30 Day Notice

28076

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices

The settlement resolves the alleged
claims by requiring Drummond to,
among other things: (1) Pay a civil
penalty of $775,000 for the past alleged
violations to be split equally between
the United States and JCBH; (2)
undertake fixes to the Facility to address
the alleged violations; (3) implement a
leak detection and repair program to
ensure compliance and reduce potential
future fugitive benzene emissions; and
(4) implement a supplemental
environmental project of two years of
semi-annual use of an infrared camera
as part of leak detection efforts at a cost
of $16,000.
Notice of the lodging of the decree
was originally published in the Federal
Register on February 14, 2019. See 84
FR 4104 (February 14, 2019). The
publication of the original notice
opened a thirty (30) day period for
public comment on the Decree. The
public comment period was extended
until June 17, 2019. 84 FR 9,560 (March
15, 2019); 84 FR 16,038 (April 17, 2019);
84 FR 22,168 (May 16, 2019). The
publication of the present notice
extends the period for public comment
on the Decree to July 17, 2019.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and should refer to United
States et al. v. Drummond Company,
Inc. d/b/a ABC Coke, D.J. Ref. No. 90–
5–2–1–10717. All comments must be
submitted no later than July 17, 2019.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:

Send them to:

By email .......

pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.

khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

By mail .........

During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $10.00 (25 cents per page

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:34 Jun 14, 2019

Jkt 247001

reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Jeffrey Sands,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2019–12635 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; New
Collection
Bureau of Justice Assistance,
Office of Justice Programs, Department
of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Department of Justice,
Bureau of Justice Assistance, is
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: The Department of Justice
encourages public comment and will
accept input until July 17, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Gregory Torain, Policy Advisor, Office
of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, 810 Seventh Street NW,
Washington, DC 20531,
Gregory.Torain@usdoj.gov, 202–305–
4485. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be sent to the
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to OIRA_submissions@
omb.eop.gov.
SUMMARY:

Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau of Justice

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

PO 00000

Frm 00077

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Assistance, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
New collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Annual Treatment Court Survey Series.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Bureau of
Justice Assistance.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: The Local ATCS (N=4,172
courts), Tribal ATCS (N=117 courts),
and State Coordinator (N=54 state/
territory court coordinators) address the
structure (e.g., funding, personnel,
partnerships), operation (e.g., services
offered, eligibility, decision making),
and successes and challenges (e.g.,
adherence to or deviance from best
practices; racial, ethnic, and gender
disparity or equity). The purpose of the
ATCS is to develop a current portrait of
treatment courts including needs and
emerging trends.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: Overall, the ATCS Series uses
three national population frames,
totaling 4,343 courts and offices for
court administration. Data collection
uses these full population frames;
samples from these population frames
are not created for collection purposes.
The national population frame for the
Local ATCS contains each of the
treatment courts across the country
(N=4,172) with one respondent from
each court, and the tribal courts across
the country constitute the population
frame for the Tribal ATCS (N=117) with
one respondent from each court. All
state/territory court coordinators (N=54)
comprise the population frame for the

E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM

17JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
State Coordinator ATCS. Estimated
amounts of time to complete the surveys
in the ATCS Series are 20 minutes for
the State Coordinator ATCS, 35 minutes
for the Local ATCs, and 35 for the Tribal
ATCS.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: Using the maximum
response rate of 100%, the total annual
hours for the ATCS Series is
approximately 2,502 hours across the
4,343 courts in the population frames.
Specifically, total completion time of
the State Coordinator ATCS is an
estimated 18 hours (20 minutes for each
of the 54 potential respondents); the
Local ATCS’s total completion time is
estimated at 2,433.67 hours (35 minutes
for each of the 4,172 potential courts).
The total time to complete the Tribal
ATCS across the tribal population frame
is 68.25 hours (35 minutes for each of
the 117 tribal courts).
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.

2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect copies of the petition and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 44
govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification.

Dated: June 12, 2019.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.

I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.

[FR Doc. 2019–12684 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before July 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject
line of the message.

khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:34 Jun 14, 2019

Jkt 247001

II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2019–002–C.
Petitioner: Cumberland Contura, LLC,
Three Gateway Center, Suite 1500, 401
Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15222–1000.
Mine: Cumberland Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 36–05018, located in Greene
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.500(d)
(Permissible electric equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing

PO 00000

Frm 00078

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

28077

standard to permit an alternative
method of compliance to allow the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment including, but not limited to,
portable battery-operated mine transits
and total station surveying equipment,
in or inby the last open crosscut.
The petitioner states that:
(1) To comply with requirements for
mine ventilation maps and mine maps
in 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200, use of
the most practical and accurate
surveying equipment is necessary.
(2) The Cumberland Mine utilizes the
longwall method of mining. The panels
it develops are approximately 12,000 to
15,000 feet in length.
(3) Accurate surveying is critical to
the safety of the miners at the mine. A
surveying error in a longwall panel
could result in the need to remove or
add longwall shields during the
longwall retrieval process which would
be very hazardous.
(4) Mechanical surveying equipment
of acceptable quality is not
commercially available and has been
obsolete for a number of years. Such
equipment is difficult, if not impossible,
to be serviced or repaired.
(5) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment is, at a minimum,
much more accurate than mechanical
surveying equipment. To comply with
Pennsylvania laws on the accuracy of
surveying, it is necessary to use
electronic surveying equipment.
(6) Application of the existing
standard would result in a diminution
of safety to miners. Underground
mining by its nature, size and
complexity of mine plans requires that
accurate and precise measurements be
completed in a prompt and efficient
manner.
As an alternative to the existing
standard, the petitioner proposes the
following:
(a) The operator may use the
following total stations and theodolites
and similar low-voltage battery-operated
total stations and theodolites with an
ingress protection (IP) rating of 66 or
greater in or inby the last open crosscut.
—Topcon GTS–233W 7.2V
—Topcon GTS–223 7.2V
—Topcon DT–205L 6.0V
—Topcon DT–102L 6.0V
—Topcon DT–205L 6.0V
(b) The nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment that will be used
is low-voltage or battery-powered
nonpermissible total stations and
theodolites. All nonpermissible
electronic total stations and theodolites
will have an IP rating of 66 or greater.
(c) The operator will maintain a
logbook for nonpermissible electronic

E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM

17JNN1