Interview
guide
and topics for discussions with program and partner administrators
and staff
Pathway
Home Grant Program Evaluation
April 2022
This page has been left blank for double-sided copying.
This guide is the source of topics for semistructured interviews with three types of respondents: (1) Pathway Home grant program administrators, (2) correctional facility and other partner administrators, and (3) Pathway Home frontline staff. Not every topic will be asked of each respondent; tailored protocols with appropriate subsets of questions will be developed for each respondent type.
My name is ___________________, and this is my colleague _________________ and we are from Mathematica/Social Policy Research Associates/Council of State Governments Justice Center. We are part of an independent research team contracted by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to study the implementation of the Pathway Home grant program. Thank you very much for agreeing to participate in this conversation. Your participation is very important to the study.
To help us better understand how your program is working, we would like to ask you some questions about your experiences delivering the program. Our team will use your responses in conjunction with other data sources to identify themes to describe the overall experience of implementing the program. Your name will never be mentioned in a report, though we might use quotes from your interview to illustrate findings without using your name. If we choose to quote you, you will only be identified by your title. While it is possible that you might be identified by your title, we will do our best to minimize the chance of that occurring.
My colleague and I will be taking notes in order to document what we hear during our discussion, and we would like to record this discussion. The audio recording of the discussion is just to help us remember what you say in your own words and will not be shared with anyone outside our research team. Are you okay with us recording the interview to improve the accuracy of our notes?
The
OMB control number for this collection is 1290-xxxx
and expires on [month/day/year].
According
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to
respond to a collection of information unless such collection
displays a valid OMB control number. Collection of this information
is authorized by Section 169 of the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA). The obligation to respond to this collection
is voluntary. We estimate it takes about 90 minutes to complete this
collection of information, including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing the collection of
information. Please send comments regarding the burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information to
the U.S. Department of Labor, Chief Evaluation Office, 200
Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20210, or email
ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov
and reference OMB control number 1290-xxxx.
Name, title, and organization/affiliation
Role in the grant program and other organization roles
Length of involvement with the organization and with the program
Training/educational background and prior experience related to duties on Pathway Home program
General training and educational background
Types of jobs available to individuals after their release from incarceration
Employer support toward hiring individuals with justice involvement
Employment skill gaps for population (e.g., basic literacy and numeracy, vocational or technical skills, credentials, etc.)
Barriers and perceptions to avoiding recidivism (e.g., mental health or substance abuse problems, unstable housing, lack of family support, neighborhood crime context, etc.)
Availability of other reentry services in the community
Pathway Home program alignment to the mission of respondent organization
Support for program within respondent organization
Organization’s prior experience serving justice-involved individuals before and/or after release
Decision to apply for grant
Selection of correctional facility partners
Correctional facility partner involvement in grant planning and writing
Process for rolling out the program after the grant was awarded
Modifications to the grant since it was awarded
(For intermediaries) Changes in the number or composition of subgrantees
Challenges during planning that affected implementation
Impact of COVID on planning
Key criteria for selecting subgrantees
Division of Pathway Home responsibilities across subgrantees
Extent to which subgrantees implement a uniform service model
Guidance and support provided to subgrantees
Communication of information to subgrantees
Data and reporting responsibilities across subgrantees
Performance measurement across subgrantees
Successes in coordinating across subgrantees
Challenges coordinating across subgrantees
Correctional facility partner involvement in planning
Alignment of correctional facility culture with vision of program
Operational and logistical issues faced when implementing Pathway Home program (e.g., access to internet, security access for program staff, changes in protocols for jail staff, etc.)
Grantee perspective of program implementation within correctional facility
Challenges and successes of integrating the program within correctional facility
Main partner organizations that are involved in the program (e.g., partners in corrections/law enforcement, housing, public assistance, etc.)
Selection of partners
Previous experience working with partners
Coordination and colocation between grantee and partner staff
Shared decision making for the program and approach to coordinating the program among the various partner agencies
Factors that support collaboration with partners
Sharing of participant information and other data across partners
Type of contract, subgrant, or memorandum of understanding in place with each of the Pathway Home partners
Monitoring partner implementation of the program (use of quality/fidelity measures, use of protocols for processes)
Changes in partnerships
Challenges working with partners
Main employers involved in Pathway Home
Establishing employer relationships
Representation of employer interests during planning stage
Employer involvement in the provision of services through Pathway Home
Encouraging employers to hire people returning from incarceration
Whether employer partners have hired Pathway Home participants
Challenges and successes in getting employers to participate in the program
Overall structure of oversight and staffing for the program
Primary staff roles and responsibilities
Facility partner involvement in hiring Pathway Home staff
Staff turnover
Staffing challenges related to COVID
Management of day-to-day program operations
Program staff training and professional development
Facility staff training and professional development
Whether case managers work with both Pathway Home and non-Pathway Home participants
Whether case managers have both pre-release and post-release Pathway Home caseloads
Outreach strategies
Enrollment and intake process
Eligibility criteria
Focal population for Pathway Home services
Incentives for enrollment
Cohort vs. rolling enrollment
Challenges related to recruiting participants
Number of people who express interest but do not participate in Pathway Home
Influence of COVID on recruitment and enrollment
Implementation of pre-release program services
Where and how pre-release services are delivered
Supports provided by facility partners to deliver pre-release services
Usability/functionality of the facility space use for program services
Availability of internet access
Special accommodations for the program or for staff
Challenges with the logistics of participant access to the pre-release program services (including COVID-related)
Use of an individual development plan, or IDP, for each participant
Use of interest or skill assessments to determine the types of services that should be offered to a participant
Typical caseload for case managers
Average length of time participants receive case management
Whether caseload is solely program participants
Typical case management topics
Frequency of case management sessions with participants pre-release
Typical sequence of services for participants while incarcerated and whether certain services are required as a condition of PH eligibility
How long participants are active in the program before they are released
Involvement in supporting employment training within the facility
Types of employment services offered
Whether employment services are specific to a particular industry
Whether services provided result in a credential or certificate and anticipated completion rate
Types of support services offered
Non-Pathway Home services within the facility that participants can receive (e.g., mental health, substance abuse treatment or groups, cognitive therapy, other pre-release services.)
Challenges providing employment and supportive services to participants pre-release (including COVID-related)
Description of the transition process
Structure of “hand-off” of participants at the time of their release to the community-based program services
Information shared by facility partners to support transition to post-release services
Strategies used to ensure that participants come to the community-based program site
Frequency and content of case management post-release
Referrals to other community-based services to support reentry
How often community resource lists are updated
Other supports or wraparound services available (e.g., housing assistance, mental health treatment, parenting or relationship counseling, etc.)
Tracking participant receipt of non-Pathway Home services
Relationship with probation/parole providers
Typical sequence of services for participants and duration of each phase
Customization of services
Types of job-related services offered
Whether employment services are specific to a particular industry
Types of post-release supportive services offered
Challenges with providing post-release services to participants (including COVID-related)
How grantees track employment and recidivism outcomes
Follow up services and maintaining contact with participants
Participants’ ability to find jobs
Whether participants who find work are able to stay employed
Whether participants have returned to incarceration after being released
Changes made to how the program is delivered based on participant participation and outcomes
Component of Pathway Home with biggest impact
Biggest successes and challenges in starting up and carrying out the program
Other challenges affecting whether program participants are able to achieve positive employment and recidivism outcomes
Program improvements to better serve this population
Interest in continuing Pathway Home program beyond the grant period
Factors for determining whether the program will be sustained beyond the end of the grant
Obstacles to sustainability
Potential sources of funding identified to support program
Program components respondent would like to sustain
Key program elements for successful program
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | LocalAdmin |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2022-08-31 |