Download:
pdf |
pdf66542
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 20, 2020 / Notices
CONTACT section, at least seven (7)
business days prior to the meeting so
that appropriate arrangements can be
made.
Written Comments or Statements:
Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.105(j) and
102–3.140 and section 10(a)(3) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the
public or interested organizations may
submit written comments or statements
to the Board about its mission and/or
the topics to be addressed in this
Microsoft Office 365 Teams virtual
public meeting. Written comments or
statements should be submitted to Mrs.
Ghostlaw, the committee DFO, via
electronic mail, the preferred mode of
submission, at the address listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section in the following formats: Adobe
Acrobat or Microsoft Word. The
comment or statement must include the
author’s name, title, affiliation, address,
and daytime telephone number. Written
comments or statements being
submitted in response to the agenda set
forth in this notice must be received by
the committee DFO at least seven (7)
business days prior to the meeting so
that they may be made available to the
Board for its consideration prior to the
meeting. Written comments or
statements received after this date may
not be provided to the Board until its
next meeting. Please note that because
the Board operates under the provisions
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
as amended, all written comments will
be treated as public documents and will
be made available for public inspection.
Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.140d, the
committee is not obligated to allow a
member of the public to speak or
otherwise address the committee during
the meeting. However, the committee
Designated Federal Official and
Chairperson may choose to invite
certain submitters to present their
comments verbally during the open
portion of this meeting or at a future
meeting. The Designated Federal
Officer, in consultation with the
committee Chairperson, may allot a
specific amount of time for submitters to
present their comments verbally.
James W. Satterwhite, Jr.,
Alternate Federal Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–23208 Filed 10–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–03–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Oct 19, 2020
Jkt 253001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RD20–4–000]
Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–725A(1B), FERC–
725D, FERC–725F, FERC–725G, and
FERC–725L); Comment Request;
Revision
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of information
collections and request for comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) is soliciting
public comment on revisions to the
information collections FERC–725A(1B)
(Mandatory Reliability Standards for the
Bulk-Power System), FERC–725D
(Facilities Design, Connections and
Maintenance Reliability Standards),
FERC–725F (Mandatory Reliability
Standard for Nuclear Plant Interface
Coordination), FERC–725G (Reliability
Standards for the Bulk-Power System:
PRC Reliability Standards), and FERC–
725L (Mandatory Reliability Standards
for the Bulk-Power System: MOD
Reliability Standards) and submitting
the information collections to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review. Any interested person may file
comments directly with OMB and
should address a copy of those
comments to the Commission as
explained below.
DATES: Comments on the collections of
information are due November 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments on
the information collections to OMB
through www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Attention: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Please identify the OMB Control
Number(s) in the subject line of your
comments. Comments should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
A copy of the comments should also
be sent to the Commission, in Docket
No. RD20–4–000, by any of the
following methods:
• eFiling at Commission’s Website:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp.
• U.S. Postal Service Mail: Persons
unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE, Washington, DC 20426.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Effective 7/1/2020, delivery of
filings other than by eFiling or the U.S.
Postal Service should be delivered to
Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland
20852.
Instructions:
OMB submissions must be formatted
and filed in accordance with submission
guidelines at www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Using the search function
under the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’
field, select Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission; click ‘‘submit,’’ and select
‘‘comment’’ to the right of the subject
collection.
FERC submissions must be formatted
and filed in accordance with submission
guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov. For
user assistance, contact FERC Online
Support by email at ferconlinesupport@
ferc.gov, or by phone at: (866) 208–3676
(toll-free).
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at http://www.ferc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by email
at DataClearance@FERC.gov and
telephone at (202) 502–8663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Titles: FERC–725A(1B) (Mandatory
Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power
System),1 FERC–725D (Facilities Design,
Connections and Maintenance
Reliability Standards), FERC–725F
(Mandatory Reliability Standard for
Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination),
FERC–725G (Reliability Standards for
the Bulk-Power System: PRC Reliability
Standards), and FERC–725L (Mandatory
Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power
System: MOD Reliability Standards).
OMB Control Nos.: 1902–0292 (FERC–
725A(1B)); 1902–0247 (FERC–725D);
1902–0249 (FERC–725F); 1902–0252
(FERC–725G); and 1902–0261 (FERC–
725L).
Type of Request: Revisions to FERC–
725A(1B), FERC–725D, FERC–725F,
FERC–725G, and FERC–725L
information collection requirements, as
discussed in Docket No. RD20–4–000.
Abstract: The Commission published
a 60-day Notice requesting public
comments on July 24, 2020 (85 FR
1 The 60-day Notice also proposed changes to the
FERC–725A (OMB Control No. 1902–0244) and
FERC–725Z (OMB Control No. 1902–0276).
However other items are pending OMB review
under FERC–725A and FERC–725Z, and only one
item per OMB Control No. can be pending OMB
review at a time. In order to submit the proposed
changes in Docket No. RD20–4–000 to OMB timely,
we are submitting the proposed changes for FERC–
725A and FERC–725Z to OMB under the
placeholder information collection FERC–725A(1B)
(OMB Control No. 1902–0292).
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 20, 2020 / Notices
44875). Comments were due September
22, 2020; no comments were received.
The North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC) filed a
petition to modify seven Reliability
Standards.
On February 21, 2020, NERC filed a
petition in Docket No. RD20–4–000 2
requesting Commission approval of:
• Reliability Standard TOP–003–4
(Operational Reliability Data),
• Reliability Standard FAC–002–3
(Facility Interconnection Studies),
• Reliability Standard NUC–001–4
(Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination),
• Reliability Standard PRC–006–4
(Automatic Underfrequency Load
Shedding),
• Reliability Standard MOD–031–3
(Demand and Energy Data),
• Reliability Standard MOD–033–2
(Steady-State and Dynamic System
Model Validation), and
• Reliability Standard IRO–010–3
(Reliability Coordinator Data
Specification and Collection).
NERC is requesting approval of the
seven proposed Reliability Standards
pursuant to section 215(d)(1) of the
Federal Power Act (‘‘FPA’’) 3 and
Section 39.5 4 of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission’s (‘‘FERC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) regulations. The
revisions in the proposed Reliability
Standards will align these standards
with the previously-approved changes
to the NERC registration criteria 5 by
removing reference to entities 6 that are
no longer registered with NERC. In
proposed Reliability Standard PRC–
006–4, NERC adds the UFLS-only
Distribution Provider as an applicable
entity. In two instances, NERC has
proposed changes that will promote
consistent use of the term Planning
Coordinator across the Reliability
Standards.7
The Commission’s request to OMB
will reflect the following:
• Elimination of the burden
associated with the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in Requirement R5 of
proposed Reliability Standard TOP–
2 The
petition and exhibits are posted in the
Commission’s eLibrary system in Docket No. RD20–
4–000 (Standards Alignment with Registration
Petition).
3 16 U.S.C. 824o (2018).
4 18 CFR 39.5 (2020).
5 Order on Electric Reliability Organization Risk
Based Registration Initiative and Requiring
Compliance Filing, 150 FERC ¶ 61,213 (2015); Order
on Compliance Filing, 153 FERC ¶ 61,024 (2015).
6 NERC’s risk-based registration initiative resulted
in the removal of the load-serving entity and
purchasing-selling entity from the NERC
compliance registry.
7 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Oct 19, 2020
Jkt 253001
003–4.8 The petition states that the
currently effective standard is
applicable to the transmission operator,
balancing authority, generator owner,
generator operator, load-serving entity,
transmission owner, and distribution
provider. As the load-serving entity is
no longer a NERC registration category,
NERC proposes to remove this entity
from the applicability section of
proposed Reliability Standard TOP–
003–4 and remove reference to this
entity in Requirement R5.9
• Elimination of the burden
associated with the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in Requirement R3 of
proposed Reliability Standard FAC–
002–3.10 The NERC petition states as the
load-serving entity is no longer a NERC
registration category, NERC proposes to
remove this entity from the applicability
section of proposed Reliability Standard
FAC–002–3 and remove reference to
this entity in Requirement R3.11
• Removal of the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in the applicability
section of proposed Reliability Standard
NUC–001–4.12 The NERC petition states
as the load-serving entity is no longer a
NERC registration category, NERC
proposes to remove this entity from the
list of applicable transmission entities
in the applicability section of proposed
Reliability Standard NUC–001–4.13
Removing this function from the list of
transmission entities will not change the
estimated burden associated with this
standard.
• Addition of the burden associated
with UFLS-only distribution providers
to proposed Reliability Standard PRC–
006–4.14 The petition states that the
currently effective standard is
applicable to planning coordinators,
‘‘UFLS entities’’ (which may include
transmission owners and distribution
8 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, TOP–003–3, is included in FERC–
725A.
9 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 14.
10 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, FAC–002–2, is included in FERC–
725D.
11 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 8.
12 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, NUC–001–3, is included in FERC–
725F.
13 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 12.
14 The burden associated with the Commission
approved standard, PRC–006–2, is included in
FERC–725G. The current version of this standard,
PRC–006–3, was adopted by the NERC Board of
Trustees on August 10, 2017. Reliability Standard
PRC–006–3 was not submitted to the Commission
for approval because it is identical to the
Commission-approved version, PRC–006–2. The
only change was a revision to the regional variance
for the Quebec Interconnection and does not impact
the requirements for entities in the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66543
providers that own, operate, or control
UFLS equipment), and transmission
owners that own certain elements. In
proposed Reliability Standard PRC–
006–4, NERC proposes to add the UFLSonly distribution provider as an
applicable UFLS entity.15
• Elimination of the burden
associated with the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in Requirement R1 of
proposed Reliability Standard MOD–
031–3.16 The NERC petition states as the
load-serving entity is no longer a NERC
registration category, NERC proposes to
remove this entity from the applicability
section of proposed Reliability Standard
MOD–031–3 and remove reference to
this entity in Requirement R1, Part 1.1,
where it is listed as an ‘‘Applicable
Entity’’ for purposes of Requirements R2
and R4.17
Additionally, NERC proposes to strike
the term ‘‘Planning Authority’’ from the
applicability section of the standard and
the explanatory text that follows. The
preferred terminology for the
responsible entity that coordinates and
integrates transmission facilities and
service plans, resource plans, and
protection systems is ‘‘Planning
Coordinator.’’ 18 This is a terminology
change and will not result in a change
in burden.
• Modification of the term ‘‘Planning
Authority’’ to ‘‘Planning Coordinator’’
in proposed Reliability Standard MOD–
033–2.19 In the petition, NERC proposes
to strike the term ‘‘Planning Authority’’
from the applicability section of the
standard and the explanatory text that
follows. The proposed change is
intended to promote consistent use of
‘‘Planning Coordinator’’ throughout the
Reliability Standards.20 This is a
terminology change and will not result
in a change in burden.
• Elimination of the burden
associated with the load-serving entity
(LSE) function in Requirement R3 of
proposed Reliability Standard IRO–010–
3.21 The NERC petition states as the
load-serving entity is no longer a NERC
registration category, NERC proposes to
15 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 13.
16 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, MOD–031–2, is included in FERC–
725L.
17 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 10.
18 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 10.
19 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, MOD–033–1, is included in FERC–
725L.
20 Standards Alignment with Registration Petition
at 11.
21 The burden associated with the current version
of this standard, IRO–010–2, is included in FERC–
725Z.
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
66544
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 20, 2020 / Notices
remove this entity from the applicability
section of proposed Reliability Standard
IRO–010–3 and remove reference to this
entity in Requirement R3.22
Type of Respondents: Reliability
coordinator (RC), balancing authority
(BA), transmission owner (TO),
transmission operator (TOP), generator
owner (GO), generator operator (GOP),
distribution provider (DP), UFLS-only
distribution provider (UFLS-only DP),
planning coordinator (PC), and
transmission planner (TP).
Estimate of Annual Burden 23: The
Commission based its estimates on the
NERC compliance registry as of April
10, 2020. According to the registry,
there are 12 reliability coordinators, 98
balancing authorities, 314 distribution
providers, 63 UFLS-only distribution
providers, 973 generator owners, 916
generator operators, 321 transmission
owners, 169 transmission operators, 64
planning coordinators, and 196
transmission planners in the United
States. NERC registered entities can be
registered as multiple functions, and the
burden estimates reflect the overlapping
of functions per entity respondent.
Changes Due to Docket No. RD20–4–000
The changes proposed in Docket No.
RD20–4–000 include the removal of
load-serving entity from the
applicability of five Reliability
Standards; addition of UFLS-only
distribution provider in one Reliability
Standard; and a terminology change of
‘‘planning authority’’ to ‘‘planning
coordinator’’ in the applicability of two
Reliability Standards. The load-serving
entity function was removed from the
NERC compliance registry in October
2015 as a result of the risk-based
registration order.24 Prior to the removal
of the load-serving entity function, the
NERC compliance registry in early 2015
included 446 registered load-serving
entities, however, many of these entities
were also registered as other functions
and remained on the registry. NERC
deregistered 63 load-serving entities
from the compliance registry on October
15, 2015, coinciding with the
Commission approval of NERC’s riskbased registration initiative.25
The proposed Reliability Standard
NUC–001–4 modification of removing
the load-serving entity from its
applicability is not a substantive change
and does not require a change in
burden. This is due to the current
burden assumptions based on: (1) The
number of nuclear plants in the United
States, and (2) applicability including
two transmission entities 26 for each
nuclear plant. The removal of loadserving entity from the list of possible
transmission entities does not change
these assumptions.
The Commission staff estimates the
program changes, due to Docket No.
RD20–4–000, for the listed information
collections. Because the affected
Reliability Standards were implemented
at various times since Order No. 693 in
March 2007, using the hourly cost
estimates in effect at that time, we are
being conservative and not showing cost
estimates for the changes.
Adjustments, Updates, and
Clarification of Estimates (Not Due to
Docket No. RD20–4–000)
In addition to the changes identified
in Docket No. RD20–4–000, the
Commission is updating the entire
burden estimates for six of the
Reliability Standards. These
adjustments are warranted based on
updates to the number of applicable
registered entities and to ensure that the
burden for each applicable function is
quantified with clear granularity.
The table also includes adjustments
due to normal industry fluctuations
(e.g., companies merging or splitting,
going into or leaving the industry, or
filling more or fewer roles in the NERC
registry); the figures are based on the
NERC registry as of April 10, 2020.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO BURDEN DUE TO DOCKET NO. RD20–4–000 AND ADJUSTMENTS AND CLARIFICATIONS 27
Reliability standard and requirements
Number of respondents and
type of entity
Annual
number of
responses per
respondent
Annual
number of
responses
Average
burden hrs.
per response
Total annual
burden hours
(1)
(2)
(1) * (2) = (3)
(4)
(3) * (4) = (5)
FERC–725A(1B), OMB Control No. 1902–0292
TOP–003–4 (Operational Reliability Data), R1–R5, & Evidence Retention—adjustment.
TOP–003–4 (Operational Reliability Data), R5 & Evidence Retention—program increase 28.
IRO–010–3 (Reliability Coordinator Data Specification
and Collection), R1–R3, Evidence Retention—adjustment.
IRO–010–3 (Reliability Coordinator Data Specification
and Collection), R3 & Evidence Retention—adjustment/clarification 29.
22 Standards
Alignment with Registration Petition
at 9.
23 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, refer to 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
24 Order on Electric Reliability Organization Risk
Based Registration Initiative and Requiring
Compliance Filing, 150 FERC ¶ 61,213 (2015); Order
on Compliance Filing, 153 FERC ¶ 61,024 (2015).
25 NERC posts its list of deregistered entities at
the following link. https://www.nerc.com/pa/comp/
Registration%20and%20Certification%20DL/
NCR%20Deregistered%20Entities.xls
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Oct 19, 2020
Jkt 253001
¥3 (TOP & BA) ..................
1
¥3 ........................
230
1,363 (GO, GOP, TO & DP)
1
1,363 ....................
8
+1 (RC) ...............................
1
1 ...........................
36
1,388 (BA, GO, GOP, TOP,
TO & DP).
1
1,388 ....................
8
26 The current Reliability Standard NUC–001–3
defines the phrase ‘‘transmission entities’’ as all
entities that are responsible for providing services
related to nuclear plant interface requirements
(NPIRs). Such entities may include one or more of
the following: Transmission operators, transmission
owners, transmission planners, transmission service
providers, balancing authorities, reliability
coordinators, planning coordinators, distribution
providers, load-serving entities, generator owners,
and generator operators.
27 The adjustments, due to normal industry
fluctuations, are based on figures in the NERC
registry as of April 10, 2020.
28 This is not a program change (increase) due to
Docket No. RD20–4–000. Rather, we are correcting
an earlier oversight. It appears that the estimated
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
¥690
10,904
+36
11,104
burden figures for the GO, GOP, TO and DP were
inadvertently omitted from the package submitted
to and approved by OMB related to the Final Rule
(Order No. 817, issued 11/19/2015) in Docket No.
RM15–16. The number of respondents is the current
figure based on the NERC registry.
29 The original Reliability Standard IRO–010–1a
was included in Order No. 748 (Docket No. RM10–
15) under FERC–725A. The burden for 11 RCs for
IRO–010–2 (Order No. 817 in Docket No. RM15–16)
was covered by FERC–725Z. Some of this burden
may still be in FERC–725A (and double counted
temporarily). This action is an adjustment and not
related to Docket No. RD20–4–000.
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
66545
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 20, 2020 / Notices
PROPOSED CHANGES TO BURDEN DUE TO DOCKET NO. RD20–4–000 AND ADJUSTMENTS AND CLARIFICATIONS 27—
Continued
Reliability standard and requirements
Net Sub-Total for FERC–725A(1B) ............................
Number of respondents and
type of entity
Annual
number of
responses per
respondent
Annual
number of
responses
Average
burden hrs.
per response
Total annual
burden hours
(1)
(2)
(1) * (2) = (3)
(4)
(3) * (4) = (5)
.............................................
........................
2,749 (net increase).
........................
21,354 (net increase)
FERC–725D, OMB Control No. 1902–0247
FAC–002–3 (Facility Interconnection Studies), R1,
Study—adjustment.
FAC–002–3 (Facility Interconnection Studies), R1, Evidence Retention—adjustment.
FAC–002–3 (Facility Interconnection Studies), R2–R5,
Coordination—(program decrease & adjustment decrease) 30.
FAC–002–3 (Facility Interconnection Studies), R2–R5,
Evidence Retention—(program decrease & adjustment
decrease) 32.
+20 (PC & TP) ....................
1
+20 .......................
32
640
+20 (PC & TP) ....................
1
+20 .......................
1
20
¥93 (TO, GO & DP) 31 .......
1
¥93 ......................
16
¥93 (TO, GO & DP) ...........
1
¥93 ......................
1 hr.
Net Sub-Total for FERC–725D ..................................
.............................................
........................
¥146 (net reduction).
........................
¥1,488
¥93
¥921 (net reduction)
FERC–725G, OMB Control No. 1902–0252
PRC–006–4 (Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding),
Reporting Requirement—program decrease 33.
PRC–006–4 (Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding),
Evidence Retention—program decrease 33.
PRC–006–4 (Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding),
R1–R7, R11–R15, Reporting Requirement—program
increase & clarification 34.
PRC–006–4 (Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding),
R1–R7, R11–R15, Evidence Retention-program increase & clarification 34.
PRC–006–4 (Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding),
R8–R10, Evidence Retention—program increase &
clarification 35.
Net Sub-Total for FERC–725G ..................................
¥80 (TO & DP) ..................
1
¥80 ......................
47
¥80 (TO & DP) ..................
1
¥80 ......................
5
¥400
64 (PC) ................................
1
64 .........................
47
3,008
64 (PC) ................................
1
64 .........................
5
320
478 (TO, DP, UFLS-only
DP).
1
478 .......................
5
2,390
.............................................
........................
446 (net increase)
........................
¥3,760
1,558 (net increase)
FERC–725L, OMB Control No. 1902–0261
¥561 (DP, LSE, TP & BA)
1
¥561 ....................
8
¥4,488
113 (PC & BA) ....................
1
113 .......................
8
904
381 (TP, BA & DP) .............
1
381 .......................
8
3,048
¥14 (RC & TOP) 38 ............
1
¥14 ......................
8
¥112
¥14 (PC, RC & TOP) 39 .....
1
¥14 ......................
1
¥14
Net Sub-Total for FERC–725L ...................................
.............................................
........................
¥95 (net reduction).
........................
¥662 (net reduction)
Net Total Program Changes 40 ...................................
.............................................
........................
...............................
........................
+8,812
Net Total Adjustments ................................................
.............................................
........................
...............................
........................
+12,517
TOTAL NET CHANGES (Including Program
Changes and Adjustments) 40.
.............................................
........................
...............................
........................
+21,329
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data), Develop summary in accordance w/R1, Subparts 1.5.4 and 1.5.5.—
program decrease & adjustment/clarification 36.
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data) Develop data
request in accordance w/R1 and R3 & Evidence Retention—adjustment/clarification 37.
MOD–031–3 (Demand and Energy Data) Develop and
provide data in accordance w/R2 and R4 & Evidence
Retention—adjustment/clarification 36.
MOD–033–2 (Steady-State Dynamic System Model Validation), R2, Data Submittal [for R2]—adjustment.
MOD–033–2 (Steady-State Dynamic System Model Validation), R1–R2, Evidence Retention, adjustment.
30 The reduction of 93 respondents and
corresponding burden hours include 63 LSEs that
were de-registered (program decrease of 1,008 hrs.)
and an adjustment decrease of 30 respondents (480
hrs.) due to normal industry fluctuations.
Out of the total decrease of 1,488 hours, the
program decrease of 1,008 hours [corresponding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Oct 19, 2020
Jkt 253001
decrease of 63 responses] is due to Docket No.
RD20–4–000. The reduction of 480 hours is due to
normal adjustments.
31 Although 1,232 entities are registered as TO,
DP, or GO, we expect at the most 123 entities (ten
percent) will seek to interconnect and go through
the study phase that may require coordination in
any given year.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32 The reduction of 93 respondents and
corresponding burden hours include 63 LSEs that
were de-registered (program decrease of 63 hrs., due
to Docket No. RD20–4–000) and an adjustment
decrease of 30 respondents (30 hrs.) due to normal
industry fluctuations.
33 The number of entities is being reduced in
order to more clearly identify the applicable entities
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
Continued
20OCN1
66546
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 20, 2020 / Notices
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimates of the burden and cost of the
collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information collections; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collections
of information on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
in subsequent rows in this table. As stated in the
NERC Petition, ‘‘[t]he currently effective standard is
applicable to Planning Coordinators, ‘‘UFLS
entities’’ (which may include Transmission Owners
and Distribution Providers that own, operate, or
control UFLS equipment), and Transmission
Owners that own certain Elements. In proposed
Reliability Standard PRC–006–4, NERC proposes to
add the UFLS-Only Distribution Provider as an
applicable UFLS entity, consistent with the
language in Section III(b) of Appendix 5B of the
NERC Rules of Procedure (Statement of Compliance
Registry Criteria) that the Reliability Standards
applicable to UFLS-Only Distribution Providers
includes prior effective versions of the PRC–006
standard.’’ The changes are not due to Docket No.
RD20–4–000.
34 The increases are not due to Docket No. RD20–
4–000. They are a program increase of 64 PCs (and
the corresponding hrs.) in order to correct and
clarify the estimates.
35 The program increase is due to adding 63
UFLS-only DPs due to Docket No. RD20–4–000. In
addition, 415 TOs and DPs were originally
estimated in FERC–725A due to Order No. 693.
However, the estimates and descriptions were not
clearly spelled out, so we are clarifying them. As
a result, there are 315 hours (63 * 5 hours) and the
corresponding increase of 63 respondents of
program increase due to Docket No. RD20–4–000,
and 2,075 hours (415 * 5 hours) of increase due to
adjustment.
36 The estimates reflect a program decrease of 63
de-registered LSEs (and corresponding program
decrease of 504 hrs.) related to Docket No. RD20–
4–000, and an adjustment/clarification (decrease) of
498 DPs, TPs, and BAs (and corresponding decrease
of 3,984 hrs.), not related to Docket No. RD20–4–
000. The updated number of 381 DPs, TPs and BAs
is listed in a new row clarifying their applicability
with Requirements R2 and R4. Requirement R2
requires applicable entities to develop and provide
data pursuant with Requirement R1.
37 The 113 PCs and BAs were originally estimated
in FERC–725A due to Order No. 693. However, the
estimates and descriptions were not clearly spelled
out, so we are clarifying them. [Some of this burden
may still be in FERC–725A (and double counted
temporarily).]
38 The estimate is changing to 174 (from 188) due
to normal industry fluctuation.
39 The estimate is changing to 188 (from 194) due
to normal industry fluctuation.
40 The net total program changes due to Docket
No. RD20–4–000 result in a decrease of 1,260 hours
and decrease of 126 respondents.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Oct 19, 2020
Jkt 253001
Dated: October 13, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–23059 Filed 10–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG21–6–000.
Applicants: Harts Mill TE Holdings
LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification as an Exempt Wholesale
Generator of Harts Mill TE Holdings
LLC.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5006.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER20–17–003.
Applicants: Tenaska Pennsylvania
Partners, LLC.
Description: Report Filing: Refund
Report—Informational Filing to be
effective N/A.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5055.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–2453–001.
Applicants: Hamilton Patriot LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Amendment to Notice of Succession to
be effective 7/18/2020.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5064.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–98–000.
Applicants: Baltimore Gas and
Electric Company, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: BGE
submits Revisions to PJM Tariff, H–2A
re: Depreciation filing re: ER20–1929 to
be effective 11/1/2020.
Filed Date: 10/13/20.
Accession Number: 20201013–5346.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/3/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–99–000.
Applicants: DesertLink, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
Annual TRBAA Filing to be effective
1/1/2021.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5034.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–100–000.
Applicants: Gulf Power Company.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Facility Construction Agreement for
Affected System Project to be effective
10/7/2020.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5075.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–101–000.
Applicants: California Independent
System Operator Corporation.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
2020–10–14 EIM Entity Agreement—Los
Angeles Dept of Water and Power—
LADWP to be effective 1/20/2021.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5088.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–102–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Generator Retirement Process Tariff
Revisions to be effective 1/1/2021.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5091.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–103–000.
Applicants: Horizon Power and Light
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Horizon Power and Light, LLC Updated
Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
12/13/2020.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5093.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
Docket Numbers: ER21–104–000.
Applicants: Basin Electric Power
Cooperative, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Basin Electric Power Cooperative
Formula Rate to be effective 1/1/2020.
Filed Date: 10/14/20.
Accession Number: 20201014–5109.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/20.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system (https://
elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/
fercgensearch.asp) by querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2020-10-20 |
File Created | 2020-10-20 |