Rule_237_Supporting_Statement

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3235-0528
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
For the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 237
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1. Necessity for the Information Collection
In Canada, as in the United States, individuals can invest a portion of their earnings in

tax-deferred retirement savings accounts (“Canadian retirement accounts”). These accounts,
which operate in a manner similar to individual retirement accounts in the United States,
encourage retirement savings by permitting savings on a tax-deferred basis. Individuals who
establish Canadian retirement accounts while living and working in Canada and who later move
to the United States (“Canadian-U.S. Participants” or “participants”) often continue to hold their
retirement assets in their Canadian retirement accounts rather than prematurely withdrawing (or
“cashing out”) those assets, which would result in immediate taxation in Canada.
Once in the United States, however, these participants historically have been unable to
manage their Canadian retirement account investments. Most securities that are “qualified
investments” for Canadian retirement accounts are not registered under the U.S. securities laws.
Those securities, therefore, generally cannot be publicly offered and sold in the United States
without violating the registration requirement of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”)
(15 U.S.C. 77). 1 As a result of this registration requirement, Canadian-U.S. Participants

1

In addition, the offering and selling of securities of investment companies (“funds”) that are not
registered pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) (15
U.S.C. 80a) is generally prohibited by U.S. securities laws.

2
previously were not able to purchase or exchange securities for their Canadian retirement
accounts as needed to meet their changing investment goals or income needs.
The Commission issued a rulemaking in 2000 that enabled Canadian-U.S. Participants to
manage the assets in their Canadian retirement accounts by providing relief from the U.S.
registration requirements for offers of securities of foreign issuers to Canadian-U.S. Participants
and sales to Canadian retirement accounts. 2 Rule 237 under the Securities Act 3 permits
securities of foreign issuers, including securities of foreign funds, to be offered to Canadian-U.S.
Participants and sold to their Canadian retirement accounts without being registered under the
Securities Act.
Rule 237 contains a “collection of information” requirement within the meaning of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“PRA”). 4 Rule 237 requires written offering materials for
securities that are offered and sold in reliance on the rule to disclose prominently that those
securities are not registered with the Commission and are exempt from registration under the
U.S. securities laws. Rule 237 does not require any documents to be filed with the Commission.
2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

Rule 237 has provided relief from the U.S. registration requirements for the offer of a
foreign issuer’s securities to a Canadian-U.S. Participant and the sale of those securities to his or

2

See Offer and Sale of Securities to Canadian Tax-Deferred Retirement Savings Accounts, Release
Nos. 33-7860, 34-42905, IC-24491 (June 7, 2000) [65 FR 37672 (June 15, 2000)]. This
rulemaking also included new rule 7d-2 under the Investment Company Act, permitting foreign
funds to offer securities to Canadian-U.S. Participants and sell securities to Canadian retirement
accounts without registering as investment companies under the Investment Company Act. 17
CFR 270.7d-2.

3

17 CFR 230.237.

4

44 U.S.C. 3501 - 3502.

3
her Canadian retirement account. Written offering materials concerning securities offered or sold
in reliance on the rule must disclose prominently that those securities are not registered with the
Commission, and are exempt from registration. The rule is designed to ensure that CanadianU.S. Participants are aware that those securities are not subject to the protections afforded by
registration under the U.S. securities laws.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

There are no requirements in rule 237 that any documents be filed with the Commission.
There is no “collection of information” that involves the use of automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
4.

Duplication

No other rule duplicates the requirement that written offering materials concerning
securities offered or sold in reliance on rule 237 disclose that those securities are not registered
with the Commission.5 This information likely would not be readily available to Canadian-U.S.
Participants without this disclosure requirement.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

Rule 237 enables Canadian-U.S. participants to manage assets in their Canadian
retirement accounts by providing relief from U.S. registration requirements. The burden under
5

Rule 7d-2 under the Investment Company Act requires that the fund provide similar, but not
identical, disclosures. The differences reflect that investment companies are registered under the
Investment Company Act, while securities issued by the funds to the public are registered under
the Securities Act. Canadian funds can rely on both rule 7d-2 and rule 237 to offer securities to
participants and sell securities to their Canadian retirement accounts. Rule 237, however, does
not require any disclosure in addition to that required by rule 7d-2. Thus, the disclosure
requirements of rule 237 do not impose any burden on Canadian funds in addition to the burden
imposed by the disclosure requirements of rule 7d-2. To avoid double-counting this burden, the
staff has excluded Canadian funds from the estimate of the hourly burden associated with rule
237.

4
the rule consists of adding certain disclosure information to written offering materials. This is a
minimal and non-recurring burden that applies equally to both small and large entities. The
Commission believes that it would not be feasible to adjust the rule to lessen this minor burden
on small entities because the disclosure requirements ensure that participants are aware that
securities covered by the rule are not subject to protections afforded under the U.S. securities
laws.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

The rule requires each written offering document for securities offered or sold in reliance
on the rule to disclose prominently that those securities are not registered with the Commission.
Less frequent disclosure of this information would not fulfill the objective of ensuring that
Canadian-U.S. Participants are aware that the investments that they make for their Canadian
retirement accounts are not subject to the protections afforded by registration under the U.S.
securities laws.
7.

Inconsistencies With Guidelines in 5 CFR 1230.5(d)(2)

There are no 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2) special circumstances connected with this collection.
8.

Consultations Outside of the Agency

The Commission requested public comment on the collection of information
requirements in rule 237 before it submitted this request for extension and approval to the Office
of Management and Budget. The Commission received no comments in response to its request.
The Commission and the staff of the Division of Investment Management participate in
an ongoing dialogue with representatives of the fund industry through public conferences,

5
meetings, and informal exchanges. These forums provide the Commission and the staff means
of ascertaining and acting upon paperwork burdens confronting the industry.
9.

Payment or Gift

Not applicable.
10.

Confidentiality

Not applicable.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive nature will be required under this collection of information.
The information collection does not collect personally identifiable information (PII). The agency
has determined that a system of records notice (SORN) and privacy impact assessment (PIA) are
not required in connection with the collection of information.
12.

Burden of Information Collection

Rule 237 requires written offering documents for securities offered and sold in reliance
on the rule to disclose prominently that the securities are not registered with the Commission and
are exempt from registration under the U.S. securities laws. The burden under the rule
associated with adding this disclosure to written offering documents is minimal and is nonrecurring. The foreign issuer, underwriter, or broker-dealer can re-draft an existing prospectus or
other written offering material to add this disclosure statement, or may draft a sticker or
supplement containing this disclosure to be added to existing offering materials. In either case,
the staff estimates that it would take an average of 10 minutes per document to draft the requisite
disclosure statement.
The Commission understands that there are approximately 2,553 Canadian issuers other
than funds that may rely on rule 237 to make an initial public offering of their securities to

6
Canadian-U.S. Participants. 6 The staff estimates that in any given year approximately 25 (or
approximately 1 percent) of those issuers are likely to rely on rule 237 to make a public offering
of their securities to participants, and that each of those 25 issuers, on average, distributes 3
different written offering documents concerning those securities, for a total of 75 offering
documents.
The staff therefore estimates that during each year, approximately 25 respondents 7 would
be required to make 75 responses by adding the new disclosure statements to approximately 75
written offering documents. Thus, the staff estimates that the total annual burden associated with
the rule 237 disclosure requirement would be approximately 13 hours (75 offering documents x
10 minutes per document). The total annual cost of internal burden hours is estimated to be
$5,915 (13 hours x $455 per hour of attorney time). 8
In addition, issuers from foreign countries other than Canada could rely on rule 237 to
offer securities to Canadian-U.S. Participants and sell securities to their accounts without
becoming subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act. However, the staff

6

This estimate is based on the following calculation: 3,461 total issuers – (82 closed-end funds +
826 exchange-traded products) = 2,553 total equity and bond issuers. See The MiG Report,
Toronto Stock Exchange and TSX Venture Exchange (January 2022) (providing number of
issuers on the Toronto Exchange).

7

This estimate of respondents only includes foreign issuers. The number of respondents would be
greater if foreign underwriters or broker-dealers draft stickers or supplements to add the required
disclosure to existing offering documents.

8

The Commission’s estimate concerning the wage rate for attorney time is based on salary
information for the securities industry compiled by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (“SIFMA”). The $455 per hour figure for an attorney is from SIFMA’s Management
& Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, modified by Commission staff to
account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits, overhead, and adjusted to account for the effects of inflation.

7
believes that the number of issuers from other countries that rely on rule 237, and that therefore
are required to comply with the offering document disclosure requirements, is negligible.
13.

Cost to Respondents

The disclosure requirements do not entail any annual external cost burden in addition to
the cost of the hourly burden discussed above.
14.

Cost to the Federal Government

The disclosure requirements do not entail any cost to the federal government. Rule 237
does not require issuers to file any documents with the Commission.
15.

Changes in Burden

The burden hours for rule 237 increased from 12 hours to 13 hours based on an increase
in the estimated number of issuers that may rely on the rule. There are no changes to the external
cost burdens.

8
Rule 237
Information
Collection
Disclosure
requirement

16.

Previously
approved

Annual No.
of Responses

72

Requested

Change

75

3

Annual Time Burden (Hrs.)
Previously
Requested Change
approved
12

13

Burden Cost Burden ($)
Previously
Requested
Change
approved

1

0

0

0

Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable.
17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date

Not applicable.
18.

Exceptions to Certification Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act
Submissions

Not applicable.
B.

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
Not applicable.