In-Person Convening Child Care Policy Research Partnership – Participant Feedback

Fast Track Generic Clearance for Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

Evaluation form March 27 meeting RE_Clean

In-Person Convening Child Care Policy Research Partnership – Participant Feedback

OMB: 0970-0401

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

In-Person Convening

Child Care Policy Research Partnership Grantees

Meeting Evaluation Form


Friday, March 27, 2020 – Liaison Washington Capitol Hill


Thank you for attending the CCPRP Grantee meeting! Please take a few minutes to provide feedback.
Your responses will be used to shape future Community of Practice (CoP) meetings.


Please circle a number to indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement.

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Neither Agree Nor Disagree 4=Agree 5=Strongly Agree


Strongly ------------------ Strongly

Session 1: Sharing Grantee Updates with Shannon Disagree Agree

  1. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  2. I am more aware of how my project goals relate to federal 1 2 3 4 5 policy interests.

Session 2: Peer Working Group Session I

  1. Which peer working group did you join for Session I? __________________________

  2. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  3. I felt opportunities for collaboration became clearer. 1 2 3 4 5

Session 3: Making Information Useful to State Administrators

  1. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  2. I felt the discussions were helpful for my project. 1 2 3 4 5

Session 4: Peer Working Group Session II

  1. Which peer working group did you join for Session II? __________________________

  2. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  3. I felt opportunities for collaboration became clearer. 1 2 3 4 5

Session 5: Sampling and Recruitment

  1. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  2. I felt the discussions were helpful for my project. 1 2 3 4 5

Session 6: Next Steps

  1. I felt this session was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  2. I understand how the CoP will support the CCPRP grantees. 1 2 3 4 5

Reflecting on the Meeting as a whole

  1. Overall, I felt the meeting was a good use of my time. 1 2 3 4 5

  2. I felt comfortable contributing to the discussion. 1 2 3 4 5

  3. I will be able to apply what I learned in the meeting

to my work. 1 2 3 4 5





  1. If you disagreed (2) or strongly disagreed (1) with any statements above, please explain further:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________


  1. Please circle a response to indicate if you would have preferred to spend more time, about the same time, or less time on each of the following:

    1. Grantee Updates More time About the same Less time

    2. Whole group discussion More time About the same Less time

    3. Peer working groups More time About the same Less time

    4. Planning next steps More time About the same Less time

    5. Informal networking and discussion More time About the same Less time


  1. What aspects of the meeting did you find most useful?

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________



  1. Do you have any additional comments for the meeting organizers, including topics you wish had been covered more deeply? Topics you would like to discuss in our next meetings?

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________



  1. Please indicate your role:

    • Shape1

      Thank you for your time!

      Grantee CCDF lead agency staff

    • Shape2

      Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This collection of information is voluntary and will be used to collect participant feedback to shape future meetings. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to jisaacs@urban.org.


      Grantee research partner

OMB Control #:0970-0401

Expiration Date: 05/31/2021

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDwyer, Kelly
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy