NESHAP for Metal Furniture
Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart RRRR) (Renewal)
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
03/25/2022
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
04/30/2022
40
1,797
4,270
190,123
0
700,000
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Surface Coating of Metal
Furniture (40 CFR 63, Subpart RRRR) were proposed on April 24, 2002
and promulgated on May 23, 2003. The NESHAP is codified at 40 CFR
part 63, Subpart RRRR. This supporting statement addresses new
information collection activities that would be imposed by
amendments as part of the EPAs residual risk and technology review
(RTR), conducted in accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). As part of the RTR for the Surface Coating of Metal
Furniture NESHAP, the EPA is revising the startup, shutdown, and
malfunction (SSM) provisions of the Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) rule and the use of electronic data reporting for
future performance test data submittals, notifications, and
reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRRR. In general, all NESHAP standards
require initial notifications, performance tests (if sources are
using add-on controls to demonstrate compliance), and periodic
reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They
are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any deviation from an emission limitation (either a
numerical emission limit, an operating limit, or an equipment or
work practice standard), or any period during which the monitoring
system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records
are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to the NESHAP.
There is a decrease in burden
from the most-recently approved ICR as currently identified in the
OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This ICR incorporates the
requirements from the March 2019 and November 2020 rules. The
decrease is due to two considerations. Since a previous ICR
renewal, 1952.06, was published in 2016, sources have changed their
coating practices to use non-HAP coatings, resulting in a decrease
in the number of respondents. The data gathered during the recent
rulemaking indicates that there are no sources using add-on
controls, resulting in a decrease in O&M costs. There is no
growth in this industry, therefore there is no annualized
capital/startup cost.
$25,700
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Muntasir Ali 919
541-0833
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.