Extension without change of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
06/27/2022
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2022
41
51
401
440
19,729
379,480
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
requires the National Indian Gaming Commission Chairman to review
and approve all management contracts for the operation and
management of class II and/or class III gaming activities, and to
conduct background investigations of persons with direct or
indirect financial interests in, and management responsibility for,
management contracts. The Commission has promulgated parts 533,
535, and 537 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to implement
these statutory requirements.
US Code:
25
USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
It should be cautioned at the
outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices
are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local,
state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size
and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class
casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes
expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and
is further complicated by different Tribal governance practices and
varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies
and technical expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a
statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants
has limited value and it would be improper to extrapolate from
these burden estimates any definitive trends. It should also be
noted that, in previous years, the Commission did not break out
wage costs in its data. This deficiency was identified in a
previous review process and has now been rectified, however,
because these costs were previously lumped together, it is not
possible to make direct caparisons between costs this review cycle.
Overall, this past cycle saw a decrease in burden hours. This would
be due to the fact that the gaming industry was substantially
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the temporary closures of
gaming operations for a period of time during the pandemic. The
estimated financial cost for information collected under Section
533.3 of title 25 saw a particularly marked drop this cycle. This
is due to a change in how the Commission assesses this activity for
purposes of the PRA. Previously, the cost of providing the
information to the Commission was equated to the cost of performing
the related background investigations. It is now understood that
providing the information is only a first step in the investigative
process and for this cycle, and going forward, the burden is
assessed for the production of the information and exclude any
subsequent background investigative activities.
$310,320
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Tim Osumi 202 632-7054
tim_osumi@nigc.gov
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.