Final Supporting Statement - 17a-8 2022

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3235-0235
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
For the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 17a-8
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1.

Necessity for the Information Collection

Section 17(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-17(a)) (the
“Investment Company Act” or “Act”) generally prohibits a person that has specified
affiliate relationships with a registered investment company (“fund”), 1 when acting as
principal, from knowingly selling securities or property to or purchasing securities or
property from the fund. 2 Congress enacted section 17(a) to protect funds and their
shareholders from overreaching by fund affiliates. Mergers of funds with their affiliates
(“affiliated fund mergers”) are among the affiliated transactions that section 17(a)
prohibits. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to permit affiliated
transactions if: (i) the terms of the transaction are reasonable and fair and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person concerned; (ii) the proposed transaction is
consistent with the policy of each fund; and (iii) the proposed transaction is consistent
with the general purposes of the Act. 3
In 1980, the Commission adopted rule 17a-8, which exempted affiliated fund
mergers from the prohibitions in section 17(a) if the affiliation arose as the result of a
common investment adviser, common directors, or common officers. The amendments
1

Unless otherwise indicated, the term “fund” will be used in this supporting statement to
refer to both registered investment companies and series or portfolios of registered
investment companies.

2

15 U.S.C. 80a-17(a). Section 17(a) governs transactions involving affiliated persons of
funds, promoters of or principal underwriters for a fund, or affiliated persons of any
affiliated person, promoter, or underwriter. See also section 2(a)(3) of the Investment
Company Act (defining the term “affiliated person). 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3).

3

15 U.S.C. 80a-17(b).

to rule 17a-8, adopted in 2002, 4 expanded the types of mergers exempted by the rule to
include mergers between funds affiliated for any reason and mergers between funds and
certain unregistered entities. 5
To ensure that mergers permitted under the amended rule will not raise the types
of investor protection issues that require Commission review, funds must satisfy certain
conditions in order to rely on the rule. These conditions include information collection
requirements. These collections of information requirements are voluntary. Rule 17a-8
is an exemptive rule and, therefore, funds may choose whether or not to rely on the rule.
The rule requires that the board of any fund participating in the merger (“Merging
Company”) determine that participation in the merger is in the best interests of the
Merging Company, and that the interests of the Merging Company’s existing
shareholders will not be diluted as a result of the merger. 6 The directors must request and
evaluate such information as may reasonably be necessary to make these determinations
and must consider and give appropriate weight to all pertinent factors. 7

4

Investment Company Mergers, Investment Company Act Release No. IC-25666 (July 18,
2002) [67 FR 48512 (July 24, 2002)] (“Adopting Release”).

5

Eligible unregistered entities include collective trust funds, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80a3(c)(11), and common trust funds and similar funds, as described in 15 U.S.C.
80a-3(c)(3) of the Act. Rule 17a-8(b)(2).

6

Rule 17a-8(a)(2)(i).

7

Rule 17a-8(a)(2)(ii). The rule includes a note that refers to the Adopting Release, which
provides factors that the board should consider, if relevant, in connection with the
determination that participation in the merger is in the best interests of the fund. The
factors relate to the following issues: the federal income tax consequences to the
shareholders, the fees or expenses that the Merging Company will pay (directly or
indirectly) in connection with the merger, any effect of the merger on annual fund
operating expenses and shareholder fees and services, and any change in investment
objectives, restrictions, and policies after the merger. See Note to Rule 17a-8(a)(2)(i);
Adopting Release, supra note 4 at 48513.

2

In order to enable boards of directors to assess whether the interests of existing
shareholders would be diluted as a result of improper valuations in connection with a
merger transaction, the directors of any fund merging with an unregistered entity must
approve procedures for the valuation of assets received from that entity. The procedures
must provide for the preparation of a report by an independent evaluator that sets forth
the fair value of each such asset for which market quotations are not readily available. 8
Unless certain conditions are met, the rule also requires a fund being acquired to
obtain approval of the merger transaction by a majority of its outstanding voting
securities. 9
A Merging Company must record the determinations of its board, and the bases
for those determinations, in its minute books.10 The preparation and recording of these
board determinations constitutes a collection of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Finally, the rule requires any surviving fund to preserve written records describing
the merger and its terms for six years after the merger (the first two in an easily
accessible place). 11 This preservation of written records constitutes a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

8

Rule 17a-8(a)(2)(iii). These procedures are unnecessary for mergers between registered
investment companies because they value assets according to methods set forth in the
Investment Company Act. See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 2(a)(41); 17 C.F.R. 2a41-1.

9

Rule 17a-8(a)(3).

10

Rule 17a-8(a)(2)(iv).

11

Rule 17a-8(a)(5).

3

2.

Purposes and Use of the Information Collection

The purpose of the conditions in rule 17a-8, including those that are information
collection requirements, is to ensure that the interests of each Merging Company and its
shareholders are sufficiently considered and protected throughout the merger negotiation
and approval process. The information collection requirements in the rule also ensure
that adequate records are available for Commission review in the course of its
compliance and examination program.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

Rule 17a-8 does not require the reporting of any information or the filing of any
documents with the Commission. The rule requires Merging Companies to keep board
minutes and maintain written records describing the merger transaction and its
termsFunds are permitted to maintain records electronically.
4.

Duplication

With the exception of the requirements identified below, rule 17a-8 does not
impose any requirements that are duplicated elsewhere in federal securities laws, and
similar information is not available from other sources. The written records that describe
the merger and its terms may be encompassed by the general recordkeeping requirements
contained in rules 31a-1 and 31a-2 under the Investment Company Act. 12 For example,
the rule requires the preservation of minute books recording board meetings at which the
merger was considered and advisory materials received from the investment adviser in
connection with the merger, both of which fall within categories of records required to be

12

17 CFR 270.31a-1 and 270.31a-2.

4

kept under the general recordkeeping rules. 13 The record preservation requirements under
rule 17a-8 are more specific than those in rules 31a-1 and 31a-2 and are designed to
ensure preservation of adequate information to assess the compliance of Merging
Companies with the rule's conditions. A fund that has preserved those records for
purposes of rule 17a-8 will have also satisfied the requirements for the preservation of
such records pursuant to rules 31a-1 and 31a-2.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

Rule 17a-8 is available for any merger, including mergers involving small
entities, as long as the registered funds participating in the merger comply with the
conditions set forth in the rule. These requirements protect the interests of the funds and
their shareholders from overreaching by fund affiliates. Rule 17a-8 does not
disproportionately burden small entities. The Commission believes that it could not
adjust the rule to lessen the burden on small entities of complying with the rule without
jeopardizing the interests of holders of securities of those entities.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

The information collection requirements of rule 17a-8 apply to a fund only if the
fund relies on the rule to merge with an affiliated fund or affiliated common or collective
trust fund. Less frequent information collection would be incompatible with the eventspecific nature of the rule.

13

See rule 31a-1(b)(4) (requiring investment companies to maintain, among other things,
minute books of directors’ meetings); rule 31a-1(b)(11) (requiring investment companies
to maintain, among other things, “files of all advisory material received from the
investment adviser”). Funds are not required to maintain duplicate copies of any
overlapping records.

5

7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

Rule 17a-8 requires that written records describing the merger transaction and
terms be maintained for six years after the merger, the first two in an easily accessible
place. Although this provision exceeds the three-year guideline for most kinds of records
under 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)(iv), the Commission believes that the unusual and important
nature of merger transactions in the life of a fund warrants the six-year recordkeeping
requirement. This requirement contributes to the effectiveness of the Commission’s
examination and inspection program.
8.

Consultations Outside the Agency

The Commission requested public comment on the collection of information
requirements in rule 17a-8 before it submitted these requests for extension and approval
to OMB. The Commission received no comments in response to this request.
The Commission and the staff also participate in an ongoing dialogue with
representatives of the investment company industry through public conferences,
meetings, and informal exchanges. These forums provide the Commission and the staff
with means to identify and address paperwork burdens that may confront the industry.
9.

Payment or Gift

Not applicable.
10.

Confidentiality

Not applicable.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive nature, including social security numbers, will be
required under this collection of information. The information collection does not collect

6

personally identifiable information (PII). The agency has determined that a system of
records notice (SORN) and privacy impact assessment (PIA) are not required in
connection with the collection of information.
12.

Burden of Information Collection

During 2020, there were approximately 192 mergers 14 of affiliated series or
portfolios of registered investment companies. 15 The staff estimates that none of the
affiliated mergers proceeded pursuant to an exemptive order under section 17(b) of the
Act. Accordingly, the staff believes that all the affiliated mergers in 2020 proceeded
under rule 17a-8. 16 Assuming that there will be approximately 192 mergers annually, we
estimate that approximately 384 registered investment companies, or, in many cases,
portfolios or series thereof, would be subject to the rule’s information collection
requirements annually. 17
The staff estimates that compliance with the rule's requirements imposes a total
annual burden on each merging portfolio or series of 7 hours (3 hours of professional
14

This figure is based on review of N-CEN filings by our Disclosure Review and
Accounting Office to identify funds that reported relying on rule 17a-8 to conduct an
affiliated merger from January 1, 2017 until December 31, 2020. Funds reported a total
of 268 affiliated mergers in 2018, 161 affiliated mergers in 2019, and 148 affiliated
mergers in 2020. The average number of mergers during this three year period was (268
+ 161 + 148) / 3 = 192 mergers. The decrease in the number of mergers under rule 17a-8,
as compared to the prior PRA estimate in Table 1, is partly attributable to yearly
fluctuations and partly attributable to the change in the data sourcing and methodologies
used to calculate the number of affiliated mergers, as prior rule 17a-8 merger estimates
were based on data from Form N-14.

15

Each portfolio or series merger was counted separately. This way of counting reflects the
staff’s determination to assess the paperwork burden faced at the series or portfolio level
rather than at the level of the registered investment company, in order to be consistent
with the amendments discussed above, which require that the impact of the merger be
separately assessed for each series or portfolio involved.

16

Any merger that involved affiliated funds would not be able to proceed without either
relying on rule 17a-8 or on an exemptive order obtained under section 17(b).

17

192 affiliated mergers x 2 = 384 registered investment companies.

7

time and 4 hours of clerical time) to prepare and record board resolutions documenting
the board's findings and to compile and maintain records documenting the merger
transaction and its terms. 18 The staff therefore estimates the total annual burden imposed
by the rule on all affected funds is 2,688 hours, based on an estimate of 192 affiliated
mergers under rule 17a-8 per year. 19 We estimate that professional staff performs 1,152
of these burden hours at a total cost of $429,373, 20 while support staff performs 1,872 of
these burden hours at a total cost of $110,592. 21 The staff estimates the total annual cost
of the burden hours for all funds of complying with rule 17a-8 is $539,965. 22
The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived from a comprehensive or even a
representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules. The number of burden

18

These hour burden estimates are consistent with prior staff burden estimates related to the
rule’s requirements. The Commission has requested public comment on these prior
estimates and has not received any comments in response to this request. This collection
of information is labeled in Table 1 below as a recordkeeping requirement. This estimate
encompasses the aggregate burden to comply with both of the collection of information
requirements of the rule. The surviving fund would maintain the documents describing
the merger transaction and its terms.

19

This estimate is based on the following calculation: (3 hours + 4 hours) x 2 x 192 funds
= 2,688 hours.

20

The professional staff estimates are based on the following calculations: 1,152= 3 hours x
2 x 192 funds; and 1,152 hours x $373/hour = $429,373. The per hour cost estimates are
based on figures for compliance attorney positions found in the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association’s Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities
Industry 2013, modified to account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.

21

The support staff estimates are based on the following calculations: 1,536 hours = 4 hours
x 2 x 192 funds; and 1,536 hours x $72/hour = $110,592. The per hour cost estimates are
based on figures for compliance clerk positions found in the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association’s Office Salaries in the Securities Industry 2013,
modified to account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 2.93 to account for
bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.

22

This estimate is based on the following calculation: $539,965 = $429,373 + $110,592.

8

hours may vary depending on the nature of the merger transaction and the number of
records a fund is required to preserve pursuant to the rule.
Table 1: Summary of Revised Annual Responses, Burden Hours, and Burden Hour Costs Estimates
for the Recordkeeping Requirement under Rule 17a-8
Professional staff hourly burden per response
Support staff hourly burden per response

3 hours
x

Total annual hourly burden per response
Total annual responses (funds)

4 hours
7 hours

x

Total annual hourly burden

384
2,688 hours

Professional staff hourly burden per response

3 hours

Total annual responses (funds)

x

384

Professional staff hourly wage rate

x

$373

Total annual professional staff cost burden

$429,373

Support staff hourly burden per response

4 hours

Total annual responses (funds)

x

384

Support staff hourly wage rate

x

$72

Total annual support staff cost burden

$110,592

Total annual professional staff burden
Total annual support staff cost burden

$429,373
+

Total annual cost burden

$110,592
$539,965

TABLE 2: Aggregate Annual Cost for Shareholder Approval under Rule 17a-8
Funds requiring a Shareholder vote
Cost per fund to obtain shareholder approval
Aggregate cost

59
x

$100,000
$5,900,000

9

TABLE 3: Change in Burden Estimates
Annual Number of Responses

Rule
17a8

Previously
Approved

Proposed
Estimate

468

384

13.

Annual Time Burden (hours)

Change

Previously
Approved

Proposed
Estimate

(84)

3,276

2,688

Cost Burden (dollars)

Change

Previously
Approved

Proposed
Estimate

Change

(588)

$13,700,000

$5,900,000

($7,800,,000)

Cost to Respondents

The rule imposes an annual cost burden on the industry in addition to the cost
arising from the hour burden described in Item 12 of this Supporting Statement. The
directors of any fund merging with an unregistered entity must approve procedures for
the valuation of assets received from that entity. The procedures must provide for the
preparation of a report by an independent evaluator that sets forth the fair value of each
such asset for which market quotations are not readily available. The staff estimates that
obtaining a valuation report from independent evaluators typically would cost each fund
that merges with an unregistered entity approximately $15,000. 23 In 2020, the staff
estimates there were no affiliated fund mergers involving the kinds of unregistered
entities covered by the rule. 24 Thus, the staff estimates there is no annual cost to the
industry from this requirement.
We anticipate that the condition in the rule requiring non-surviving funds to
obtain shareholder approval would result in shareholder votes by approximately 59 funds

23

This cost estimate is consistent with prior staff estimates related to the rule’s
requirements. The Commission has requested public comment on these prior estimates
and has not received any comments in response to this request.

24

The staff’s estimate that there are no mergers each year involving common or collective
trust funds is based on staff review of Form N-14 filings regarding fund mergers.

10

that otherwise would not have conducted shareholder votes. 25 The funds or their advisers
incur legal, mailing, printing, solicitation, and tabulation costs in connection with a
shareholder vote. We estimate that the total cost to an acquired fund of obtaining
shareholder approval for a fund merger is $100,000. Thus, as noted in Table 2, we
estimate that the aggregate annual cost associated with this provision is $5,900,000. 26

14.

Cost to the Federal Government

Rule 17a-8 imposes essentially no costs on the federal government. The rule does
not require funds to file any documents with the Commission. Commission staff may
review board minutes and records related to the merger as a matter of course during fund
inspections.
15.

Changes in Burden

The estimated hourly burden of rule 17a-8 decreased by 588 hours from the prior
estimate of 3,276 hours, while the estimate cost burden decreased by $7,800,000 from the
prior estimate of $13,700,000. Both the decrease in the hourly burden and increase in the
25

The staff’s estimate that the condition in the rule requiring non-surviving funds to obtain
shareholder approval would result in shareholder votes by approximately 59 funds that
otherwise would not have conducted shareholder votes. This figure is based on review of
Form N-14 filings by funds that reported relying on rule 17a-8 on Form N-CEN to
conduct an affiliated merger between January 1, 2018 until December 31, 2020. There
were 53 such mergers in 2018, 55 mergers in 2019, and 70 mergers in 2020. The average
number of such mergers during this three year period was (53 + 55 + 70) / 3 = 59 mergers
requesting a shareholder vote. The decrease in the number of such mergers under rule
17a-8, as compared to the prior PRA estimate in Table 1, is partly attributable to yearly
fluctuations and partly attributable to the change in the data sourcing and methodologies,
as prior estimates were not informed by data from Form N-CEN. We also note that most
funds are constrained by state law to conduct a shareholder vote in the event of a merger,
and that even funds that are not required by state law to obtain shareholder approval may
do so in order to maintain good relations with their shareholders.

26

This estimate is based on the following calculation: $5,900,000 = $100,000 x 59
funds.

11

cost burden are attributed to a change in the estimated number of funds relying on rule
17a-8 as well as a change in data sourcing and methodologies used.
16.

Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes
Not applicable.

17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date
Not applicable.

18.

Exception to Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act

Submissions
Not applicable.
B.

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

Not applicable.

12