Feedback related to PDG B-5 TA Center Annual All-Grantee Convening

General All-Grantee Convening Survey

Thank you for attending PDG B-5 TA Center Virtual All Grantee Convening. Your thoughts and suggestions are important for future conferences. Your individual responses will be kept private. Only aggregate information will be shared with the convening organizers, presenters, the Center’s leadership and funders. This should take you about 5 minutes to complete. Thank you for taking the time to complete this feedback form! 

Attendance 

1. Did you attend the PDG B-5 TA Center Virtual All-Grantee Convening any time between [Date Ranges]?  

• Yes

• No [If no, skip to end of survey]

2. Which days did you attend the PDG B-5 TA Center Virtual All-Grantee Convening? (select all that apply)

	Attended
2a. Date #1
2b. Date #2
2c. Date #3
2d. Date #4
2e. Date #5

Keynote Sessions

If 2a = Yes , Display 3

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to gather feedback from participants at the PDG B-5 Annual All-Grantee Convening. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This collection of information is voluntary. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # for this collection is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 05/31/2021. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact Paula Bendl Smith (Paula.Smith@ACF.hhs.gov).

3. The opening plenary included [description of opening plenary, e.g., session title, names of speakers].

Did you attend most or all of the opening plenary? 

• Yes

• No  

If 3 = Yes, Display 3a , 3b, 3c

 3a. Rate the quality of the information (and resources, if applicable) presented in the opening plenary: 

• Excellent 

• Good

• Poor

• Very poor

 3b. Rate the relevance of the information (and resources, if applicable) in the plenary to your state: 

• Very relevant

• Somewhat relevant

• Not relevant

• Not at all relevant

 3c. Rate the usefulness of the information (and resources, if applicable) provided in the opening plenary: 

• Very useful

• Somewhat Useful

• Not useful

• Not at all useful

If 2c = Yes, Display 4

4. The second keynote session included [description of second keynote, e.g., session title, names of speakers], [Name of second keynote here], 

Did you attend most or all of the second keynote session? 

• Yes  

• No [skip to question 5]

 

If 4= Yes, Display 4a, 4b, 4c 

 4a. Rate the quality of the information (and resources, if applicable) presented in the second keynote session: 

• Excellent 

• Good

• Poor

• Very poor

 4b. Rate the relevance of the information (and resources, if applicable) in the second keynote session to your state: 

• Very relevant

• Somewhat relevant

• Not relevant

• Not at all relevant

 4c. Rate the usefulness of the information (and resources, if applicable) provided in the second keynote session: 

• Very useful

• Somewhat useful

• Not useful

• Not at all useful

If 2d= Yes, Display 5

5. The closing plenary included [description of closing plenary, e.g., session title, names of speakers].

Did you attend most or all of the closing plenary? 

• Yes 

• No

If 5= Yes, Display 5a, 4b, 4c 

5a. Rate the quality of the information (and resources, if applicable) presented in the closing plenary. 

• Excellent 

• Good

• Poor

• Very poor

 5b. Rate the relevance of the information (and resources, if applicable) in the closing plenary to your state. 

• Very relevant

• Somewhat relevant

• Not relevant

• Not at all relevant

 5c. Rate the usefulness of the information (and resources, if applicable) provided in the closing plenary. 

• Very useful

• Somewhat useful

• Not useful

• Not at all useful

Overall Virtual All-Grantee Convening Evaluation 

The following questions address the overall convening.  

6. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.

As a result of attending the PDG B-5 TA Center Virtual All-Grantee Convening… 

6a. I [insert intended outcome 1 for the convening, e.g., learned about resources that inform policy decisions and issues affecting the early care and education system]

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

6b. I [insert intended outcome 2 for the convening]

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

6c. I [insert intended outcome 3 for the convening]

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

7. Rate the quality of the information (and resources, if applicable) provided. 

• Excellent 

• Good

• Poor

• Very poor

8. Rate the relevance of the information (and resources, if applicable) to your state. 

• Very relevant

• Relevant

• Somewhat relevant

• Not at all relevant

9. Rate the usefulness of the information (and resources, if applicable) provided. 

• Very useful  

• Somewhat useful   

• Not useful

• Not at all useful

10. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.

10a. The convening provided ample opportunities to comment and ask questions.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

10b. The convening provided enough time to connect with my peers.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

10c. Presentations and discussions were free from bias and inclusive of diverse and historically underrepresented groups.

• Strongly Agree

• Agree

• Disagree

• Strongly Disagree

11. How easy was it to register for the convening?  

• Very easy  

• Somewhat easy

• Not easy

• Not at all easy

12. How easy was it to join the individual sessions? 

• Very easy  

• Somewhat easy

• Not easy

• Not at all easy

We appreciate any additional comments or suggestions for improvement. If you do not want to provide additional feedback, click “Next” and submit your responses. 

13. Were there any aspects of the virtual convening (e.g., agenda, format, or speakers) that were particularly useful? If so, please describe.    

_______________________________________________________________ 

14. Were there any aspects of the virtual convening that could have been improved? If so, please describe. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

15. Do you have any other comments or suggestions? 

________________________________________________________________ 

8