Download:
pdf |
pdf2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
Examiner Performance Assessment
Your assessment of the examiners on your team is helpful to us in creating
training and development activities, as well as making future selection
decisions.
Please assess the performance of all the examiners on your team, including
seniors and masters. The survey should take approximately 20 minutes to
complete.
Thank you!
OMB Control #0693-0079
Expiration date: 11/30/2022
A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply with an information collection subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 unless the information collection has a currently valid OMB Control Number.
The approved OMB Control Number for this information collection is 0693-0079. Without this approval, we could
not conduct this survey/information collection. Public reporting for this information collection is estimated to be
approximately 20 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the information collection. All
responses to this information collection are voluntary. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden to the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, Dawn Bailey, dawn.bailey@nist.gov.
_________
* 1. What is your application/team number?
2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
Rating Your SENIORS and MASTERS
The primary purpose of this portion of the survey is to determine the effectiveness of
our most experienced examiners in supporting the Award process through the
various leadership activities on teams. This information may be used for future
assignments as team leaders, backup team leaders, and tech editors. Please rate
your seniors/masters on the competencies listed.
* 2. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #1.
* 3. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #1 in each
of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
* 4. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #2.
Cannot Rate
* 5. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #2 in each
of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
6. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #3.
Cannot Rate
* 7. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #3 in each
of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
* 8. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #4.
Cannot Rate
* 9. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #4 in each
of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
10. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #5 (if applicable).
Cannot Rate
11. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #5 (if
applicable) in each of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
12. Name of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #6 (if applicable).
Cannot Rate
13. How would you rate the current performance of SENIOR/MASTER Examiner #6 (if
applicable) in each of the competencies below?
Fully Competent: can Exceeds expectations
guide others
- a real strength for
Needs Improvement
effectively
this examiner
Mentoring/coaching
less experienced
examiners re: Criteria
and evaluation process
Project Management
Skills (meeting
deadlines, making
suggestions to improve
the team's
efficiency/effectiveness)
Writing Actionable
Feedback-Ready
Comments and/or Key
Themes
Leadership Skills
(setting clear
expectations, rolemodeling appropriate
team behavior, taking
on additional
assignments to assist
the team)
Comments
Cannot Rate
2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
NEW and RETURNING Examiner Performance Ratings
* 14. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #1:
* 15. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #1 on the following competencies as
demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
* 16. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #2:
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
* 17. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #2 on the following competencies as
demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
* 18. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #3:
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
* 19. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #3 on the following competencies as
demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
20. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #4 (if applicable):
21. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #4 (if applicable) on the following
competencies as demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
22. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #5 (if applicable):
23. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #5 (if applicable) on the following
competencies as demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
24. Name of NEW/RETURNING Examiner #6 (if applicable):
25. How would you rate the performance of Examiner #6 (if applicable) on the following
competencies as demonstrated during both IR and CR?
Needs Improvement
Understanding the
Baldrige Criteria
Determining Key
Factors
Analyzing an award
application
Identifying
Strengths/OFIs
Writing FeedbackReady Comments
Determining a
Scoring Range and
Score
Meeting Deadlines
Team Skills
(honoring Ground
Rules during calls,
providing feedback,
overall
communication
skills)
Other Comments
Basic Competence:
can work with
guidance
Competent: can work Fully Competent: can
independently
guide others
2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
Returning Examiner Readiness to Lead a Team
* 26. Please list the names of RETURNING Examiners on your team and rate their readiness
to lead a team as a Senior Examiner.
Returning Examiner
#1:
Returning Examiner
#2:
Returning Examiner
#3 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#4 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#5 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#6 (if applicable):
* 27. How would you rate each RETURNING Examiner's readiness to be a team leader?
Not Ready
Returning Examiner
#1:
Returning Examiner
#2:
Returning Examiner
#3 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#4 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#5 (if applicable):
Returning Examiner
#6 (if applicable):
Can Lead a Team with
Assistance
High Performer Team Leader Next
Year
N/A
2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
Enhanced Tech Editing Process
The enhanced tech editing process is intended to provide the team feedback on the
scorebook before it is finalized. This page asks how well that was accomplished.
* 28. Did you find the tech editor's input on the team's R-3 scorebook beneficial?
Yes
No
Comments (Strengths and/or OFIs)
2021 CR Team Leader Evaluation of Team Members
Overall Feedback
* 29. Please share your thoughts on your experience as a team leader and recommendations
for improving the IR and CR phases of the Award process.
30. Overall, do you feel online examiner training effectively prepared new and returing
examiners to complete IR and CR?
* 31. New this year was the Results Call with the applicant at the beginning of IR. Please
provide feedback on the following areas:
Was the call useful to the team's evaluation?
Were there questions that you could not ask, but would have been helpful to the team's evaluation? If so, what were
the questions?
Should the call take place sooner or later in the process?
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2022-11-15 |