FERC-725L 60-day notice

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices
plan can be developed and submitted
after your application has been
reviewed and selected for funding. For
additional information on the open
licensing requirements please refer to 2
CFR 3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: For the
purposes of the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993
(GPRA) and reporting under 34 CFR
75.110, the Department has established
a set of performance measures,
including long-term measures, that are
designed to yield information on the
quality of the Personnel Development to
Improve Services and Results for
Children with Disabilities program.
These measures include: (1) The
percentage of preparation programs that
incorporate scientifically or evidencebased 13 practices into their curricula;
(2) the percentage of scholars
completing preparation programs who
are knowledgeable and skilled in
evidence-based practices for children
with disabilities; (3) the percentage of
scholars who exit preparation programs
prior to completion due to poor
academic performance; (4) the
percentage of scholars completing
preparation programs who are working
in the area(s) in which they were
prepared upon program completion; (5)
the Federal cost per scholar who
completed the preparation program; (6)
the percentage of scholars who
completed the preparation program and
13 For the purposes of this performance measure,
‘‘evidence-based’’ means, at a minimum, evidence
that demonstrates a rationale (as defined in 34 CFR
77.1), where a key project component included in
the project’s logic model is informed by research or
evaluation findings that suggest the project
component is likely to improve relevant outcomes.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Apr 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

are employed in high-need districts; and
(7) the percentage of scholars who
completed the preparation program and
who are rated effective by their
employers.
In addition, the Department will
gather information on the following
outcome measures: (1) The percentage
of scholars who completed the
preparation program and are employed
in the field of special education for at
least two years; (2) the number and
percentage of scholars proposed by the
grantee in their application that were
actually enrolled and making
satisfactory academic progress in the
current academic year; and (3) the
number and percentage of enrolled
scholars who are on track to complete
the training program by the end of the
project’s original grant period.
Grantees may be asked to participate
in assessing and providing information
on these aspects of program quality.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and a copy of the
application package in an accessible
format. The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

18279

documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
David Cantrell,
Deputy Director, Office of Special Education
Programs, Delegated the authority to perform
the functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Special Education
and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2021–07261 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC21–13–000]

Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–725l); Comment
Request; Extension
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection
and request for comments.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) is soliciting
public comment on the currently
approved information collection, FERC
725L (Mandatory Reliability Standards
for the Bulk-Power System: MOD
Reliability Standards).
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due June 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit copies of
your comments (identified by Docket
No. IC21–13–000) by one of the
following methods:
Electronic filing through http://
www.ferc.gov, is preferred.
• Electronic Filing: Documents must
be filed in acceptable native
applications and print-to-PDF, but not
in scanned or picture format.
• For those unable to file
electronically, comments may be filed
by USPS mail or by hand (including
courier) delivery:
Æ Mail via U.S. Postal Service Only:
Addressed to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM

08APN1

18280

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
Æ Hand (Including Courier) Delivery:
Deliver to: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions must be
formatted and filed in accordance with
submission guidelines at: http://
www.ferc.gov. For user assistance,
contact FERC Online Support by email
at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by
phone at (866) 208–3676 (toll-free).
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at http://www.ferc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by email
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, telephone
at (202) 502–8663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: FERC–725L, Mandatory
Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power
System: MOD Reliability Standards.
OMB Control No.: 1902–0261.
Type of Request: Three-year extension
of the FERC–725L information
collection requirements with no changes
to the reporting requirements.
Abstract: MOD Reliability Standards
ensure that generators remain in
operation during specified voltage and
frequency excursions, properly
coordinate protective relays and
generator voltage regulator controls, and
ensure that generator models accurately
reflect the generator’s capabilities and
equipment performance.
On May 30, 2013, the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
filed a petition explaining that the
reliability of the Bulk-Power System
benefits from ‘‘good quality simulation
models of power system equipment,’’ 2
and that ‘‘model validation ensures the
proper performance of the control
systems and validates the computer
models used for stability analysis.’’
NERC further stated that the Reliability
Standards will enhance reliability
because the tests performed to obtain
model data may reveal latent defects
that could cause ‘‘inappropriate unit
response during system disturbances.’’ 2
Subsequently, on March 20, 2014,1 the
Commission approved Reliability
1 Final

Rule in Docket No. RM13–16–000.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Apr 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

Standards MOD–025–2, MOD–026–1,
and MOD–027–1. These Standards were
intended to address generator
verifications needed to support BulkPower System reliability that would also
ensure that accurate data is verified and
made available for planning
simulations.2
On May 1, 2014,3 the Commission
approved Reliability Standards MOD–
032–1 and MOD–033–2. These
Standards were to address ‘‘system-level
modeling data and validation
requirements necessary for developing
planning models and the
Interconnection-wide cases that are
integral to analyzing the reliability of
the Bulk-Power System’’.
MOD–025–2, MOD–026–1, MOD–
027–1, MOD–031–3, MOD–032–1 and
MOD–033–2 are all currently approved
within the FERC–725L information
collection. The reporting requirements
associated with each standard will not
change as a result of this extension
request.
Type of Respondents: NERCregistered entities including generator
owners, transmission planners,
planning authorities, balancing
authorities, resource planners,
transmission service providers,
reliability coordinators, and
transmission operators.4
Estimate of Annual Burden: 5 The
Commission estimates the annual public
reporting burden 6 and cost for the
information collection as:
2 NERC Petition for Approval of Five Proposed
Reliability Standards MOD–025–2, MOD–026–1,
MOD–027–1, PRC–019–1, and PRC–024–1
submitted to FERC on 5/30/2013.
3 Order in Docket No. RD14–5–000.
4 In subsequent portions of this notice, the
following acronyms will be used: PA = Planning
Authority, GO = Generator Owner, TP =
Transmission Planner, BA = Balancing Authority,
RP = Resource Planner, TSP = Transmission Service
Provider, RC = Reliability Coordinator, TOP =
Transmission Operator.
5 ‘‘Burden’’ is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
6 Each of the five MOD standards in the FERC–
725L information collection previously contained
‘‘one-time’’ components to their respondent burden.
These one-time burden categories consisted
primarily of activities related to establishing
industry practices and developing data validation
procedures tailored toward these reliability

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

RD20–4
• Elimination of the burden
associated with the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in Requirement R1 of
proposed Reliability Standard MOD–
031–3.7 The NERC petition states as the
load-serving entity is no longer a NERC
registration category, NERC proposes to
remove this entity from the applicability
section of proposed Reliability Standard
MOD–031–3 and remove reference to
this entity in Requirement R1, Part 1.1,
where it is listed as an ‘‘Applicable
Entity’’ for purposes of Requirements R2
and R4.8 Additionally, NERC proposes
to strike the term ‘‘Planning Authority’’
from the applicability section of the
standard and the explanatory text that
follows. The preferred terminology for
the responsible entity that coordinates
and integrates transmission facilities
and service plans, resource plans, and
protection systems is ‘‘Planning
Coordinator.’’ 9 This is a terminology
change and will not result in a change
in burden.
• Modification of the term ‘‘Planning
Authority’’ to ‘‘Planning Coordinator’’
in proposed Reliability Standard MOD–
033–2.10 In the petition, NERC proposes
to strike the term ‘‘Planning Authority’’
from the applicability section of the
standard and the explanatory text that
follows. The proposed change is
intended to promote consistent use of
‘‘Planning Coordinator’’ throughout the
Reliability Standards.11 This is a
terminology change and will not result
in a change in burden.
• Reliability Standard MOD–031–3
(Demand and Energy Data).
• Reliability Standard MOD–033–2
(Steady-State and Dynamic System
Model Validation).
standards and their reporting requirements. None of
the one-time burdens apply any longer, so they are
being removed from the FERC–725L information
collection.
7 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, MOD–031–2, is included in FERC–
725L.
8 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 10.
9 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 10.
10 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, MOD–033–1, is included in FERC–
725L.
11 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 11.

E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM

08APN1

18281

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices
PROPOSED CHANGES TO BURDEN DUE TO DOCKET NO. RD20–4–000 ADJUSTMENTS AND CLARIFICATIONS 1
Reliability standard & requirements

Number of respondents &
type of entity

Annual number
of responses per
respondent

Annual number of
responses

Average burden
hrs. per
response

Total annual burden
hours

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

RD20–4 Net Changes to FERC–725L, OMB Control No. 1902–0261
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data) Develop summary in accordance w/R1, Subparts 1.5.4 and 1.5.5.—program decrease &
adjustment/clarification 12.
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data) Develop data request in accordance w/R1 and
R3 & Evidence Retention—adjustment/clarification 13.
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data) Develop and provide data in accordance w/R2
and R4 & Evidence Retention—adjustment/
clarification 12.
MOD–033–2 (Steady-State Dynamic System
Model Validation) R2 Data Submittal [for
R2]—adjustment.
MOD–033–2 (Steady-State Dynamic System
Model Validation), R1–R2, Evidence Retention, adjustment.
Net Changes for FERC–725L due to
RD20–4.
1 The

–561 (DP, LSE, TP & BA) ...

1

–561 .........................

8

–4,488

113 (PC & BA) .....................

1

113 ...........................

8

904

381 (TP, BA & DP) ..............

1

381 ...........................

8

3,048

–14 (RC & TOP) 14 ..............

1

–14 ...........................

8

–112

–14 (PC, RC & TOP) 15 .......

1

–14 ...........................

1

–14

..............................................

............................

–95 (net reduction) ...

............................

–662 (net reduction).

adjustments, due to normal industry fluctuations, are based on figures in the NERC registry as of April 10, 2020.

MOD–025–2 (VERIFICATION AND DATA REPORTING OF GENERATOR REAL AND REACTIVE POWER CAPABILITY AND
SYNCHRONOUS CONDENSER REACTIVE POWER CAPABILITY)
Number of
respondents 16

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost per
response

Total annual burden hours &
total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

Attachment 2 ...........................
Evidence Retention .................

1003 (GO) ......
1003 (GO) ......

1
1

1003
1003

6 hrs.; $502.02 17 ...................
1 hr.; $34.79 18 .......................

6,018 hrs.; $503,526.06 .........
1003 hrs.; $34,894.07 ............

Total .................................

........................

........................

........................

.................................................

7,021 hrs.; $538,420.07.

502.02
34.79

MOD–026–1 (VERIFICATION OF MODELS AND DATA FOR GENERATOR EXCITATION CONTROL SYSTEM OR PLANT VOLT/
VARIANCE CONTROL FUNCTIONS)

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

Instructions for obtaining excitation control system or plant
voltage/variance control function model.

Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost
per response

Total annual burden
hours & total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

8 hrs.; $669.36 17 ............

1,608 hrs.; $134,541.36 ..

201 (TP) .....................

12 The estimates reflect a program decrease of 63
de-registered LSEs (and corresponding program
decrease of 504 hrs.) related to Docket No. RD20–
4–000, and an adjustment/clarification (decrease) of
498 DPs, TPs, and BAs (and corresponding decrease
of 3,984 hrs.), not related to Docket No. RD20–4–
000. The updated number of 381 DPs, TPs and BAs
is listed in a new row clarifying their applicability
with Requirements R2 and R4. Requirement R2
requires applicable entities to develop and provide
data pursuant with Requirement R1.
13 The 113 PCs and BAs were originally estimated
in FERC–725A due to Order No. 693. However, the

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Apr 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

1

201

estimates and descriptions were not clearly spelled
out, so we are clarifying them. [Some of this burden
may still be in FERC–725A (and double counted
temporarily).]
14 The estimate is changing to 174 (from 188) due
to normal industry fluctuation.
15 The estimate is changing to 188 (from 194) due
to normal industry fluctuation.
16 The number of respondents for MOD–025–2/
MOD–026–1/MOD–027–1/MOD–31–3/MOD–032–/
MOD–033–2 are from the NERC compliance registry
February 5, 2021.

PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

669.36

17 This wage figure uses the average hourly wage
(plus benefits) for electrical engineers (Occupation
Code: 17–2071, $70.19/hour) and managers
(Occupation Code: 11–0000, $97.15/hour) obtained
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (from
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm).
The average used the following calculation:
[$70.19/hour + $97.15/hour] ÷ 2 = $83.67/hour.
18 The estimate uses the hourly average wage
(plus benefits) for file clerks obtained from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics: $34.79/hour (BLS
Occupation Code: 43–4071).

E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM

08APN1

18282

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices

MOD–026–1 (VERIFICATION OF MODELS AND DATA FOR GENERATOR EXCITATION CONTROL SYSTEM OR PLANT VOLT/
VARIANCE CONTROL FUNCTIONS)—Continued
Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost
per response

Total annual burden
hours & total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

8 hrs.; $669.36 17 ............

4,008 hrs.; $335,349.36 ..

669.36

668 hrs.; $23,239.72 .......

34.79

501 (GO) i ..................

Documentation on generator
verification.
Evidence Retention ....................

1

501

668 (GO and TOP) ....

1

668

Total ....................................

....................................

........................

........................

1 hr.;

$34.79 18

................

.........................................

6,284 hrs.; $493,130.44.

MOD–027–1 (VERIFICATION OF MODELS AND DATA FOR TURBINE/GOVERNOR AND LOAD CONTROL OR ACTIVE POWER/
FREQUENCY CONTROL FUNCTIONS)

Instructions for obtaining excitation control system or plant
voltage/variance control function model.
Documentation on generator
verification.
Evidence Retention ....................
Total ....................................

Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost
per response

Total annual burden
hours & total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

201 (TP) .....................

1

201

8 hrs.; $669.36 17 ............

1,608 hrs.; $134,541.36 ..

669.36

501 (GO) 19 ................

1

501

8 hrs.; $669.36 17 ............

4,008 hrs.; $335,349.36 ..

669.36

668 (GO and TP) .......

1

668

1 hr.; $34.79 18 ................

668 hrs.; $23,239.72 .......

34.79

....................................

........................

........................

.........................................

6,284 hrs.; $493,130.44.

MOD–031–3 (FORMERLY MOD–031–2) (DEMAND AND ENERGY DATA), INCLUDED IN FERC–725L
Reliability standard MOD–031–3

(On-going) Develop summary in
accordance with Requirement
R1, Subparts 1.5.4 and 1.5.5.
MOD–031–3 Net Changes in
RD20–4 (in the first table
above).

Number and type of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Avg. burden & cost per
response 20

Total annual burden
hours & total annual cost

Cost per
respondent

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

616 (DP, TP and/or
BA).

New Total for MOD–031–3
for Renewal.

1

616

8 hrs.; $561.52 ................

4,928 hrs.; $345,896.32 ..

....................................

........................

–67

.........................................

–536 hrs.; $37,621.84.

....................................

........................

549

.........................................

4,392 hrs.; $308,274.48.

561.52

MOD–032–1 (VERIFICATION OF MODELS AND DATA FOR TURBINE/GOVERNOR AND LOAD CONTROL OR ACTIVE POWER/
FREQUENCY CONTROL FUNCTIONS)

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

Data Submittal ....................

Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost per
response

Total annual burden hours
& total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

1,418 (BA, GO, PA/PC,
RP, TO, TP, and
TSP).

19 It is estimated that the applicable numbers of
generator owner respondents used to calculate the
public reporting burden for these standards MOD–
026–1, MOD–027–1, MOD–032–1 and MOD–033–1

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Apr 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

1

1,418

8 hrs.;

$561.52 20

is half of total numbers of GO (501=1003/2) due to
the higher applicability threshold for those
Reliability Standards.

PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

..............

11,344 hrs.; $796,235.36 ..

561.52

20 The estimate uses the average hourly wage
(plus benefits) of $70.19/hour for electrical
engineers (Occupation Code: 17–2071) from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.

E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM

08APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices

18283

MOD–032–1 (VERIFICATION OF MODELS AND DATA FOR TURBINE/GOVERNOR AND LOAD CONTROL OR ACTIVE POWER/
FREQUENCY CONTROL FUNCTIONS)—Continued
Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost per
response

Total annual burden hours
& total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

Evidence Retention ............

1,418 (BA, GO, PA/PC,
RP, TO, TP, and
TSP).

1

1,418

1 hr.; $34.79 18 ..................

1,418 hrs.; $49,332.22 ......

Total .............................

......................................

........................

........................

............................................

12,762 hrs.; $998,484.70.

34.79

MOD–033–2 (FORMERLY MOD–033–1) (STEADY-STATE AND DYNAMICS SYSTEM MODEL VALIDATION)

Data Submittal ...........................
Evidence Retention ....................
MOD–033–2 Net Changes in
RD20–4 (in the first table
above).

Number of
respondents

Annual
number of
responses per
respondent

Total number
of responses

Average burden & cost
per response

Total annual burden
hours & total annual cost

Cost per
respondent
($)

(1)

(2)

(1) * (2) = (3)

(4)

(3) * (4) = (5)

(5) ÷ (1)

178 (RC and TOP) ....
243 (PA/PC, RC, and
TOP).
....................................

1
1

178
243

8 hrs.; $669.36 ................
1 hr.; $34.79 18 ................

1,424 hrs.; $119,146.08 ..
243 hrs.; $8,453.97 .........

........................

–28

.........................................

–126.

....................................

........................

393

.........................................

1,541 hrs.; $128,935.47.

New Total for MOD–033–2
Renewal.

The total annual estimated burden
and cost for the FERC–725L information
collection is 38,724 hours and
$2,960,375.60 respectively.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: April 4, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–07226 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Apr 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[10022–37–Region 1]

Notice of Availability of Draft NPDES
Small Wastewater Treatment Facility
General Permits in Massachusetts and
New Hampshire
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft
NPDES General Permits MAG580000
and NHG580000.
AGENCY:

The Director of the Water
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency—Region 1 (EPA), is providing a
Notice of Availability for the Draft
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Small
Wastewater Treatment Facility General
Permit (WWTF GP) for discharges to
certain waters of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts and the State of New
Hampshire. This Draft NPDES WWTF
GP (‘‘Draft General Permit’’) establishes
effluent limitations and requirements,
effluent and ambient monitoring
requirements, reporting requirements,
and standard conditions for 66 eligible
facilities currently covered by either the
existing General Permit or individual
NPDES permits (see Attachment E of the
Draft General Permit for a list of eligible
WWTFs; 34 in Massachusetts and 32 in
New Hampshire). The Draft General
Permit is available on EPA Region 1’s

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

669.36
34.79

website at https://www.epa.gov/npdespermits/region-1-draft-smallwastewater-treatment-facilities-generalpermit. The Fact Sheet for the Draft
General Permit sets forth principal facts
and the significant factual, legal,
methodological, and policy questions
considered in the development of the
Draft General Permit and is also
available at this website.
DATES: Public comments must be
received by May 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
Draft General Permit may be mailed to
U.S. EPA Region 1, Water Division,
Attn: Michael Cobb, 5 Post Office
Square, Suite 100, Mail Code 06–1,
Boston, Massachusetts 02109–3912, or
sent via email to: Cobb.Michael@
epa.gov. Due to the COVID–19 National
Emergency, if comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please also email a
copy to the EPA contact above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information concerning the
Draft General Permit may be obtained
from Michael Cobb, U.S. EPA Region 1,
Water Division, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100, Mail Code 06–1, Boston, MA
02109–3912; telephone: 617–918–1369;
email: Cobb.Michael@epa.gov.
Following U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
guidance and specific state guidelines
impacting our regional offices, EPA’s
workforce has been directed to telework
to help prevent transmission of the

E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM

08APN1