30day FRN

28436

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2021–0013]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Automated Driving
Systems 2.0 A Vision for Safety
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments on a request for approval of
an extension of a currently-approved
information collection.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below will be forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. The ICR
describes the nature of the information
collection and its expected burden. This
is a request for an extension of a
currently-approved information
collection. This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA seeks OMB extension approval,
titled ‘‘Automated Driving Systems 2.0:
A Vision for Safety’’ and identified by
OMB Control Number 2127–0723,
which is currently approved through
May 31, 2021. The burden hour
calculations have been adjusted to
reflect a reduction in burden as well as
a reduction in the frequency of response
resulting in a total annual burden hour
reduction from 86,100 hours to 12,000
hours. A Federal Register Notice with a
60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the information collection
was published on March 9, 2021.
NHTSA received three comments to this
notice, two of which were generally
supportive of the information collection.
The third comment addressed
accessibility of ADS-equipped vehicles.
None of the comments addressed
burden hours or cost estimates.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before June 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing burden, should
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
To find this particular information
collection, select ‘‘Currently under 30day Review—Open for Public
Comment’’ or use the search function.
SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:00 May 25, 2021

Jkt 253001

For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact Debbie
Sweet, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
Telephone (202) 366–7179; Fax: (202)
366–2106; email address:
Debbie.Sweet@dot.gov. Please identify
the relevant collection of information by
referring to its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a Federal
agency must receive approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) before it collects certain
information from the public and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information by a Federal
agency unless the collection displays a
valid OMB control number. In
compliance with these requirements,
this notice announces the following
information collection request will be
submitted to OMB.
Title: Automated Driving Systems 2.0:
A Vision for Safety.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0723.
Form Number: None.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently-approved information
collection.
Length of Approval Requested: Three
years.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: In September 2017,
NHTSA published a policy document
titled Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A
Vision for Safety (ADS 2.0). Recognizing
the potential that Automated Driving
Systems (ADSs) have to enhance safety
and mobility, this policy document set
out an approach to enable the safe
deployment of Automated Driving
Systems (SAE Automation Levels 3
through 5—Conditional, High, and Full
Automation Systems as defined in SAE
J3016).1
Consistent with its statutory purpose
to reduce traffic crashes and deaths and
injuries resulting from traffic crashes,2
NHTSA has recommended disclosure of
information via a Voluntary Safety SelfAssessment (VSSA) related to ADS
technologies by vehicle manufacturers
and other entities as described in ADS
2.0. In the section of ADS 2.0 titled,
‘‘Voluntary Guidance for Automated
Driving systems’’ (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘Voluntary Guidance’’), NHTSA
recommended that manufacturers and
other entities assess their ADS-equipped
vehicle against specific safety elements,
summarize that assessment, and then
voluntarily disclose that summary to the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

1 For more information about SAE J3016, see
https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_
201806
2 49 U.S.C. 30101.

PO 00000

Frm 00108

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

public.3 The Voluntary Guidance
outlines recommended best practices,
many of which should be commonplace
in the industry, for the safe predeployment design, development, and
testing of ADSs prior to commercial sale
or operation on public roads.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: To assist States and the
public in understanding how safety is
being considered by manufacturers and
other entities developing and testing
ADSs, NHTSA has encouraged
disclosures that aid in that mission. The
burden estimates contained in this
notice are based on the Agency’s
understanding of the ADS market and
the time associated with generating a
self-assessment and voluntarily making
a summary of that self-assessment
public. The estimates in this notice are
adjustments from the previous
information collection request (ICR)
demonstrating a decrease in the burdenhour estimate.
The manner by which NHTSA
encourages ADS manufacturers and
other entities to disclose information is
through a VSSA. The VSSA summarizes
how the manufacturer or other entity
has considered the safety elements
contained in the Voluntary Guidance as
shown below:
• System Safety
• Operational Design Domain
• Object and Event Detection and
Response
• Fallback (Minimal Risk Condition)
• Validation Methods
• Human Machine Interface
• Vehicle Cybersecurity
• Crashworthiness
• Post-Crash ADS Behavior
• Data Recording
• Consumer Education and Training
• Federal, State and Local Laws
The Agency believes the work
associated with consideration of the
safety element in the Voluntary
Guidance to be an extension of good and
safe engineering practices already in
place. It therefore believes that
manufacturers and other entities will
have access to all the information
needed to craft a VSSA that discusses
how the safety elements were
considered and, if they choose, release
a summary of that assessment publicly.
Of the manufacturers and other entities
who voluntarily disclose this
information, NHTSA anticipates that
most manufacturers and other entities
will post the VSSAs online. As of
December 28, 2020, NHTSA was aware
of 26 VSSAs, all available online.
3 https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/
documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf.

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1

28437

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices
The safety elements are fully
described in the Voluntary Guidance
section (section 1) of ADS 2.0, as is the
VSSA. The VSSA (including the public
release of that summary assessment) is
intended to communicate to the public
(particularly States and consumers) that
entities are (1) considering the safety
aspects of ADSs; (2) communicating and
collaborating with DOT; (3) encouraging
the self-establishment of industry safety
norms for ADSs; and (4) building public
trust, acceptance, and confidence
through transparent testing and
deployment of ADSs.
60-Day Notice: A Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the information
collection was published on March 9,
2021 (86 FR 13602). The Agency
received three comments on this notice.
Two comments, one from Locomation
and one from the California Department
of Motor Vehicles (DMV) were generally
supportive of the information collection.
Locomation stated that it ‘‘applauds
NHTSA work to provide voluntary data
sharing platforms to improve the
public’s understanding’’ and believes
the information collection should be
extended for these activities. The
California Department of Motor Vehicles
(DMV) and California Highway Patrol
(CHP) stated it was ‘‘pleased to submit
these comments expressing [their]
support for extending the VSSA as a
method to collect information from
Automated Driving System (ADS)
developers about their development of
the technology.’’ The third comment,
from an individual, addressed
accessibility in ADS-equipped vehicles,
but did not provide any specific
comments about this information
collection. None of the comments
addressed burden hours or cost
estimates.
Affected Public: Entities involved in
the testing and deployment of ADSs.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
NHTSA estimates that there will be,
on average, 20 respondents a year.
Frequency: On Occasion (based on
information from the current
information collection, respondents are

expected to respond, on average, once
every three years).
Number of Responses: 20.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 12,000 hours.
NHTSA is using the number of
entities that have received permits from
the State of California as surrogate for
the number of respondents that may
choose to develop and issue a VSSA. As
of December 28, 2020, California has
cumulatively issued permits to 58
entities to test Automated Driving
Systems with drivers present, five of
those entities also received permits to
test without a driver present, and one
entity (included on both other lists) has
a permit to deploy.4 At the onset of the
current information collection,
California had issued permits to 45
entities as of November 16, 2017, but
NHTSA had expected the number to
grow to 60 entities within the three
years of the information collection,
assuming an addition of new entrants.
For that reason, the burden hours and
cost were calculated based on 60
respondents. NHTSA expects the
number of potential respondents to
remain at approximately 60 given the
coordinated efforts of some companies
on the list, the departure of some of
those entities from the industry
(departures were not prevalent in 2017
as the industry was new), and
accounting for new entrants. As a point
of reference, since the previous ICR was
approved, NHTSA is aware of 26
published VSSAs. Given that only 26
VSSAs have been published in three
years compared to the 58 activelypermitted entities in California, NHTSA
believes that 60 respondents is an
appropriate high-end estimate for total
respondents. However, based on
observations of the current information,
NHTSA estimates that respondents will
only produce and disclose a new VSSA
once every three years. Therefore,
NHTSA has revised its burden
calculations to reflect estimates based
on 20 respondents each year.
Components of the Voluntary
Guidance in ADS 2.0 and public
disclosure of the VSSA have not
changed since release in 2017. NHTSA

expects the industry burden of
addressing safety elements in the
Voluntary Guidance to be comprised of
efforts entities would already incur in
normal business operation and existing
documentation. While the previous ICR
calculated burden hours associated with
a potential increase in analysis and
review in order to develop the VSSA,
NHTSA has since determined there to
be no increased documentation citing
how an entity addressed the safety
elements in the Voluntary Guidance.
NHTSA does not believe that any entity
is documenting its safety efforts solely
for the purpose of the VSSA and public
disclosure. Therefore, NHTSA reduced
the estimation of burden hours by 835
burden hours per respondent per year
from the previous ICR.
Development and disclosure of a
VSSA is expected to involve burden for
format, content, and summary, varying
by safety element. NHTSA estimates
that each entity will spend
approximately 600 hours to develop and
disseminate a VSSA. This estimate of
burden is comprised of efforts to
transmit information from the existing
format (520 hours for development) into
a summary format that would be
consumable by the public, including
data translation, analysis, and
discussion of traditionally technical
information (80 hours to summarize).
The total estimated burden hours for
a single VSSA is calculated as 600 hours
for each of the 20 respondents. The total
burden hours per year is estimated at
12,000 hours, a reduction from the
86,100 hours in the previous ICR.
In summary, NHTSA estimates the
total burden associated with disclosure
recommendations via a VSSA would be
600 hours per respondent with 20
respondents submitting information
each year. The frequency of responding
is once every three years; therefore,
NHTSA estimates there will be a total of
60 unique responders over the course of
the next three years.
The burden hours associated with
development of a VSSA are detailed in
the tables below.

TABLE 1—BURDEN HOURS ESTIMATES FOR VSSA, PER SAFETY ELEMENT
Burden hours
for VSSA
development

Safety element in voluntary guidance
A. System Safety .........................................................................................................................................
B. Operational Design Domain ....................................................................................................................
C. Object and Event Detection and Response ...........................................................................................

20
20
40

4 https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicleindustry-services/autonomous-vehicles/
autonomous-vehicle-testing-permit-holders/.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:00 May 25, 2021

Jkt 253001

PO 00000

Frm 00109

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

Burden hours
for VSSA
summary

26MYN1

10
5
5

28438

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices
TABLE 1—BURDEN HOURS ESTIMATES FOR VSSA, PER SAFETY ELEMENT—Continued
Burden hours
for VSSA
development

Safety element in voluntary guidance

Burden hours
for VSSA
summary

D. Fallback ...................................................................................................................................................
E. Validation Methods ..................................................................................................................................
F. Human Machine Interface .......................................................................................................................
G. Vehicle Cybersecurity .............................................................................................................................
H. Crashworthiness .....................................................................................................................................
I. Post-Crash ADS Behavior ........................................................................................................................
J. Data Recording ........................................................................................................................................
K. Consumer Education and Training .........................................................................................................
L. Federal, State, and Local Laws ..............................................................................................................

80
80
20
20
20
20
80
40
80

10
10
5
5
5
5
10
5
5

Total Burden Hours per ADS ...............................................................................................................

520

80

TABLE 2—CALCULATION OF ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS
Estimated Number of Respondents Annually ...............................................................................................................................
Estimated Burden Hours for Voluntary Assessment Development ..............................................................................................
Estimated Burden Hours for Summarizing Information ................................................................................................................

20.
520 hours.
80 hours.

Total Burden Hours per Respondent .....................................................................................................................................

600 hours.

Total Estimated Burden Hours for Industry per Year .....................................................................................................

NHTSA estimates the hourly cost
associated with preparing VSSAs to be
$97.36 5 per hour using the Bureau of
Labor Statistics’ mean hourly wage
estimate for architectural and
engineering managers in the motor
vehicle manufacturing industry
(Standard Occupational Classification
#11–9041). Therefore, the total
estimated annual burden to each
respondent is $58,416 (600 hours ×
$97.36 = $58,416). Therefore, the total
estimated labor costs to all respondents
to this collection is $1,168,320.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
NHTSA does not anticipate any further
burden to respondents beyond the labor
costs associated with the burden hours.
Public Comments Invited
You are asked to comment on any
aspect of this information collection,
including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
5 The hourly wage is estimated to be $68.35 per
hour. National Industry-Specific Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates NAICS 336100—
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing, May 2019, https://
www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_336100.htm, last
accessed June 30, 2020. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimates that wages represent 70.2
percent of total compensation to private workers, on
average. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the total
hourly compensation cost to be $97.36.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:00 May 25, 2021

Jkt 253001

ways for the department to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses
without reducing the quality of the
collected information.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29.
Cem Hatipoglu,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety
Research.
[FR Doc. 2021–11150 Filed 5–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
of one or more persons that have been
placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
(SDN List) based on OFAC’s
determination that one or more

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00110

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

12,000 hours.

applicable legal criteria were satisfied.
All property and interests in property
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these
persons are blocked, and U.S. persons
are generally prohibited from engaging
in transactions with them.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for effective date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.:
202–622–2490; Associate Director for
Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420;
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855;
or the Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Availability
The Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Action
On May 17, 2021, OFAC determined
that the property and interests in
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of
the following persons are blocked under
the relevant sanctions authority listed
below.
Individuals
1. AL–FAY, Ibrahim Ali ’Awad (a.k.a.
‘‘Abu Ali al-Samarra’i’’), Sakarya, Turkey;
DOB 1968; Gender Male (individual) [SDGT].
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(iii)(B)
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23,

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1