Form approved
OMB No. 0920-1257
Expiration date: 04/30/2022
Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant Assessment
Thank you for participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) assessment of the Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant. Your participation will help CDC gather important information regarding results and improvements achieved by the PHHS Block Grant from July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.
Completing the questionnaire is voluntary and will take approximately 45 minutes.
To advance through the questionnaire, please use the Forward (>>) and Back (<<) buttons located in the lower-right corner of each page. Please note that you do not have to complete the questionnaire in one sitting. The data you enter are automatically saved as you progress to each new section; therefore, you may stop and return at a later time if needed. You will also have an opportunity to review and print your responses before submitting. Your response to the questionnaire is due on X/X/2022.
Throughout the questionnaire, key terms appear in underlined, italicized font. If you hover over a key term with your mouse/pointer, the term’s definition will appear in a text box.
For technical support on completing and submitting the questionnaire, please contact ASTHO's Research and Evaluation team (researchandevaluation@astho.org /202-371-9090).
For other questions about this questionnaire, please contact the PHHS Block Grant Evaluation Team at phhsblockgranteval@cdc.gov.
The findings from this assessment will be used to inform CDC of the outputs and cross-cutting outcomes of the PHHS Block Grant, refine existing measures, and/or inform the development of future measures. No personally identifiable information will be collected. Responses will be kept secure, and results will be reported only in aggregate form. Findings will be shared with various stakeholders, including grantees, and might be included in articles and reports that will be made available publicly.
Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 45 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing the instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to CDC/ATSDR Information Collection Review Office, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, GA 30333; ATTN: PRA (0920-1257).
Respondent Information
Select your PHHS Block Grant-funded jurisdiction from the drop-down menu. [List of 61 grantees]
Public Health Infrastructure
Public health infrastructure includes the organizational capacity (i.e., the systems, workforce, partnerships, and resources) that enables agencies to perform their core functions and provide essential services. Improvements to infrastructure may occur within the grantee health department, either department-wide or within a specific program, or across the grantee jurisdiction’s public health system.
This section includes questions related to measure 1.1 and measure 1.2, which are focused on two aspects of public health infrastructure respectively: 1) information systems capacity improvement and 2) quality improvement.
Information Systems Capacity Improved – Measure 1.1
Please answer the following questions related to information systems that were newly developed, improved, and/or maintained through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period.
Have any agencies in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to support development, improvement, and/or maintenance of one or more information systems?
Yes [DISPLAY Q3]
No [SKIP to Q5]
What type of agency in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to support development, improvement, and/or maintenance of one or more information systems? Select all that apply.
Grantee health department
Local health department [DISPLAY 3a]
3a. How many unique local health departments used PHHS Block Grant funds to support development, improvement, and/or maintenance of one or more information systems? Number of local health departments: __________
Tribal health department [DISPLAY 3b]
3b. How many unique tribal health departments used PHHS Block Grant funds to support development, improvement, and/or maintenance of one or more information systems? Number of tribal health departments: __________
Local organization [DISPLAY 3c]
3c. How many unique local organizations used PHHS Block Grant funds to support development, improvement, and/or maintenance of one or more information systems? Number of local organizations: __________
What is the total number of unique information systems that were newly developed, improved, and/or maintained by agencies within your jurisdiction? Number: __________
4a. What is the name/title of the newly developed, improved, and/or maintained information system? __________
4a.1 What type of system was newly developed, improved, and/or maintained?
Laboratory data system
Surveillance system
Vital events database (e.g., birth, death, fetal death)
Registry (e.g., cancer registry)
Performance management system
Program administration
Financial management system
Human capital management system (e.g., human resources, personnel)
Health information exchange (HIE)
Electronic health record (EHR) system
Public health database (e.g., public facing database)
Public health digital library (e.g., publications, journals)
Online mapping system (e.g., GIS)
Other information system
4a.2 What type of agency developed, improved, and/or maintained this information system? Select all that apply.
Grantee health department [DISPLAY Q4a.2a]
Local health department
Tribal health department
Local organization
4a.2a How many agencies used or had access to the system?
Number of local health departments: _____
Number of tribal health departments: _____
Number of local organizations: _______
Not sure
4a.3 Which of the following best describes how PHHS Block funds were used to support this information system?
Initiated development of the new system or module
Maintained existing system or module
Enhanced or expanded existing system or module
Sustained or restored the system or module
Quality Improved – Measure 1.2
Please answer the following questions related to improvements in the efficiency and/or effectiveness of operations, programs, or services that were achieved through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period.
Have any agencies in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to achieve an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement for an operation, program, or service through a quality improvement effort?
Yes [DISPLAY Q5a]
No [SKIP to Q6]
5a. What type of agency in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to achieve an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement for an operation, program, or service through a quality improvement effort? Select all that apply.
Grantee health department [DISPLAY Q5b]
Local health department [DISPLAY Q5c]
Tribal health department [DISPLAY Q5d]
Local organization [DISPLAY Q5e]
5b. What is the total number of unique operations, programs, or services for which an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement was achieved by your (grantee) health department using PHHS Block grant-funded support? Number: __________
5b.1. What types of improvements were achieved? Select all that apply.
Time saved
Reduced number of steps
Costs saved
Costs avoided
Revenue generated due to billable service
Increased staff satisfaction
Organizational design improvements
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services
Other (please specify): __________
5b.2. Indicate the number of operations, programs, or services that achieved the following improvements: [Display improvements selected in 5b.1]
Time saved Number:____
Reduced number of steps Number:____
Costs saved Number:____
Costs avoided Number:____
Revenue generated due to billable service Number:____
Increased staff satisfaction Number:____
Organizational design improvements Number:____
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services Number:____
Other [Display specified responses provided in 5b.1] Number:____
5b.3 For how many operations, programs, or services were PHHS Block Grant funds used to:
Initiate new efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: ____________
Maintain ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness (i.e., efficiency and/or effectiveness effort was ongoing from previous reporting period, but improvement was achieved during this reporting period)? Number: ________
Enhance or expand efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
Sustain or restore efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
5c. How many local health departments used PHHS Block Grant funds to achieve an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement for an operation, program, or service? Number of local health departments: _____
5c.1 What is the total number of unique operations, programs, or services for which an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement was achieved by a local health department in your jurisdiction using PHHS Block grant-funded support? Number: __________
5c.2 What types of improvements were achieved? Select all that apply.
Time saved
Reduced number of steps
Costs saved
Costs avoided
Revenue generated due to billable service
Increased staff satisfaction
Organizational design improvements
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services
Other (please specify): __________
5c.3 Indicate the number of operations, programs, or services that achieved the following
improvements: [Display improvements selected in 5c.2]
Time saved Number:____
Reduced number of steps Number:____
Costs saved Number:____
Costs avoided Number:____
Revenue generated due to billable service Number:____
Increased staff satisfaction Number:____
Organizational design improvements Number:____
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services Number:____
Other [Display specified responses provided in 5c.2] Number:____
5c.4 For how many operations, programs, or services were PHHS Block Grant funds used to:
Initiate new efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: ____________
Maintain ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness (i.e., efficiency and/or effectiveness effort was ongoing from previous reporting period, but improvement was achieved during this reporting period)? Number: ________
Enhance or expand efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
Sustain or restore efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
5d. How many tribal health departments used PHHS Block Grant funds to achieve an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement for an operation, program, or service? Number of tribal health departments: _________
5d.1 What is the total number of unique operations, programs, or services for which an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement was achieved by a tribal health department in your jurisdiction using PHHS Block grant-funded support? Number: __________
5d.2 What types of improvements were achieved? Select all that apply.
Time saved
Reduced number of steps
Costs saved
Costs avoided
Revenue generated due to billable service
Increased staff satisfaction
Organizational design improvements
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services
Other (please specify): __________
5d.3 Indicate the number of operations, programs, or services that achieved the following
improvements: [Display improvements selected in 5d.2]
Time saved Number:____
Reduced number of steps Number:____
Costs saved Number:____
Costs avoided Number:____
Revenue generated due to billable service Number:____
Increased staff satisfaction Number:____
Organizational design improvements Number:____
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services Number:____
Other [Display specified responses provided in 5d.2] Number:____
5d.4 For how many operations, programs, or services were PHHS Block Grant funds used to:
Initiate new efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: ____________
Maintain ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness (i.e., efficiency and/or effectiveness effort was ongoing from previous reporting period, but improvement was achieved during this reporting period)? Number: ________
Enhance or expand efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
Sustain or restore efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
5e. How many local organizations used PHHS Block Grant funds to achieve an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement for an operation, program, or service? Number local organizations: _________
5e.1 What is the total number of unique operations, programs, or services for which an efficiency and/or effectiveness improvement was achieved by a local organization in your jurisdiction using PHHS Block grant-funded support? Number: __________
5e.2 What types of improvements were achieved? Select all that apply.
Time saved
Reduced number of steps
Costs saved
Costs avoided
Revenue generated due to billable service
Increased staff satisfaction
Organizational design improvements
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services
Other (please specify): __________
5e.3 Indicate the number of operations, programs, or services that achieved the following
improvements: [Display improvements selected in 5e.2]
Time saved Number:____
Reduced number of steps Number:____
Costs saved Number:____
Costs avoided Number:____
Revenue generated due to billable service Number:____
Increased staff satisfaction Number:____
Organizational design improvements Number:____
Quality enhancements of operations, programs, or services Number:____
Other [Display specified responses provided in 5e.2] Number:____
5e.4 For how many operations, programs, or services were PHHS Block Grant funds used to:
Initiate new efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: ____________
Maintain ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness (i.e., efficiency and/or effectiveness effort was ongoing from previous reporting period, but improvement was achieved during this reporting period)? Number: ________
Enhance or expand efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
Sustain or restore efforts to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness? Number: _______
5f. Was an established quality improvement method (e.g., Plan-Do-Study-Act, Lean/Six Sigma) used by an agency to achieve any of the improvements in the efficiency and/or effectiveness of an operation, program, or service you have reported on in this questionnaire?
Yes [DISPLAY Q5f.1. – Q5f.4.]
No
Not sure
Please provide the following information for one example of an improvement in the efficiency and/or effectiveness of an operation, program, or service for which a deliberate and defined quality improvement method was used by an agency:
5f.1. Name/title of the operation, program, or service: _______________________________________
5f.2. Specific issue being addressed through quality improvement: ______________________________
5f.3. Quality improvement method used: __________________________________________________
5f.4. Brief description of the efficiency and/or effectiveness achieved: ___________________________
To help us learn more about public health infrastructure improvements achieved through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period, please answer the following question focused on national standards and accreditation.
How did your health department use PHHS Block Grant funds to address national standards or conduct accreditation-related activities as established by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB)? Select all that apply.
PHHS Block Grant funds not used in this way
Paid for PHAB fees
Hired staff to support accreditation-related activities (e.g., performance improvement manager, accreditation coordinator)
Worked to meet and/or maintain performance against the standards (including prerequisites, key plans, and processes described through the standards)
Provided support to local health department(s) to pay for PHAB fees
Provided support to local health department(s) to hire staff to support accreditation-related activities (e.g., performance improvement manager, accreditation coordinator)
Provided support to local health department(s) to meet and/or maintain performance against the standards
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to pay for PHAB fees
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to hire staff to support accreditation-related activities (e.g., performance improvement manager, accreditation coordinator)
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to meet and/or maintain performance against the standards
Other (please specify): __________
Emerging Needs
Emerging needs are public health issues that are beginning to present themselves as problems within the grantee’s jurisdiction. They can affect the jurisdiction as a whole or specific areas within the jurisdiction, such as counties, tribes, and cities.
This section includes questions related to measure 2.1, which is focused on all types of emerging public health needs.
Emerging Public Health Needs Addressed – Measure 2.1
Please answer the following questions related to emerging public health needs that were addressed through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period.
Have any agencies in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to support an effort to address an emerging public health need?
Yes [DISPLAY Q7a]
No [SKIP to Q8]
7a. What is the total number of unique emerging public health needs that were addressed by agencies in your jurisdiction through PHHS Block Grant-funded support?
Number of unique emerging public health needs: __________
7b. What is the name/title of the emerging public health need that was addressed? __________
7b.1 How would you characterize this emerging public health need?
Newly developing
Newly prioritized
7b.2 How was this emerging public health need identified? Select all that apply.
Conducted, monitored, or updated a jurisdiction health assessment (e.g., state health assessment)
Conducted a topic- or program-specific assessment (e.g., tobacco assessment, environmental health assessment)
Identified via surveillance systems or other data sources
Prioritized within a strategic plan
Declared as an emergency within your jurisdiction
Governor (or other political leader) established as a priority
Legislature established as a priority
Tribal government/elected official established as a priority
Other (please specify): __________
7b.3 What Healthy People 2020 health topic area best aligns with the emerging need? Select the health topic area that was the primary focus for the emerging need.
1-Access to health services
2-Adolescent health
3-Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back conditions
4-Blood disorders and blood safety
5-Cancer
6-Chronic kidney disease
7-Dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease
8-Diabetes
9-Disability and health
10-Early and middle childhood
11-Educational and community-based programs
12-Environmental health
13-Family planning
14-Food safety
15-Genomics
16-Global health
17-Health communication and health information technology
18-Health-related quality of life and well-being
19-Healthcare-associated infections
20-Hearing and other sensory or communication disorders
21-Heart disease and stroke
22-HIV
23-Immunization and infectious diseases
24-Injury and violence prevention
25-Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health
26-Maternal, infant, and child health
27-Medical product safety
28-Mental health and mental disorders
29-Nutrition and weight status
30-Occupational safety and health
31-Older adults
32-Oral health
33-Physical activity
34-Preparedness
35-Public health infrastructure
36-Respiratory diseases
37-Sexually transmitted diseases
38-Sleep health
39-Social determinants of health
40-Substance abuse
41-Tobacco use
42-Vision
43-Emergency medical services
44-Rape or attempted rape
7b.4 What was the focus of the emerging need?
Health-related (e.g., health risk factors, disease outcomes) [DISPLAY 7b.4a – 4c]
Organizational or systems-related (e.g., agency infrastructure)
7b.4a What was the geographic area affected by this emerging need?
Jurisdiction-wide: Entire grantee jurisdiction
Regional: More than one city, county, borough, etc. but not jurisdiction-wide
Local: Limited to one city, county, borough, etc.
Not sure
7b.4b What was the size of the population potentially affected by this emerging need? Number: _______
7b.4c Please provide a brief description of how the population estimate was identified. __________________________________________________________________
7b.5 Which of the following best describes how PHHS Block Grant funds were used to support efforts to address this emerging need?
Initiated a new effort to address the emerging public health need
Maintained an existing effort to address the emerging public health need
Enhanced or expanded an existing effort to address the emerging public health need
Sustained or restored an effort to address the emerging public health need
Evidence-Based Public Health
Evidence-based public health practice involves implementing effective interventions. It also includes both building and using evidence (i.e., data and information) to assess and define public health needs, prioritize public health needs for action, and determine the effectiveness of interventions.
This section includes questions related to measure 3.1, which is focused on a key aspect of evidence-based public health practice—implementing evidence-based public health interventions.
Evidence-Based Public Health Interventions Implemented – Measure 3.1
Please answer the following questions related to public health interventions that were implemented (i.e., delivered for the first time, ongoing, or completed) through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period.
Have any agencies in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to support implementation of public health interventions?
Yes [DISPLAY 8a]
No [SKIP to Q9]
8a. What is the total number of unique public health interventions that were implemented by agencies in your jurisdiction through PHHS Block Grant-funded support? Number of unique public health interventions: ____
8a.1 Through the use of PHHS Block Grant funds, how many public health interventions were:
Newly initiated? Number: __________ (If none, enter a zero.)
Maintained? Number: _________ (If none, enter a zero.)
Enhanced or expanded? Number: __________ (If none, enter a zero.)
Sustained or restored? Number: __________ (If none, enter a zero.)
8b. What type of agency in your jurisdiction used PHHS Block Grant funds to support implementation of public health interventions? Select all that apply.
Grantee health department [DISPLAY 8b.1]
Local health department [DISPLAY 8c.1]
Tribal health department [DISPLAY 8d.1]
Local organization [DISPLAY 8e.1]
8b.1 What is the total number of unique public health interventions that were implemented by your (grantee) health department through PHHS Block Grant-funded support? Number of unique public health interventions: _ __
8b.2 Which Healthy People 2020 health topic areas were addressed by the public health interventions
implemented by your (grantee) health department? Select each health topic area that was identified as the primary focus for an intervention.
1-Access to health services
2-Adolescent health
3-Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back conditions
4-Blood disorders and blood safety
5-Cancer
6-Chronic kidney disease
7-Dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease
8-Diabetes
9-Disability and health
10-Early and middle childhood
11-Educational and community-based programs
12-Environmental health
13-Family planning
14-Food safety
15-Genomics
16-Global health
17-Health communication and health information technology
18-Health-related quality of life and well-being
19-Healthcare-associated infections
20-Hearing and other sensory or communication disorders
21-Heart disease and stroke
22-HIV
23-Immunization and infectious diseases
24-Injury and violence prevention
25-Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health
26-Maternal, infant, and child health
27-Medical product safety
28-Mental health and mental disorders
29-Nutrition and weight status
30-Occupational safety and health
31-Older adults
32-Oral health
33-Physical activity
34-Preparedness
35-Public health infrastructure
36-Respiratory diseases
37-Sexually transmitted diseases
38-Sleep health
39-Social determinants of health
40-Substance abuse
41-Tobacco use
42-Vision
43-Emergency medical services
44-Rape or attempted rape
8b.3 For each Healthy People 2020 health topic area addressed, how many of the public health interventions implemented by your (grantee) health department were supported by rigorous, strong, moderate, weak, or no evidence?
[Populate list based on health topic areas selected in 8b.2] |
Rigorous |
Strong |
Moderate |
Weak (If >0, display 8b.3a – 8b.3b) |
No Evidence (If >0, display 8b.3a – 8b.3b) |
Not Sure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8b.3a How many of the public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were untested, new, and/or innovative? _________________
8b.3b For how many of the public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were data or information collected to determine the intervention’s effectiveness at achieving intended outcomes? ___________________
8c.1 What is the total number of unique public health interventions that were implemented by local health departments through PHHS Block Grant-funded support? Number of unique public health interventions: ____
8c.2 Which Healthy People 2020 health topic areas were addressed by the public health interventions
implemented by local health departments? Select each health topic area that was identified as the primary focus for an intervention.
1-Access to health services
2-Adolescent health
3-Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back conditions
4-Blood disorders and blood safety
5-Cancer
6-Chronic kidney disease
7-Dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease
8-Diabetes
9-Disability and health
10-Early and middle childhood
11-Educational and community-based programs
12-Environmental health
13-Family planning
14-Food safety
15-Genomics
16-Global health
17-Health communication and health information technology
18-Health-related quality of life and well-being
19-Healthcare-associated infections
20-Hearing and other sensory or communication disorders
21-Heart disease and stroke
22-HIV
23-Immunization and infectious diseases
24-Injury and violence prevention
25-Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health
26-Maternal, infant, and child health
27-Medical product safety
28-Mental health and mental disorders
29-Nutrition and weight status
30-Occupational safety and health
31-Older adults
32-Oral health
33-Physical activity
34-Preparedness
35-Public health infrastructure
36-Respiratory diseases
37-Sexually transmitted diseases
38-Sleep health
39-Social determinants of health
40-Substance abuse
41-Tobacco use
42-Vision
43-Emergency medical services
44-Rape or attempted rape
8c.3 For each Healthy People 2020 health topic area addressed, how many of the public health interventions implemented by local health departments were supported by rigorous, strong, moderate, weak, or no evidence?
[Populate list based on health topic areas selected in 8c.2]
|
Rigorous |
Strong |
Moderate |
Weak (If >0, display 8c.3a – 8c.3b) |
No Evidence (If >0, display 8c.3a – 8c.3b) |
Not Sure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8c.3a How many of the public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were untested, new, and/or innovative? _________________
8c.3b For how many of these public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were data or information collected to determine the intervention’s effectiveness at achieving intended outcomes? ___________________
8d.1 What is the total number of unique public health interventions that were implemented by tribal health departments through PHHS Block Grant-funded support? Number of unique public health interventions: _ __
8d.2 Which Healthy People 2020 health topic areas were addressed by the public health interventions
implemented by tribal health departments? Select each health topic area that was identified as the primary focus for an intervention.
1-Access to health services
2-Adolescent health
3-Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back conditions
4-Blood disorders and blood safety
5-Cancer
6-Chronic kidney disease
7-Dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease
8-Diabetes
9-Disability and health
10-Early and middle childhood
11-Educational and community-based programs
12-Environmental health
13-Family planning
14-Food safety
15-Genomics
16-Global health
17-Health communication and health information technology
18-Health-related quality of life and well-being
19-Healthcare-associated infections
20-Hearing and other sensory or communication disorders
21-Heart disease and stroke
22-HIV
23-Immunization and infectious diseases
24-Injury and violence prevention
25-Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health
26-Maternal, infant, and child health
27-Medical product safety
28-Mental health and mental disorders
29-Nutrition and weight status
30-Occupational safety and health
31-Older adults
32-Oral health
33-Physical activity
34-Preparedness
35-Public health infrastructure
36-Respiratory diseases
37-Sexually transmitted diseases
38-Sleep health
39-Social determinants of health
40-Substance abuse
41-Tobacco use
42-Vision
43-Emergency medical services
44-Rape or attempted rape
8d.3 For each Healthy People 2020 health topic area addressed, how many of the public health
interventions implemented by tribal health departments were supported by rigorous, strong, moderate, weak, or no evidence?
[Populate list based on health topic areas selected in 8d.2]
|
Rigorous |
Strong |
Moderate |
Weak (If >0, display 8d.3a – 8d.3b) |
No Evidence (If >0, display 8d.3a – 8d.3b) |
Not Sure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8d.3a How many of the public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were untested, new, and/or innovative? _________________
8d.3b For how many of these public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were data or information collected to determine the intervention’s effectiveness at achieving intended outcomes? ___________________
8e.1 What is the total number of unique public health interventions that were implemented by local
organizations through PHHS Block Grant-funded support?
Number of unique public health interventions: _ __
8e.2 Which Healthy People 2020 health topic areas were addressed by the public health interventions
implemented by local organizations? Select each health topic area that was identified as the primary focus for an intervention.
1-Access to health services
2-Adolescent health
3-Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back conditions
4-Blood disorders and blood safety
5-Cancer
6-Chronic kidney disease
7-Dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease
8-Diabetes
9-Disability and health
10-Early and middle childhood
11-Educational and community-based programs
12-Environmental health
13-Family planning
14-Food safety
15-Genomics
16-Global health
17-Health communication and health information technology
18-Health-related quality of life and well-being
19-Healthcare-associated infections
20-Hearing and other sensory or communication disorders
21-Heart disease and stroke
22-HIV
23-Immunization and infectious diseases
24-Injury and violence prevention
25-Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health
26-Maternal, infant, and child health
27-Medical product safety
28-Mental health and mental disorders
29-Nutrition and weight status
30-Occupational safety and health
31-Older adults
32-Oral health
33-Physical activity
34-Preparedness
35-Public health infrastructure
36-Respiratory diseases
37-Sexually transmitted diseases
38-Sleep health
39-Social determinants of health
40-Substance abuse
41-Tobacco use
42-Vision
43-Emergency medical services
44-Rape or attempted rape
8e.3 For each Healthy People 2020 health topic area addressed, how many of the public health interventions implemented by local organizations were supported by rigorous, strong, moderate, weak, or no evidence?
[Populate list based on health topic areas selected in 8e.2]
|
Rigorous |
Strong |
Moderate |
Weak (If >0, display 8e.3a – 8e.3b) |
No Evidence (If >0, display 8e.3a – 8e.3b) |
Not Sure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8e.3a How many of the public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were untested, new, and/or innovative? _________________
8e.3b For how many of these public health interventions with either weak or no evidence were data or information collected to determine the intervention’s effectiveness at achieving intended outcomes? ___________________
To help us learn more about evidence-based public health practice implemented through PHHS Block Grant-funded support during the 12-month reporting period, please answer the following questions focused on 1) building the evidence base for public health and 2) making evidence-based decisions.
How did your health department use PHHS Block Grant funds to support building the evidence base for public health? Select all that apply.
PHHS Block Grant funds not used in this way
Conducted, monitored, or updated a jurisdiction health assessment (e.g., state health assessment)
Conducted a topic- or program-specific assessment (e.g., tobacco assessment, environmental health assessment)
Analyzed or monitored surveillance or other types of data
Provided support to local health department(s) to conduct, monitor, or update a community health assessment
Provided support to local health department(s) to conduct a topic- or program-specific assessment (e.g., tobacco assessment, environmental health assessment)
Provided support to local health department(s) to analyze or monitor surveillance or other types of data
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to conduct, monitor, or update a tribal health assessment
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to conduct, monitor, or update a tribal community health assessment
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to conduct a topic- or program-specific assessment (e.g., tobacco assessment, environmental health assessment)
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to analyze or monitor surveillance or other types of data
Provided support to local organization(s) to conduct, monitor, or update a community health assessment
Provided support to local organization(s) to conduct a topic- or program-specific assessment (e.g., tobacco assessment, environmental health assessment)
Provided support to local organization(s) to analyze or monitor surveillance or other types of data
Other (please specify): __________
How did your health department use PHHS Block Grant funds to support evidence-based decision making? Select all that apply.
PHHS Block Grant funds not used in this way
Developed or updated a jurisdiction’s health improvement plan (e.g., state health improvement plan) based on a jurisdiction health assessment (e.g., state health assessment)
Developed or updated a community health improvement plan based on a community health assessment
Developed or updated a topic- or program-specific action plan
Provided support to local health department(s) to develop or update a community health improvement plan
Provided support to local health department(s) to develop or update a topic- or program-specific action plan
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to develop or update a tribal health improvement plan based on a tribal health assessment
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to develop or update a tribal community health improvement plan
Provided support to tribal health department(s) to develop or update a topic- or program-specific action plan
Provided support to local organization(s) to develop or update a community health improvement plan
Provided support to local organization(s) to develop or update a topic- or program-specific action plan
Other (please specify): __________
You have reached the end of the survey. On the next page, you will be given an opportunity to review and print your responses. [Forward button on this page reads “Review Your Responses >>”]
[Summary response page] You have not yet submitted your responses. Please review your responses to the survey below. You may also print a copy of your responses for your records.
If you are finished reporting your data, please scroll to the bottom of this page and click the forward (>>) button to submit the questionnaire. You will not be able to return to the questionnaire after submitting your responses. To revise a response after submission, please contact ASTHO's Research and Evaluation team (researchandevaluation@astho.org / 202-371-9090).
Thank you!
[After submission page] Thank you for taking the time to participate in this assessment of the PHHS Block Grant. Please contact the PHHS Block Grant Evaluation Team at phhsblockgranteval@cdc.gov if you have any questions. Also, please feel free to provide any feedback about this questionnaire, the process used to collect/report the required information, or the measures in general to phhsblockgranteval@cdc.gov.
Definition of key terms by survey section—for use in “hover over” function
Overall survey
12-month reporting period: July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.
PHHS Block Grant-funded support: Use of PHHS Block Grant funds, in any amount, to directly fund, provide staff for, or provide technical assistance to support an activity.
Local organizations: Governmental and non-governmental entities within a grantee’s jurisdiction that receive support from the grantee to implement public health efforts in support of communities within that jurisdiction. Types of local organizations include community-based organizations, schools, faith-based organizations, community health centers, and medical clinics. Local organizations do not include local health departments.
Initiate new public health efforts: Develop and implement new programs, services, and activities that address public health needs that were previously not funded, either due to lack of available funds or an absence of funding allotted to the need.
Maintain existing public health efforts: Support established programs, services, and activities from year to year.
Enhance or expand existing public health efforts: Enhance an effort by refining and improving its quality or expand an effort by adding components or outreach to additional populations.
Sustain public health efforts: Continue an effort without disruptions after original funding for the effort has ended.
Restore public health efforts: Reinstate or rebuild an effort that was significantly disrupted or had ended due to loss of original funding.
Healthy People 2020 health topic area(s): The 42 health topic areas designated by Healthy People 2020. Note: Two additional categories—“emergency medical services” and “rape or attempted rape”—are included in the Block Grant Management Information System as health topic areas that grantees can select to identify the focus of their work.
Information Systems Capacity Improved
Measure 1.1: Number of state, territorial, tribal, and local agencies whose capacity to collect or enhance data that provide information of public health importance was improved or maintained through the use of PHHS Block Grant funds.
Information systems: Systems that provide the ability to collect, store, protect, process, manage, analyze, use, and communicate information.
Information of public health importance: Any data that provide insight into health, health inequities, contributing factors or causes of health challenges, and/or potential policy, public health, or community solutions. These are data that are needed for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice.
Quality Improved
Measure 1.2: Number of state, territorial, tribal, and local agencies in which the efficiency or effectiveness of operations, programs, or services was improved through the use of PHHS Block Grant funds.
Costs avoided: Reduction in future costs due to innovations in, or changes to, process or program implementation or service delivery. The difference between the documented costs after implementation of a quality improvement effort and the predicted costs before the effort was implemented.
Costs saved: Reduction in existing costs of completing a process, implementing a program, or delivering a service. The difference between the documented costs after implementation of a quality improvement effort and the costs that occurred before the effort was implemented.
Efficiency and/or effectiveness (i.e., quality improvements): Improvements in programs, operations, or services that result in reductions in the amount of resources required for implementation (i.e., efficiency) or in a greater ability to achieved agency or program goals through improved delivery of programs or services or implementation of organizational processes (i.e., effectiveness).
Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB): A nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing the continuous quality improvement of state, territorial, tribal, and local public health departments.
Emerging Needs Addressed
Measure 2.1: Number of emerging public health needs that were addressed through the use of PHHS Block Grant funds.
Emerging public health needs: Public health needs within a grantee’s jurisdiction that are newly developing or newly prioritized.
Newly developing: A public health need that is newly arisen; exists, but has developed new characteristics; or has re-emerged.
Newly prioritized: A public health need that has been known to the grantee but lacked funding or support; is new to the public health field; or has new expectations for a public health response.
Evidence-Based Public Health Interventions Implemented
Measure 3.1: Number of evidence-based public health interventions implemented through the use of PHHS Block Grant funds.
Build the evidence base for public health: Produce new or strengthen existing data and information that are used to 1) define public health needs and 2) determine the effectiveness of interventions at achieving intended outcomes.
Public health intervention(s): Any type of planned activity (e.g., program, service, policy) designed to prevent disease or injury or promote health in a group of people.
Innovative: Incorporating novel, creative thinking around new or existing programs or services.
Evidence-based decision making: The use of data and information to prioritize public health needs and approaches for addressing those public health needs.
Rigorous: Healthy People 2020 rating criteria for strength of evidence (Rating category 4)—Formal, comprehensive, and systematic review of all relevant literature (i.e., published intervention evaluations or studies that have evidence of effectiveness, feasibility, reach, sustainability, and transferability). Examples of sources of evidence qualifying as rigorous include The Guide to Community Preventive Services, the US Preventive Services Task Force, and systematic reviews published in peer-reviewed journals.
Strong: Healthy People 2020 rating criteria for strength of evidence (Rating category 3)—An informal, non-comprehensive, non-systematic review of some but not all relevant literature (i.e., multiple published evaluations or studies that have evidence of effectiveness, feasibility, reach, sustainability, and transferability). Examples of sources of evidence qualifying as strong include non-systematic reviews published by the federal government and non-systematic reviews published in peer-reviewed journals.
Moderate: Healthy People 2020 rating criteria for strength of evidence (Rating category 2) —At least one published evaluation or study, with peer review, that has evidence of effectiveness, feasibility, reach, sustainability, and transferability. Examples of sources of evidence qualifying as moderate include journal articles of individual studies, published intervention research, and published pilot studies.
Weak: Healthy People 2020 rating criteria for strength of evidence (Rating category 1) —At least one unpublished evaluation or study without peer review, that has evidence of effectiveness, feasibility, reach, sustainability, and transferability. Examples of sources of evidence qualifying as weak include unpublished intervention research, pilot studies, case studies, and field-based summaries.
No evidence: No evaluation or study either peer reviewed or non-peer reviewed, that has evidence of effectiveness, feasibility, reach, sustainability, and transferability. New and/or innovative interventions would most likely have no evidence established.
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| File Title | Attachment B - Instrument- Word Version |
| Author | Garry Lowry |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2022-04-27 |