced amount for an applicant who
qualifies as:
•
•
•

a natural person;
a “small entity” whose yearly revenue does not exceed the amount set in the
Israeli Design Regulations;
a higher education institution recognized by the Israeli law.

The fee reduction does not apply if the international application contains a priority claim. To
benefit from a reduction of the individual designation fee in respect of Israel, the applicant
must check the relevant box. .
The declaration made by Mexico has specified a reduced amount for an applicant who is a:
•
•
•
•

creator who is a natural person;
micro or small entity;
public or private higher education institution; or
public scientific or technological research institute.

Hague Guide for Users

page 65

To benefit from a reduction of the individual designation fee in respect of Mexico, the
applicant must check the relevant box.
The declaration made by Mexico also specified, in accordance with Rule 12(3) of the
Common Regulations, that the individual designation fee comprises two parts.
The declaration made by the United States of America has specified reduced amounts for
applicants who qualify:
• for “small entity” status within the meaning of Section 41(h) of Title 35 of the United

States Code and Section 3 of the Small Business Act, and applicable regulations of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO);
• as a “micro entity” within the meaning of Section 123 of Title 35 of the United States
Code and applicable regulations of the USPTO.
To benefit from a reduction of the individual designation fee in respect of the United States of
America, the applicant may assert small entity status by checking the appropriate box. If the
applicant checks the box for micro entity, the applicant has to submit the micro entity
certification form PTO/SB/15A or PTO/SB/15B (available using Annex IV: Reduction of
United States individual designation fee).
The declaration made by the United States of America also specified, in accordance with
Rule 12(3) of the Common Regulations, that the individual designation fee comprises two
parts.
A.I. Section 408(b)

Item 19: Signature by the applicant or representative (mandatory)
The international application form may be signed by the applicant or the representative (or
by an Office when the international application has been presented to the International
Bureau through that Office). The signature may be replaced by affixing a seal. In either
case, the name of the signatory should be indicated separately.
Rule 7(1); A.I. Section 202
For eHague, , a signature is replaced by an electronic authentication through a user account
which requires the user account holder’s user name and password. It is also recommended
to indicate an email address of the applicant/contact person.
A.I. Section 205
Name of contact person
It is not obligatory, but may be useful, for the applicant to indicate the name of the person to
contact, if necessary. This may be particularly of interest where the international application
is filed in the name of a legal entity.

Payment of fees
The following paragraphs should be read in conjunction with the general remarks contained
in “Payment of fees to the International Bureau” concerning fees.
On the fee payment sheet which precedes the Fee Calculations Sheet and forms part of the
international application form, it is possible to indicate the following:

page 66

Hague Guide for Users

• An authorization to debit the required amount from a current account at WIPO

(indicating also the name of the holder of the account, the account number and the
identity of the party giving the authorization). In such a case, it is not necessary to
specify the amount of the fees in question. This mode of payment has the
advantage of avoiding the risk of a fees irregularity.
• Another method of payment, namely, via a bank transfer to the WIPO postal
account or the WIPO bank account or through the Office of indirect filing
(e.g. USPTO) (in both cases, indicating the identity of the party making the payment
and the amount of fees being paid).
When using the eHague interface, the fees may be paid to the International Bureau through
an online payment system offering a range of payment methods according to the user
account profile.
For more information on the payment system under the Hague System, refer to the WIPO
website.
Fees due
The fees payable in connection with an international application consist of:
• a basic fee;
• a standard designation fee (level one, two or three) or, where a designated

Contracting Party is one in respect of which an individual designation fee is
payable, that fee (refer to “Individual designation fees”)7;
• a publication fee, consisting of an amount to be paid in respect of each reproduction
to be published and, where these reproductions are shown on a page of A4 format
(refer to “The reproductions of the industrial designs”), an amount to be paid in
respect of each such page, in addition to the first.
Rule 12(1)
Reduction of fees for applicants from Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
For international applications filed by applicants whose sole entitlement is a connection with
a Least Developed Country (LDC), in accordance with the list established by the United
Nations, or with an intergovernmental organization the majority of whose member States are
LDCs, the fees intended for the International Bureau are reduced to 10% of the prescribed
amounts (rounded to the nearest full figure). The reduction also applies in respect of an
international application filed by an applicant whose entitlement is not solely a connection
with such an intergovernmental organization, provided that any other entitlement of the
applicant is a connection with a Contracting Party which is an LDC or, if not an LDC, is a
member State of that intergovernmental organization and the international application is
governed exclusively by the 1999 Act. If there are several applicants, each must fulfill the
said criteria.
The reduction to 10% of the regular amount of the fee also applies to the standard
designation fees under the same conditions.
The Assembly of the Hague Union adopted, at its twenty-sixth (10th extraordinary) session,
the following recommendation concerning individual fees:
“Contracting Parties that make, or that have made, a declaration under Article 7(2) of
the 1999 Act or under Rule 36(1) of the Common Regulations are encouraged to
indicate, in that declaration or in a new declaration, that for international applications

Hague Guide for Users

page 67

filed by applicants whose sole entitlement is a connection with a Least Developed
Country, in accordance with the list established by the United Nations, or with an
intergovernmental organization the majority of whose member States are Least
Developed Countries, the individual fee payable with respect to their designation is
reduced to 10% of the fixed amount (rounded, where appropriate, to the nearest full
figure). Those Contracting Parties are further encouraged to indicate that the
reduction also applies in respect of an international application filed by an applicant
whose entitlement is not solely a connection with such an intergovernmental
organization, provided that any other entitlement of the applicant is a connection with a
Contracting Party which is a Least Developed Country or, if not a Least Developed
Country, is a member State of that intergovernmental organization and the
international application is governed exclusively by the 1999 Act.”
These fees are payable at the time of filing the international application, except that, where
the international application contains a request for deferment of publication, the publication
fee may be paid later (refer to “Consequences of deferred publication”). In such case the
applicant should tick the appropriate box on the fee payment sheet.
Rule 12(2)
Individual designation fee payable in two parts (applicable only to the designation of
Mexico and the United States of America)
The declarations under Article 7(2) of the 1999 Act made by Mexico and the United States of
America concerning the application of an individual designation fee specified, in accordance
with Rule 12(3) of the Common Regulations, that the individual designation fee comprises
two parts. The declarations also specified reduced amounts of the first part and of the
second part of the individual designation fee for certain applicants.
The first part of the individual designation fee is to be paid at the time of the international
application.
The second part will become payable only if the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property
(IMPI) or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is satisfied that the
design that is the subject of the international registration qualifies for protection, i.e., if the
design is allowed. Therefore, the payment of the second part will, if applicable, be required
at a later date.
The date by which the second part of the individual designation fee must be paid will be
notified through an invitation. IMPI will issue a Notice of Allowance and Invitation for
Payment (Notice of Allowance) which will be sent to the holder through the International
Bureau in respect of each concerned international registration. The USPTO will issue a
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due (Notice of Allowance), both directly to the holder, using
the address for correspondence established before it, and through the International Bureau.
The Notice of Allowance from IMPI sets forth detailed information concerning the payment of
the fee and the status of the holder. The Notice of Allowance from USPTO sets forth
detailed information concerning the payment of the fee, the current economic status, and
how to change the economic status.
Furthermore, the International Bureau will send a letter to the representative of the holder of
the international registration or, if no representative was appointed before the International
Bureau, to the holder of the international registration, giving instructions on the payment of
the second part of the individual designation fee and indicating the date by which the second
part of the individual designation fee must be paid .

page 68

Hague Guide for Users

Upon receipt of the Notice of Allowance, the holder may pay the fee either directly to the
Office concerned, to IMPI in Mexican pesos, or to the USPTO, in United States dollars, or
through the International Bureau, in Swiss francs. The International Bureau only accepts the
payment in full corresponding to the holder’s status indicated in the Notice of Allowance
issued by the Office concerned (IMPI or USPTO). Accordingly, if the status of the holder has
changed after the Notice of Allowance has been issued, the fee should be paid directly to the
Office concerned (IMPI or USPTO).
Where the payment is made through the International Bureau, the International Bureau will
record the payment in the International Register and notify the Office concerned (IMPI or
USPTO) accordingly. No confirmation of payment will be sent to the representative/holder.
The International Bureau will not accept a late payment. Where the second part of the
individual designation fee is paid through the International Bureau, the date of the payment
will be the date on which the International Bureau receives the required amount, in
accordance with Rule 27(5)(a) of the Common Regulations. Thus, for instance, in case of
payment through a bank or postal transfer, the date of payment is the date on which the
required amount is received in the WIPO bank or postal account. If the payment is late, all
fees paid will be refunded.
If the second part of the individual designation fee is not paid in full within the time period
specified in the Notice of Allowance to either the International Bureau or the Office
concerned (IMPI or the USPTO, the Office may request the cancellation of the international
registration with respect to the designation of Mexico or the United States of America
respectively in accordance with Rule 12(3)(d) of the Common Regulations. The International
Bureau shall then cancel the international registration in the International Register with
respect to the designation of Mexico and the Unites States of America, respectively, and
communicate the cancellation to the representative of the holder of the international
registration or, if no representative was appointed before the International Bureau, to the
holder of the international registration. The cancellation will be published in the I.D.B.
Finally, it shall be noted that Rule 5 does not apply to the payment of the second part of the
individual designation fee through the International Bureau (refer to “Excuse of delay in
meeting time limits”).
Article 7(2); Rule 5(5); Rule 12(3)(c) and (d); Rule 18bis(1)(a) and (2); Rule 26(1)(viii);
Rule 27(5)(a)
The amounts of the basic fee, the standard designation fee and the publication fee are set
out in the Schedule of Fees comprised in the Common Regulations. With regard to
individual fees, users should refer to “Individual Fees under the Hague Agreement” where
details of individual fees are published and updated.
In addition, a fee calculator is available which takes into account all the possible fee
permutations, depending upon the particular Contracting Parties designated in any given
international application, the number of industrial designs, etc.
As far as eHague is concerned, the fee calculator automatically calculates and indicates the
fees to be paid, based on the data entered by the applicant.

Annex I: Oath or declaration of the creator
Annex I is mandatory content for an international application designating the United States of
America and, if filed on paper, it must be submitted with the DM/1 form. It cannot be
submitted alone. Annex I is also available in the eHague interface, which automatically

Hague Guide for Users

page 69

verifies that the mandatory contents for the designation of the United States of America in an
international application are complied with and alerts the applicant accordingly. Annex I is
applicable for the designation of the United States of America only.
Annex I enables the submission of an oath or declaration of the creator pursuant to
Rule 8(1)(a)(ii) or, in the impossibility to provide such a declaration, for example, where the
inventor is deceased, a Substitute Statement in Lieu of a Declaration of Inventorship.
Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.63 and 37 CFR 1.64 (law of the United States of America), the oath or
declaration and the substitute statement must be “signed”. Signature requirements for
documents are set forth in 37 CFR 1.4. Accordingly, the inventor or the person executing
the substitute statement may apply a text string signature in between two forward slashes as
follows: / Inventor Name /, or a handwritten signature. In the case of several creators, the
declaration has to be signed by each of them. In particular, the “inventor” must be the same
as the “creator” indicated under item 11 of the DM/1 form or in the relevant sector of the
eHague interface.
For detailed information on the inventor’s oath or declaration, please visit the USPTO
website.

Annex II: Supporting document(s) concerning a declaration to the exception
to lack of novelty
Annex II is optional content of the international application, which can be submitted with the
DM/1 form. This Annex cannot be submitted alone to the International Bureau. Annex II is
applicable for the designation of the Republic of Korea only (refer to “Optional contents”).
Annex II is also available in the eHague interface.
A.I. Section 408(c)
The applicant may make a declaration as provided for in item 15 concerning exception to
lack of novelty. If this declaration is made with respect to the designation of the Republic
of Korea, the international application may be accompanied by supporting documentation.
The supporting documentation must be attached to Annex II, its page numbers being
properly referenced. The documentation duly received by the International Bureau will be
electronically distributed to the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).
The applicant is not obliged to submit supporting documentation at the time of filing the
international application. However, if the international application is not accompanied by its
supporting documentation, the latter must be submitted directly to the Office of the
Contracting Party concerned, subject to the national requirements. It cannot be submitted
later to the International Bureau (refer to “Item 15: Exception to lack of novelty”).

Annex III: Information on eligibility for protection
Annex III is optional and serves to submit a statement that identifies information known by
the applicant to be material to the eligibility for protection of the industrial design concerned.
This Annex must be submitted with the DM/1 form. It cannot be submitted alone. Annex III
is also available in the eHague interface.
Rule 7(5)(g); A.I. Section 408(d)
Annex III is only relevant for the designation of the United States of America and serves to
submit an Information Disclosure Statement and relevant accompanying documentation as
prescribed under the national law of the United States of America. The purpose of a “duty of

page 70

Hague Guide for Users

candor” under the law of the United States of America is to assist the examination process
by the USPTO obliging applicants to disclose any information they know of, which could
consequently prevent them from acquiring a valid right.
In this context, it is recalled that Rule 6 of the Common Regulations does not exclude the
submission of documentation accompanying the international application in a working
language other than that of the international application (refer to “Languages”). Thus, to the
extent that Annex III can be submitted only in respect of a designation of the United States
of America, it is recommended that applicants submit their documentation in English.
Rule 7(5)(g)
The Information Disclosure Statement forms (SB08a/SB08b/SB08a-EFS-web) are available
on the USPTO website. These forms may be submitted to the USPTO also after the filing of
the international application.
For detailed information on the Information Disclosure Statement, please visit the USPTO
website.

Annex IV: Reduction of United States individual designation fee
Optional Annex IV allows the applicant to support a claim of micro entity status (item 18) with
a micro entity certification in order to benefit from a reduction of the individual designation
fee in respect of the United States of America. This Annex must be submitted with the DM/1
form. It cannot be submitted alone. Annex IV is also available in the eHague interface.
A.I. Section 408(b)
The requirements to qualify for a reduction for micro entity status are set forth in
37 CFR 1.29 (law of the United States of America) and detailed in Section 509.04 of the
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure.
Annex IV is mandatory content if the applicant claims “micro entity status” in item 18 of
form DM/1. The eHague interface automatically alerts the applicant to attach the micro
entity certification, completed and signed, to the international application in which the United
States of America is designated and micro entity status is claimed.
The certification form (PTO/SB/15A or PTO/SB/15B), along with the instructions for its
completion and signature, is available on the USPTO website.

Annex V: Supporting document(s) concerning priority claim
Annex V is optional content of the international application, which can be submitted with the
DM/1 form. This Annex cannot be submitted alone to the International Bureau. Annex V is
applicable for the designation of the Republic of Korea only (refer to “Optional contents”).
Annex V is also available in the eHague interface.
Annex V is to submit (a) document(s) in support of a priority claim (priority document) to the
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Where the priority document is not submitted
with the DM/1 form, it may be submitted directly to KIPO. In such a case, the priority
document must be submitted to KIPO within three months from the date of publication of the
international registration in the International Designs Bulletin. If the holder resides outside
the country, it must be submitted through a local representative. The right of priority will be
lost if the priority document is not submitted within this period.

Hague Guide for Users

page 71

1.
For more specific information concerning the requirement of unity of design applicable in each of these
Contracting Parties, please consult the Office(s) in question.
2.
If Finland, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland and/or Mexico is/are designated, it is compulsory to indicate in item
11 the identity of the creator. The latter declares that he believes himself to be the creator of the industrial
design. Where the person identified as the creator is a person other than the applicant, it is hereby stated that
the present international application has been assigned by the creator to the applicant.
3.
It should be noted that a more specific indication of a product would entail a possible risk of narrowing the
scope of protection in other jurisdictions where a broader indication of a product is accepted and the scope of
protection is determined by a product indication.
4.
It is to be noted that, generally, designs relating to products belonging to class 32 of the Locarno
Classification cannot be protected under the laws of Canada and the Republic of Korea. Consequently, a
designation of Canada or the Republic of Korea in an international registration for industrial designs in class 32
would be the subject of a refusal by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) or the Korean Intellectual
Property Office (KIPO).
5.
For sufficient disclosure of an industrial design, Japan and the United States of America may require that
the legend corresponding to each reproduction be indicated.
6.
In the case of eHague, this nine-digit number is not automatically notified to the applicant. If an irregularity
notice is issued, that number is included in the notice.
7.
In connection with an international application in which the Republic of Korea is designated, the Locarno
Classification determines the designation fee in respect of that designation. For international applications for
designs relating to products belonging to classes 2, 5, or 19 of the Locarno Classification, level 3 of the standard
designation fee applies. For any other class, an individual designation fee applies in respect of a designation of
the Republic of Korea.

page 72

Hague Guide for Users

The reproductions of the industrial designs
The reproductions accompanying an international application must comply with the formal
requirements described in the "International procedure". When the reproductions do not
comply with these requirements, the International Bureau may treat the international
application as irregular (refer to “Irregularities in the international application”).
However, it is important to note that even where these requirements have been complied
with to the satisfaction of the International Bureau, the Office of a Contracting Party may find
that the reproductions contained in the ensuing international registration are not sufficient to
disclose fully the industrial design and, on that basis, issue a refusal of protection (refer to
“Refusal of protection”).
Rule 9(4)

Guidance
The criteria for sufficient disclosure of an industrial design may be different from one
jurisdiction to another.
Therefore, Guidance on Preparing and Providing Reproductions in Order to Forestall
Possible Refusals on the Ground of Insufficient Disclosure of an Industrial Design by
Examining Offices was established in consultation with Contracting Parties, in particular all
those that currently have an Examining Office, and several user organizations, and is
intended to mitigate the risk of refusals pursuant to Rule 9(4).
It should, however, be noted that the Guidance cannot be considered self-sufficient or
exhaustive.
Rule 9(4)

Mode of reproduction
The reproductions of the designs for which registration is sought may be in the form of
photographs or other graphic representations of the industrial designs, or of the products
which constitute the industrial designs. A single international application may at the same
time comprise both photographs and graphic representations, which may be in black and
white or in color.
Rule 9(1); 99 Article 5(1)(iii); A.I. Section 401(a)
The reproductions accompanying an international application filed on paper should be either
pasted or printed directly onto a separate sheet of A4 paper which is white and opaque. The
separate sheet of paper should be used upright and should not contain more than
25 reproductions. The reproductions should be arranged in the orientation in which the
applicant wishes them to be published. Where the application is filed on paper a margin of
at least five millimeters should be left around the representation of each industrial design.
A.I. Section 401(c) and (d)

Hague Guide for Users

page 73

Each reproduction should fall within a right-angled quadrilateral containing no other
reproduction, or part of another reproduction, and no numbering. The term ‘right angled
quadrilateral’ is intended to include both squares and rectangles. The reproductions should
not be folded, stapled or marked in any way.
A.I. Section 401(e)

Representation of the industrial design
For E-filing, any reproduction accompanying an international application shall be in the
image formats JPEG or TIFF, its file size shall not exceed 2 megabytes. Any reproduction
shall have a resolution of 300 x 300 dots per inch (dpi). A reproduction uploaded with a
different resolution is automatically adjusted to have a resolution of 300 x 300 dpi. The
interface asks for validation of the adjusted resolution by the applicant. Detailed instructions
can be found under “"How to submit an international application to the International Bureau:
eHague interface or DM/1 form?".
In principle, the reproductions should represent the industrial design alone, or the product in
relation to which the industrial design is to be used, to the exclusion of any other object,
accessory, person or animal. Thus, for example, if protection is sought for a bowl, the bowl
should be represented without fruit, or a frame for which protection is sought should be
represented without a picture (refer to “Disclaimers and matter that does not form part of the
claimed design”).
A.I. Section 402(a)
Technical drawings showing articles in section or in plan, particularly with axes and
dimensions, are not acceptable. Explanatory text or legends are not acceptable in the
representation itself. (Explanatory text or legends indicating the type of view (e.g., “front
view”, “top view”, etc.), may be contained in item 9 of the DM/1 form and in the relevant
section of the eHague interface (refer to “Numbering of reproductions and legends”).)
99 Article 5(2)(b)(ii); A.I. Section 402(c)(ii); A.I. Section 405
If the reproductions consist of photographs, such photographs must be of professional
standard and have all their edges cut at right angles. In such case, the industrial design
must be shown against a neutral plain background and photographs may not be retouched
with ink or correcting fluid.
A.I. Section 404(a)
If the reproductions consist of other graphic representations, they must be of professional
standard and produced with drawing instruments or by electronic means and, where the
application is filed on paper, must be produced on good quality white, opaque paper, and
have all their edges cut at right angles. The representation may comprise shading and
hatching to provide relief. Graphic representations executed by electronic means may be
shown against a background, provided that it is neutral and plain and has only edges cut at
right angles.
A.I. Section 404(b)

page 74

Hague Guide for Users

Disclaimers and matter that does not form part of the claimed design
Matter which is shown in a reproduction, but for which protection is not claimed, may be
indicated in a reproduction by means of dotted or broken lines or coloring, and/or explained
in the description (refer to “Item 9: Description”). Accordingly, protection of part of the
industrial design may be disclaimed.
A.I. Section 403(a)
Notwithstanding the principle under Section 402(a) (refer to “Representation of the industrial
design”), matter which does not form part of the claimed design and for which protection is
not sought (“environmental matter”), may be shown in a reproduction if it is indicated by
means of dotted or broken lines or coloring (and/or in the description).
A.I. Section 403(b)

Number of reproductions
There is no limit on the number of reproductions which can be submitted for each design
included in an international application. Only a single copy of each reproduction should be
submitted (by default, reproductions are published in color). An applicant wishing to obtain
the maximum protection for a design should ensure that the design is fully represented, as
only aspects visible in the reproduction will be protected. It may be necessary, therefore, to
represent a single article from many angles and submit several different views. However,
several views shown from different angles may not be included in a single reproduction.
Each view must be represented separately.
Rule 9(1)(b); A.I. Section 401(a) and (b)

Numbering of reproductions and legends
Where there are several designs included in an international application, each design must
be identified by an individual number appearing in the margin of each reproduction. The
eHague interface automatically proceeds to the numbering of the reproductions filed by the
applicant. When the same design is represented from different angles, the numbering must
consist of two separate figures, separated by a dot (for example, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc., for the
first design, and 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, etc., for the second design, and so on). In such case, the
reproductions should be submitted in ascending numerical order.
99 Article 5(2)(b)(ii); A.I. Section 401(b); A.I. Section 405
An applicant may choose to submit different views of the same industrial design (e.g., “front
view”, “top view”, etc.), in order either to illustrate all the characteristic features of a threedimensional design or to comply with the requirement of the law of a designated Contracted
Party which has made a declaration whereby it requires certain specified views of the
product concerned (refer to “Requirements concerning views”). Legends to indicate a
specific view of the product may be indicated in association with the numbering of the
reproduction in item 10 of form DM/1 or in the relevant section of the eHague interface. The
proposed legends are: 1. Perspective; 2. Front; 3. Back; 4. Top; 5. Bottom; 6. Left;
7. Right; 9. Unfolded; 10. Exploded; 11. Cross-sectional; 12. Enlarged; 00. Other (limited
to 40 characters).
A.I. Section 401(c)

Hague Guide for Users

page 75

Dimensions of the reproductions
The dimensions of the representation of each industrial design appearing in a photograph or
other graphic representation may not exceed 16 x 16 centimeters, and in respect of at least
one representation of each design one of those dimensions must be at least 3 centimeters,
at a resolution of 300 x 300 dpi.
A.I. Section 402(b)
In respect of eHague, any reproduction shall be in a combination of pixel number and
resolution such that, when that reproduction is printed, the dimensions of the reproduction of
each design appearing in a photograph or other graphic representation will not exceed
16 x 16 centimeters, and in respect of at least one representation of each design one of
those dimensions must be at least 3 centimeters, at a resolution of 300 x 300 dpi.

Specific views
Under the 1999 Act, any Contracting Party which requires certain specific views of the
product in relation to which the industrial design is to be used may, in a declaration, notify
the Director General of WIPO accordingly. If those requirements are not met in an
international application, the International Bureau will not raise an irregularity but the ensuing
international registration might be the subject of a refusal by the Office of that Contracting
Party.
Rule 9(3)
The Republic of Korea has made a declaration under Rule 9(3) specifying that the following
specific views are required, respectively:
• for a design of a set of articles: one view of the coordinated whole and

corresponding views of each of its components, and
• for a design for typefaces: views of the given characters, a sample sentence and

typical characters.
Viet Nam has made a declaration under Rule 9(3) requiring, where the product which
constitutes the industrial design is three-dimensional, a perspective view of the industrial
design.

Quality of the reproductions
Reproductions must be of a quality permitting all the details of the industrial design to be
clearly distinguished and permitting publication. The reproductions which accompany an
international application should be of the highest possible quality, since, in the final analysis,
it is upon the content and quality of the reproductions that the scope of protection will
depend.
Rule 9(2)(a)

page 76

Hague Guide for Users

Filing of specimens under the 1999 Act
Where an international application is governed exclusively by the 1999 Act, it is permissible
in certain limited circumstances to substitute reproductions by specimens. This is possible
where the international application:
• is governed exclusively by the 1999 Act, and
• contains a request for deferment of publication, and
• concerns a two-dimensional industrial design.

Rule 10(1)
Where specimens are submitted instead of reproductions, the applicant must furnish one
specimen for the International Bureau and one further specimen for each designated
national Office that has notified the International Bureau that it wishes to receive copies of
international registrations. This requirement aims at enabling Examining Offices to take into
account the industrial designs which are the subject of the international registration when
carrying out the novelty examination provided for by their domestic legislation (refer to
“Grounds for refusal”).

Filing of specimens under the 1960 Act
In the case of an international application is governed exclusively or partly by the 1960 Act,
the application may be accompanied also by specimens. This means that the filing of
specimens is optional but does not exempt the applicant from the requirement to furnish a
reproduction of the designs.
60 Article 5(3)(b)

Requirements concerning specimens
All the specimens should be contained in a single package. None of the dimensions of the
package should exceed 30 centimeters and the overall weight of the package and its
packing should not exceed four kilograms.
Rule 10(2); A.I. Section 406(b)
The individual specimens may be folded and may not exceed
26.2 centimeters x 17 centimeters in size (unfolded), 50 grams in weight, or 3 millimeters in
thickness. The specimens should also be pasted on sheets of A4 paper and numbered in
ascending numerical order. If, and when, in due course, the reproductions are submitted to
the International Bureau, the number assigned to each reproduction should be the same as
the number assigned to each corresponding specimen.
A.I. Section 406(a)
Perishable products or products which may be dangerous to store are not accepted by the
International Bureau.
A.I. Section 406(c)

Hague Guide for Users

page 77

No additional matter
If the international application contains any matter other than that required or permitted by
the 1999 Act, the 1960 Act, the Common Regulations or the Administrative Instructions, the
International Bureau deletes it ex officio. If the international application is accompanied by
any document other than those required or permitted, the International Bureau may dispose
of such document.
Rule 7(6)

Presentation of the international application to the
International Bureau
Channels of communication
An international application is normally sent directly by the applicant or his representative to
the International Bureau. However, a number of exceptions to that principle are provided for
by the 1960 and the 1999 Acts.
Under the 1960 Act, an international application may be filed through the Office of a
Contracting State if such State so permits. In addition, a Contracting State may require that,
where it is considered to be the State of origin, the deposit be filed through its national
Office. To the extent that such requirement is not required to be notified to the Director
General of WIPO under the 1960 Act, the International Bureau does not check whether an
international application governed exclusively or partly by the 1960 Act has been presented
through the Office of the State of origin pursuant, where applicable, to the law of that
Contracting State. Non-compliance with this requirement shall not prejudice the effects of
the international deposit in the other Contracting States.
60 Article 4
Under the 1999 Act, it is possible for Contracting Parties to prohibit the indirect route, but
they are not allowed to impose it. Where an international application is presented to the
International Bureau through the intermediary of an Office, that Office may fix, and collect for
its own benefit, a fee to cover the cost of the work involved in handling the international

application. An Office that requires a transmittal fee must notify the International Bureau of
the amount of such fee, which should not exceed the administrative costs of receiving and
transmitting the international application, and its due date.
99 Article 4; Rule 13(2)
Where an international application governed exclusively or partly by the 1999 Act is
addressed to the International Bureau through the Office of the applicant’s Contracting Party,
it must be received by the International Bureau within a period of one month from the date of
receipt by that Office. However, that period may not be sufficient for a Contracting Party
whose law requires a security clearance. The possibility has therefore been provided for
such a Contracting Party to notify the replacement of the period of one month by a period of
six months. If the applicable time limit is not complied with, the filing date of the international
application is the date of its receipt by the International Bureau.

page 78

Hague Guide for Users

The United States of America and the Russian Federation are the only Contracting Parties
that have made the notification under Rule 13(4) to replace a period of one month by a
period of six months. It is a requirement under the law of the United States of America that,
for designs created in the United States of America, the applicant first obtains an export
license before filing outside of the United States of America. If the applicant needs to obtain
such a license, alternatively, an international application may be filed through the USPTO (in
most cases the security clearance will be performed within a couple of days) or through the
International Bureau once the said license has been received by the applicant (it is the
responsibility of the applicant to comply with any national security provisions before filing the
international application).
More information on foreign filing is available on the USPTO website.
It is a requirement under the law of the Russian Federation that designs created in the
Russian Federation by Russian legal entities or nationals are subject to a security clearance
procedure by the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT) to ensure that the
designs do not contain state secrets.
More information on foreign filing is available on the ROSPATENT website.
Rule 13(3) and (4)

Filing date of the international application
Provided that the international application does not contain any irregularities entailing a
postponement of the filing date (refer to “Irregularities entailing a postponement of the filing
date of the international application”), the International Bureau allocates to the international
application a filing date in accordance with the following principles:
• in the case of direct filings, and in the case of indirect filings of international

applications other than international applications governed exclusively by the 1999
Act, the filing date is the date of receipt by the International Bureau of the
international application (refer to “Communications with the International Bureau”);
Rule 13(3)(ii)
• in the case of indirect filings of international applications governed exclusively by

the 1999 Act, the filing date is the date on which the application was received by the
Office of the applicant’s Contracting Party concerned, provided that it is received by
the International Bureau within one month of that date or within six months in case
of security clearance (refer to “Security clearance” and “Channels of
communication”). If that time limit is not complied with, the filing date of the
international application is the date of its receipt by the International Bureau.
Rule 13(3)(i) and (4)

Irregularities in the international application
Time limit for correcting irregularities
If the International Bureau finds that the international application does not, at the time of its
receipt by the International Bureau, fulfill the applicable requirements, it invites the applicant
to make the required corrections within three months from the date of the invitation sent by
the International Bureau. Where an irregularity is not remedied within this three-month time

Hague Guide for Users

page 79

limit, the international application is considered abandoned and the International Bureau
refunds any fees paid in respect of that application, after deduction of an amount
corresponding to the basic fee.
Rule 14(1); Rule 14(3)

Irregularities entailing a postponement of the filing date of the international
application
Where the international application has, on the date on which it is received by the
International Bureau, an irregularity which is prescribed as an irregularity entailing a
postponement of the filing date, the filing date is the date on which the correction of such
irregularity is received by the International Bureau. The irregularities which are prescribed
as entailing a postponement of the filing date of the international application are the
following:
• the international application is not in one of the prescribed languages;
• any of the following elements is missing from the international application:
o an express or implicit indication that international registration under the 1999 Act

or the 1960 Act is sought;
o indications allowing the identity of the applicant to be established;
o indications sufficient to enable the applicant or its representative, if any, to be

contacted;
o a reproduction, or, in accordance with Article 5(1)(iii) of the 1999 Act, a

specimen, of each industrial design that is the subject of the international
application;
o the designation of at least one Contracting Party.
Rule 14(2)

Irregularities concerning the prohibition on self-designation
Where a Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act, whose Office is an Examining
Office, has made the declaration prohibiting its self-designation (refer to “Prohibition on selfdesignation” and is indicated in an international application both as the applicant’s
Contracting Party and as a designated Contracting Party, the International Bureau
disregards the designation of that Contracting Party.
99 Article 14(3)

Irregularities concerning special requirement notified by a Contracting Party or
regarding the identity of the creator, description and claim
In the case of an irregularity which relates either:
• to a special requirement notified by a Contracting Party concerning the applicant or

the creator (refer to “Special requirements concerning the applicant and the creator
(Rule 8) (declaration)”), or
• to one of the additional elements which has been notified by a Contracting Party
under Article 5(2) of the 1999 Act (namely, indications concerning the identity of the
creator, a brief description and/or a claim; refer to “Additional mandatory contents”),
if the applicant does not remedy such irregularity within the prescribed time limit of three
months, the international application is deemed not to contain the designation of the
Contracting Party in question.

page 80

Hague Guide for Users

Furthermore, if the applicant does remedy an irregularity which relates to Article 5(2) of the
1999 Act, the date of the international registration is the date on which the correction of such
irregularity is received by the International Bureau or the filing date of the international
application, whichever is the later.

Publication of the international registration
Centralized publication of an international registration having effect in all the designated
Contracting Parties is one of the fundamental features of the international registration
system. International registrations are published by the International Bureau in the I.D.B.
and such publication is deemed, in all Contracting Parties, to be sufficient publication and to
take the place of any national or regional publication, so that no other publication may be
required of the holder.
99 Article 10(3)(a); 60 Article 6(3); Rule 17
Nevertheless, a Contracting Party is not precluded from republishing the international
registration, in whole or in part, if it so wishes (for example, in order to translate into its
national language the particulars contained in the international registration). However, in
such a case, the republication may not create for the holder an obligation to furnish further
reproductions of the design or an obligation to pay an additional fee to the Office of that
Contracting Party.
Publication of the I.D.B. takes place on the WIPO website. In addition to the relevant data
concerning international registrations, the Bulletin also contains data relating to refusals,
invalidations, changes in ownership and mergers, other changes, corrections, renewals,
cancellations, and declarations that a change in ownership has no effect and withdrawals of
such declarations. Furthermore, the International Bureau publishes any declaration made by
a Contracting Party under the Acts or the Common Regulations on the WIPO website.
Rule 26(2)
If so requested by the Office of a Contracting Party, the International Bureau communicates
to the Office the date on which each issue of the Bulletin is made available on the WIPO
website. Such communication is made electronically – by email – on the same day as the
Bulletin is to appear on the WIPO website. The publication by the International Bureau of
each issue of the Bulletin on the WIPO website is deemed to replace the “sending” of the
Bulletin referred to in the 1999 and the 1960 Acts and will constitute, at the same time, the
date of receipt of the Bulletin by the Offices of the designated Contracting Parties.
Rule 26(3); A.I. Section 204(d)
The publication of the international registration in the Bulletin contains the following:
• the relevant data recorded in the International Register;
• the reproduction or reproductions of the industrial design;
• where publication has been deferred, an indication of the date on which the period

of deferment expired or is considered to have expired.
Rule 17(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 81

Publication cycle
The publication cycle of the I.D.B. can be broken down into two components: the frequency
of publication and the time lag needed for the preparation of the Bulletin. The frequency of
publication is the number of times the Bulletin is issued in a given year. The time lag is
linked to the preparation work for the Bulletin and refers to the number of days that elapse
between the last recording day considered for the insertion of data in a given issue of the
Bulletin and actual date of publication of that issue.
Since January 1, 2012, the Bulletin is published on a weekly basis. In addition, the time
required to prepare each issue of the Bulletin has also been shortened to one week.

Timing of publication
The general rule is that an international registration is published six months after the date of
the international registration (refer to “Publication of the international registration”).
Rule 17(1)(iii)
There are two exceptions to the general rule that an international registration is published six
months after the date of international registration.

Firstly, an applicant may request that an international registration be published immediately.
Rule 17(1)(i)
The reference to “immediately after the registration” should, however, be taken with some
reservation. In effect, where immediate publication is requested, “immediately” should be
read as meaning that the publication will take place as soon as the necessary technical
preparations have been carried out after the registration of the industrial design, thus, in any
event, involving the elapsing of a certain amount of time. For instance, taking into account
the shortening of the publication cycle of the Bulletin and of the time lag (refer to “Publication
cycle”), international registrations programmed for immediate publication and recorded in the
International Register during the first week of May will be published in the issue of the
Bulletin released at the end of the second week of May; those recorded in the International
Register during the last week of May will be published in the issue of the Bulletin released at
the end of the first week of June.
The second exception to the general six-month period concerns those international
registrations for which a deferment of publication has been requested. In such case,
publication of the international registration takes place immediately after the date on which
the period of deferment expired, or is considered to have expired.
Rule 17(1)(ii)

Deferment of publication
Consequences of deferred publication
In the case of deferment of publication, the payment of the publication fee is not required to
be made at the time of filing. In addition, in the case of international applications governed
exclusively by the 1999 Act, the submitting of reproductions may be provisionally replaced

page 82

Hague Guide for Users

by specimens, provided that the industrial design is two-dimensional. The rationale for
permitting the furnishing of specimens instead of reproductions is the relieving of applicants
of the higher costs of producing quality reproductions where, having requested deferment of
publication, they may eventually decide not to proceed with publication (and protection) of
the design. The payment of the publication fee and the submission of reproductions are,
however, preconditions to the publication of the international registration. The former must
take place not later than three weeks before the period of deferment expires, and the latter
must take place not later than three months before the expiry of the period for paying the
publication fee.
Rule 16(3); Rule 16(4)
The obligation to furnish the publication fee not later than three weeks prior to the expiry of
the period of deferment applies also in the situation where the period of deferment is
“considered to have expired”. This relates to the situation under Article 11(4)(a) of the
1999 Act and Article 6(4)(b) of the 1960 Act where an applicant requests earlier publication
than that already indicated in the request for deferment.
Three months before the expiry of the period of deferment of publication, the International
Bureau sends an unofficial reminder notice to the holder of the international registration as
well as to the holder’s representative (if any), indicating the date by which the publication fee
must be paid. If, however, the holder (or representative) does not receive such unofficial
notice, this does not constitute an excuse for failure to comply with any time limit for payment
of the publication fee due.
Rule 16(3)(b)
The reproductions submitted earlier than three months before the expiry of the period for
paying the publication shall be recorded in the International Register, provided that those
reproductions comply with the requirements under Rule 9(1) and (2).
Rule 16(4)
Failure to pay the publication fee earlier than three weeks before the expiry of the period of
deferment or failure to submit the reproductions earlier than three months before the expiry
of the period for paying the publication fee results in the cancellation of the international
registration. Cancellation will be total in case of missing fees but only partial in case of
missing reproductions. The cancelled international registration is not published.
Rule 16(5)

Periods of deferment
The conditions which regulate the applicable period of deferment in any given situation
depend upon the laws of the various national or regional systems of the Contracting Parties
designated in the international application, including the case of Contracting Parties which
do not permit deferred publication at all.
For Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act, the maximum period of deferment is
12 months from the filing date or, where priority is claimed, from the priority date of the
application concerned.
60 Article 6(4)(a)

Hague Guide for Users

page 83

Under the 1999 Act, the general principle is that each Contracting Party is assumed to
permit the prescribed period of deferment of 30 months from the filing date or, where priority
is claimed, from the priority date of the application concerned, unless it has notified, in a
declaration to the Director General of WIPO, that it authorizes only a shorter period – or that
it does not authorize deferment at all (refer to “Deferred publication for a period which is less
than the prescribed period” and “No deferment of publication”).
99 Article 11(1); Rule 16(1)(a)
It follows that where an international application governed exclusively by the 1999 Act
(i.e., in respect of which all the designated Contracting Parties have been designated under
the 1999 Act) contains a request for deferment of publication, such deferment may in
principle be requested for a period up to 30 months from the filing date, or where priority is
claimed, from the priority date. However:
• if such application includes the designation of one Contracting Party that has made

a declaration in accordance with which the period of deferment under its legislation
is less than the prescribed period of 30 months, then publication takes place on the
expiry of the period stated in that declaration;
99 Article 11(2)(ii)
• if such application includes the designations of more than one Contracting Party

which have made a declaration in accordance with which the period of deferment is
less than the prescribed period of 30 months, then publication takes place on the
expiry of the shortest of the periods notified in those declarations;
99 Article 11(2)(ii)
• if such application includes the designation of a Contracting Party which has made

a declaration in accordance with which deferment of publication is not possible at all
under its law, it is subject to different treatment, depending upon whether the
application is accompanied by reproductions or specimens of the filed design. The
principles are as follows:
o if the international application is accompanied by reproductions of the design, the

International Bureau notifies the applicant that the request for deferment of
publication is incompatible with the designation of the Contracting Party
concerned. If the holder does not withdraw the designation of that Contracting
Party within one month from the date of the notification sent by the International
Bureau, the request for deferment of publication is not taken into consideration;
99 Article 11(3)(i); Rule 16(2)
o if the international application is accompanied by specimens of the design, the

International Bureau does not take into account the designation of the
Contracting Party concerned and so notifies the applicant.
99 Article 11(3)(ii)

page 84

Hague Guide for Users

Where an international application is governed exclusively or partly by the 1960 Act (i.e., in
respect of which at least one Contracting Party has been designated under the 1960 Act),
deferment of publication cannot exceed 12 months from the filing date, or where priority is
claimed, from the priority date of the application concerned. In other words, the designation
of a Contracting Party under the 1960 Act can be considered as equivalent to the
designation of a Contracting Party which has made a declaration for a deferment period of a
maximum of 12 months.
Rule 16(1)(b)

Events during period of deferment
The deferment period is computed from the filing date of the international application, or from
the claimed priority date, if any. During the period of deferment of publication, the following
actions may be initiated by the holder with regard to the international registration:

Request for earlier publication
The holder may request earlier publication – i.e., publication prior to the expiry of the
deferment period already requested – in respect of any or all of the designs contained in the
international registration. The deferment period is then considered to have expired on the
date on which the request for earlier publication has been received by the International
Bureau.
60 Article 6(4)(b); 99 Article 11(4)(a)

Request to provide extract or authorize access
It is a general principle that international applications and international registrations are kept
secret by the International Bureau until publication. This principle of confidentiality also
applies to any document accompanying the international application. However, there may
be situations where the holder may wish no longer to preserve such confidentiality, for
example, in order to assert his rights before a jurisdiction or third parties. Therefore, the
holder may request the International Bureau to provide an extract of the international
registration to a third party he has designated, or to authorize access to the international
registration by a third party.
99 Article 11(4)(b)

Renunciation or limitation
The holder may renounce the international registration in respect of all the designated
Contracting Parties. In such case, the industrial design or designs that are the subject of the
international registration will not be published. The holder may also limit the international
registration, for all the designated Contracting Parties, in respect of some only of the
industrial designs that are the subject of the international registration. In such case, only the
industrial designs that are not affected by the limitation will be published.
60 Article 6(4)(b); 99 Article 11(5)

Hague Guide for Users

page 85

Where the publication of an international registration is deferred, a request for the recording
of a limitation or renunciation concerning that registration, complying with the applicable
requirements (refer to “Renunciation” and “Limitation”), must be received by the International
Bureau not later than three weeks prior to the expiry of the period of deferment. In default of
this, the international registration is published at the expiration of the period of deferment
without account being taken of the request for the recording of a limitation or renunciation.
Provided that the request for limitation or renunciation complies with the applicable
requirements, the limitation or renunciation is nevertheless recorded in the International
Register.
A.I. Section 601

Furnishing of confidential copies to Examining Offices; confidentiality
As a general principle, the International Bureau keeps in confidence each international
application and each international registration until publication in the Bulletin (refer to
“Publication of the international registration”).
60 Article 6(4)(d); 99 Article 10(4)
However, when publication has been deferred, Examining Offices are faced with the
situation in which they need to examine applications without knowing whether an
international registration whose publication has been deferred is included in the prior art. In
order to resolve this problem, immediately after registration has been completed, the
International Bureau must send, by electronic means agreed upon between the International
Bureau and the Office concerned, a copy of the international registration, along with any
documentation accompanying the international application, to each Office that has notified
the International Bureau that it wishes to receive such a copy and has been designated in an
international application.
99 Article 10(5)(a); A.I. Section 901
In such a case, the Office is required to maintain the confidentiality of the international
registration until publication, and may use the documentation sent to it only for the purpose
of the examination of other applications. It may not divulge the contents of the international
registration to any persons outside the Office, except for the purposes of administrative or
legal proceedings involving a conflict over entitlement to file the international application on
which the international registration is based.
99 Article 10(5)(b)
If an Examining Office concludes that an application concerns a design that is similar to a
design that is the subject of an unpublished international registration resulting from an earlier
application, of which it has received a confidential copy, it must suspend the prosecution of
the later application until publication of the international registration, since it will not be able
to divulge the content of the international registration to the holder of the later application.
The Office may notify the holder of the later application of the fact that prosecution of that
application is suspended on account of possible conflict with an as yet unpublished
registration resulting from an earlier application. If the later filing is also an international
registration, the Examining Office will refuse the effect of that later international registration
until the earlier unpublished international registration has been published and it has taken a
decision regarding the conflict between the two registrations.

page 86

Hague Guide for Users

Updating of data concerning the international registration
Updated data concerning an international registration shall be communicated to each Office
that has received a confidential copy of the international registration in the same manner as
established for confidential copies. The purpose of Section 902(a) is to inform the Offices of
all the designated Contracting Parties that have received a confidential copy of the
international registration of its cancellation under Rule 16(5), in the case where the
publication fee is not paid or proper reproductions of the industrial design are not submitted.
Furthermore, the purpose of Section 902(b) is to inform the Office of a designated
Contracting Party that has received a confidential copy of the international registration of any
change relevant to that Contracting Party upon its recording in the International Register.
Finally, the purpose of Section 902(c) is to inform the Offices of designated Contracting
Parties that have received a confidential copy of the international registration of any
correction effected before the publication of the international registration, unless the
correction only concerns the designations of other Contracting Parties.
A.I. Section 902
If the international application is accompanied by a specimen, instead of a reproduction, the
designated Examining Office receives a specimen at the same time as a copy of the
international registration. In effect, therefore, the number of copies of specimens
accompanying an international application in cases where specimens can take the place of
reproductions (refer to “Filing of specimens under the 1999 Act” and “Filing of specimens
under the 1960 Act” ) corresponds to the number of Contracting Parties designated in the
international application under the 1999 Act, having an Examining Offices, and having made
a notification under Article 10(5) of the 1999 Act – plus one copy for the International
Bureau.
Rule 10(1)(ii)

The international registration
Registration in the International Register
Where the International Bureau finds that the international application conforms to the
applicable requirements, it registers the industrial design in the International Register and
sends a certificate to the holder. This is so, whether or not deferment of publication of the
international registration has been requested.
Rule 15(1)
The international registration contains:
• all the data contained in the international application, except any priority claim

•
•
•
•

where the date of the earlier filing is more than six months before the filing date of
the international application;
any reproduction of the industrial design;
the date of the international registration;
the number of the international registration; and
the relevant class of the International Classification, as determined by the
International Bureau.
Rule 15(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 87

Crediting of fees
Any standard designation fee or individual designation fee collected by the International
Bureau is credited to the account maintained with the International Bureau by the
Contracting Party concerned. This is done within the month following the month during
which was recorded the international registration or, as regards the payment of the second
part of an individual fee, upon its receipt by the International Bureau.
Rule 29

Date of the international registration
As a matter of principle, the date of the international registration is the filing date of the
international application (refer to “Filing date of the international application”). However,
where the international application has, on the date on which it is received by the
International Bureau, an irregularity which relates to one of the additional elements which
may be notified by a Contracting Party to the 1999 Act (namely the identity of the creator, a
brief description and/or a claim; refer to “Irregularities concerning special requirement
notified by a Contracting Party or regarding the identity of the creator, description and
claim”), the date of the international registration is the date on which the correction of such
irregularity is received by the International Bureau or the filing date of the international
application, whichever is the later.

Refusal of protection
Notion of refusal
Under the Hague Agreement, the word “refusal” does not mean a final decision of refusal,
that is to say, a decision that is no longer subject to review or appeal. All that is required is
that, within the applicable refusal period (refer to “Time limits for refusal”), a designated
Office indicates the grounds which may be liable to lead to a refusal of protection. In other
words, what must be notified within the applicable refusal period is simply a provisional
objection. In practice, therefore, refusals may be based on:
• an objection resulting from the ex officio examination undertaken by an Office;
• an opposition lodged by a third party. It must be emphasized that, under the

wording of the Hague Agreement, the simple fact of an opposition being lodged
against an international registration must be notified to the International Bureau as a
“refusal of protection based on an opposition”. This does not prejudge the eventual
decision taken by the Office concerned on the opposition.
Ex officio examination, as well as examination following an opposition by a third party, is
carried out by the Office in accordance with the law of its Contracting Party. For example,
the Office may examine ex officio only the formal requirements of national applications, or
that the industrial design meets the definition of a design under its law, or carry out an
exhaustive worldwide novelty examination.

page 88

Hague Guide for Users

Grounds for refusal
Each designated Contracting Party has the right to refuse, in its territory, the grant of
protection to an international registration. Such refusal may be total or partial, in the sense
that it may apply to all the designs which are the subject of the international registration or to
some only of them.
60 Article 8(1); 99 Article 12(1)
Pursuant to Article 12(1), protection may not be refused on the grounds that the international
registration does not satisfy formal requirements, since such requirements are to be
considered by each Contracting Party as having already been satisfied following the
examination carried out by the International Bureau. For example, a designated Office may
not refuse protection on the ground that the required fees have not been paid or that the
quality of the reproductions is not sufficient, since such verification is the exclusive
responsibility of the International Bureau.
Likewise, a Contracting Party may not refuse the effects of the international registration on
the ground that requirements relating to the form of the reproductions that are additional to,
or different from, those which may have been notified by that Contracting Party (refer to
“Specific Views” have not been met. A Contracting Party may however refuse protection on
the ground that a reproduction does not sufficiently disclose the appearance of the industrial
design. In such a case, the reason for the refusal would be the substantive ground that the
industrial design is not sufficiently disclosed, not the formal ground that the reproduction, for
example, does not contain surface shading.
The refusal must indicate all the grounds on which it is based, together with the provisions of
the applicable legislation. In general, the refusal grounds may only relate to substantive
issues, such as lack of novelty of the industrial design. However, there are two exceptions
to that general principle, namely, where a Contracting Party has notified a declaration under
Article 13(1) concerning the requirement of unity of design, or a declaration under Rule 9(3)
concerning views required (refer to “Declarations by Contracting Parties”, “Unity of design”,
“Specific Views”), it may issue a refusal on that basis.
Rule 9(4)
It is not within the competence of the International Bureau to express an opinion as to the
justification of a refusal of protection or to intervene in any way in the settlement of the
substantive issues raised by such a refusal.

Unity of design
There is an exception to the principle set up in Article 12(1), namely, a Contracting Party
whose law, at the time of its becoming party to the 1999 Act, contains a requirement of unity
of design may notify that fact to the Director General of WIPO.
The purpose of the notification is to enable the Office of the Contracting Party to refuse the
effects of the international registration, pending compliance with the requirement of unity of
design, as specified in the notification by that Contracting Party. In such a case, the holder of
the international registration may divide the international registration before the Office
concerned in order to overcome the grounds for refusal. The Office is entitled to charge the
holder of that registration as many additional fees as divisions prove necessary.

Hague Guide for Users

page 89

Estonia, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Romania, Singapore, the Russian Federation, the Syrian Arab
Republic, Tajikistan, the United States of America and Viet Nam have made a declaration
under Article 13 of the 1999 Act to notify that they require that all industrial designs
contained in a single international application are subject to a requirement of unity of design
(refer to “Declarations by Contracting Parties”, “Unity of design”).
It is not within the competence of the International Bureau to express an opinion whether or
not the requirement of unity of design under the law of a designated Contracting Party is
met. However, applicants who designate Mexico, the Russian Federation, the United States
of America or Viet Nam are highly recommended to refer to their respective declarations, in
order to mitigate the risk of refusals by those Contracting Parties (refer to “"How to submit an
international application to the International Bureau: eHague interface or DM/1 form?"”, “Item
6: Number of industrial designs, reproductions and/or specimens (mandatory)”).
99 Article 13

Specific views or sufficient disclosure of the design
Only the Republic of Korea and Viet Nam have made a declaration under Rule 9(3) (refer to
“Specific views”). This being said, it is recalled that any Office of a designated Contracting
Party may refuse the effects of the international registration on the ground that the
reproductions contained in the international registration are not sufficient to disclose fully the
industrial design, pursuant to Rule 9(4).
The criteria for sufficient disclosure of an industrial design may be different from one
jurisdiction to another. In order to mitigate the refusals under Rule 9(4), applicants are highly
recommended to refer to the Guidance on Preparing and Providing Reproductions in Order
to Forestall Possible Refusals on the Ground of Insufficient Disclosure of an Industrial
Design by Examining Offices.
Rule 9(3) and (4)

Time limits for refusal
A refusal of protection must be notified to the International Bureau within a prescribed time
limit. Any refusal sent after the expiry of that time limit will not be considered as such by the
International Bureau (refer to “Calculation of time limits”).
Rule 18; Rule 19(1)(a)(iii)
As a matter of principle, the time limit for the notification of a refusal is six months from the
date of publication of the international registration.
Rule 18(1)(a)
However, any Contracting Party to the 1999 Act whose Office is an Examining Office or
whose law provides for opposition proceedings may declare that, for international
registrations in which it is designated under the 1999 Act, the time limit of six months is
replaced by a time-limit of 12 months.
Rule 18(1)(b)
In order to determine whether a notification of refusal of protection meets the applicable time
limit, it is the date of sending of the notification of refusal, by the Office concerned, which is
decisive. In the case of a notification of refusal sent by mail, the date of sending is

page 90

Hague Guide for Users

determined by the postmark. If the postmark is illegible or missing, the International Bureau
will treat the notification as having been sent 20 days before the date on which it was
actually received by the International Bureau; if, however, this date would be earlier than the
date of any refusal or date of sending mentioned in the notification, the notification will be
treated as having been sent on the latter date. In the case of a notification sent through a
delivery service, the date of sending will be determined on the basis of the information
recorded by the delivery service.
A.I. Section 501

Procedure for refusal of protection
A notification of refusal must relate to only one international registration. It must also be
dated and signed by the Office making the notification.
Rule 18(2)(a)

Contents of the notification
A notification of refusal must contain the following information and indications:
• the Office making the notification;
• the number of the international registration;
• all the grounds on which the refusal is based, together with a reference to the

corresponding essential provisions of the law;
• if the grounds refer to similarity with an industrial design that is the subject of an

earlier national, regional or international application or registration, all relevant data
concerning that industrial design, including the filing or registration date and
number, the priority date (if any), a copy of a reproduction of the earlier industrial
design and the name and address of the owner of the industrial design in question1;
• if the refusal does not concern all the industrial designs that are the subject of the
international registration, those to which it does or does not relate;
• if the refusal may be subject to review or appeal, the time limit, reasonable under
the circumstances, for filing a request for review of, or appeal against, the refusal,
and the authority to which such request for review or appeal lies; if such request for
review or appeal must be filed through the intermediary of a representative whose
address is within the territory of the Contracting Party whose Office has pronounced
the refusal, this should also be indicated. In such a case, the requirements for
appointment of a representative is governed by the law and practice of the
Contracting Party concerned; and
• the date on which the refusal was pronounced.
Rule 18(2)(b)
A refusal must state the grounds on which it is based in order to enable the holder to assess
the appropriateness of challenging these grounds in a review or appeal procedure before the
Office or other authority concerned.
A refusal may also indicate a possible remedy concerning a refusal ground, for example,
where the refusal ground is that all the designs in the international registration are not in
conformity with the requirement of unity of design under the law of the designated
Contracting Party, the Office of that Contracting Party may indicate which designs conform
to the same concept of unity of design, as required under its law, and give instructions on the
possible division of the international registration before that Office.

Hague Guide for Users

page 91

The requirement to state in the notification of refusal all grounds on which the refusal is
based does not prevent new grounds from being raised subsequently during the procedure
before the Office, even after expiry of the time limit for refusal, as a result of the holder’s
reaction to the refusal, or during an appeal procedure lodged by the holder, since the latter is
informed of those grounds under the procedure in question.

Recording and publication of the refusal; transmittal to the holder
A refusal of protection is notified to the International Bureau by the Office of the Contracting
Party concerned. The International Bureau records such refusal in the International Register
(unless it is not considered as such; refer to “Irregular notifications of refusal”), publishes it in
the Bulletin, and transmits a copy of the notification to the holder of the international
registration concerned.
Rule 18(2)(b)

Language of the notification of refusal
The refusal may be notified to the International Bureau in English, French, or Spanish, at the
option of the Office making the notification. The refusal is recorded and published. The
holder receives from the International Bureau a copy of the notification of refusal, in the
language in which it was sent by the Office of the designated Contracting Party.

Irregular notifications of refusal
There are two kinds of irregular refusals, those which can be remedied and those which
entail that the notification of refusal is not considered as such by the International Bureau.
A notification of refusal is not regarded as such by the International Bureau (and is therefore
not recorded in the International Register) if:
• it does not contain an international registration number (unless other indications

contained in the notification permit the International Bureau to identify the
international registration concerned);
• it does not indicate any grounds for refusal; or
• it was sent to the International Bureau after the expiry of the applicable refusal
period (six months or 12 months, as the case may be; refer to “Time limits for
refusal”).
Rule 19(1)(a)
In all three cases, the International Bureau nevertheless transmits a copy of the notification
to the holder and informs him (and at the same time the Office that issued it) that it does not
regard the notification of refusal as such, and indicates the reasons therefor.
Rule 19(1)(b)
It is useful for the holder of the international registration to receive from the International
Bureau copies of such notifications of refusal (even if they have not been regarded as such,
and consequently have not been recorded in the International Register), because this holder
should be aware of potential grounds of refusal in the Contracting Party concerned. For
example, a third party might initiate an invalidation action against the designation, based on
the same grounds as were cited by the Office in the defective notification of refusal.

page 92

Hague Guide for Users

If the notification is irregular in other respects (for example, it is not signed by the Office or it
does not indicate the date of refusal), the International Bureau nonetheless records the
refusal in the International Register and transmits a copy of the (irregular) notification to the
holder. If the holder so requests, the International Bureau invites the Office concerned to
rectify its notification without delay.
Rule 19(2)
Where an Office rectifies a notification of refusal that specified a period for requesting review
or appeal, it should also, where appropriate, specify a new period (for example, starting from
the date on which the rectified notification was sent to the International Bureau), preferably
with an indication of the date on which the new time limit expires.

Procedure following notification of refusal
Where the holder of an international registration receives, through the International Bureau,
a notification of refusal, he has the same rights and remedies (such as review of, or appeal
against, the refusal) as if the industrial design had been filed directly with the Office that
issued the notification of refusal. The international registration is, therefore, with respect to
the Contracting Party concerned, subject to the same procedures as would apply to an
application for registration filed with the Office of that Contracting Party.
60 Article 8(3); 99 Article 12(3)(b)
When lodging a request for review or an appeal against a decision of refusal or responding
to an opposition, the holder may, even if this is not required by the law of the Contracting
Party concerned, find it useful to appoint a local representative who is familiar with the law
and practice (and the language) of the Office that pronounced the refusal. The appointment
of such a representative is entirely outside the scope of the Hague Agreement and the
Common Regulations, and is governed by the law and practice of the Contracting Party
concerned.
In the case that the Office has issued a notification of refusal on the ground that the designs
do not conform with the requirement of unity of design under its law, the holder of the
international registration may divide the international registration before the Office concerned
in order to overcome the grounds for refusal (refer to “Grounds for refusal” and “Contents of
the notification”). The Office is entitled to charge the holder of that registration as many
additional fees as divisions prove necessary. The mode of payment of additional fees of this
type is not governed by the Hague System; they will be specified by each Contracting Party
concerned, which will collect them directly from the holder of the international registration.
Where an international registration has been divided before the Office of a designated
Contracting Party following a notification of refusal based upon lack of unity of design, that
Office must notify the International Bureau of that fact, together with the following additional
particulars:
• the Office making the notification;
• the number of the international registration concerned;
• the numbers of the industrial designs which have been the subject of the division
with the Office concerned; and
• the resulting national or regional application numbers or registration numbers.
99 Article 13(2); Rule 18(3)

Hague Guide for Users

page 93

Moreover, if there was no other ground for refusal, the Office must send to the International
Bureau a notification of withdrawal of refusal or statement of grant of protection.

1.
In the event of a refusal based on similarity with a design that is the subject of an earlier registration that
has not been published (in particular because deferred publication has been requested), the Office will not be
able to provide the data concerning the conflicting earlier design since it is required to keep the copy of that
earlier registration secret. In such case it will have to indicate in its notification, as ground for refusal, similarity
with an earlier unpublished registration. The holder of the later international registration should receive the
detailed contents of the earlier registration once publication has taken place. The time limits applicable to a
possible appeal against refusal would be set accordingly.

page 94

Hague Guide for Users

Notification of withdrawal of refusal and statement of grant
of protection
Notification of withdrawal of refusal
An Office which has issued a notification of refusal may withdraw the said notification,
following, in particular, the lodging of an appeal by the holder. The notification of withdrawal
of refusal must relate to only one international registration, but may relate only to one or
some of the industrial designs in the international registration to which the refusal applied. It
must also be dated and signed by the Office concerned.
99 Article 12(4); Rule 18(4)(a)
A notification of withdrawal of refusal must contain the following information and indications:
• the Office making the notification;
• the number of the international registration;
• if the withdrawal does not concern all the industrial designs that are the subject of

the refusal, those to which it does, or does not, relate;
• the date on which the international registration produced the effect as a grant of

protection under the applicable law;
• the date on which the refusal was withdrawn.

Rule 18(4)(b)
Where the international registration was amended in a procedure before the Office, the
notification shall also contain or indicate either all the amended elements or the whole
information concerning the industrial designs as amended, at the discretion of the Office.
This information could be provided in the language in which the Office detained it, even if it
were a language other than the working language used for the notification of withdrawal of
refusal.
Rule 18(4)(c)
Where a designated Contracting Party has made a declaration under Article 7(2) of the
1999 Act, concerning the individual designation fee to be paid in two parts, the effect as
grant of protection is subject to the payment of the second part of the individual designation
fee (refer to “Individual designation fee payable in two parts (applicable only to the
designation of Mexico and the United States of America)”). Accordingly, a notification of
withdrawal of refusal will be sent once the second part of the individual designation fee is
paid.
99 Article 7(2)

Statement of grant of protection following a refusal
A withdrawal of refusal by an Office that has communicated a notification of refusal may also
take the form of a statement to the effect that the Office concerned has decided to grant
protection to the industrial designs, or some of the industrial designs, as the case may be,
that are the subject of the international registration.
Rule 18bis(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 95

A statement of grant of protection following a refusal must contain the following information
and indications:
• the Office making the notification;
• the number of the international registration;
• where the statement does not relate to all the industrial designs that are the subject

of the international registration, those to which it relates or does not relate;
• the date on which the international registration produced the effect as a grant of
protection under the applicable law;
• the date of the statement;
• where the international registration was amended in a procedure before the Office,
the statement shall also contain or indicate all amendments (refer to “Notification of
withdrawal of refusal”).
Rule 18bis(2)(b) and (c)
Where a designated Contracting Party has made a declaration under Article 7(2) of the
1999 Act, concerning the individual designation fee to be paid in two parts, the effect as
grant of protection is subject to the payment of the second part of the individual designation
fee (refer to “Individual designation fee payable in two parts (applicable only to the
designation of Mexico and the United States of America)”). Accordingly, a statement of
grant of protection will be sent once the second part of the individual designation fee is paid.
99 Article 7(2)

Statement of grant of protection in the absence of a prior notification
of refusal
The Office of a designated Contracting Party which has not communicated a notification of
refusal may, within the applicable refusal period, send to the International Bureau a
statement to the effect that protection is granted to the industrial designs or some of the
industrial designs, as the case may be, that are the subject of the international registration in
the Contracting Party concerned.
Rule 18bis(1)(a)
Where a designated Contracting Party has made a declaration under Article 7(2) of the
1999 Act, concerning the individual designation fee to be paid in two parts, the effect as
grant of protection is subject to the payment of the second part of the individual designation
fee (refer to “Individual designation fee payable in two parts (applicable only to the
designation of Mexico and the United States of America)”). Accordingly, a statement of
grant of protection will be sent once the second part of the individual designation fee is paid.
99 Article 7(2)
In general, no legal consequences result from the fact that such a statement of grant of
protection has not been sent by an Office. It remains the case that the industrial designs
that are the subject of the international registration are protected if no notification of refusal
has been sent within the applicable refusal period.

page 96

Hague Guide for Users

However, where a Contracting Party has made a declaration under Rule 18(1)(b) covering
situations under Rule 18(1)(c)(i) or (ii), and either of them applies, and where protection is
granted following amendments in the procedure before an Office, the sending of a statement
of grant of protection is mandatory (refer to “Extension of period for notification of refusal
(Rule 18(1)(b))”).
Rule 18bis(1)(d) and (e)
A statement of grant of protection where no notification of refusal has been communicated
must contain the following information and indications:
• the Office making the statement;
• the number of the international registration;
• where the statement does not relate to all the industrial designs that are the subject

of the international registration, those to which it relates;
• the date on which the international registration produced or shall produce the effect
as a grant of protection under the applicable law;
• the date of the statement;
• where the international registration was amended in a procedure before the Office,
the statement shall also contain or indicate all amendments (refer to “Notification of
withdrawal of refusal”).
Rule 18bis(1)(b)
The International Bureau records any withdrawal of refusal or statement of grant of
protection in the International Register, informs the holder accordingly and, where the
withdrawal or statement was communicated, or can be reproduced, in the form of a specific
document, transmits a copy of that document to the holder. The recording of any withdrawal
or statement is published in the Bulletin and a pdf copy of the document is made publicly
available in the Bulletin alongside the publication.
Rule 18(5), (6) and Rule 18bis(3)

Effects of the international registration
Effects of the international registration in respect of Contracting
Parties designated under the 1999 Act
Effect as a national application and effect as a grant of protection
The 1999 Act provides for the recognition of, successively, two sets of effects to an
international registration, namely, the effect as an application under the domestic law, and
the effect as a grant of protection.
Firstly, as from the date of the international registration, the international registration has at
least the same effect in each designated Contracting Party as a regularly-filed application
under the law of that Contracting Party. “At least the same” is a minimum standard; in other
words, the effect may start on an earlier date, or its scope may be broader in respect of
international registrations. One of the consequences is that any Contracting Party that
affords provisional protection to published national or regional applications must also afford
that type of protection to published international registrations in which it is designated.

Hague Guide for Users

page 97

Furthermore, where under the applicable law only the granted registrations are published,
that Contracting Party may afford provisional protection to international registrations as from
the publication date of the international registration in which it is designated.
99 Article 14(1)
Secondly, in each designated Contracting Party the Office of which has not notified a refusal
of protection, the international registration has the same effect as a grant of protection under
the law of that Contracting Party. The effect of protection starts to run, at the latest, from the
date of expiry of the applicable refusal period (six or 12 months, as the case may be).
99 Article 14(2)
The only exception to the above principle is that a Contracting Party whose Office is an
Examining Office, or whose law provides for the possibility of opposition to the grant of
protection, may, by making the corresponding declaration to the Director General of WIPO,
specify that the international registration will have the effect as a grant of protection at the
latest:
• at a time specified in the declaration which may be later than the date of expiry of

the applicable refusal period but which may not be more than six months after that
date (in such case, the effect as a grant of protection begins at the time stated in
that declaration), or
• at a time at which protection is granted according to the law of the Contracting Party
where a decision regarding the grant of protection was unintentionally not
communicated; in the latter case, the Office of the Contracting Party concerned
should notify the International Bureau accordingly and endeavor to communicate its
decision to the holder of the international registration promptly thereafter.
99 Article 14(2); Rule 18(1)(c)
The effect as a grant of protection, as described above, applies to the industrial design or
designs that are the subject of that registration as received from the International Bureau by
the designated Office or, where applicable, as amended in the procedure before that Office.
99 Article 14(2)(c)
The words “at the latest” mean that each Contracting Party has the possibility of recognizing
that the international registration has the effect as a grant of protection under its laws at an
earlier date, for example as from the date of the international registration. Moreover, it is to
be understood that, where a multiple international registration has been refused with respect
to some only of the industrial designs contained in the registration, protection of the
international registration under the applicable law is limited to those industrial designs that
are not subject to the notification of refusal.
Furthermore, where a refusal of protection has been notified and subsequently withdrawn
(totally or partially), the effect as a grant of protection under the law of the Contracting Party
concerned must be afforded to the international registration, to the extent that the refusal is
withdrawn, at the latest on the date of its withdrawal. Again in this case, the words “at the
latest” mean that each Contracting Party has the possibility of recognizing that the effect of
protection under its applicable law begins at an earlier date, for example retroactively as
from the date of the international registration. The words “to the extent that the notification of
refusal is withdrawn” indicate that, where a refusal is withdrawn with respect to some only of

page 98

Hague Guide for Users

the industrial designs that were the subject of the notification, the protection under the
applicable law does not extend to the designs with regard to which the refusal has not been
withdrawn. Since a withdrawal of refusal may take the form of a statement of grant of
protection, the foregoing applies where such a statement is issued in the context of a
withdrawal of refusal (refer to “Notification of withdrawal of refusal”).
99 Article 14(2)(b); Rule 18(4); Rule 18bis(2)
The Office of a designated Contracting Party may, within the applicable refusal period, send
to the International Bureau a statement of grant of protection where it has not communicated
a notification of refusal and has decided to accept the effects of an international registration
(refer to “Statement of grant of protection in the absence of a prior notification of refusal”). In
such a case, the international registration may have, in accordance with the law of the
designated Contracting Party, the effect as a grant of protection, for example, as from the
date on which the statement of grant of protection was issued, since each Contracting Party
has the possibility of recognizing that the effect of protection begins at an earlier date. As
regards the latest time at which protection must be granted, the principles explained above
remain applicable.

Postponed international registration date
Finally, the date of the international registration is, in principle, the filing date of the
international application. However, pursuant to Article 10(2)(b) of the 1999 Act, the date of
the international registration may be later than the filing date owing to certain irregularities in
the international application relating to Article 5(2) (refer to “Date of the international
registration” and “Irregularities concerning special requirement notified by a Contracting
Party or regarding the identity of the creator, description and claim”).
The postponement of the date of the international registration may expose the industrial
design(s) in the international registration to potential risks under the applicable law (also in
the designated Contracting Parties which have not made a declaration under Article 5(2) of
the 1999 Act, which would cause a postponement of the date of the international
registration), for example:
–
where the effect as a regularly-filed application under the law of a designated
Contracting Party commences on the date of the international registration
(i)
the novelty of the industrial design(s) may be destroyed by an industrial
design made available to the public before the (postponed) date of international registration
(i.e., including the period between the filing date of the international application and the
(postponed) international registration date);
(ii) a priority claim in the international registration may be dismissed by the
Office of a designated Contracting Party if the filing date of the earlier application is more
than six months prior to the (postponed) date of the international registration, even if the
filing date of the international application is within the six-month priority period (refer to
“Item 13: Priority claim”).
–
Where the effect as a grant of protection under the law of a designated
Contracting Party begins from the date of international registration, protection may not be
provided to the industrial design(s) against the use of same/similar industrial design(s) by a
third party before the (postponed) date of international registration.

Hague Guide for Users

page 99

Applicants are thus advised to make sure to provide the additional mandatory contents,
where applicable, at the time of filing the international application, in order to avoid any
potential risks.
However, it is recalled that a designated Contracting Party has the possibility of recognizing
that the international registration has the same effect as a regularly-filed application, as well
as, as a grant of protection under its law, as from the filing date of the international
application, rather than the date of the international registration.
Rule 18bis(1)

Payment of the second part of the individual designation fee
Where a designated Contracting Party has made a declaration under Article 7(2) of the
1999 Act, concerning the individual designation fee to be paid in two parts, the effect as
grant of protection is subject to the payment of the second part of the individual designation
fee.
Rule 12(3); Rule 18bis(1)(a) and (2)

Effects of the international registration in respect of Contracting
Parties designated under the 1960 Act
If no refusal is notified within the prescribed time limit of six months by a Contracting Party
designated under the 1960 Act, the international registration becomes effective in that
Contracting Party as from the date of the international registration. However, in a
Contracting Party having a novelty examination, the international registration becomes
effective from the expiration of the refusal period unless the domestic law provides for an
earlier date for registrations made with its national Office. Furthermore, if, under the
provisions of the domestic law of a Contracting State having a novelty examination,
protection commences at a date later than that of the international registration, the term of
protection must be computed from the date at which protection commences in that State.
The fact that the international registration is not renewed or is renewed only once shall in no
way affect the terms of protection thus defined.
60 Articles 8(1) and 11(1)(b)
Where a refusal of protection has been notified and subsequently withdrawn (totally or
partially), the effects under the law of the Contracting Party must be afforded to the
international registration, in accordance with the principles mentioned above.
Where a statement of grant of protection has been notified in the absence of a prior
notification of refusal, the same considerations as outlined in “Effects of the international
registration in respect of Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act” apply (refer to
“Statement of grant of protection in the absence of a prior notification of refusal”). As
regards the latest time at which protection must be granted, the principles explained above
remain applicable.

page 100

Hague Guide for Users

Term of protection of international registrations in respect of
Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act
With respect to Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act, the international
registration is effected for an initial period of five years and may be renewed for two
additional five-year periods before each of those periods expires. Subject to renewal, the
minimum duration of protection in each Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act is
therefore 15 years following the date of international registration.
99 Article 17
Moreover, if the national legislation of a Contracting Party provides for a duration of
protection in excess of 15 years for designs filed for registration by the national route, the
international registration may be renewed with respect to that Contracting Party for additional
periods of five years up to the expiry of the total duration of protection provided for in its
national legislation.

Term of protection of international registrations in respect of
Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act
With respect to Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act, the international
registration is made for an initial period of five years and may be renewed for one additional
period of five years. Subject to renewal, the minimum duration of protection in each
Contracting Party designated under the 1960 Act is therefore 10 years following the date of
international registration.
60 Article 11(1)(a)
Moreover, if the national legislation of a Contracting Party provides for a duration of
protection in excess of 10 years for designs filed for registration by the national route, the
international registration may be renewed with respect to that Contracting Party for additional
periods of five years up to the expiry of the total duration of protection provided for in its
national legislation.
60 Article 11(2)

Changes in the international registration
Types of changes
A request for the recording of a change may relate to any of the following:
• change in ownership of an international registration (form DM/2);

Rule 21(1)(a)(i)
• change in the name and/or address of the holder (including address for

correspondence) (form DM/6);
Rule 21(1)(a)(ii)

Hague Guide for Users

page 101

• renunciation of the international registration in respect of any or all of the

designated Contracting Parties (form DM/5);
Rule 21(1)(a)(iii)
• limitation, in respect of any or all of the designated Contracting Parties, to one or

some of the industrial designs that are the subject of the international registration
(form DM/3).
Rule 21(1)(a)(iv)
Where the request for the recording of a change concerns any of the above, such request
must be presented to the International Bureau on the corresponding official form.
Rule 21(1)

Change in ownership
The ownership of an industrial design may change for various reasons and in different ways.
A change in ownership may result from a contract, such as an assignment. Other reasons
might be a court decision, or operation of law, such as an inheritance or bankruptcy, or from
the merger of two companies.
99 Article 16(1)(i)
The change in ownership of an international registration may relate to all the industrial
designs covered by the international registration, or to some only of them. Similarly, the
change in ownership may be in respect of all the designated Contracting Parties or some
only of them.
Rule 21(2)(v)
The Common Regulations do not distinguish between such different causes for, or different
types of, change in ownership. The uniform terminology “change in ownership” is used for
all cases. Until the change has been recorded in the International Register, the former owner
of the international registration is referred to as the “holder”, since this term is defined as the
person or legal entity in whose name the international registration is recorded. The new
owner is referred to as the “transferee”. Once the change in ownership has been recorded,
the transferee becomes the holder of the international registration.
Furthermore, the issue of the recording of a change in ownership in the International
Register must be distinguished from that of the validity of such change in ownership. The
Hague Agreement does not set out, for example, the conditions to be met regarding the
validity of a deed of assignment relating to an international registration. These conditions
are, and remain, governed exclusively by the relevant domestic legislation, and may
therefore vary from one Contracting Party to another (e.g., the need for execution of a
document in writing certifying the assignment, proof of the age of the parties in order to
assess their legal entitlement, etc.).

page 102

Hague Guide for Users

The Hague Agreement provides only for the requirements to be complied with in order to
validly record a change in ownership in the International Register. This issue is therefore a
matter which comes into play only subsequently to the formal conclusion of the contractual
arrangement or to the occurring of the non-contractual cause for the change in ownership.
The recording of a change in ownership in the International Register normally aims at
ensuring that such change in ownership will be effective against third parties.
Moreover, it is to be noted that, in certain circumstances, a designated Contracting Party
may refuse the effect of a recording of a change in ownership in the International Register
with respect to its designation, pursuant to a declaration requiring certain statements or
documents, under Article 16(2) of the Geneva Act (1999), or to a declaration to refuse the
effects of the recording of a given change in ownership issued pursuant to Rule 21bis(1)
(refer to “Effect of the recording of a change in ownership” et seq).

Entitlement to be recorded as new holder
Where there has been a change in the ownership of an international registration, the new
owner (transferee) may be recorded as the new holder in respect of a given designated
Contracting Party provided he holds an entitlement (i.e., by virtue of establishment, domicile,
habitual residence or nationality) in a Contracting Party bound by an Act to which the
designated Contracting Party concerned is also bound.
99 Article 3; Rule 21(2)(iv)
For example, if a designated Contracting Party is bound by both the 1960 Act and the
1999 Act, the transferee could be recorded as the new holder in respect of such Contracting
Party to the extent that he holds an entitlement in a Contracting Party bound by either (but at
least one) of these Acts. On the other hand, where the transferee is a company holding an
entitlement only in a Contracting Party bound exclusively by the 1999 Act, such transferee
cannot be recorded as new holder in respect of designated Contracting Parties bound
exclusively by the 1960 Act (or vice-versa).
In certain situations, the application of this principle may entail a change in the Act governing
the designation of the Contracting Party concerned vis-à-vis the Contracting Party of the new
holder. The following example may illustrate the issue concerned.
An applicant originates from a Contracting Party bound exclusively by the 1960 Act and has
designated a Contracting Party bound by both the 1960 and the 1999 Acts. Such
designation is therefore governed by the 1960 Act (the single common Act). The
corresponding registration is subsequently assigned to a company established in a
Contracting Party bound exclusively by the 1999 Act. This transfer can be recorded in the
International Register, since the 1999 Act is common to the Contracting Party of the new
holder and the designated Contracting Party concerned. For the very same reason,
however, it follows that the designation of that Contracting Party is no longer governed by
the 1960 Act, but instead by the 1999 Act (the only common Act between the designated
Contracting Party and the Contracting Party of the new holder).
Where this situation occurs, however, the following consequences must be inferred.

Hague Guide for Users

page 103

Refusal period
If the recording of the change in ownership takes place during the course of the refusal
period, and given that such period may differ according to whether a Contracting Party has
been designated under the 1960 Act or under the 1999 Act (refer to “Time limits for refusal”),
the recording of the change in ownership does not have the effect of prolonging – or
reducing – the refusal period allowed for a designated Contracting Party to notify a refusal of
protection. This solution was approved by the Assembly of the Hague Union at its twenty
second session in September/October 2003, by means of an interpretative statement.

Deferment of publication
If the recording of the change in ownership takes place during the period for deferment of
publication, and given that such period under the 1999 Act (up to 30 months) may be longer
than the maximum period of deferment provided for by the 1960 Act (12 months), the
recording of the change in ownership does not have the effect of reducing the applicable
deferment period where (i) deferment of publication had been requested for a period of more
than 12 months under the 1999 Act and (ii) the international registration concerned is
transferred, during this deferment period, to a person having an entitlement in a Contracting
Party bound exclusively by the 1960 Act. This solution was approved by the Assembly of
the Hague Union at its twenty second session in September/October 2003, by means of an
interpretative statement.

Individual renewal fees
Given that an individual fee may be required at the stage of renewal for Contracting Parties
designated under the 1999 Act, but that such a fee is not provided for in respect of
Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act in the context of renewal, it follows that
the new holder may have to pay individual renewal fees in a designated Contracting Party
(while such possibility had been precluded with respect to the initial holder), or vice versa.
This solution was approved by the Assembly of the Hague Union at its twenty second
session in September/October 2003, by means of an interpretative statement.

Entitlements of the new owner in several contracting parties bound by
different acts (plurality of entitlements)
The transferee may indicate, in the request for the recording of change in ownership, an
entitlement in several Contracting Parties which may be bound by different Act(s) (refer to
“Entitlement to file an international application”). Therefore, assuming for example that the
transferee:
• claims a domicile in a Contracting Party bound exclusively by the 1960 Act

(Contracting Party A) and the nationality of a Contracting Party bound exclusively
by the 1999 Act (Contracting Party B), and
• requests to be recorded as the new holder in respect of a Contracting Party bound
by both Acts (Contracting Party C),
it is the more recent (1999) Act which is taken into account to determine which Act governs
the designation of the Contracting Party concerned (Contracting Party C) vis-à-vis the new
holder (the same result would ensue if, in the example above, Contracting Party B was not
the State from which the assignee is a national but an intergovernmental organization of
which Contracting Party A is a member State). This solution was approved by the Assembly
of the Hague Union at its twenty second session in September/October 2003, by means of
an interpretative statement. It results mainly from the fact that the 1999 Act is the more

page 104

Hague Guide for Users

modern legal instrument and that such a solution is also in the spirit of Article 31(1) of the
1999 Act and Article 31(1) of the 1960 Act, which give preference to the more recent Act.

Who can present the request
As a matter of principle, requests for the recording of changes must be presented and
signed by the holder. However, a request for the recording of a change in ownership
(form DM/2) may also be presented by the new owner, provided that it is
• signed by the holder, or
• signed by the new owner and accompanied by an attestation from the competent

authority of the holder’s Contracting Party that the new owner appears to be the
successor in title of the holder.
Rule 21(1)(b)

Contents of the request
A request for the recording of a change in ownership (form DM/2) must contain or indicate
the following:
• the number of the international registration concerned (a single request form may

be used for several international registrations in the name of the same holder,
provided that the request relates to a total change in ownership as provided for in
item 6(a) of the form. On the other hand, if the request relates to a partial change in
ownership, as provided for in item 6(b), the request form may be used only for a
single international registration);
Rule 21(2)
• the name of the holder;
• the name and address, given in accordance with the Administrative Instructions, of

the new owner of the international registration. Where there are several new
owners with different addresses and no representative has been appointed, an
address for correspondence should also be indicated. If no such address is
indicated, the International Bureau will take as the address for correspondence the
address of the person named first (in item 3 of the form). It should also be noted
that where there is only one new owner and no representative has been appointed,
item 4 of the form (address for correspondence) should be completed only if the
correspondence address is, in fact, different from the ordinary address of the
applicant already given in item 3(b);
A.I. Section 301; A.I. Section 302
• the Contracting Party or Parties in respect of which the new owner fulfills the

conditions to be the holder of an international registration;
• in the case of a change in the ownership of the international registration that does
not relate to all the industrial designs and to all the Contracting Parties, the numbers
of the industrial designs and the designated Contracting Parties to which the
change in ownership relates;
• the amount of the fees being paid and the method of payment, or instruction to debit
the required amount of fees from a current account at WIPO, and the identification
of the party effecting the payment or giving the instructions.
99 Article 16(3); Rule 21(2)(vi)

Hague Guide for Users

page 105

The form should be signed or have a seal affixed and the identity of the signatory should be
indicated as provided for in item 7. There is also provision for an indication of the name of
the person to be contacted, if necessary. This may prove useful if, for example, the form is
submitted in the name of a legal entity.
Rule 21(1)(b); A.I. Section 202

Appointment of a representative
The new owner or transferee may also, optionally, appoint a representative, simultaneously
with the filing of the request for the recording of the change in ownership. This is provided
for in item 8 of the form, which requires that such appointment be made either by means of
the attachment of the appropriate power of attorney to form DM/2 (Change in Ownership) or
the annexing to form DM/2 of duly completed form DM/7 (Appointment of Representative).
Rule 3(1)(b)

Irregular or inadmissible requests
Request not admissible
A change in the ownership of an international registration may not be recorded in respect of
a designated Contracting Party if that Contracting Party is not bound by an Act to which the
Contracting Party, or one of the Contracting Parties, in respect of which the new owner
fulfills the conditions to be the holder of an international registration, is also bound (refer to
“Entitlement to be recorded as new holder”).
Rule 21(3)

Irregular request
If the request does not comply with any of the applicable requirements, the International
Bureau notifies that fact to the holder and, if the request was presented by a person claiming
to be the new owner, to that person.
Rule 21(4)
An irregularity in a request for recording of a change in ownership may be remedied within
three months from the date of the notification of the irregularity by the International Bureau.
If the irregularity is not remedied within that three months period, the request is considered
abandoned and the International Bureau notifies accordingly and at the same time the holder
and, if the request was presented by a person claiming to be the new owner, that person,
and refunds any fees paid, after deduction of an amount corresponding to one half of the
relevant fees.
Rule 21(5)

Partial change in ownership – numbering
An assignment or other transfer of the international registration in respect of some only of
the industrial designs, or some only of the designated Contracting Parties, is recorded in the
International Register under the number of the international registration of which a part has
been assigned or otherwise transferred. In such case, any assigned or otherwise
transferred part is cancelled under the original number of the international registration and is

page 106

Hague Guide for Users

recorded as a separate international registration. The separate international registration
bears the number of the international registration of which a part has been assigned or
otherwise transferred, together with a capital letter.
Rule 21(7)

Merger
Where the same person becomes the holder of two or more international registrations
resulting from a partial change in ownership, the registrations may be merged at the request
of such person. In that regard, the requirements concerning a request for the recording of a
change in ownership (refer to “Change in ownership”) apply mutatis mutandis to the request
for the recording of a merger.
Rule 21(8)
The international registration resulting from the merger bears the number of the international
registration of which a part had been assigned or otherwise transferred, together, where
applicable, with a capital letter.

Recording, notification and publication
Provided that the request is in order, the International Bureau promptly records the change
in the International Register and informs both the new holder and the previous holder.
Rule 21(6)(a)
The International Bureau publishes in the Bulletin the relevant data concerning the change in
ownership and the mergers.
Rule 26(1)(iv)

Effect of the recording of a change in ownership
The recording of a change in ownership in the International Register has the same effect as
if it had been made directly at the corresponding national or regional Register of the Office.
However, Article 16(2) of the 1999 Act provides for one possible exception, namely a
Contracting Party may, in a declaration, notify the Director General of WIPO that a recording
of a change in ownership in the International Register shall not have effect in that
Contracting Party until the Office of that Contracting Party has received the statements or
documents specified in that declaration.
60 Article 7(1)(b); 99 Article 16(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 107

Refusal of the effects of the recording of a change in ownership
issued by the Office of a designated Contracting Party
As indicated above, a Contracting Party may make a declaration under Article 16(2) of the
1999 Act to the effect that the recording of a change in ownership in the International
Register does not have effect in that Contracting Party until the Office has received the
statements or documents specified in that declaration.
Rule 21bis
Furthermore, there are situations under some national/regional laws, where the recording of
a partial change in ownership is not allowed. For example, this is the case under certain
jurisdictions where a set of industrial designs is considered to constitute a single industrial
design, which means that all the designs belonging to the same set acquire legal protection
as a whole and do not acquire protection independently. As a consequence, all the designs
forming the set can only be transferred to the same transferee at the same time. This is also
the case under certain jurisdictions where the law provides for a “similar design” system or a
“related design” system. Industrial designs registered under this particular condition can
only be transferred all together at the same time.
As described above, if a given change in ownership is not allowed under its national/regional
laws, the Office of that Contracting Party may declare that the change in ownership recorded
in the International Register has no effect in the said Contracting Party.
Rule 21bis(1)
That declaration must be sent by the Office to the International Bureau within six months
from the date of publication of the change in ownership or within the applicable refusal
period, whichever expires later. The declaration should indicate (i) the reasons for which the
change in ownership has no effect, (ii) the corresponding essential provisions of the law,
(iii) the numbers of the industrial designs concerned by the declaration where it does not
relate to all the industrial designs that are the subject of the change in ownership, and
(iv) whether such a declaration may be subject to review or appeal.
Rule 21bis(2) and (3)
Upon its receipt, the International Bureau records the declaration in the International
Register and notifies accordingly the previous holder (the transferor) and the new holder
(transferee). The International Bureau also modifies the International Register, so that that
part of the international registration which has been the subject of the said declaration be
recorded as a separate international registration in the name of the previous holder (the
transferor). The International Bureau notifies accordingly the previous holder (the transferor)
and the new holder (the transferee).
Rule 21bis(4)
The withdrawal of a declaration of refusal issued under this Rule shall be notified to the
International Bureau which shall then record it in the International Register, modify the
International Register accordingly, and notify accordingly the previous holder (the transferor)
and the new holder (the transferee).
Rule 21bis(5)

page 108

Hague Guide for Users

The International Bureau publishes the relevant data concerning declarations of refusal of
the effects of the recording of a change in ownership and their withdrawals.
Rule 26(1)(ix)
The following example may illustrate how this Rule works: a given international registration
contains the designations of Contracting Parties A and B under the 1999 Act, Contracting
Party A having made the declaration under Article 16(2) of the 1999 Act. A total change in
ownership of the international registration has been recorded in the International Register
from holder X to new holder Y. After three months from the date of publication of the
recording of the said change in ownership, the International Bureau receives from the Office
of Contracting Party A the declaration that the change in ownership has no effect in that
Contracting Party. The International Bureau records the said declaration in the International
Register and notifies accordingly the previous holder (the transferor) and the new holder (the
transferee), in accordance with paragraph (4) of this Rule. Pursuant to the said paragraph,
the International Bureau modifies the total change in ownership to a change in ownership in
respect of Contracting Party B, this modification leading to the creation of a new international
registration in the name of X for Contracting Party A. According to the general principle
established under Rule 21(7) for the recording of a partial change in ownership, the new
international registration would bear the number of the original international registration,
together with a capital letter. In the event of a further decision to withdraw the
aforementioned declaration of refusal in Contracting Party A, it shall be notified to the
International Bureau pursuant to paragraph (5) of Rule 21bis. The International Bureau then
modifies the name of the holder of the new international registration from X (the previous
holder) to Y (the new holder) and notifies the previous and the new holder accordingly. The
International Bureau then merges those two international registrations in the name of Y (the
new holder) and informs the new holder (transferee) accordingly.
Rule 21bis and 21(7)

Change in the name and/or address of the holder
A request for the recording of a change in the name and/or address (or address for
correspondence) of the holder may be presented to the International Bureau on official form
DM/6. This form must not be used where the change of name results from a change in
ownership. In such a case, form DM/2 should be used (refer to “Change in ownership”).
Rule 21(1)(a)(ii)

Item 1: International registration number
A single request may relate to several international registrations recorded in the name of the
same holder. If, in respect of a given international registration, the number is not known
(because the international registration has not yet been effected or notified to the holder), no
other number should be given. The holder should wait until he is notified of the international
registration number concerned and then make a further request.
Rule 21(2)(i)

Item 2: Holder
The name of the holder, as recorded in the International Register, must be indicated in the
same way as that described under “Applicant”.
Rule 21(2)(ii)

Hague Guide for Users

page 109

Item 3: Change
Spaces are provided to indicate the new name, new address, new phone number and new
email address. Only the information which has changed need be indicated. That is, for
example, where only the name has changed, it is sufficient to indicate the new name, leaving
the other spaces blank; similarly, where only the address has changed, there is no need to
repeat the name.
Rule 21(2)(iii)
Where only the telephone number and/or email address has changed, it is sufficient to
indicate the new number and/or email address in a letter (the use of form DM/6 is not
necessary). Where this is the only change to be recorded, no fee is payable for the request.

Item 4: Address for correspondence
Space is provided to indicate an address for correspondence, if any, and if different from the
address of the holder indicated in item 2. If this item is not completed, an address for
correspondence which may already have been recorded in the International Register is
automatically disregarded by the International Bureau.

Item 5: Appointment of a representative
The holder may also, optionally, appoint a representative, simultaneously with the filing of
the request for the recording of the change in the name and/or address of the holder. Such
appointment may be made by attaching form DM/6 to the appropriate power of attorney, or
form DM/7, or by inserting the holder’s signature where indicated in item 6.
Rule 3(2)
Where there is no change in the representative already recorded, this item of the form
should be left blank.
The observations made above in relation to change in ownership (concerning presentation of
the request, irregularities, rectification and effect of the recording, notification and
publication) apply in equal measure to requests for the recording of a change of name and/or
address (refer to “Change in ownership”).

Item 6: Signature by the holder or representative
The form should be signed or have a seal affixed and the identity of the signatory should be
indicated. There is also provision for an indication of the name of the person to be
contacted, if necessary. This may prove useful if, for example, the form is submitted in the
name of a legal entity.
Rule 21(1)(b)(i)

page 110

Hague Guide for Users

Fee calculation sheet
A request to record a change in the name or address of the holder is subject to the payment
of the fee specified in the Schedule of Fees. Refer to the general remarks concerning
payment of fees to the International Bureau (refer to “Payment of fees to the International
Bureau”).
99 Article 16(3); Rule 21(2)(vi)

Irregular requests
If a request to record a change in name or address of the holder or representative does not
comply with any of the applicable requirements, the International Bureau notifies that fact to
the holder. The irregularity may be remedied within three months from the date of the
notification. If this is not done, the request will be considered abandoned and any fee paid
will be reimbursed to the party that paid it, after deduction of an amount corresponding to
one half of the relevant fee.
Rule 21(4) and (5)

Recording, notification and publication
Provided that the request is in order, the International Bureau promptly records the change
in the International Register and informs the holder. The change is recorded as of the date
of receipt by the International Bureau of the request complying with the applicable
requirements. Where however the request indicates that the change should be recorded
after another change, or after renewal of the international registration, the International
Bureau proceeds accordingly.
99 Article 16(4); Rule 21(6)

Renunciation
Renunciation of an international registration always concerns all the industrial designs that
are the subject of the international registration, but may relate to some or all of the
designated Contracting Parties.
99 Article 16(1)(iv); Rule 21(1)(a)(iii)
A request for the recording of a renunciation should be presented to the International Bureau
on official form DM/5.
Rule 21(1)(a)

Item 1: International registration number
If, in respect of a given international registration, the number is not known (because the
international registration has not yet been effected or notified to the holder), no other number
should be given. The holder should wait until he is notified of the international registration
number concerned and then make a further request.
Rule 21(2)(i)

Hague Guide for Users

page 111

One single form may be used to request the recording of a renunciation in respect of several
international registrations of the same holder, provided that the designated Contracting
Parties in respect of which the international registration is renounced are the same for each
of the international registration concerned.
The request must necessarily relate to all the industrial designs covered by the international
registration(s) in respect of some, or all, the designated Contracting Parties. If the request
relates to some only of the industrial designs covered by the international registration(s),
form DM/3 (limitation) must be used instead.

Item 2: Holder
The name of the holder, as recorded in the International Register, must be indicated in the
same manner as that described in “Applicant”.
Rule 21(2)(ii)

Item 3: Appointment of a representative
The holder may also, optionally, appoint a representative, simultaneously with the filing of
the request for the recording of the renunciation. For such appointment to be effective, the
request for the recording of a renunciation must be signed by the holder, or be accompanied
by a power of attorney or form DM/7 duly completed, and the appropriate box in item 3
should be ticked accordingly.
Rule 3(1)(b)
Where there is no change in the representative already recorded, this item of the form
should be left blank.

Item 4: Contracting Parties
The holder must indicate whether the request for the recording of the renunciation relates to
all designated Contracting Parties (in which case item 4(a) should be ticked) or to some only
of the designated Contracting Parties (in which case item 4(b) should be ticked with the
boxes corresponding to the Contracting Parties concerned).

Item 5: Signature by the holder or representative
The form should be signed or have a seal affixed and the identity of the signatory should be
indicated. There is also provision for an indication of the name of the person to be
contacted, if necessary. This may prove useful if, for example, the form is submitted in the
name of a legal entity.
Rule 21(1)(b)

Fee calculation sheet
A request to record a renunciation is subject to the payment of the fee specified in the
Schedule of Fees (refer to “Payment of fees to the International Bureau”).
99 Article 16(3); Rule 21(2)(vi)

page 112

Hague Guide for Users

Irregular requests
If a request to record a renunciation does not comply with any of the applicable
requirements, the International Bureau notifies that fact to the holder. The irregularity may
be remedied within three months from the date of the notification. If this is not done, the
request will be considered abandoned and any fee paid will be reimbursed to the party that
paid it, after deduction of an amount corresponding to one half of the relevant fee.
Rule 21(4) and (5)

Recording, notification and publication
Provided that the request is in order, the International Bureau promptly records the
renunciation in the International Register and informs the holder. The change is recorded as
of the date of receipt by the International Bureau of the request complying with the
applicable requirements.
99 Article 16(4); Rule 21(6)
Normally, the renunciation is recorded as of the date of the receipt of the request by the
International Bureau. It may happen, however, that a holder wishes that the date of the
recording of a renunciation be linked with the recording of another change.
Rule 21(6)(b)

Limitation
A request for the recording of a limitation should be presented to the International Bureau on
official form DM/3. It may be used only to request the recording of a limitation for a single
international registration.
99 Article 16(1)(v); Rule 21(1)(a)(iv)
A limitation differs from renunciation in that a renunciation concerns all the industrial designs
that are the subject of an international registration, but not necessarily all the designated
Contracting Parties. On the other hand, a limitation necessarily concerns some only of the
industrial designs, but never all, in relation to any, or all, of the Contracting Parties.

Item 1: International registration number
A request must relate to a single international registration. If the number is not known
(because the international registration has not yet been effected or notified to the holder), no
other number should be given. The holder should wait until he is notified of the international
registration number concerned and then make a further request.
Rule 21(2)(i)

Item 2: Holder
The name of the holder, as recorded in the International Register, must be indicated in the
same manner as that described in “Applicant”.
Rule 21(2)(ii)

Hague Guide for Users

page 113

Item 3: Appointment of a representative
The holder may also, optionally, appoint a representative, simultaneously with the filing of
the request for the recording of the limitation. Such appointment may be made by attaching
to form DM/3 the appropriate power of attorney, or form DM/7, or by inserting the holder’s
signature where indicated in item 6.
Rule 3(1)(b)
Where there is no change in the representative already recorded, this item of the form
should be left blank.

Item 4: Industrial designs
Each industrial design affected by the limitation (that is, for which protection is no longer
sought) must be specified by indicating its number.

Item 5: Contracting Parties
The holder must indicate whether the request for the recording of the limitation relates to all
the designated Contracting Parties (in which case box (a) must be ticked) or to some only of
the designated Contracting Parties (in which case box (b) must be ticked, along with the
boxes corresponding to those Contracting Parties concerned).

Item 6: Signature by the holder or representative
The form should be signed or have a seal affixed and the identity of the signatory should be
indicated. There is also provision for an indication of the name of the person to be
contacted, if necessary. This may prove useful if, for example, the form is submitted in the
name of a legal entity.
Rule 21(1)(b)

Fee calculation sheet
A request to record a limitation is subject to the payment of the fee specified in the Schedule
of Fees (refer to “Payment of fees to the International Bureau”).
99 Article 16(3); Rule 21(2)(vi)

Irregular requests
If a request to record a limitation does not comply with any of the applicable requirements,
the International Bureau notifies that fact to the holder. The irregularity may be remedied
within three months from the date of the notification. If this is not done, the request is
considered abandoned and any fee paid is reimbursed to the party that paid it, after
deduction of an amount corresponding to one half of the relevant fee.
Rule 21(4) and (5)

page 114

Hague Guide for Users

Recording, notification and publication
Provided that the request is in order, the International Bureau promptly records the limitation
in the International Register and informs the holder. The change is recorded as of the date
of receipt by the International Bureau of the request complying with the applicable
requirements.
99 Article 16(4); Rule 21(6)

It is not possible to record a license in the International
Register
There is no provision in the Hague System allowing for the possibility of recording a license
in the International Register. Therefore, formalities which may be necessary to secure the
effectiveness of a licensing agreement in a designated Contracting Party must be carried out
at the national or regional level directly before the Office of the Contracting Party concerned,
provided that the domestic legislation in question so permits.

Corrections in the International Register
Where the International Bureau, acting ex officio or at the request of the holder, considers
that there is an error in the International Register concerning an international registration, it
will modify the International Register and inform the holder accordingly.
Rule 22(1)
The Office of any designated Contracting Party has however the right to declare in a
notification to the International Bureau that it refuses to recognize the effects of such
correction. Rules 18 and 19, concerning refusal of protection, apply mutatis mutandis.
Rule 22(2)

Renewal of the international registration
With respect to Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act, the international
registration is valid for an initial period of five years and may be renewed for two additional
five-year periods. Subject to renewal, the duration of protection available in each
Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act is at least 15 years, counted from the date
of international registration (refer to “Individual designation fee and renewal for the United
States of America”). Moreover, if the national legislation of a Contracting Party provides for
a duration of protection in excess of 15 years for designs filed for registration by the national
route, the international registration may be renewed with respect to that Contracting Party for
additional periods of five years up to the expiry of the total duration of protection provided for
in its national legislation.
99 Article 17; 99 Article 17(3)(b)
With respect to Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act, the international
registration is valid for an initial period of five years and may be renewed for an additional
period of five years. Subject to renewal, the duration of protection available in each
Contracting Party designated under the 1960 Act is at least 10 years counted from the date
of international registration. Moreover, if the national legislation of a Contracting Party
provides for a duration of protection in excess of 10 years for designs filed for registration by

Hague Guide for Users

page 115

the national route, the international registration may be renewed with respect to that
Contracting Party for additional periods of five years up to the expiry of the total duration of
protection provided for in its national legislation.
60 Article 11(1)(a) items 1 and 2; 60 Article 11(2)
Contracting Parties are required to notify to the Director General of WIPO the maximum
duration of protection provided for by their domestic law. This information is supplied to
holders in the unofficial notices of expiry which are sent by the International Bureau six
months before the expiration of each five-year term (refer to “Procedure for renewal”).
Where the holder wishes to renew the international registration in respect of a designated
Contracting Party notwithstanding the fact that the maximum period of protection in that
Contracting Party has expired, payment of the required fees for that Contracting Party must
be accompanied by a statement that the renewal of the international registration is to be
recorded in the International Register in respect of that Contracting Party. Allowing a
renewal with respect to a designated Contracting Party notwithstanding the fact that the
maximum period of protection in that Contracting Party, as notified to the Director General of
WIPO, has expired is aimed at preserving the rights of the holder in the event, for example,
of a change in the maximum duration of protection under the law of a Contracting Party
which has not yet been notified to the Director General of WIPO.
99 Article 17(3)(c); Rule 36(2); Rule 23; Rule 24(2)(b)

Renewal following refusal or invalidation
If a refusal is recorded in the International Register with respect to a particular Contracting
Party for all the industrial designs covered by the international registration, the holder may
nevertheless request the renewal of the international registration with respect to that
Contracting Party. The payment of the renewal fees must however be accompanied by a
statement that the renewal is to be recorded in respect of that Contracting Party. The
reason for allowing a renewal with respect to a Contracting Party that has pronounced a
refusal is that, at the time of renewal, there may still be pending a judicial or administrative
procedure in respect of such refusal. The rights of the holder may need to be preserved
where the refusal was the subject of an appeal and no final decision had been taken by the
date on which the renewal was due. A designated Contracting Party which has pronounced
a refusal is, of course, free to determine the effects in its territory of such a renewal.
Rule 24(2)(c)
The situation is different with respect to an invalidation, since the recording of an invalidation
in the International Register means, by definition, that the invalidation is no longer subject to
appeal. The international registration may not, therefore, be renewed with respect to a
Contracting Party for which an invalidation has been recorded for all the industrial designs.
Nor may it be renewed with respect to a Contracting Party in respect of which a renunciation
has been recorded. Furthermore, the international registration may not be renewed in
respect of any Contracting Party for those industrial designs in respect of which an
invalidation in that Contracting Party has been recorded. Nor may it be renewed for those
industrial designs in respect of which a limitation has been recorded in that Contracting
Party.
Rule 20; Rule 21; Rule 24(2)(d)

page 116

Hague Guide for Users

Procedure for renewal
Six months before the expiry of each five-year term, the International Bureau sends to the
holder and the representative, if any, a notice indicating the date of expiry of the international
registration, along with the maximum term of protection which has been notified to the
Director General of WIPO by the Contracting Parties concerned (refer to “Declarations by
Contracting Parties”). If however the holder (or representative) does not receive such
unofficial notice, this does not constitute an excuse for failure to comply with any time limit
for payment of the renewal fees due.
Rule 23; A.I. Section 701
The international registration may be renewed for some only of the designated Contracting
Parties and for some only of the industrial designs that are the subject of the international
registration.
99 Article 17(4); Rule 24(2)(a)
No official form is prescribed for the renewal of an international registration. Renewal may
be effected by any communication giving the required indications (number(s) of the
international registration(s) concerned and purpose of the payment). Holders may however
find it convenient to use the unofficial form DM/4 which provides for the necessary
information, namely:
• the number of the international registration to be renewed;
• the name and address of the holder (which must be the same as the name and

address recorded in the International Register);
• either (in item 3(a)) that the international registration is to be renewed for all the

designs and for all the designated Contracting Parties – including, where applicable,
those Contracting Parties in respect of which a total refusal has been recorded in
the International Register and those Contracting Parties designated under the
1999 Act or the 1960 Act in respect of which the maximum period of protection has
expired – or (in item 3(b)) the indication of the designated Contracting Parties
and/or industrial designs for which the international registration is not to be
renewed. Where item 3(b) has been ticked, it is understood that the renewal is to
be recorded in respect of all the Contracting Parties not indicated in item 3(b)(ii) –
including, where applicable, those Contracting Parties in respect of which a total
refusal has been recorded in the International Register and those Contracting
Parties designated under the 1999 Act or the 1960 Act in respect of which the
maximum period of protection has expired;
• the signature of the holder or his representative; and
• the fees being paid and the method of payment, or instructions to debit the required

fees from a current account at WIPO.
An electronic renewal (eRenewal) interface is available for total or partial renewal of
international registrations. In case of partial renewal (i.e. for only some of the industrial
designs and/or only some of the designated Contracting Parties), the eRenewal interface
allows the holders of international registrations to specify the scope of renewal in a more
granular manner than which may be requested through the unofficial DM/4 form. In
particular, the eRenewal interface permits the selection of different sets of designated
Contracting Parties for which different sets of industrial designs are to be renewed.

Hague Guide for Users

page 117

In addition, the eRenewal interface automatically calculates the renewal fees to be paid
based on the data entered by the holder of a given international registration and allows the
latter to view the reproductions of the industrial designs contained in the international
registration. The eRenewal interface allows the payment of the renewal fees through an
online payment system offering a range of payment methods according to the user account
profile.

Fees for renewal
The fees due for the renewal of an international registration must be paid directly to the
International Bureau by the holder. Those fees consist of:
• a basic fee;
• an individual designation fee for each Contracting Party designated under the 1999

Act which has required such fee1; and
• a standard designation fee in respect of each other Contracting Party for which the
international registration is to be renewed.
Rule 24(1)
The payment of individual designation fees in the context of renewal may only apply to
Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act (provided that they have requested such
fees) and cannot concern those Contracting Parties designated under the 1960 Act. In fact,
the 1960 Act envisages solely the payment of “individual designation fees” in the context of a
designation in the international application and not at the stage of renewal.
99 Article 17(2); Rule 24(1)(iii)

Individual designation fee and renewal for the United States of America
The individual designation fee, which must be paid in connection with an international
application in which the United States of America is designated, is payable in two
parts, in accordance with Rule 12(3). The second part of the individual designation
fee covers a single 15-year duration counted from the date of grant of protection.
Therefore, subject to the payment of the second part of the individual designation fee, no
renewal is required in order to maintain the effects of the international registration with
respect to the designation of the United States of America. This does not, however,
preclude the holder to renew the international registration with respect to the designation of
the United States of America, in order to benefit from the possibility of centralized
subsequent management of the international registration for this designation, such as the
recording of a change in ownership in the International Register. In this case, only the
payment of the basic fee is required in order to effect the renewal of the international
registration in respect of the United States of America. In other words, no renewal
designation fee is payable for the designation of the United States of America.
99 Article 7(2); Rule 12(3)
The fee calculator may be used to calculate the fees payable for the renewal of an
international registration. The eRenewal interface automatically calculates the renewal fees
to be paid taking into account the scope of the renewal.

page 118

Hague Guide for Users

The fees should be paid to the International Bureau by, at the latest, the date of expiry of the
registration. However, payment may still be made within six months from the date on which
the renewal of the international registration is due, provided that the surcharge specified in
the Schedule of Fees is paid at the same time.
Rule 24(1)(c)
If any payment made for the purposes of renewal is received by the International Bureau
earlier than three months before the date on which the renewal of the international
registration is due, it is considered as having been received three months before that date.
Rule 24(1)(d)
If the amount of a renewal fee changes between the date on which the fee was paid to the
International Bureau and the date on which renewal is due,
• where payment is made not more than three months before the date on which

renewal is due, it is the fee that was valid on the date of payment that is applicable;
• where the fee is paid more than three months before the date on which renewal is
due, the payment is considered to have been received three months before the due
date, and it is the fee that was valid three months before the due date that is
applicable; and
• where the renewal fee is paid after the due date, it is the fee that was valid on the
due date that is applicable.
Rule 27(6)(b)

Insufficient fees paid
If the amount received is less than the amount required for renewal, the International Bureau
promptly notifies at the same time both the holder and the representative, if any, accordingly.
The notification specifies the missing amount.
If the amount received, after the expiry of the period of six months following the date on
which renewal was due, is less than the amount required (including the surcharge for late
payment), the renewal is not recorded. The International Bureau refunds the amount
received and notifies accordingly the holder and the representative, if any.
Rule 24(3)
Where the amount paid is insufficient, the holder may, instead of paying the missing amount,
ask for some of the designated Contracting Parties and/or industrial designs to be omitted,
thereby reducing the amount due. This request must however be made within the time
within which the missing payment would have had to be made.

Recording of the renewal; certificate and publication
The International Bureau records the renewal in the International Register, with the date on
which it was due, even if the fees required were paid within the grace period of six months
after the due date. The relevant data concerning the renewal is published in the I.D.B..
Rule 25(1); 99 Article 17(5); Rule 26(1)(vi)

Hague Guide for Users

page 119

Where the international registration has been renewed, the International Bureau sends a
certificate of renewal to the holder.
Rule 25(2)

Crediting of fees
Any standard designation fee or individual designation fee collected by the International
Bureau is credited to the account maintained with the International Bureau by the
Contracting Party concerned. This is done within the month following the month during
which was recorded the renewal in connection with which the fee was paid.
Rule 29

Non-renewal
If an international registration is not renewed (because the holder did not pay the renewal
fees or because the fees paid were not sufficient), it lapses with effect from the date of expiry
of the previous period of protection.
Where the international registration has not been renewed, that fact is published in the
Bulletin. Such publication is not made until there is no longer any possibility that the
international registration might be renewed, that is, after the expiry of the period of six
months following the due date (within which period renewal was possible upon payment of a
surcharge).
Rule 26(1)(vii)
Where the required renewal fees have not been paid by the due date, no recordings
concerning the international registration concerned may be recorded in the International
Register during the period of six months after the due date within which renewal remains
possible upon payment of a surcharge. It is only after renewal has been recorded in the
International Register that changes may be recorded in the International Register.

1.
It is recalled that in connection with an international application in which the Republic of Korea is
designated and in connection with the renewal of any international registration resulting from such an
international application, the Locarno Classification determines the designation fee, as well as the renewal fee.
For international applications for designs belonging to classes 2, 5, or 19 of the Locarno Classification, level 3 of
the standard designation fee applies and for the renewal of international registrations resulting therefrom, the
standard designation fee applies. For any other class, an individual designation fee applies in respect of the
designation of the Republic of Korea in an international application and also in respect of the renewal of the
designation of the Republic of Korea in the ensuing international registration.

page 120

Hague Guide for Users

Invalidation in a designated Contracting Party
The term “invalidation” must be understood as encompassing any decision by a competent
authority (whether administrative or judicial) of a designated Contracting Party revoking or
canceling the effects, in the territory of that Contracting Party, of an international registration
with regard to all or some of the industrial designs covered by the designation of that
Contracting Party.
Rule 20
Proceedings concerning such invalidation take place directly between the holder of the
international registration, the party who has brought the action for invalidation and the
competent authority concerned (Office or tribunal). It may be necessary for the holder to
appoint a local representative. The proceedings are governed entirely by the law and
practice of the Contracting Party concerned. However, the invalidation of an international
registration may not be pronounced without the holder having, in good time, been afforded
the opportunity to defend his rights.
The procedures governing such invalidation should be the same as for industrial designs
registered directly with the Office of that Contracting Party. For example, the protection of
an industrial design may be revoked in proceedings brought by a third party, or in a
counterclaim in infringement proceedings.
Where the effects of an international registration are invalidated (in whole or in part) in a
Contracting Party, and the invalidation is no longer subject to any appeal, the Office of that
Contracting Party, where it is aware of the invalidation, must notify the International Bureau
of the relevant facts, namely:
•
•
•
•

the authority (for example, the Office or tribunal) which pronounced the invalidation;
the fact that the invalidation is no longer subject to appeal;
the number of the international registration;
if the invalidation does not concern all the industrial designs, those which are
concerned (either by indicating those industrial designs which are no longer
covered or those which are still covered); and
• the date on which the invalidation was pronounced and its effective date.
Rule 20(1)
The International Bureau records the invalidation in the International Register, together with
the data contained in the notification. It also publishes the invalidation in the I.D.B.
Rule 20(2)

Hague Guide for Users

page 121

Termination of the 1934 Act
The termination of the 1934 Act became effective on October 18, 2016. The application of
the 1934 Act had already been frozen since January 1, 2010. It has not been possible to file
international deposits under the 1934 Act, or to make designations governed by that Act
since that date. However, the prolongation (the renewal) of designations made under the
1934 Act before January 1, 2010, and the recording of any changes affecting such
designations remains possible in the International Register up to the maximum duration of
protection under the 1934 Act, which is 15 years1.
All activities under the 1934 Act will gradually diminish, and, finally, terminate at the latest on
December 31, 2024, i.e., 15 years after the last possible deposits or designations under the
1934 Act were made.

Implications of the freezing of the application of the
1934 Act
Rule 37(1) of the Common Regulations provides for a transitional provision relating to the
1934 Act.
Since January 1, 2010, no new registrations or designations under the 1934 Act have been
allowed to be recorded in the International Register. However, those with a registration date
prior to January 1, 2010, remain in force. This means, more precisely, that those
registrations and designations could be the subject of a renewal or any other recording
provided for in the version of the Common Regulations that was in force before
January 1, 2010.
As provided for in Rule 37(1)(b), the Common Regulations, as in force before
January 1, 2010, that is the Common Regulations Under the 1999 Act, the 1960 Act and the
1934 Act of the Hague Agreement, as in force on January 1, 2009, remain applicable to an
international application governed exclusively by the 1934 Act (refer to “International
registrations resulting from international applications governed exclusively by the 1934 Act”)
and filed before that date and that was still pending on that date, as well as in respect of any
Contracting Party designated under the 1934 Act in an international registration resulting
from an international application filed before that date.
Rule 37(1)(b)

International registrations resulting from international
applications governed exclusively by the 1934 Act
An international application was considered as governed exclusively by the 1934 Act where
all the Contracting Parties designated in that international application were designated under
the 1934 Act.
As a general principle, the international procedure applies equally to international
registrations resulting from international applications governed exclusively by the 1934 Act,
subject however to the exceptions mentioned below.
Rule 30(1)2

page 122

Hague Guide for Users

Language
Any communication concerning an international registration resulting from an international
application governed exclusively by the 1934 Act must be in French. This is in contrast with
communications in respect of the other kinds of international registrations, which may be in
English, French or Spanish. The recording and publication of any new data will also be
made only in French. (The publication of an international registration in the Bulletin under
the 1934 Act contains only bibliographical data relating to that registration.)
Rule 30(2)(a)2

No refusal of protection
The 1934 Act does not provide for the possibility for the Offices of the designated
Contracting Parties to notify a refusal of protection, therefore, international registrations
resulting from international applications governed exclusively by the 1934 Act may not be the
subject of such refusals.
Rule 30(2)(j)2

Change in ownership
A change in ownership cannot be recorded in respect of a Contracting Party designated
under the 1934 Act if that Act would cease to be applicable following the recording of the
change in ownership concerned. For example, assuming that Contracting Party A, bound by
both the 1960 and the 1934 Acts, has been designated under the 1934 Act and that the
international registration concerned is transferred to a new owner originating from
Contracting Party B, bound exclusively by the 1960 Act, this change in ownership could not
be recorded in the International Register because the 1934 Act would cease to be applicable
in such a case. This derogation from the general principle concerning the possibility of
recording a change in ownership in the International Register is due to the number and types
of features which are exclusive to the 1934 Act.
Rule 30(2)(k)2

Renewal
Only one renewal may be requested under the 1934 Act (which provides for a maximum
period of protection of 15 years divided into two periods: one period of five years and one
of 10 years). Having regard to this specific feature of the 1934 Act, the renewal of an
international registration resulting from an international application governed exclusively by
the 1934 Act, for the second period of protection of 10 years, could have been requested at
the time of filing the international application concerned.
Rule 30(2)(l),(m) and (n)2
The renewal of an international registration resulting from an international application
governed exclusively by the 1934 Act is subject only to the payment of the basic fee,
irrespective of the number of designated Contracting Parties. The amount of that fee is
prescribed under item IV of the Schedule of Fees, part of the Common Regulations in the
version in force before January 1, 2010.
Rule 30(2)(l)2

Hague Guide for Users

page 123

International registrations resulting from international
applications governed partly by the 1934 Act
The international registrations resulting from international applications governed partly by the
1934 Act comprise three categories, namely:
• international registrations resulting from international applications governed by both

the 1960 and the 1934 Acts, which means that, at the time of filing the application,
the designated Contracting Parties included:
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1960 Act, and
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1934 Act, while
o no Contracting Party had been designated under the 1999 Act.
• international registrations resulting from international applications governed by both
the 1999 and the 1934 Acts, which means that, at the time of filing the application,
the designated Contracting Parties included:
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act, and
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1934 Act, while
o no Contracting Party had been designated under the 1960 Act.
• international registrations resulting from international applications governed by the
1999, the 1960 and the 1934 Acts, which means that, at the time of filing the
application, the designated Contracting Parties included:
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1999 Act, and
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1934 Act, and
o at least one Contracting Party designated under the 1960 Act.

No refusal of protection
In relation to an international registration resulting from an international application governed
partly by the 1934 Act (refer to “International registrations resulting from international
applications governed partly by the 1934 Act”), the Contracting Party or Parties designated
under the 1934 may not notify a refusal of protection since such possibility is not envisaged
under the 1934 Act.
Rule 31(2)(c)(ii)2

Change in ownership
A change in ownership cannot be recorded in respect of a designated Contracting Party if
the 1934 Act would cease to be applicable, or would become applicable, in respect of that
Contracting Party following the recording of the change in ownership. For example,
assuming that Contracting Party A, bound by both the 1999 and the 1934 Acts, has been
designated under the 1999 Act and that the international registration concerned is
transferred to a new owner originating from Contracting Party B, bound exclusively by the
1934 Act, this change in ownership could not be recorded in the International Register given
that the 1934 Act would become applicable in such a case (refer also to “Renewal”).
Rule 31(2)(b)2

Renewal
In relation to an international registration resulting from an international application governed
partly by the 1934 Act (refer to “International registrations resulting from international
applications governed partly by the 1934 Act”), a renewal cannot be recorded with respect to

page 124

Hague Guide for Users

Contracting Parties designated under the 1934 Act where the maximum duration of
international protection of 15 years has expired. This differs from the situation applicable to
Contracting Parties designated under the 1999 Act or the 1960 Act (refer to “Renewal of the
international registration”).
Rule 31(2)(c)(iv)2
The renewal of a designation under the 1934 Act does not give rise to the payment of a
designation fee.
Rule 31(2)(c)(iii)2

Termination of the 1934 Act
The Director General of WIPO received the required instruments of acceptance of
termination or instruments of denunciation3 of the 15 Contracting Parties to the 1934 Act,
namely, Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, France, Germany, Indonesia, Liechtenstein, Monaco,
Morocco, the Netherlands, Senegal, Spain, Suriname, Switzerland and Tunisia, according to
their decision to terminate that Act which was taken at the Extraordinary Meeting of
Contracting States to the London Act (1934), on September 24, 2009.
Consequently, in accordance with the above decision, and pursuant to Article 54(b) of the
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of May 23, 1969, the termination of the 1934 Act
and of the Additional Act of Monaco, became effective on October 18, 2016, that is, three
months after the deposit of the last required instrument of acceptance of the termination of
the 1934 Act.
As the application of the 1934 Act was frozen since January 1, 2010, it was not possible,
since that date, to file international deposits under the 1934 Act, or to make designations
governed by that Act in an international application.
However, the prolongation (the renewal) of designations made under the 1934 Act before
January 1, 2010, and the recording of any changes affecting such designations remain
possible in the International Register up to the maximum duration of protection under the
1934 Act, which is 15 years.

1.
Refer to document H/A/28/3 entitled “Freezing of the Application of the London Act (1934) of the Hague
Agreement” and document H/A/28/1 entitled “Proposed Amendments to the Common Regulations under the
1999 Act, the 1960 Act and the 1934 Act of the Hague Agreement”.
2.
As in the Common Regulations “in force before the effective date of the freeze”, that is, the version that
came into force on January 1, 2009.
3.
The denunciation of the 1934 Act by Indonesia, Switzerland and the Netherlands took effect, on
June 3, 2010, November 19, 2010, and December 13, 2011, respectively.