1218-0260_VTLs_ 08-04-2021_ROCIS

1218-0260_VTLs_ 08-04-2021_ROCIS.docx

Vertical Tandem Lifts for Marine Terminals (29 CFR part 1917)

OMB: 1218-0260

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

VERTICAL TANDEM LIFTS (VTLs) FOR

MARINE TERMINALS (29 CFR PART 1917)

OMB Control Number: 1218-0260

August 31, 2021


SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR

THE INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENT

OF VERTICAL TANDEM LIFTS (VTLs) FOR

MARINE TERMINALS (29 CFR PART 1917)1

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB)

CONTROL NO. 1218-0260 (July 2021)



The agency is seeking a revision and an adjustment to the currently approved data collection.

A. JUSTIFICATION


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The main purpose of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSH Act”) is to “assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources” (29 U.S.C. 651). To achieve this objective, the OSH Act specifically authorizes “the development and promulgation of occupational safety and health standards” (29 U.S.C 651).


Under the authority granted by the OSH Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA” or “the Agency”) published a final rule on Vertical Tandem Lifts (VTLs) in Marine Terminals. A VTL means the lifting of two intermodal containers that are coupled together vertically (one on top of the other). The Standard permits VTLs of two empty containers. The information collection requirements in the Standard require employers to develop and implement a terminal plan for transporting VTLs inside the terminal.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The collection of information required by the Standard is used by employers to ensure that employees are informed properly about the safety hazards associated with VTL operations, and the proper use of twistlocks when performing a VTL. The collection of information is necessary to prevent employee injuries and fatalities associated with lifting cargo.


§1917.71(a)(1) – (a)(3), (b)(2)(i) and (ii) Labeling of Intermodal Containers


Paragraph (a) requires that all intermodal containers are legibly and permanently marked with the weight of the container when empty ((a)(1)); the maximum weight the container is designed to carry in pounds ((a)(2)); and the sum of the weight of the container and the cargo, in pounds ((a)(3)).


Additionally, loaded containers must display their gross weight plainly marked on the container in a way that it is visible to the crane operator or other hoisting equipment operator or signalman, or to every supervisor and foreman on the site and in charge of the operation ((b)(2)(i)), or supplied in the form of a cargo stowage plan or equivalent permanent record to the crane or other hoisting equipment operator and signalman, if any, and to every supervisor and foreman on the site and in charge of the operation ((b)(2)(ii)).


Purpose: The labeling of intermodal containers with the weight of the container, the maximum weight of cargo that can be packed in the container, and their sum provides the crane operator or other hoisting equipment operator or signalman, or to every supervisor and foreman on the site and in charge of the operation with a minimum and maximum range under which a container can be safely lifted. Providing the gross weight, either marked on the container or supplied in the form of a cargo stowage plan or equivalent permanent record, ensures that the containers being lifted and the cranes/derricks performing the lifting are not overloaded.

§1917.71(i)(8)(iv) through (vi) Testing, Certification, and Labeling of Interbox Connectors


Paragraph (i)(8)(iv) requires employers to ensure that the interbox connectors used in VTL operations have been certified by a competent authority authorized under §1918.11 (for interbox connectors that are part of a vessel’s gear) or §1917.50 (for other interbox connectors).


Paragraph (i)(8)(v) requires employers to make the certificate, which attests that the interbox connector meets the strength criteria given in paragraph (i)(8)(iv), available for inspection. Also, paragraph (i)(8)(vi) requires that each interbox connector be clearly and durably marked with its safe working load for lifting and an identifying number or mark that will enable it to be associated with its test certificate.


Purpose: The certification is necessary to ensure that interbox connector-corner casting assemblies have adequate strength to ensure the safety of the lift. Marking of interbox connectors informs employers, workers, and OSHA that the interbox connectors have been certified.


§§1917.71(j)(2) and (k)(2) Written Plan for Transporting VTLs and Establishing a Safe Work Zone for Employees

Paragraph (j)(2) requires that employers develop, implement, and maintain a written transport plan for vertically connected containers. This plan must establish procedures to ensure safe operating and turning speeds and address all conditions in the terminal that could affect the safety of VTL-related operations, including communication and coordination among all employees involved in these operations.

Paragraph (k)(2) requires that the written transport plan also include information regarding the safe work zone and procedures to ensure that employees are not in this zone when a VTL is in motion.

Purpose: The written plan for transporting vertically connected containers is necessary for the safe transport of VTLs in the marine terminal where the mentioned factors affect the stability of a VTL which has a higher center of gravity than a single container. Without a VTL terminal plan, containers handled as a VTL could overturn. The safe work zone and procedures ensure employees are not in this zone when a VTL is in motion.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also, describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


Employers may use automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology (e.g., electronic submission of responses), when establishing and maintaining the required records. The Agency wrote the paperwork requirements of these standards in performance-oriented language, i.e., in terms of what data to collect, not how to record the data.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item A.2 above.


The requirement to collect and maintain information are specific to each employer involved, and no other source or agency duplicates the requirement or can make the required information available to OSHA (i.e., the required information is available only from employers).


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The VTL information collection requirements in the Standard do not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing the burden.


The Agency believes that the information collection frequency required by the Standard is the minimum frequency necessary to prevent employee injuries and fatalities associated with lifting cargo. The Agency believes that failure of the employer to collect and distribute the information required by the information collection requirement in the regulation will affect significantly the cooperative effort between OSHA and the employer to ensure employee safety through controlling or reducing injuries and fatalities in marine terminal operations and longshoring. Any Federal program or policy activities or decisions that would reduce or eliminate the collections of information required in these standards would also affect OSHA's efforts to ensure employee safety and health in the workplace.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


in connection with a statistical survey that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;


requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


that includes a pledge of confidentially that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can prove that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentially to the extent permitted by law.


No special circumstances exist that require employers to collect information in the manner or using the procedures specified by this item. The information collection requirement is consistent with the guidelines provided in 5 CFR 1320.5.


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, revealed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every three years -- even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that mitigate against consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), OSHA published a notice in the Federal Register on May 3, 2021 (86 FR 23432) soliciting comments on its proposal to extend the Office of Management and Budget’s approval of the information collection requirements specified by the Standard on Vertical Tandem Lifts for Marine Terminals (29 CFR part 1917) under the docket number OSHA-2011-0066. This notice is part of a preclearance consultation program that provides the general public and government agencies with an opportunity to comment. The agency did not receive any public comments in response to this notice.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payments or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


The Agency will not provide payments or gifts to the respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


None of the information collection requirements in the standards require the collection of confidential information.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the Agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


None of the provisions in the regulations require sensitive information.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


· Show the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burdens, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.


  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage-rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.


Respondent Burden Hour and Cost Burden Determinations:


The estimated burden hour and cost determinations are based on the industrial profile of the VTLs’ Final Rule (73 FR 75245). OSHA updated the industrial profiles by using the 2017 County Business Patterns Data from the US Census Bureau. The industrial profile identifies 1,192 establishments affected by the VTL Standard. This includes port and harbor operations (NAICS 488310) (335 establishments), deep sea freight transportation (NAICS 483111)) (276 establishments), and coastal and great lakes freight transportation (NAICS 483113)) (581 establishments). However, West coast marine terminals are covered under International Longshore and Warehouse Union contracts, which discourage these employers from using VTLs. Further, Agency discussions with employers indicate that East and gulf coast employers rarely use VTLs in their shore based operations. For these reasons, the Agency estimates that no more than 10 percent of marine terminals are currently using VTLs; the Agency will conservatively assume 10 percent are for the purposes for calculating this ICR. The Agency will retain the same percentage as the last ICR update.


Estimated Wage Rates


The Agency determined the wage rate from mean hourly wage earnings to represent the cost of employee time. For the relevant standard occupational classification category, OSHA used the wage rates reported in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Employment Statistics (OES), May 2019. (OES data is available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm. To access a wage rate, select the year, “Occupation profiles,” and the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code.)


To account for fringe benefits, the Agency used the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) (May 2020) the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation – September 2020, news released on Thursday, December 17, 2020 (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_12172020.pdf) . BLS reported that for civilian workers, fringe benefits accounted for 29.82 percent of total compensation and wages accounted for the remaining 70.2 percent. To calculate the loaded hourly wage for each occupation, the Agency divided the mean hourly wage by 70.2 percent.


Table 1 – Estimated Wage Rate


WAGE HOUR ESTIMATES3

Occupational Title

Standard Occupation Code

Mean Hour Wage Rate

[A]

Fringe Benefits Multiplier

[B]

Loaded hourly Wage Rate

[C] = [A (1/1-B)]

General Manager

11-1021

$59.15

0.298

$84.26

Maintenance Worker

49-9043

$23.77

0.298

$33.86

File Clerk

43-4071

$16.64

0.298

$23.70


§1917.71(a)(1) – (a)(3), (b)(2)(i) and (ii) Labeling of Intermodal Containers


OSHA estimates that there are 18,8064 container vessel calls processed a year between the total 49 ports. Assuming the size of each vessel is medium and carries 187 containers per call, there are 3,516,722 containers per year shipped. ( 18,806 x 187 = 3,516,722 containers) The total of 1,192 establishments is divided into the total number of containers (3,516,722) giving a total of 2,950 containers per establishments (3,516,722/1,192 employers/establishments = 2,950 containers per employer/establishment).


Employers are to label intermodal containers with the weight of the container, maximum allowed weight of cargo, and maximum combined weight of the container and allowed cargo. OSHA believes that containers are already marked with this information before arriving at the marine terminal. However, over time, container labels have the potential to become worn and become illegible. On average, OSHA estimates that there are approximately 2,950 containers processed each year per establishment/employer. Of those containers, the Agency estimates that 1% (30) will be required to have labels replaced, which will take 30 minutes (30/60 hour) for a terminal maintenance worker to acquire and affix the label.


Burden hours: 1,192 establishments x 30 labels repaired/establishment x 30/60 hour = 17,880 hours


Cost: 17,880 hours x $33.86 (Maintenance worker) = $605,416.8


Additionally, the gross weight of loaded containers must be provided to the crane or other hoisting equipment operator and signalman, if any, and to every supervisor and foreman on the site and in charge of the operation. This information can either be displayed on the container itself, or supplied in the form of a cargo stowage plan or equivalent permanent record. OSHA estimates that the gross weight is primarily supplied by way of cargo stowage plan or equivalent permanent record, rather than marked on the container. Therefore, OSHA associates no cost with the display of the gross weight physically on the container. OSHA also estimates that there is no cost associated with development of a cargo stowage plan/other permanent record that displays container gross weight. However, the Agency presumes that burden hours are associated with ensuring the crane or other hoisting equipment operator and signalman, if any, and* every supervisor and foreman on the site and in charge of the operation have this information readily available.


OSHA estimated that there are 18,806 vessels per year carrying the containers. For each merchant vessel, a list is generated of the stowage plan. OSHA assumes that a manager, earning $84.26 an hour, will take 10 minutes (10/60 hour) per vessel to print and supply the cargo stowage plan or other similar record to the necessary personnel.


Burden hours: 18,806 vessel per plan x 10/60 hour to print and supply each plan = 3,134.33 hours


Cost: 3,134.33 hours x $84.26 = $264,098.65


OSHA estimates that it will take a file clerk 5 minutes (5/60 hours) to maintain the plan per vessel.


Burden hours: 18,806 vessel per plan x 5/60 hours to maintain the plan = 1,567.17 hours


Cost: 1,567.17 hours x $23.70 (Clerical worker) = $37,141.93


§1917.71(i)(8)(iv) through (vi) Testing, Certification, and Labeling of Interbox Connectors


Employers must provide a certificate, attesting that the interbox connectors meet the strength criteria provided by paragraph (i)(8)(iv). Such a certificate is issued by a competent person. Additionally, each interbox connector must be clearly and durably marked with its safe working load for lifting with and an identifying number or mark that will enable it to be associated with its test certificate.


Assuming one load per establishment, OSHA estimates that it will take a maintenance worker making $33.86 an hour 5 minutes (5/60 hours) to certify the marking of the load.


Burden hours: 1,192 establishment x 1 certification x 5/60 hours = 99.33 hours


Cost: 99.33 hours x $33.86 = $3,363.31


OSHA estimates that it will take a file clerk 5 minutes (5/60 hours) to maintain the certificate.


Burden hours: 1,192 certificates x 5/60 = 99.33 hours


Cost: 99.33 hours x $23.70 (Clerical worker) = $2,354.12


§§1917.71(j)(2) and (k)(2) Written Plan for Transporting VTLs and Establishing a Safe Work Zone for Employees


Employers are to develop and implement a written plan for transporting vertically coupled containers in a terminal. OSHA estimates that 10% (119) of the 1,192 employers are generating, developing, and maintaining these written plans. OSHA assumes that a manager, earning $84.26 an hour, will take four hours to develop and implement the written plan including identification of safe work zones and procedures.


Burden hours: 119 establishments x 4 hours = 476 hours

Cost: 476 hours x $84.26 = $40,108










Table 2 – Summary of Estimated Respondent Hour and Cost Burdens

Information Collection Requirement

No. of Respondents


No. of Responses

per Respondent

Total Responses

Time per Response (In Hours)

Total Burden Hours

Hourly

Wage Rate

Total Burden Cost

§1917.71(a)(1) – (a)(3), (b)(2)(i) and (ii) Labeling of Intermodal Containers


1,192

30

35,760

30/60

17,880

$33.86

$605,416.8


1,192

15.7768456376

18,806

10/60

3,134.33

$84.26

$264,098.65


1,192

15.7768456376

18,806

5/60

1,567.17

$23.70

$37,141.93

§1917.71(i)(8)(iv) through (vi) Testing, Certification, and Labeling of Interbox Connectors

1,192

1

1,192

5/60

99.33

$33.86

3,363.31


1,192

1

1,192

5/60

99.33

$23.70

$2,354.12

§§1917.71(j)(2) and (k)(2) Written Plan for Transporting VTLs and Establishing a Safe Work Zone for Employees

1,192

0.10

119


4


476

$84.26

$40,107.76

Totals



75,875


23,256


$952,482.57


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)


Item 12 above provides the total cost of the information collection requirements specified by the Standard. There are no additional costs to the respondent other than their time.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Usually, OSHA requests access to records during an inspection. Information collected by the Agency during the investigation is not subject to the PRA under 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(2).  Therefore, OSHA takes no burden or cost in Items 12 and 14 of this Supporting Statement.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.


OSHA is requesting an increase of 22,744 hours in the currently approved burden hours from 512 hours to 23,256 hours. This increase is due to the addition of two new paragraphs to the collections; (1) paragraph §1917.71(a)(1) – (a)(3), (b)(2)(i) and (ii) - Labeling of Intermodal Containers and; (2) §1917.71(i)(8)(iv) through (vi) - Testing, Certification, and Labeling of Interbox Connectors. This is a revision to the currently approved burden hours that includes an adjustment decrease of 36 from 512 to 476 hours and a program change increase of 22,268 hours.


Based on staff expertise with marine terminals, the Agency estimates of the number VTLs are based on the updated establishment data from the North American Classification Information System retrieved from the 2017 County Business Patterns. OSHA realized with the renewal of this request that although new data collections were created when the standards were amended during the publication of the Federal Register on July 21, 2014 (79 FR 22018) they were not added to the collection.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication, address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


OSHA will not publish the information collected under these standards.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be appropriate.


OSHA lists current valid control numbers in §§1910.8, 1915.8, 1917.4, 1918.4, and 1926.5 and publishes the expiration date in the Federal Register notice announcing OMB approval of the Information collection requirement (see 5 CFR 1320.3(f)(3)). OSHA believes that this is the most appropriate and accurate mechanism to inform interested parties of these expiration dates.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement.


OSHA is not seeking an exception to the certification statement.


B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS


This Supporting Statement does not contain any information collection requirements that employ statistical methods.



1The purpose of this Supporting Statement is to analyze and describe the burden hours and costs associated with the provisions of the Standard that contain paperwork requirements; this Supporting Statement does not provide information or guidance on how to comply with, or how to enforce, the Standard.

2Employer Costs for Employee Compensation – June 2020, news released September 17, 2020, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09172020.pdf


3 Source: May 2019 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2019

4 Assuming each port receives at least 373.73 calls a year plus or minus one between the ports.

11


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorWashington, Robert - OSHA
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-08-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy